Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Demographics, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of patients with IRD admitted to hospital due to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Hospitalized, n = 41 Hospitalized and Surviving, n = 31 Hospitalized and Deceased, n = 10 P* Age, yrs, median (range) 72 (36–87) 72 (36–84) 76 (61–87) 0.06 Female 25 (61) 20 (64) 5 (50) 0.41 Hospital stay, days, median 9 9 9 0.88 Deaths 10 (24) 0 (0) 10 (100) Comorbidities Hypertension 23 (56) 17 (54) 6 (60) 0.77 Lung diseasea 14 (34) 8 (25) 6 (60) 0.04 Diabetes 9 (22) 6 (19) 3 (30) 0.47 Cardiovascular disease 7 (17) 4 (13) 3 (30) 0.21 Malignant tumor 5 (12) 3 (10) 2 (20) 0.38 Other comorbidities 9 (22) 5 (16) 4 (40) 0.11 None 6 (15) 6 (19) 0 0.13 Rheumatic disease RA 16 (39) 12 (39) 4 (40) 0.94 SpA 3 (7) 3 (10) 0 0.30 PsA 4 (10) 4 (13) 0 0.23 SLE 4 (10) 2 (6) 2 (20) 0.20 Sjögren syndrome 4 (10) 4 (13) 0 0.23 Vasculitis 3 (7) 1 (3) 2 (20) 0.07 Inflammatory myopathy 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 0.56 PMR 6 (15) 4 (13) 2 (20) 0.58 Active IRDb 6 (15) 3 (10) 3 (30) 0.11 Disease duration, yrs, median 15 12 18 0.45 IRD treatment No DMARDs 10 (24) 6 (19) 4 (40) 0.18 Conventional synthetic DMARDsc 23 (56) 19 (61) 4 (40) 0.23 Biologic DMARDs 12 (29) 9 (29) 3 (30) 0.95 Anti-TNF 4 (10) 4 (13) 0 0.23 RTX 7 (17) 4 (13) 3 (30) 0.21 ABA 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 0.56 JAK inhibitors 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 0.56 GC use 27 (66) 18 (58) 9 (90) 0.06 GC dose, mg, mean 5.2 5.4 4.6 0.54 Values are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise indicated. Values in bold are statistically significant.
↵a Lung disease included interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or smoking.
↵b Active rheumatic disease included high clinical activity, or newly diagnosed or recently started biologics treatment.
↵c Conventional synthetic DMARDs included methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil.
↵* Comparisons were between surviving and deceased patients. ABA: abatacept; DMARD: disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GC: glucocorticoid; IRD: inflammatory rheumatic disease; JAK: Janus kinase; PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; RTX: rituximab; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SpA: spondyloarthritis; TNF: tumor necrosis factor.
- Table 2.
COVID-19 hospital admission rate and ORs in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
All Patientsa, n Hospitalized Patients, n Hospitalization Rate, % OR* 95% CI* Total population 492,745 2315 0.47 Non-IRD patients 488,153 2274 0.47 1.00 IRD patients 4592 41 0.89 1.91 1.41–2.61 RA 1708 16 0.94 2.01 1.23–3.28 SpA 862 3 0.35 0.74 0.24–2.31 PsA 515 4 0.78 1.66 0.63–4.43 SLE 254 4 1.57 3.38 1.28–8.95 Sjögren syndrome 175 4 2.29 4.90 1.86–12.94 Vasculitis 165 3 1.82 3.90 1.27–11.99 Inflammatory myopathy 88 1 1.14 2.43 0.35–17.13 PMR 474 6 1.27 2.71 1.23–6.02 Others 351 0 0 0 Values in bold are statistically significant.
↵a Hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients.
↵* Comparisons were between each disease group and no inflammatory rheumatic disease patients. COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; IRD: inflammatory rheumatic disease; PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SpA: spondyloarthritis.
- Table 3.
Biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with IRD, including rates and ORs of hospitalization in relation to undergoing treatment.
All Patientsa, n Hospitalized Patients, n Hospitalization Rate, % OR* 95% CI* IRD patients without biologics/JAK inhibitors 3709 28 0.75 1 Anti-TNF 603 4 0.66 0.88 0.31–2.50 RTX 72 7 9.72 12.88 5.82–28.51 ABA 40 1 2.50 3.31 0.46–23.75 JAK inhibitors 18 1 5.55 7.36 1.06–51.22 Others 150 0 0 0 ↵a Hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients, diagnosed with IRD and monitored by the Department of Rheumatology.
↵* Comparisons were between each treatment group and IRD patients without biologic/JAK inhibitor treatment. ABA: abatacept; IRD: inflammatory rheumatic disease; JAK: Janus kinase; RTX: rituximab; TNF: tumor necrosis factor.