Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
EditorialEditorial

Racial Disparities in the Modern Gout Epidemic

Natalie McCormick and Hyon K. Choi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2022, 49 (5) 443-446; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.220173
Natalie McCormick
1N. McCormick, H.K. Choi, MD, DrPH, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, and Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalie McCormick
Hyon K. Choi
1N. McCormick, H.K. Choi, MD, DrPH, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, and Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hyon K. Choi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Gout is a common hyperuricemic metabolic condition, leading to recurrent inflammatory arthritis and some of the most severe pain experienced by humans. As detailed in a recent Global Burden of Disease analysis of 195 countries and territories between 1990 and 2017,1 the incidence, prevalence, and disability burden of gout have risen worldwide for decades, and the condition now affects > 10 million US adults (4%).2 The disease burden of gout is also complicated by a higher prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiometabolic comorbidities.3 Further, this “modern gout epidemic” and suboptimal gout care4 have contributed to high rates of recurrent gout flares worldwide, rising ambulatory5 and emergency room visits,6 and hospitalizations due to gout over the past several decades.7,8 For example, from 1993 to 2011, US hospitalization rates due to gout doubled, whereas hospitalization rates for rheumatoid arthritis declined, narrowing the gap and soon reversing the rates between the 2 diseases.7 These data indicate the clear unmet need for improved gout prevention and care.

Gout has historically been considered a disease of White men who overindulged in red meats and other rich foods, and epidemiologic studies have focused on White individuals. A few epidemiologic studies have reported higher risks of gout or hyperuricemia among Black individuals (Table 1),2,9,10,11 particularly among women9; however, no studies have evaluated the risks among other races or ethnicities in the US. Similarly, evaluation of gout risk factors (including genetics) has heavily focused on White individuals, including the deleterious factors of meat, seafood, and alcohol consumption, excess adiposity, and diuretic use,12 and protective factors of low-fat dairy and coffee consumption, vitamin C, and healthy dietary patterns.12,13 This stems from a paucity of suitable multiethnic exposure data together with sufficient numbers of gout cases ascertained over time. Nevertheless, race-specific data about differential disease risk and underlying etiologic drivers are essential to address the racial disparity and health equity for prevention and care of this excruciatingly painful condition. The study by Thompson et al in this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology14 is the first to address these important knowledge gaps in a large-scale prospective cohort. By linking prospective data for older-aged participants from 5 self-reported racial/ethnic groups (White, Black, Native Hawaiian, Latino, and Japanese American) in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (N = 92,264 participants recruited from California and Hawaii, mean age 68 yrs) to Medicare gout claims between 1999 and 2016, the authors compared gout incidence among different race/ethnic groups within 1 cohort (ie, internal comparison), and evaluated the potential race-specific effects of several behavioral factors (diet, alcohol, vitamin C, and smoking).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Studies reporting on racial disparities in gout burden and care in the US.

The authors found Native Hawaiian, Black, and Japanese participants had a 220%, 34%, and 14% higher risk of incident gout compared to White participants, respectively, during the follow up (mean 9.6 years), whereas Latino participants had a 22% lower risk. The excess risk among Black participants agreed with previous Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study findings, although its magnitude was somewhat smaller (hazard ratio 1.69 among women and 1.92 among men in the ARIC),9 whereas the excess risk among Native Hawaiian and Japanese participants is the first reported in the field. Various risk factors could explain these racial differences, including genetics, environmental factors, and interactions between the 2 factors. As suggested by analyses of Māori and Pacific Peoples, the excess risk among Native Hawaiians is likely influenced by genetics, their interactions with environmental factors, as well as excess adiposity and lower dietary quality as evident in the study baseline. The higher risk among Japanese American participants was surprising, given the low prevalence in Japan (1.1%15) and the lower levels of BMI at baseline compared to White participants, and may be explained by their high frequency of gout risk genes16 and potentially strong interactions with Western lifestyles. Indeed, increasing serum urate levels with emergence of metabolic syndrome features were observed among Japanese immigrants who moved to the US, unlike those who continued to live in Japan.17 Widespread use of urate-lowering therapy for asymptomatic hyperuricemia in Japan (unlike in the US) may also contribute to the low prevalence of gout in Japan. Although the relative risk among Japanese participants tended to be higher than among White participants, their overall alcohol consumption was lower than that of White participants, making it unlikely as a reason for the elevated risk of gout. Higher risk among Black individuals is likely due to BMI, poor diet quality, and higher prevalence of advanced-stage chronic kidney disease, rather than genetics.18 These speculations call for mediation analyses that account for plausible causal pathways and that consider how additional social and economic factors influence the lifestyle factors studied by Thompson et al.14

Further, the authors found that the roles of alcohol, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and vitamin C intake on gout risk, previously reported in cohorts predominantly comprising White individuals,13,19 largely persist among other races, despite relatively minor variations of statistical significance. Japanese tended to have a higher relative risk associated with alcohol consumption than White participants, who tended to have more clear protective effects from the DASH diet (Figure 1), whereas vitamin C supplementation (of any dose) was associated with a decreased risk of gout only among Japanese participants. Measurement errors stemming from single dietary exposure assessment (with a 21-year span, on average, between exposure and incident outcome),14 accuracy of gout endpoint ascertainment (ie, 1 International Classification of Diseases code), and older study population (with survival effects)14 are potential reasons that could bias the findings toward null. To that end, the findings reported are likely conservative. Future studies with time-updated exposures and accurate outcome measurements would be valuable for precise quantification of risks, particularly among a wider age group that includes younger individuals. Further, given the distinctive differences between gout in male and female individuals in terms of their absolute risk as well as risk factors (eg, higher frequency of obesity and diuretic use among White females with gout, as compared to White males, and lower frequency of alcohol use),19 sex-specific studies are also warranted.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Multivariable hazard ratios for incident gout according to quintiles of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score in (A) the Nurses Health Study (NHS) cohort (predominantly White)a; (B) Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) cohort (predominantly White); and (C) the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) overallb and according to self-reported race/ethnicity: (D) White, (E) Black, (F) Native Hawaiian, (G) Japanese, and (H) Latino. a Adapted from Yokose et al19, JAMA Intern Med 2022 Jan 31 (Epub ahead of print). b Adapted from Rai et al, BMJ 2017;357:j1794 with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

By documenting these racial disparities in the future risk of gout and investigating the effect of modifiable lifestyle factors across multiple racial/ethnic groups in the US, Thompson et al14 have made an important contribution to the field. Their race-specific findings warrant external replication, along with evaluation of modifiable risk factors in other racial/ethnic groups disproportionately affected by cardiometabolic and inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including Native American populations and descendants of other Asian countries. At the same time, advancing the field also requires a better understanding of how these and other risk factors contribute to the racial differences in gout risk, and the suitable approaches for addressing them, including mediation analyses.

From a population health standpoint, determining the attributable risk fraction of gout within each racial/ethnic group would inform both the theoretical fraction of incident gout cases avoided by eliminating each factor from the source population, and the relative importance among these factors. For example, we have shown recently that 22% of incident gout cases among a cohort of White men could be theoretically prevented by adherence to a DASH-style eating pattern alone.20 For the racial groups in the Thompson et al study where DASH adherence was particularly low (eg, only 11% of Native Hawaiians and 13% of Japanese in the top quintile of DASH scores, thus with more room to improve), the attributable risk fractions of gout for diet quality could be substantially larger.

Finally, alongside these environmental factors, there is also a strong genetic component in gout, with serum urate heritability estimates of 25–60%21 and 183 urate-associated variants identified in the latest transethnic, multicohort genome-wide association study (GWAS).21 In that study and in a prior GWAS,22 some individual variants were identified that suggested ancestry-specific effects for Japanese and other populations, although no systemic ancestry-related heterogeneity was detected. Further elucidation of the genetic architecture of gout among different minority groups and of ancestry-specific gene–environmental interactions could inform on the relative contribution of genetics and modifiable factors toward the development of gout, facilitating a more personalized approach to gout prevention. For example, racial differences were observed in a recent analysis of the interactions between dietary patterns, genetic risk scores, and risk of metabolic syndrome, a condition closely related to gout.23 Such work would build upon the gene–environmental interactions demonstrated for adiposity24 and alcohol,25 and suggested for sugar-sweetened beverage consumption,26 for gout and hyperuricemia in European ancestry populations.

The racial disparities in gout incidence described by Thompson et al14 almost certainly reflect a complex interplay of clinical and lifestyle factors and, in many circumstances, social inequities. Lifestyle modification has the potential to reduce the risk and burden of the modern gout epidemic in all races, and of related cardiometabolic conditions, but interventions must be culturally informed and tailored to the community of interest.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01-AR065944 and P50-AR060772.

  • HKC reports research support from Ironwood and Horizon; and consulting fees from Ironwood, Selecta, Horizon, Takeda, Kowa, and Vaxart. NM declares no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

  • See Gout and ethnicity, page 504

  • Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Rheumatology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Safiri S,
    2. Kolahi AA,
    3. Cross M, et al
    . Prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability due to gout and its attributable risk factors for 195 countries and territories 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1916-27.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chen-Xu M,
    2. Yokose C,
    3. Rai SK,
    4. Pillinger MH,
    5. Choi HK
    . Contemporary prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the United States and decadal trends: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2016. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:991-9.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Choi HK,
    2. McCormick N,
    3. Yokose C
    . Excess comorbidities in gout: the causal paradigm and pleiotropic approaches to care. Nature Rev Rheumatol 2022;18:97-111.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kuo CF,
    2. Grainge MJ,
    3. Mallen C,
    4. Zhang W,
    5. Doherty M
    . Rising burden of gout in the UK but continuing suboptimal management: a nationwide population study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:661-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Castro KE,
    2. Corey KD,
    3. Raymond DL,
    4. Jiroutek MR,
    5. Holland MA
    . An evaluation of gout visits in the United States for the years 2007 to 2011. BMC Rheumatol 2018;2:14.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jinno S,
    2. Hasegawa K,
    3. Neogi T,
    4. Goto T,
    5. Dubreuil M
    . Trends in emergency department visits and charges for gout in the United States between 2006 and 2012. J Rheumatol 2016;43:1589-92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lim SY,
    2. Lu N,
    3. Oza A, et al
    . Trends in gout and rheumatoid arthritis hospitalizations in the United States, 1993-2011. JAMA 2016;315:2345-7.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rai SK,
    2. Avina-Zubieta JA,
    3. McCormick N, et al
    . Trends in gout and rheumatoid arthritis hospitalizations in Canada From 2000 to 2011. Arthritis Care Res 2017;69:758-62.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Maynard JW,
    2. McAdams-DeMarco MA,
    3. Law A, et al
    . Racial differences in gout incidence in a population-based cohort: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol 2014;179:576-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hochberg MC,
    2. Thomas J,
    3. Thomas DJ,
    4. Mead L,
    5. Levine DM,
    6. Klag MJ
    . Racial differences in the incidence of gout. The role of hypertension. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:628-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Helget LN,
    2. England BR,
    3. Roul P, et al
    . Incidence, prevalence, and burden of gout in the Veterans Health Administration. Arthritis Care Res 2021;73:1363-71.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Choi HK
    . 189. Epidemiology and classification of gout. In: Hochberg MC, editor. Rheumatology. Seventh edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rai SK,
    2. Fung TT,
    3. Lu N,
    4. Keller SF,
    5. Curhan GC,
    6. Choi HK
    . The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, Western diet, and risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2017;357:j1794.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Thompson MD,
    2. Wu YY,
    3. Cooney RV,
    4. Wilkens LR,
    5. Haiman CA,
    6. Pirkle CM
    . Modifiable factors and incident gout across ethnicity within a large multiethnic cohort of older adults. J Rheumatol 2022;49:504-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Koto R,
    2. Nakajima A,
    3. Horiuchi H,
    4. Yamanaka H
    . Real-world treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: a cross-sectional study of Japanese health insurance claims data. Mod Rheumatol 2021;31:261-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Butler F,
    2. Alghubayshi A,
    3. Roman Y
    . The epidemiology and genetics of hyperuricemia and gout across major racial groups: a literature review and population genetics secondary database analysis. J Pers Med 2021;11:231.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kagan A,
    2. Harris BR,
    3. Winkelstein W Jr, et al
    . Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: demographic, physical, dietary and biochemical characteristics. J Chronic Dis 1974;27:345-64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Krishnan E
    . Gout in African Americans. Am J Med 2014; 127:858-64.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yokose C,
    2. McCormick N,
    3. Lu N,
    4. Joshi AD,
    5. Curhan G,
    6. Choi HK
    . Adherence to 2020 to 2025 dietary guidelines for Americans and the risk of new-onset female gout. JAMA Intern Med 2022 Jan 31 (Epub ahead of print).
  20. 20.↵
    1. McCormick N,
    2. Rai SK,
    3. Lu N,
    4. Yokose C,
    5. Curhan GC,
    6. Choi HK
    . Estimation of primary prevention of gout in men through modification of obesity and other key lifestyle factors. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2027421.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tin A,
    2. Marten J,
    3. Halperin Kuhns VL, et al
    . Target genes, variants, tissues and transcriptional pathways influencing human serum urate levels. Nat Genet 2019;51:1459-74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kottgen A,
    2. Albrecht E,
    3. Teumer A, et al
    . Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations. Nature Genet 2013;45:145-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hardy DS,
    2. Racette SB,
    3. Garvin JT,
    4. Gebrekristos HT,
    5. Mersha TB
    . Ancestry specific associations of a genetic risk score, dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal ARIC study. BMC Med Genomics 2021;14:118.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. McCormick N,
    2. Yokose C,
    3. Lu N,
    4. Joshi AD,
    5. Curhan GC,
    6. Choi HK
    . Impact of adiposity on risk of female gout among those genetically predisposed: sex-specific prospective cohort study findings over >32 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2021 Dec 2 (Epub ahead of print).
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rasheed H,
    2. Stamp LK,
    3. Dalbeth N,
    4. Merriman TR
    . Interaction of the GCKR and A1CF loci with alcohol consumption to influence the risk of gout. Arthritis Res Ther 2017;19:161.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Batt C,
    2. Phipps-Green AJ,
    3. Black MA, et al
    . Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: a risk factor for prevalent gout with SLC2A9 genotype-specific effects on serum urate and risk of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:2101-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.
    1. Krishnan E,
    2. Lienesch D,
    3. Kwoh CK
    . Gout in ambulatory care settings in the United States. J Rheumatol 2008;35:498-501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 49, Issue 5
1 May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Racial Disparities in the Modern Gout Epidemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Racial Disparities in the Modern Gout Epidemic
Natalie McCormick, Hyon K. Choi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2022, 49 (5) 443-446; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220173

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Racial Disparities in the Modern Gout Epidemic
Natalie McCormick, Hyon K. Choi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2022, 49 (5) 443-446; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220173
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sex Effect in Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Microdissecting Epigenetic Pathways in Oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A New Avenue in Transforming Growth Factor β?
  • Ro52, Myositis, and Interstitial Lung Disease
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire