Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleGout

The Burden of Gout and Its Attributable Risk Factors in the Middle East and North Africa Region, 1990 to 2019

Fatemeh Amiri, Ali-Asghar Kolahi, Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi, Maryam Noori, Alireza Khabbazi, Mark J.M. Sullman, Jay S. Kaufman, Gary S. Collins and Saeid Safiri
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2023, 50 (1) 107-116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.220425
Fatemeh Amiri
1F. Amiri, MD, Student Research Committee, and Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali-Asghar Kolahi
2A.A. Kolahi, MD, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ali-Asghar Kolahi
  • For correspondence: safiris{at}tbzmed.ac.ir saeidsafiri{at}gmail.com a.kolahi{at}sbmu.ac.ir
Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi
3S.A. Nejadghaderi, MD, Research Center for Integrative Medicine in Aging, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, and Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryam Noori
4M. Noori, MD, Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, and Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alireza Khabbazi
5A. Khabbazi, MD, Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, and Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J.M. Sullman
6M.J.M. Sullman, PhD, Department of Life and Health Sciences, and Department of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay S. Kaufman
7J.S. Kaufman, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary S. Collins
8G.S. Collins, PhD, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gary S. Collins
Saeid Safiri
9S. Safiri, PhD, Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, and Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Saeid Safiri
  • For correspondence: safiris{at}tbzmed.ac.ir saeidsafiri{at}gmail.com a.kolahi{at}sbmu.ac.ir
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective This study reported the burden of gout and its attributable risk factors in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region between 1990 and 2019 by age, sex, and sociodemographic index (SDI).

Methods Data on the prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) due to gout were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study for the 21 countries in the MENA region, from 1990 to 2019.

Results In 2019, the regional age-standardized point prevalence and annual incidence rates of gout were 509.1 and 97.7 per 100,000 population, which represent a 12% and 11.1% increase since 1990, respectively. Moreover, in 2019 the regional age-standardized YLD rate was 15.8 per 100,000 population, an 11.7% increase since 1990. In 2019, Qatar and Afghanistan had the highest and lowest age-standardized YLD rates, respectively. Regionally, the age-standardized point prevalence of gout increased with age up to the oldest age group, and it was more prevalent among males in all age groups. In addition, there was an overall positive association between SDI and the burden of gout between 1990 and 2019. In 2019, high BMI (46.1%) was the largest contributor to the burden of gout in the MENA region.

Conclusion There were large intercountry variations in the burden of gout, but in general, it has increased in MENA over the last 3 decades. This increase is in line with the global trends of gout. However, the age-standardized YLD rate change was higher in MENA than at the global level.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • global burden of disease
  • gout
  • incidence
  • Middle East and North Africa
  • prevalence
  • risk factor
  • years lived with disability

Gout is an inflammatory disease that occurs as a result of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal formation in the joints and other tissues because of the supersaturation of uric acid in the blood.1 The clinical manifestations of gout, such as swelling, warmth, redness, and pain in the affected joint, can result in sleep deprivation and work interference.2 There are a number of genetic and environmental risk factors associated with gout, including medications, unhealthy diet, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, and exposure to lead.3 These risk factors increase the level of uric acid in the blood and result in MSU crystal formation.3 When hyperuricemia persists, approximately 10 years after the clinical onset of the disease, some patients develop tophus, which is the hallmark of chronic gout.4,5 Apart from local symptoms, gout may also manifest itself with a range of renal, vascular, and articular complications.6 These complications, alongside acute gout flares, impose a significant burden on the individual and the community as a whole.7

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study on gout found that the global point prevalence, annual incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) rates had increased by 7.2%, 5.5%, and 7.2%, respectively, since 1990, with males accounting for a large portion of this burden.8 In addition to the disabilities which result in a loss of health, gout also causes a substantial economic burden. The direct and indirect costs associated with gout have been estimated to range from nearly $4000 to $18,000 per capita. The cost per affected individual depends on the serum uric acid level, frequency of attacks, and the presence of tophi.9 Thus, alleviating the health and economic burden of gout may involve controlling the risk factors, preventing hyperuricemia, and appropriately managing acute episodes.

Any changes in the overall burden of gout may guide health policymakers’ decisions in relation to the prevention and screening of gout; thus, providing up-to-date data on the burden of gout will help to improve the management of this disorder. Previous research has reported the global, regional, and national prevalence, as well as the incidence and YLD rates attributable to gout from 1990 to 2017.8 However, it is important to note that exposure to gout risk factors have changed substantially in recent years,10 and the most recent research requires updating. Further, there is a lack of information regarding the burden of gout and its attributable risk factors in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Providing detailed information at regional and country levels would be beneficial for prevention and the implementation of interventions in those countries with larger burdens. Therefore, we aimed to report the point prevalence, annual incidence, and YLD rates attributable to gout and its risk factors for the 21 countries located in the MENA region from 1990 to 2019 by sex, age, and sociodemographic index (SDI).

METHODS

The GBD 2019 measures the burden of 369 diseases and injuries, from 1990 to 2019, for 204 countries and territories. The GBD project was established by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation; a detailed description of the methodology can be found in previous articles.10-12 Further, all GBD 2019 estimates are available using GBD Results (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/) and GBD Compare (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/).

Case definition and data sources. The GBD study used the primary criteria developed by the American College of Rheumatology in 1977. The criteria include the presence of MSU crystals in the joint fluid or the presence of a tophus proven to contain MSU crystals and at least 6 of 12 gout symptoms, or findings including the following: > 1 attack of acute arthritis, maximal inflammation development within a day, monoarticular arthritis attack, joint erythema, pain or swelling in the first metatarsophalangeal joint, unilateral attack of the first metatarsophalangeal or tarsal joints, suspected tophus, hyperuricemia, asymmetrical swelling within a joint on radiographs, and negative culture of joint fluid for microorganisms during the joint inflammation attack.11,13 The International Classification of Diseases for gout are 274 (9th revision) and M10 (10th revision).

In GBD 2013, the following databases were searched from 1980 to 2009: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CAB Abstracts, and the WHO Library (WHOLIS).11 Studies were excluded if they did not have representative samples, had small sample sizes (< 150 participants), were reviews, or did not use a population-based approach. Finally, a detailed description of the information used to estimate the burden of gout is available from the GBD 2019 Data Input Sources Tool (https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019/data-input-sources).11

Data processing and disease model. The prevalence estimates were stratified by sex and age. In cases where the prevalence rates were reported by sex using broad age groups (eg, separate male and female prevalence rates for age 20-65 yrs) or by specific age groups, without separating the 2 sexes (eg, age 20-30 yrs and then 31-65 yrs, for both sexes), the age-specific estimates were separated by sex using the sex ratio reported by the study, taking into account the bounds of uncertainty. However, if the sex ratio was not available, a sex ratio was used from a metaanalysis of existing sex-specific data, using a Bayesian metaregression, with a regularized and trimmed model (MR-BRT). The ratio of females to males was 0.33 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0.33-0.34). Bias adjustments were made to those studies that reported estimates across age groups of ≥ 25 years, and these were then separated into 5-year age groups using the age pattern found in GBD 2017. Alternative case definitions were adjusted for using MR-BRT.11

DisMod-MR 2.1 (https://pypi.org/project/dismod-mr/), a Bayesian metaregression tool, was used to model the nonfatal burden of gout. Taking into consideration study and country level covariates, the point prevalence and annual incidence estimates were calculated by age, sex, location, and year. It was assumed that there were 0 cases of gout in those aged < 15 years and that excess mortality and the remission rates of gout did not exceed 0.01 and 0.2, respectively. The only change in the modeling strategy to that used in GBD 2017 was changing the coefficient of variation from 0.4 to 0.8 to improve the model fit to the data. The only country level covariate used was the summary exposure variable (SEV) scalar for gout, which summarizes exposure to risks that were found in the GBD to increase the occurrence of gout (ie, low glomerular filtration rate). The bounds ranged from 0.75 to 1.25, as the SEV is formed in such a way that the value should equal 1 if the risk estimates are accurate.

Severity and YLD. Supplementary Table S1 (available with the online version of this article) presents the 3 gout sequelae (asymptomatic, acute, and polyarticular gout) and their associated disability weights (DWs). The severity distribution of gout was calculated using data from 3 studies about the number of attacks per year and a lognormal curve was fitted using the least squared differences approach.14-16 There were no data available regarding chronic polyarticular gout, and so the proportion was taken to be the same as those who have at least 52 attacks a year (ie, ≥ 1 each week), as estimated by the lognormal curve. The mean number of attacks was estimated to be 5.66 (95% UI 5.14-6.18), also using a lognormal curve. The average duration of attacks was 6.1 (5.4-6.8) days, which was estimated using the results of 2 studies. The proportion of symptomatic time for acute gout was calculated to be 9.4% (8.0-10.9) by multiplying the 2 estimates above and dividing this by 365 (days in a year).

Compilation of results. The YLD were estimated by multiplying the prevalence estimates for each sequela by their sequela-specific DWs. One YLD represents the equivalent of 1 full year of healthy life lost as a result of disability or ill health. YLD can be used to report the burden of a disease. Daily-adjusted life-years (DALY) is a standard metric used to estimate the burden of disease and is calculated by summing the YLD and the years of life lost due to premature deaths. As no mortality was attributable to gout, the YLD estimates were the same as the DALY. The GBD standard population was used to standardize all estimates and 95% UIs were also included. Uncertainty was propagated by sampling 1000 draws at each step of the calculations. Final estimates were determined using the mean estimates across 1000 draws, and the 95% UIs were defined as the 25th and 975th values of the 1000 ordered draws.

Smoothing splines were used to investigate the relationship between the burden of gout and the SDI.17 The SDI comprises the lag-distributed income per capita (smoothed over the previous 10 yrs), average years of schooling for those aged ≥ 15 years, and the total fertility rate among women aged ≤ 25 years. The SDI ranges from 0 (lowest level of development) to 1 (highest level of development).11 The point prevalence and annual incidence estimates were sourced from https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ and presented using R software (version 3.5.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Risk factors. The GBD study found strong evidence that gout was associated with high BMI and kidney dysfunction.10 The population attributable fraction (PAF) was the proportional reduction in gout that would occur if exposure to each risk factor was lowered to the theoretical minimum risk exposure level. The total number of YLDs due to gout that were attributable to each risk factor were calculated by multiplying the total YLD for gout and corresponding PAFs for each age group, sex, location, and year. The definition of high BMI and kidney dysfunction, along with detailed information on estimating the PAFs and their attributable burden, have been previously reported.10

Ethics. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (IR.TBZMED. REC.1400.1168). Patient consent for publication was not required.

Patient and public involvement. Patients and the public were not involved in the analyses or preparation of this manuscript.

RESULTS

MENA. The number of prevalent cases of gout in 2019 was 2.5 million (95% UI 1.9-3.0 million), with an age-standardized point prevalence of 509.1 (406.0-633.9) per 100,000 population, which increased by 12% (10.1-13.9) between 1990 and 2019 (Table; Supplementary Table S1, available with the online version of this article). In 2019, there were 490,264 (95% UI 389,868 to 606,813) incident cases of gout in the MENA region, with an age-standardized rate of 97.7 (78.5-123.2) per 100,000 population, an increase of 11.1% (9.2-12.9) since 1990 (Table; Supplementary Table S2). Gout also accounted for 77,514 (95% UI 48,808 to 111,730) regional YLDs in 2019. Further, in 2019 the age-standardized YLD was 15.8 (95% UI 10.0-22.7) per 100,000 population, an increase of 11.7% (7.1-16.4) since 1990 (Table; Supplementary Table S3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table.

Prevalent cases, incident cases, and YLDs due to gout in 2019 and the percentage change in the ASRs from 1990 to 2019.

National level. In 2019, the national age-standardized point prevalence of gout ranged from 427.8 to 734.8 cases per 100,000 population among the MENA countries. Qatar (734.8, 95% UI 582.2-921.1), the UAE (664.8, 95% UI 525.4-831.2), and Kuwait (612.2, 95% UI 485.7-762.6) had the 3 highest age-standardized point prevalence rates of gout in 2019. In contrast, Yemen (427.8, 95% UI 340.5-534.9), Afghanistan (437.9, 95% UI 349.6-543.6), and Palestine (475.3, 95% UI 373.9-590.6) had the 3 lowest rates (Table and Figure 1A; Supplementary Table S1, available with the online version of this article).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Age-standardized (A) point prevalence, (B) incidence, and (C) YLDs of gout per 100,000 population in the MENA region in 2019, by sex and country. Generated from data available from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. MENA: Middle East and North Africa; YLD: years lived with disability.

The national age-standardized annual incidence rate of gout ranged from 84.1 to 137.0 cases per 100,000 population, with Qatar (137.0, 95% UI 109.7-174.1), the UAE (125.7, 95% UI 100.7-157.9), and Bahrain (115.4, 95% UI 91.6-144.3) having the highest rates. In contrast, Yemen (84.1, 95% UI 67.4-104.8), Afghanistan (85.9, 95% UI 68.8-108.9), and Palestine (91.5, 95% UI 72.8-115.3) had the lowest age-standardized annual incidence rates (Table and Figure 1B; Supplementary Table S2, available with the online version of this article).

In 2019, the national age-standardized YLD rate of gout ranged from 13.2 to 22.5 cases per 100,000 population among the MENA countries. The 3 highest rates were found in Qatar (22.5, 95% UI 14.5-32.7), the UAE (20.5, 95% UI 12.9-29.9), and Kuwait (19.0, 95% UI 11.7-27.6). Conversely, the countries with the lowest rates were Afghanistan (13.2, 95% UI 8.3-19.2), Yemen (13.3, 95% UI 8.4-19.5), and Palestine (14.6, 95% UI 9.1-21.2; Table and Figure 1C; Supplementary Table S3, available with the online version of this article).

The estimated percentage change in the age-standardized point prevalence and annual incidence rate, from 1990 to 2019, saw significant increases for most of the countries in the MENA region. Oman (27.1%, 95% UI 19.5-35.4), the UAE (20.3%, 95% UI 11.8-29.5), and Sudan (18.8%, 95% UI 11.7-25.7) had the largest estimated increases in the age-standardized point prevalence over the measurement period (Table; Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1, available with the online version of this article). Further, Oman (23.7%, 95% UI 16.4-32.3), the UAE (18.1%, 95% UI 10.5-25.2), and Qatar (16.7%, 95% UI 8.8-24.9) showed the largest increases in the age-standardized annual incidence rate over the same period (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S2). Similarly, most MENA countries had substantial increases in the age-standardized YLD rates, with Oman (26.6%, 95% UI 9.6-46.2), the UAE (19.6%, 95% UI 3.0-39.5), and Sudan (18.5%, 95% UI 2.7-34.6) having the highest increases over the measurement period (Table; Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Figure S3).

Age and sex patterns. In 2019, the regional point prevalence of gout was estimated to be highest in those aged ≥ 95 years for both sexes. In addition, the number of prevalent cases peaked in the 55- to 59-year-old and 60- to 64-year-old age groups for males and females, respectively (Figure 2A). Similarly, in 2019 the regional annual incidence rate of gout was highest in the age group ≥ 95 years for both sexes. The number of incident cases reached its peak in those aged 50 to 54 years and 55 to 59 years for males and females, respectively (Figure 2B). Further, a clear increase was observed in the regional YLD rates of gout for males and females up to the age group aged ≥ 95 years. Moreover, the number of YLDs were highest in the 50- to 54-year-old and 55- to 59-year-old age groups for males and females, respectively (Figure 2C). It is important to note that the regional point prevalence, annual incidence, and YLD rates, together with the number of prevalent, incident, and YLD cases attributable to gout, were consistently higher for males across all ages.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

(A) The number of prevalent cases and prevalence, (B) the number of incident cases and incidence rate, and (C) the number of YLDs and YLD rate for gout per 100,000 population in the MENA region, by age and sex in 2019. Dotted and dashed lines indicate 95% upper and lower uncertainty intervals, respectively. Generated from data available from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. MENA: Middle East and North Africa; YLD: years lived with disability.

The rate ratio of gout, comparing the age-standardized YLD rates in MENA to the global rates for the different age groups by sex in 1990 and 2019, revealed that the MENA region had lower age-standardized rates for males and females and in all age groups, except for females aged 40 to 44 years in 2019 and females aged 45 to 59 years in 1990, which were the same as the global average (Figure 3). In 2019, females aged ≥ 80 years and males aged 30 to 69 years had the lowest rate ratios. Further, in 1990 females aged ≥ 85 years and males aged 30 to 34 years had the lowest age-standardized YLD rates, in comparison to the global average (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Ratio of the MENA region to the global gout YLD rate according to age group and sex, from 1990 to 2019. Generated from data available from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. MENA: Middle East and North Africa; YLD: years lived with disability.

Association with SDI. The burden of gout from 1990 to 2019 increased dramatically with rising socioeconomic development. Several countries, such as Qatar, had much higher than expected burdens, whereas other countries, like Iran, Turkey, Yemen, and Morocco, had lower than expected burdens (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Age-standardized YLD rates of gout for 21 countries and territories by SDI in 2019. Expected values based on the sociodemographic index and disease rates in all locations are shown as the black line. Each point shows the observed age-standardized YLD rate for each country in 2019. Generated from data available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/. SDI: sociodemographic index; YLD: years lived with disability.

Risk factors. The proportion of YLDs due to gout, which were attributable to the individual risk factors, varied across the MENA countries. At the regional level, high BMI (46.1%) and kidney dysfunction (18.8%) were the 2 main contributors to the burden of gout in 2019. For males, the YLDs attributable to high BMI and kidney dysfunction were 46.3% and 17.9%, respectively, whereas for females, these figures were 45.6% and 22%. The UAE had the largest burden of gout due to high BMI (61.9%), whereas Yemen had the lowest burden associated with high BMI (22.8%). In terms of kidney dysfunction, Lebanon was estimated to have the highest attributable burden (25.1%), whereas the UAE was estimated to have the lowest burden (9.5%; Figure 5).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Percentage of YLDs due to gout attributable to risk factors for the MENA countries in 2019. Generated from data available from https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results. MENA: Middle East and North Africa; YLD: years lived with disability.

DISCUSSION

The present study used GBD 2019 data to report the levels and trends in the burden of gout and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019 in the MENA region. The results showed increases in the point prevalence (12%), annual incidence (11.1%), and YLDs (11.7%) associated with gout over the period 1990 to 2019. The age-standardized burden of gout increased with advancing age, and it was significantly higher among men. Further, the burden of gout, as measured by the YLDs, was estimated to be positively associated with socioeconomic status, and was lower than the global average in 1990 and 2019 among both sexes and in almost all age groups. In terms of risk factors, males had higher BMI attributable YLDs, whereas the attributable burden for kidney dysfunction was higher in females.

Previous studies, using GBD 2017 data, reported increases in the global point prevalence and annual incidence rate of gout over the period from 1990 to 2017.8 Also, a systematic review of epidemiological studies in 2015 showed that the MENA region had a prevalence of hyperuricemia between 8% to 12%, which was lower than other regions like Oceania, East Asia, and Southeast Asia18; this could be because some populations have inherently higher or lower levels of serum urate levels than others regardless of their obesity status. Further, there were geographic or ethnic differences reported in the occurrence of the disease across the world and differences in the modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, such as alcohol consumption, high BMI, and advancing age.19 Trends in alcohol use, obesity, and aging in the general population might explain the increases found in the prevalence and incidence. The GBD 2019 risk factor study found that globally high BMI and alcohol consumption had both increased over the last 3 decades,10 which could be partially responsible for the observed increases in the burden of gout during the same period. Moreover, the contribution of high BMI to the overall age-standardized DALYs in MENA increased by 52.2% over the period from 1990 to 2017.20 These results are in accordance with our findings, which showed that 46.1% of the gout-attributable YLDs was due to high BMI in 2019. Further, the age-standardized prevalence rate of chronic kidney disease increased by 1.9% in MENA between 1990 and 2017,21 which may explain our finding that 18.8% of the YLDs were attributable to kidney dysfunction in 2019. Different strategies have been suggested for the prevention of chronic kidney disease, such as controlling blood pressure and blood glucose levels, lipid-lowering therapies, carefully controlling salt and protein intake, in addition to screening patients with certain comorbidities, particularly diabetes.22 The most effective strategies for the prevention and control of excess body weight focus on 2 major areas, which are reducing unhealthy diets and increasing physical activity, by improving food systems/environment and making behavioral changes.23

In 2017, the global age-standardized prevalence and DALY rates of gout were 790.9 and 23.2 per 100,000 population in males, respectively, whereas these rates were 253.5 and 7.2 per 100,000 population among females, respectively.24 Further, the global age-standardized prevalence and YLD rates, for both sexes combined, were 510.6 and 15.9 per 100,000 population in 2017, respectively.8 In comparison, in 2019 the age-standardized prevalence and YLD rates in MENA (509.1 and 15.8 per 100,000 population, respectively) were almost the same as those observed in 2017 at the global level. However, the 2019 rates found in the present study were higher than the age-standardized prevalence and YLD rates found in 2017 (499.4 and 15.4 per 100,000, respectively).8 The differences may be due to a slight increase in exposure to the important risk factors in recent years, as mentioned earlier.

Qatar had the highest age-standardized point prevalence in 2019, followed by the UAE and Kuwait. This is likely due to a higher prevalence of overweight and obese individuals in these countries. Further, a study by Al-Thani and colleagues reported the prevalence of obesity and overweightness in Qatar from 2015 to 2016 to be 44.8% in men and 40.4% in women, in those aged 5 to 19 years old.25 According to the World Health Survey 2006, the prevalence of obesity among the general population of Qatar was 32%, and 39% were overweight.26 Another study by Sultan ALNohair reported that Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE were among the countries with the highest prevalence of obesity in the region.27 Having the highest age-standardized prevalence and incidence, it would be expected that the YLDs in Qatar would be high, which was supported by our data, as Qatar had the highest YLD in the MENA region. A study by Kelishadi et al observed an association between diets high in carbohydrates and fat and obesity.28 It has also been shown in multiple ethnicities that diet, together with physical activity level, affect the risk of obesity and eventually the risk of gout. With the expansion of the Western diet, fast food and fructose-rich beverages in those high SDI countries are likely contributing to higher BMIs, higher serum uric acid, and increased risk/prevalence of gout.29 Therefore, the implementation of education and awareness campaigns, which aim to increase physical activity and provide nutritional guidance, are highly recommended to prevent obesity and its consequences, such as gout.23

Yemen and Afghanistan were among the countries with the lowest age-standardized point prevalence and annual incidence of gout in the MENA region. Interestingly, a previous study reporting the burden of obesity, using GBD 2015 data, showed a lower age-standardized point prevalence of obesity in Afghanistan and Yemen, compared with other MENA countries.30 Therefore, the lower levels of obesity could be one of the reasons for the lower burden of gout in these countries. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of other potential risk factors, such as alcohol consumption, on the burden of gout in the MENA region.

The present study found that 46.1% of gout YLDs were attributable to high BMI. A pathophysiological mechanism for the effects of free fatty acids on the development of gout has previously been suggested. The stimulation of toll-like receptors and the initiation of inflammatory cascades, due to the synergism between MSU crystals and free fatty acids, have been proposed to explain the effects of obesity on gout occurrence.31

Consistent with the global findings, in MENA, the prevalence of gout was higher among males than among females.8 Similarly, the global age-standardized prevalence rate of gout in 2017 increased with advancing age, but the observed increase was higher in MENA specifically.8 These findings might be a result of higher serum uric acid levels in men than in women before menopause, which might be due to higher estrogen levels in women before menopause.32 Although in 2017 the global point prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (ie, low back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, and other musculoskeletal disorders) was higher in females than males, the disorders all increased with age up to the oldest age group.33 The differences in the sex patterns between gout and other musculoskeletal disorders could be as a result of different pathophysiologies, underlying mechanisms, and risk factors that contribute to the development of these disorders.33,34 Further, the percentage change in the age-standardized prevalence per 100,000 population was higher in females over the period from 1990 to 2019, but further research is needed to determine the underlying reason for this.

The current study showed that the age-standardized YLD rate increased with increasing SDI in the MENA region. This finding is also in accordance with the global trend reported in 2017, which showed a positive association between SDI and the gout-related age-standardized YLD rate.8 Further, the age-standardized DALYs attributable to musculoskeletal disorders were also positively related to SDI at the global and regional levels in 2017.33 Therefore, preventive programs are needed for those who are middle-aged with regard to the identification and treatment of gout, particularly in countries with a high socioeconomic status.

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to use data from GBD 2019 to evaluate the burden of gout and its attributable risk factors in the MENA region. However, we acknowledge that our study has several limitations. The main limitation of the study is data sparsity on the incidence and prevalence of gout in several of the MENA countries, especially the less developed countries which might not keep precise records or have registries for gout. As mentioned previously, studies have indicated several risk factors which play a role in the incidence of gout, including race, lifestyle, sex, high BMI, alcohol consumption, genetic variations, and increased serum uric acid levels, which might be a result of renal dysfunction or increased uric acid production. However, we only investigated high BMI and kidney dysfunction as risk factors for gout, as the data regarding the other risk factors were not included in the GBD. Thus, a more comprehensive study is required to investigate other risk factors, which should be undertaken in the next GBD iteration. Moreover, there is some disparity in the female data when compared to the 2017 global burden of gout,24 which may indicate an underdiagnosis of gout among females in the MENA region. Therefore, at least the same focus should be given to women, preferably even more, given the lack of data about gout among women in the region. Given the differences in the burden of gout in urban and rural areas, health policy programs should be designed for the area in which they operate. However, we did not have the data to compare different subnational regions, nor to investigate the prevalence among different ethnicities within each country.

The point prevalence, annual incidence, and YLD rates attributable to gout increased from 1990 to 2019 in the MENA region, and there were substantial differences between countries. This increase is in line with the global trends for gout, with the global burden also increasing over the period from 1990 to 2017. However, the increase in the age-standardized YLD rate was higher in MENA than it was at the global level. Further, high BMI was one of the largest contributors to the regional burden of gout and needs to be targeted with policy interventions to encourage people to adopt healthier lifestyles. Interventions to control gout should particularly target middle-aged individuals and those living in countries with a higher socioeconomic status.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to thank the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation staff and its collaborators who prepared these publicly available data. This study is based on publicly available data and solely reflects the opinion of its authors and not that of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. This is a Master of Public Health thesis and we would also like to acknowledge the support of the Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and the Social Determinants of Health Research Center at the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who were not involved in any way in the preparation of this manuscript, and who also funded the Global Burden of Disease study. The Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 68766) and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 28705) also supported the present report.

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

  • Accepted for publication August 3, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Faires J,
    2. McCarty D.
    Acute arthritis in man and dog after intrasynovial injection of sodium urate crystals. Lancet 1962;280:682-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bursill D,
    2. Taylor WJ,
    3. Terkeltaub R, et al.
    Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) consensus statement regarding labels and definitions of disease states of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1592-600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kuo CF,
    2. Grainge MJ,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Doherty M.
    Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11:649-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dalbeth N,
    2. Pool B,
    3. Gamble GD, et al.
    Cellular characterization of the gouty tophus: a quantitative analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:1549-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Neuwirth E.
    Milestones in the diagnosis and treatment of gout. Arch Intern Med 1943;72:377-87.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Boss GR,
    2. Seegmiller JE.
    Hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1459-68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Smith E,
    2. Hoy D,
    3. Cross M, et al.
    The global burden of gout: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1470-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Safiri S,
    2. Kolahi AA,
    3. Cross M, et al.
    Prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability due to gout and its attributable risk factors for 195 countries and territories 1990-2017: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Arthritis Rheum 2020;72:1916-27.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rai SK,
    2. Burns LC,
    3. De Vera MA,
    4. Haji A,
    5. Giustini D,
    6. Choi HK.
    The economic burden of gout: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015;45:75-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators
    . Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1223-49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators
    . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators
    . Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1160-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wallace SL,
    2. Robinson H,
    3. Masi AT,
    4. Decker JL,
    5. McCarty DJ,
    6. Yü TF.
    Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977;20:895-900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Edwards NL,
    2. Sundy JS,
    3. Forsythe A,
    4. Blume S,
    5. Pan F,
    6. Becker MA.
    Work productivity loss due to flares in patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy. J Med Econ 2011;14:10-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Yu KH,
    2. Luo SF.
    Younger age of onset of gout in Taiwan. Rheumatology 2003;42:166-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yu TF.
    Diversity of clinical features in gouty arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1984;13:360-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Wang Y.
    Smoothing splines: methods and applications. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2019.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Smith E,
    2. March L.
    Global prevalence of hyperuricemia: A systematic review of population-based epidemiological studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67 (suppl 10).
  19. 19.↵
    1. Smith EUR,
    2. Díaz-Torné C,
    3. Perez-Ruiz F,
    4. March LM.
    Epidemiology of gout: An update. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:811-27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dai H,
    2. Alsalhe TA,
    3. Chalghaf N,
    4. Riccò M,
    5. Bragazzi NL,
    6. Wu J.
    The global burden of disease attributable to high body mass index in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration
    . Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2020;395:709-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jha V,
    2. Garcia-Garcia G,
    3. Iseki K, et al.
    Chronic kidney disease: Global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 2013;382:260-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Siegel RL,
    3. Torre LA, et al.
    Global patterns in excess body weight and the associated cancer burden. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:88-112.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Xia Y,
    2. Wu Q,
    3. Wang H, et al.
    Global, regional and national burden of gout, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Rheumatology 2020;59:1529-38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Al-Thani M,
    2. Al-Thani A,
    3. Alyafei S, et al.
    The prevalence and characteristics of overweight and obesity among students in Qatar. Public Health 2018;160:143-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ali FM,
    2. Nikoloski Z,
    3. Reka H,
    4. Gjebrea O,
    5. Mossialos E.
    The diabetes-obesity-hypertension nexus in Qatar: Evidence from the World Health Survey. Popul Health Metr 2014;12:18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. ALNohair S.
    Obesity in gulf countries. Int J Health Sci 2014; 8:79-83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kelishadi R,
    2. Pour MH,
    3. Sarraf-Zadegan N, et al.
    Obesity and associated modifiable environmental factors in Iranian adolescents: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program - Heart Health Promotion from Childhood. Pediatr Int 2003;45:435-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Thompson MD,
    2. Wu YY,
    3. Cooney RV,
    4. Wilkens LR,
    5. Haiman CA,
    6. Pirkle CM.
    Modifiable factors and incident gout across ethnicity within a large multiethnic cohort of older adults. J Rheumatol 2022;49:504-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Afshin A,
    2. Forouzanfar MH,
    3. Reitsma MB, et al; GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators
    . Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med 2017;377:13-27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Joosten LAB,
    2. Netea MG,
    3. Mylona E, et al.
    Engagement of fatty acids with toll-like receptor 2 drives interleukin-1β production via the ASC/caspase 1 pathway in monosodium urate monohydrate crystal–induced gouty arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:3237-48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Dirken-Heukensfeldt KJ,
    2. Teunissen TA,
    3. van de Lisdonk H,
    4. Lagro-Janssen AL.
    “Clinical features of women with gout arthritis.” A systematic review. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:575-82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Safiri S,
    2. Kolahi AA,
    3. Cross M, et al.
    Prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years due to musculoskeletal disorders for 195 countries and territories 1990-2017. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:702-14.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kazeminasab S,
    2. Nejadghaderi SA,
    3. Amiri P, et al.
    Neck pain: Global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022;23:26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef

DATA SHARING POLICY

The data used for these analyses are all publicly available.

ONLINE SUPPLEMENT

Supplementary material accompanies the online version of this article.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 50, Issue 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Burden of Gout and Its Attributable Risk Factors in the Middle East and North Africa Region, 1990 to 2019
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Burden of Gout and Its Attributable Risk Factors in the Middle East and North Africa Region, 1990 to 2019
Fatemeh Amiri, Ali-Asghar Kolahi, Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi, Maryam Noori, Alireza Khabbazi, Mark J.M. Sullman, Jay S. Kaufman, Gary S. Collins, Saeid Safiri
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2023, 50 (1) 107-116; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220425

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
The Burden of Gout and Its Attributable Risk Factors in the Middle East and North Africa Region, 1990 to 2019
Fatemeh Amiri, Ali-Asghar Kolahi, Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi, Maryam Noori, Alireza Khabbazi, Mark J.M. Sullman, Jay S. Kaufman, Gary S. Collins, Saeid Safiri
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2023, 50 (1) 107-116; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220425
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
    • DATA SHARING POLICY
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

global burden of disease
GOUT
INCIDENCE
Middle East and North Africa
PREVALENCE
RISK FACTOR
years lived with disability

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Inpatient Management of Gout: Serum Urate Testing and Allopurinol Dose Adjustment
  • Improving Gout Care in a Canadian Academic Medical Center Through a Multidisciplinary, Nurse-Led Protocol
  • Association of Past Smoking Status With Gout in Māori People in Aotearoa New Zealand
Show more Gout

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • global burden of disease
  • GOUT
  • INCIDENCE
  • Middle East and North Africa
  • PREVALENCE
  • risk factor
  • years lived with disability

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire