Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms

Titilola Falasinnu, Cristina Drenkard, Gaobin Bao, Sean Mackey and S. Sam Lim
The Journal of Rheumatology August 2021, 48 (8) 1279-1289; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200595
Titilola Falasinnu
1T. Falasinnu, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Titilola Falasinnu
  • For correspondence: tof{at}stanford.edu
Cristina Drenkard
2C. Drenkard, MD, PhD, S.S. Lim, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, and Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cristina Drenkard
Gaobin Bao
3G. Bao, MS, MPH, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Mackey
4S. Mackey, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sean Mackey
S. Sam Lim
2C. Drenkard, MD, PhD, S.S. Lim, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, and Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Sam Lim
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A representation of the proportion of variance in pain intensity and pain interference explained by 7 constructs in the biopsychosocial framework. * Corresponds to results of the sensitivity analysis that tested the model using the modified SLAQ. The modified SLAQ score removes stomach pain, chest pain, headache, joint swelling, joint pain, and muscle pain. SLAQ: Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline characteristics of patients in the Georgians Organized Against Lupus cohort.

    Overall, n = 766
    Pain outcomes
          Pain intensity, 1-item scoreMean ± SD5.3 ± 2.9
    Median (IQR)6.0 (3.0–8.0)
    Range0–10
          PROMIS pain interference, t-scoreMean ± SD58.3 ± 9.7
    Median (IQR)60.3 (53.9–65.5)
    Range41.6–75.6
    Disease-related factors
          Disease activity (SLAQ score)Mean ± SD16.2 ± 9.1
    Median (IQR)15.0 (9–22)
    Range0–44
          Organ damage (BILD score)Mean ± SD2.5 ± 2.4
    Median (IQR)2.0 (1–4)
    Range0–15
          Mild-to-severe pain manifestations in past 3 months, n (%)Chest pain367 (47.9)
    Stomach pain421 (55.0)
    Headache452 (58.9)
    Joint pain658 (85.9)
    Muscle pain573 (74.8)
          Current medications, n (%)Steroids395 (51.6)
    HCQ539 (70.4)
    Immunosuppressive drugs280 (36.6)
    Biologics44 (5.7)
    CYC15 (2.1)
          Renal damage, n (%)aYes53 (6.9)
    No713 (93.1)
    Demographic factors
          Age, yrsMean ± SD48.4 ± 13.6
    Median (IQR)48.6 (38.3–58.4)
    Range17.1–89.5
          Sex, n (%)Male52 (6.8)
    Female714 (93.2)
          Marital statusb, n (%)Single478 (62.4)
    Not single288 (37.6)
          Ethnicityc, n (%)Non-Black138 (18.0)
    Black628 (82.0)
    Socioeconomic factors
          Annual income level, n (%)< $40,000511 (66.7)
    $40,000–69,000120 (15.7)
    ≥ $70,000135 (17.6)
          Education level, n (%)(1) High school or less251 (32.8)
    (2) Some college253 (33.0)
    (3) College or above262 (34.2)
    Physical factors
          PROMIS sleep disturbance, t-scoreMean ± SD55.7 ± 9.9
    Median (IQR)56.1 (51–63)
    Range32–73
          BMI, kg/m2, n (%)Mean ± SD29.4 ± 8.0
    Median (IQR)28.3 (24–34)
    Range13–66
          PROMIS physical health 1-item scoreMean ± SD2.5 ± 0.9
    Median (IQR)2.0 (2–3)
    Range1–5
    Psychological factors
          PROMIS anxiety, t-scoreMean ± SD54.8 ± 10.2
    Median (IQR)55.6 (47.9–61.7)
    Range40.3–81.4
          PROMIS depression, t-scoreMean ± SD51.8 ± 10.4
    Median (IQR)52.3 (44.4–58.9)
    Range38.0–82.4
          PROMIS anger, t-scoreMean ± SD52.8 ± 12.3
    Median (IQR)52.8 (44–61)
    Range33–83
    Behavioral health
          Cigarette smokingd, n (%)Current100 (13.1)
    Not current663 (86.9)
          Coping with spirituality and religionMean ± SD6.2 ± 2.0
    Median (IQR)7.0 (5.0–8.0)
    Range2–8
          Coping with substance and alcohol useMean ± SD2.4 ± 1.1
    Median (IQR)2.0 (2.0–2.0)
    Range2.0–8.0
          Coping with self-blameMean ± SD3.5 ± 1.8
    Median (IQR)3.0 (2.0–5.0)
    Range2–8
          Coping with denialMean ± SD3.1 ±1.6
    Median (IQR)2.0 (2.0–4.0)
    Range2–8
    Social factors
          PROMIS emotional supportMean ± SD51.3 ± 9.3
    Median (IQR)49.9 (43.8–62.0)
    Range25.8–62.0
          PROMIS social isolation, t-scoreMean ± SD49.0 ± 10.9
    Median (IQR)49.0 (40.0–57.4)
    Range34.4–76.2
          Financial strain, unmet needsMean ± SD9.2 ± 3.3
    Median (IQR)9.0 (8.0–11.0)
    Range4–16
          Everyday discrimination scaleMean ± SD1.8 ± 0.6
    Median (IQR)1.7 (1.2–2.1)
    Range1.0–4.0
    • ↵a Renal disease was defined as either receiving a kidney transplant or dialysis for more than 6 months.

    • ↵b Marital status was defined as (1) single = never married, divorced, or widowed or (2) not single = married or living with a partner.

    • ↵c This analysis was limited to non-Black and Black individuals. The original GOAL data set is multiethnic but the numbers of non-White and non-Black individuals were few.

    • ↵d Smoking status is defined as (1) current = smokes every day or some days or (2) not current = does not smoke. BILD: Brief Index of Lupus Damage; CYC: cyclophosphamide; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; PROMIS: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; SLAQ: Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Factors associated with pain outcomes and disease-related measures in individuals with SLE in the unadjusted linear regression.

    Pain IntensityPain InterferenceDisease ActivityOrgan Damage
    Demographic factors
          Age at survey0.006 (−0.009 to 0.022)0.024 (−0.027 to 0.075)-0.072 (−0.119 to -0.025)0.034 (0.021 to 0.046)
          Sex
               MaleRefRefRefRef
               Female0.396 (−0.433 to 1.226)−0.483 (−3.232 to 2.265)−2.382 (−4.965 to 0.201)0.316 (−0.368 to 1.000)
          Marital status
               Not singleRefRefRefRef
               Single0.770 (0.342 to 1.199)2.059 (0.635 to 3.483)2.496 (1.169 to 3.823)0.261 (−0.094 to 0.617)
          Ethnicity
               Non-BlackRefRefRefRef
               Black1.650 (1.117 to 2.182)3.035 (1.243 to 4.827)1.863 (0.172 to 3.553)0.151 (−0.299 to 0.600)
    Socioeconomic factors
          Household income-0.439 (−0.514 to -0.365)-1.262 (−1.515 to -1.008)-1.139 (−1.376 to -0.902)-0.147 (−0.213 to -0.082)
          Education
               High school or lessRefRefRefRef
               Some college−0.465 (−0.956 to 0.026)−0.776 (−2.422 to 0.870)1.441 (−0.120 to 3.002)0.134 (−0.293 to 0.560)
               College or above-2.133 (−2.619 to -1.647)-6.128 (−7.755 to -4.501)-3.593 (−5.132 to -2.054)−0.087 (−0.508 to 0.335)
    Physical factors
          PROMIS sleep disturbance0.142 (0.123 to 0.160)0.518 (0.459 to 0.579)0.455 (0.397 to 0.512)0.036 (0.018 to 0.053)
          BMI0.083 (0.057 to 0.108)0.237 (0.152 to 0.322)0.112 (0.031 to 0.193)0.010 (−0.011 to 0.033)
          PROMIS physical health-1.476 (−1.677 to -1.275)-5.602 (−6.237 to -4.967)-4.494 (−5.116 to -3.871)-0.625 (−0.806 to -0.444)
    Psychological factors
          PROMIS anxiety0.089 (0.069 to 0.108)0.379 (0.316 to 0.441)0.388 (0.331 to 0.446)0.018 (0.001 to 0.035)
          PROMIS depression0.089 (0.070 to 0.108)0.348 (0.287 to 0.410)0.451 (0.398 to 0.505)0.027 (0.010 to 0.043)
          PROMIS anger0.092 (0.076 to 0.108)0.360 (0.310 to 0.410)0.338 (0.291 to 0.385)0.011 (−0.000 to 0.024)
    Behavioral factors
          Smoking
               Not currentRefRefRefRef
               Current1.091 (0.476 to 1.707)3.469 (1.431 to 5.507)4.241 (2.340 to 6.142)0.331 (−0.179 to 0.842)
          Coping with religion0.133 (0.028 to 0.237)0.443 (0.096 to 0.790)0.182 (−0.145 to 0.510)0.109 (0.027 to 0.196)
          Coping with substance and alcohol use0.177 (−0.015 to 0.369)0.634 (−0.001 to 1.270)1.027 (0.434 to 1.620)0.009 (−0.149 to 0.167)
          Coping with self-blame0.256 (0.138 to 0.374)1.281 (0.895 to 1.667)1.475 (1.123 to 1.828)0.109 (0.011 to 0.208)
          Coping with denial0.474 (0.251 to 0.597)1.387 (0.970 to 1.803)1.467 (1.080 to 1.854)0.083 (−0.024 to 0.190)
    Social factors
          PROMIS emotional support-0.044 (−0.067 to -0.022)-0.231 (−0.304 to -0.156)-0.242 (−0.310 to -0.175)−0.018 (−0.037 to 0.000)
          PROMIS social isolation0.079 (0.061 to 0.097)0.342 (0.283 to 0.401)0.354 (0.300 to 0.408)0.031 (0.015 to 0.047)
          Financial strain0.354 (0.294 to 0.415)1.139 (0.934 to 1.344)1.114 (0.925 to 1.304)0.102 (0.047 to 0.157)
          Discrimination score0.640 (0.311 to 0.970)2.401 (1.312 to 3.490)3.658 (2.663 to 4.653)0.249 (−0.025 to 0.524)
    • Values indicate β coefficients (95% CI). Bolded values are statistically significant. PROMIS: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of the hierarchical linear regression models.

    OutcomeModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7
    Pain intensity
        R20.3120.3620.4050.4890.4960.5140.531
        ΔR2–0.0460.0430.0850.0070.0180.017
    Pain interference
        R20.3300.3430.3740.4980.5120.5200.540
        ΔR2–0.0130.0310.1240.0130.0080.020
    Pain intensity*
        R20.2450.2880.3480.4630.4710.4930.510
        ΔR2–0.0420.0600.1160.0080.0220.017
    Pain interference*
        R20.2540.2640.3070.4790.5000.5090.524
        ΔR2–0.0100.0430.1720.0180.0120.015
    • Model 1: disease-related factors; Model 2: Model 1 + demographic factors; Model 3: Model 2 + socioeconomic factors; Model 4: Model 3 + physical factors; Model 5: Model 4 + psychological factors; Model 6: Model 5 + behavioral factors; Model 7: Model 6 + social factors.

    • ↵* These models comprise the sensitivity analyses that include the modified Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ), which removes overt mentions of pain including stomach pain, chest pain, headache, joint swelling, joint pain, and muscle pain.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Hierarchical linear regression analyses of 7 constructs with pain intensity as outcome.

    Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7
    R20.3120.3620.4050.4890.4960.5140.531
    ΔR2–0.0460.0430.0850.0070.0180.017
    Disease-related factors
          Disease activity0.179 (0.159 to 0.199)0.182 (0.163 to 0.202)0.165 (0.144 to 0.185)0.114 (0.092 to 0.136)0.114 (0.091 to 0.137)0.112 (0.088 to 0.135)0.106 (0.081 to 0.130)
          Organ damage0.018 (−0.057 to 0.092)−0.021 (−0.096 to 0.053)−0.027 (−0.101 to 0.046)−0.044 (−0.114 to 0.025)−0.042 (−0.111 to 0.028)−0.043 (−0.114 to 0.028)−0.026 (−0.098 to 0.046)
    Demographic factors
          Age at survey0.024 (0.011 to 0.036)0.024 (0.011 to 0.036)0.021 (0.009 to 0.033)0.023 (0.011 to 0.035)0.021 (0.009 to 0.034)0.021 (0.008 to 0.034)
          Sex
               MaleRefRefRefRefRefRef
               Female-0.851 (−1.528 to -0.174)-0.676 (−1.333 to -0.019)-0.809 (−1.443 to -0.175)-0.817 (−1.449 to -0.185)-0.841 (−1.502 to -0.181)-0.932 (−1.607 to -0.257)
          Marital status
               Not singleRefRefRefRefRefRef
               Single0.072 (−0.293 to 0.437)−0.387 (−0.777 to 0.003)−0.310 (−0.679 to 0.06)−0.248 (−0.619 to 0.123)−0.208 (−0.591 to 0.174)−0.186 (−0.577 to 0.205)
          Ethnicity
               Non-BlackRefRef
               Black1.334 (0.874 to 1.794)0.905 (0.44 to 1.37)0.792 (0.353 to 1.232)0.766 (0.325 to 1.207)0.668 (0.212 to 1.125)0.726 (0.251 to 1.201)
    Socioeconomic factors
          Household income-0.181 (−0.274 to -0.088)-0.139 (−0.227 to -0.052)-0.143 (−0.231 to -0.056)-0.148 (−0.238 to -0.058)-0.121 (−0.218 to -0.024)
          Education
               High school or lessRefRefRefRefRef
               Some college−0.457 (−0.876 to -0.038)−0.472 (−0.866 to -0.078)−0.452 (−0.848 to -0.056)−0.337 (−0.747 to 0.074)−0.356 (−0.786 to 0.073)
               College or above−0.853 (−1.338 to -0.369)−0.829 (−1.284 to -0.374)−0.792 (−1.248 to -0.336)−0.574 (−1.048 to -0.101)−0.630 (−1.119 to -0.142)
    Physical factors
          PROMIS sleep disturbance0.060 (0.041 to 0.079)0.056 (0.037 to 0.076)0.057 (0.037 to 0.077)0.051 (0.030 to 0.071)
          BMI0.041 (0.021 to 0.061)0.04 (0.020 to 0.060)0.037 (0.017 to 0.058)0.041 (0.019 to 0.063)
          PROMIS physical health-0.455 (−0.655 to -0.256)-0.456 (−0.659 to -0.253)-0.538 (−0.748 to -0.329)-0.637 (−0.855 to -0.419)
    Psychological factors
          PROMIS anxiety−0.015 (−0.038 to 0.008)−0.01 (−0.034 to 0.015)−0.006 (−0.032 to 0.019)
          PROMIS depression−0.016 (−0.036 to 0.005)−0.012 (−0.034 to 0.009)−0.010 (−0.032 to 0.012)
          PROMIS anger0.028 (0.010 to 0.047)0.028 (0.009 to 0.047)0.026 (0.005 to 0.046)
    Behavioral factors
          Smoking
               Not currentRefRef
               Current−0.024 (−0.516 to 0.469)0.041 (−0.474 to 0.557)
          Coping with religion0.015 (−0.068 to 0.098)0.021 (−0.065 to 0.108)
          Coping with substance and alcohol use0.002 (−0.151 to 0.155)0.004 (−0.15 to 0.158)
          Coping with self-blame-0.178 (−0.294 to -0.063)-0.197 (−0.317 to -0.076)
          Coping with denial0.152 (0.040 to 0.264)0.159 (0.045 to 0.274)
    Social factors
          PROMIS emotional support0.007 (−0.014 to 0.029)
          PROMIS social isolation0.001 (−0.022 to 0.025)
          Financial strain0.030 (−0.034 to 0.094)
          Discrimination score−0.196 (−0.494 to 0.102)
    • Model 1: Disease-related factors; Model 2: Model 1 + demographic factors; Model 3: Model 2 + socioeconomic factors; Model 4: Model 3 + physical factors; Model 5: Model 4 + psychological factors; Model 6: Model 5 + behavioral factors; Model 7: Model 6 + social factors. Statistically significant variables in the final model are bolded. PROMIS: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Hierarchical linear regression analyses of 7 constructs with pain interference as outcome.

    Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7
    R20.3300.3430.3740.4980.5120.5200.540
    ΔR2–0.0130.0310.1240.0130.0080.020
    Disease-related factors
          Disease activity0.593 (0.528 to 0.659)0.606 (0.539 to 0.672)0.552 (0.483 to 0.620)0.323 (0.252 to 0.394)0.292 (0.217 to 0.368)0.282 (0.205 to 0.360)0.261 (0.180 to 0.341)
          Organ damage0.248 (0.002 to 0.494)0.15 (−0.102 to 0.402)0.144 (−0.107 to 0.395)0.042 (−0.187 to 0.271)0.081 (−0.146 to 0.309)0.094 (−0.142 to 0.330)0.138 (−0.101 to 0.377)
    Demographic factors
          Age at survey0.065 (0.022 to 0.109)0.065 (0.022 to 0.107)0.065 (0.026 to 0.104)0.073 (0.034 to 0.112)0.060 (0.018 to 0.101)0.051 (0.008 to 0.095)
          Sex
               MaleRefRefRefRefRefRef
               Female−1.111 (−3.388 to 1.166)−0.650 (−2.882 to 1.583)−1.541 (−3.618 to 0.536)−1.587 (−3.642 to 0.468)−1.439 (−3.613 to 0.735)−1.659 (−3.900 to 0.582)
          Marital status
               Not singleRefRefRefRefRefRef
               Single0.173 (−1.059 to 1.406)−1.104 (−2.432 to 0.225)−0.471 (−1.687 to 0.746)−0.182 (−1.395 to 1.03)−0.153 (−1.419 to 1.113)−0.286 (−1.579 to 1.007)
          Ethnicity
               Non-BlackRefRefRefRefRefRef
               Black1.864 (0.316 to 3.412)0.630 (−0.954 to 2.214)0.311 (−1.136 to 1.757)0.304 (−1.136 to 1.744)−0.003 (−1.516 to 1.510)0.184 (−1.394 to 1.762)
    Socioeconomic factors
          Household income−0.494 (−0.810 to -0.178)−0.257 (−0.546 to 0.032)−0.254 (−0.539 to 0.032)−0.301 (−0.599 to -0.004)−0.264 (−0.585 to 0.056)
          Education
               High school or lessRefRefRefRefRef
               Some college−1.003 (−2.427 to 0.422)−0.879 (−2.173 to 0.415)−0.703 (−1.995 to 0.588)−0.472 (−1.828 to 0.884)−0.388 (−1.808 to 1.031)
               College or above−2.508 (−4.156 to -0.861)−2.195 (−3.692 to -0.698)−2.082 (−3.569 to -0.595)−1.717 (−3.285 to -0.150)-1.687 (−3.306 to -0.067)
    Physical factors
          PROMIS sleep disturbance0.254 (0.193 to 0.315)0.216 (0.153 to 0.279)0.216 (0.150 to 0.282)0.200 (0.131 to 0.269)
          BMI0.093 (0.028 to 0.159)0.089 (0.023 to 0.154)0.08 (0.011 to 0.148)0.092 (0.021 to 0.164)
          PROMIS physical health−2.415 (−3.067 to -1.762)−2.226 (−2.885 to -1.566)−2.379 (−3.067 to -1.692)-2.647 (−3.369 to -1.925)
    Psychological factors
          PROMIS anxiety0.012 (−0.063 to 0.087)0.037 (−0.044 to 0.117)0.016 (−0.069 to 0.101)
          PROMIS depression−0.047 (−0.115 to 0.021)−0.026 (−0.096 to 0.045)−0.017 (−0.091 to 0.057)
          PROMIS anger0.125 (0.065–0.186)0.125 (0.061–0.189)0.137 (0.069–0.204)
    Behavioral factors
          Smoking
               Not currentRefRef
               Current0.179 (−1.441 to 1.798)0.297 (−1.397 to 1.991)
    Coping with religion0.087 (−0.186 to 0.360)0.185 (−0.101 to 0.471)
          Coping with substance and alcohol use−0.305 (−0.804 to 0.194)−0.317 (−0.824 to 0.190)
          Coping with self-blame−0.307 (−0.689 to 0.075)-0.424 (−0.823 to -0.026)
          Coping with denial0.046 (−0.325 to 0.418)0.047 (−0.333 to 0.427)
    Social factors
          PROMIS emotional support−0.016 (−0.086 to 0.054)
          PROMIS social isolation0.043 (−0.034 to 0.120)
          Financial strain−0.013 (−0.226 to 0.199)
          Discrimination score−0.595 (−1.581 to 0.392)
    • Model 1: Disease-related factors; Model 2: Model 1 + demographic factors; Model 3: Model 2 + socioeconomic factors; Model 4: Model 3 + physical factors; Model 5: Model 4 + psychological factors; Model 6: Model 5 + behavioral factors; Model 7: Model 6 + social factors. Statistically significant variables in the final model are bolded. PROMIS: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
    • 200595DataSuppl.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 48, Issue 8
1 Aug 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms
Titilola Falasinnu, Cristina Drenkard, Gaobin Bao, Sean Mackey, S. Sam Lim
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2021, 48 (8) 1279-1289; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200595

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms
Titilola Falasinnu, Cristina Drenkard, Gaobin Bao, Sean Mackey, S. Sam Lim
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2021, 48 (8) 1279-1289; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200595
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL
DISEASE ACTIVITY
PAIN
social determinants of health
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Time Trends in Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospitalizations and Outcomes in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A United States Inpatient Cohort Analysis
  • A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
  • The Renal Activity Index for Lupus: Validation for Prediction of Kidney Inflammation in Adult Patients With Lupus Nephritis
Show more Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biopsychosocial
  • DISEASE ACTIVITY
  • PAIN
  • social determinants of health
  • systemic lupus erythematosus

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire