Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticlePediatric Rheumatology

Majeed Syndrome: Five Cases With Novel Mutations From Unrelated Families in India With a Review of Literature

Pallavi Pimpale Chavan, Ivona Aksentijevich, Aditya Daftary, Hiren Panwala, Chetna Khemani, Archana Khan and Raju Khubchandani
The Journal of Rheumatology December 2021, 48 (12) 1850-1855; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201663
Pallavi Pimpale Chavan
1P. Pimpale Chavan, DNB Pediatrics, Fellowship in Pediatric Rheumatology, A. Khan, DCH DNB Pediatrics, R. Khubchandani, MD, Section of Pediatric Rheumatology, NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pallavi Pimpale Chavan
Ivona Aksentijevich
2I. Aksentijevich, MD, Genetics, Inflammatory Disease Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ivona Aksentijevich
Aditya Daftary
3A. Daftary, DABNM, DABR, Consultant Radiologist, H. Panwala, DNB Radiology, Fellowship in Pediatric Radiology, Consultant Pediatric Radiologist, NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiren Panwala
3A. Daftary, DABNM, DABR, Consultant Radiologist, H. Panwala, DNB Radiology, Fellowship in Pediatric Radiology, Consultant Pediatric Radiologist, NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hiren Panwala
Chetna Khemani
4C. Khemani, DCH DNB Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, North Goa District Hospital, Mapusa, Goa, India.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Archana Khan
1P. Pimpale Chavan, DNB Pediatrics, Fellowship in Pediatric Rheumatology, A. Khan, DCH DNB Pediatrics, R. Khubchandani, MD, Section of Pediatric Rheumatology, NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Archana Khan
Raju Khubchandani
1P. Pimpale Chavan, DNB Pediatrics, Fellowship in Pediatric Rheumatology, A. Khan, DCH DNB Pediatrics, R. Khubchandani, MD, Section of Pediatric Rheumatology, NH SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raju Khubchandani
  • For correspondence: rajukhubchandani{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective Majeed syndrome (MJS) is an autosomal recessive, systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID) caused by biallelic loss-of-function variants in the LPIN2 gene. It is characterized by early-onset chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), dyserythropoietic anemia, and neutrophilic dermatosis. We analyzed a cohort of uncharacterized Indian patients for pathogenic variants in LPIN2 and other genes associated with SAIDs.

Methods We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) for 1 patient and next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted gene panel for SAIDs in 3 patients. One patient was a referral from neurology after clinical exome sequencing identified a novel variant in LPIN2. We reviewed the literature for all published studies of mutation-positive MJS patients and have summarized their clinical features and disease-causing variants.

Results We describe the largest series of patients with MJS outside of the Middle East. All 5 patients are homozygous for novel, possibly pathogenic variants in the LPIN2 gene. Two of these variants are missense substitutions, and 3 are predicted to alter transcript splicing and create a truncated protein. In addition to the classical features of CRMO and anemia, patients exhibited previously unreported features, including abdominal pain, recurrent diarrhea/ear discharge, and erythema nodosum.

Conclusion Patients with MJS may present initially to different specialists, and thus it is important to create awareness in the medical community. In India, consanguinity is a common sociocultural factor in many ethnic communities and an abbreviated NGS gene panel for autoinflammatory diseases should include MJS. The unavailability of interleukin 1 inhibitors in some countries poses a treatment challenge.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • CRMO
  • dyserythropoietic anemia
  • LPIN2 mutation
  • Majeed syndrome
  • neutrophilic dermatosis

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM]: 259680) is a common genetically heterogenous autoinflammatory disease of the bone, first described in 19721 with the typical mean age at diagnosis being 9 years.2 Syndromic CRMO presents early in life and includes 3 monogenic recessively inherited conditions: Majeed syndrome (MJS), deficiency of interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, and CRMO related to the FBLIM1 gene.2

MJS (OMIM: 609628) was first described in 1989 as a rare, recessively inherited autoinflammatory disease.3 It is characterized by CRMO, dyserythropoietic anemia in all, and neutrophilic dermatosis in < 25% of patients.4 The anemia in MJS is microcytic, hypochromic, and can present at birth or during the first year of life with variable severity ranging from mild to severe, sometimes requiring blood transfusions.4

MJS is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous loss-of-function (LoF) pathogenic variants in LPIN2, which encodes the lipin-2 protein, a phosphatidic acid phosphatase that has an important function in the control of lipid metabolism.5 Lipin-2 is highly expressed in myeloid cells and plays a role in the regulation of innate immune responses as it downregulates proinflammatory signaling induced by saturated fatty acids in macrophages.6,7,8 The LPIN2 gene (GenBank NM_014646) is composed of 20 exons and is translated into the protein of 896 amino acid residues with several known domains (Figure 1). Disease-causal mutations are located over the entire protein with some predilection for clustering in a carboxyl terminal lipin (CLIP) domain. LPIN2-deficient monocyte-derived M2 macrophages promote osteoclastogenesis, shedding light on the mechanism for bony lesions.9 The molecular mechanism of anemia is still unclear.

Domain structure and functional motifs of the lipin-2 protein and summary of pathogenic variants in the LPIN2 gene. Mutations reported in literature are depicted; mutations identified in 5 patients with Majeed syndrome from India are in bold. CLIP: carboxyl terminal of lipin domain; DXDXT motif: required for phosphatidate phosphatase enzyme activity; LXXIL motif: transcriptional coactivator; NLIP: amino terminal of lipin domain; NLS: nuclear localization signal.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Domain structure and functional motifs of the lipin-2 protein and summary of pathogenic variants in the LPIN2 gene. Mutations reported in literature are depicted; mutations identified in 5 patients with Majeed syndrome from India are in bold. CLIP: carboxyl terminal of lipin domain; DXDXT motif: required for phosphatidate phosphatase enzyme activity; LXXIL motif: transcriptional coactivator; NLIP: amino terminal of lipin domain; NLS: nuclear localization signal.

In this article, we describe the clinical, genetic, and radiological findings from 5 new unrelated Indian patients with unreported, possibly pathogenic variants in LPIN2, and extend the MJS phenotypes. We also review literature for clinical features and disease-causing variants in all reported mutation-positive patients with MJS.

METHODS

Patient 1 was seen by a neurologist for delayed motor milestone and skin rash, and was referred to us after his clinical exome sequencing identified a homozygous, possibly pathogenic variant in LPIN2. Patient 2 was referred by a pediatrician, whereas the other 3 patients were part of our cohort of long-standing patients with undiagnosed systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs). Relevant ethics approval (number: 201901) and informed patient consent were obtained. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) in Patient 2 and next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel consisting of 53 genes associated with SAIDs in the other 3 patients.

To evaluate the pathogenicity of novel LPIN2 variants we used Variant Effect Predictor (VEP GRCh37) tool and VarSome (www.varsome.com) for American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria.10 In silico, prediction tools including SIFT, PolyPhen, Mutation taster, Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD), and SpliceAl were used to predict pathogenicity in addition to the ACMG criteria.

A detailed literature search was performed in PubMed, using the following terms: “Majeed syndrome,” “CRMO and dyserythropoietic anemia,” and “CRMO, dyserythropoietic anemia/microcytic anemia and Sweet syndrome,” along with an additional language filter of “English,” which yielded 54 articles published from 1986 to December 2020. All pathogenic variants shown in Figure 1 of this article were obtained from these 54 articles.

RESULTS

The clinical features and laboratory findings of 5 Indian patients are summarized in Table 1. The summary of radiological findings and treatment of the 5 patients are described in Supplementary Table 1 (available with the online version of this article).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Salient features of our patient cohort with Majeed syndrome.

Four out of 5 patients were born of first-cousin marriages. Patient 3 was found to have a homozygous, possibly pathogenic, variant in LPIN2 despite no known consanguinity. Disease onset was during the neonatal period in Patients 1 and 2, and the first year of life in the remaining 3 patients. All 5 children presented with bone pains and arthritis, whereas recurrent fever was reported in only 3 patients. Two patients (Patients 1 and 4) had skin lesions (Figures 2A,B). All 5 patients continue to have early-onset microcytic, hypochromic anemia; however, none of them required transfusions. Bone biopsy, skin biopsy, and bone marrow aspiration were not performed in any of these patients. Four children presented with irritability in the first year of life and were suspected to have abdominal colic by their primary care practitioner. There was no history of rheumatic illness in any of these families, and siblings of Patients 2–5 were unaffected.

Skin manifestations and radiological images demonstrating importance of different imaging techniques in patients with CRMO. (A) Pustular skin lesions on right leg and back (Patient 1). (B) Erythema nodosum in bilateral lower limbs (Patient 4). (C) 1. Normal comparative right tibial radiograph; 2. Subtle periosteal thickening on the left tibia (can be easily missed); 3. Delayed phase bone scan demonstrating discrete increased uptake along left proximal tibial metadiaphysis; and 4. Coronal STIR MRI image demonstrating left proximal tibial signal hyperintensity (Patient 1). (D) Coronal STIR MRI images of bilateral knee demonstrating right distal femoral and bilateral proximal tibial edema. There is transphyseal edema in the proximal tibia (note: this is not seen in distal femur) and this could predispose to growth disturbances (Patient 3). CRMO: chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; STIR: short-tau inversion recovery.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Skin manifestations and radiological images demonstrating importance of different imaging techniques in patients with CRMO. (A) Pustular skin lesions on right leg and back (Patient 1). (B) Erythema nodosum in bilateral lower limbs (Patient 4). (C) 1. Normal comparative right tibial radiograph; 2. Subtle periosteal thickening on the left tibia (can be easily missed); 3. Delayed phase bone scan demonstrating discrete increased uptake along left proximal tibial metadiaphysis; and 4. Coronal STIR MRI image demonstrating left proximal tibial signal hyperintensity (Patient 1). (D) Coronal STIR MRI images of bilateral knee demonstrating right distal femoral and bilateral proximal tibial edema. There is transphyseal edema in the proximal tibia (note: this is not seen in distal femur) and this could predispose to growth disturbances (Patient 3). CRMO: chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; STIR: short-tau inversion recovery.

In this cohort, we observed clinical features that expand the MJS phenotype to include recurrent diarrhea (Patient 1), recurrent ear discharge (Patient 3), erythema nodosum (Patient 4), and abdominal pain (Patient 5). Patient 1 had watery stools, which started at 2 months of age with each episode lasting for 3–6 days and recurring every 6–8 weeks. The stool frequency has gradually reduced after starting treatment. Patient 3 has isolated, recurrent, unilateral, serous ear discharge, which started at 6 years of age. She continues to have intermittent ear discharge and involvement of the mastoid bone was ruled out on imaging. Patient 4 has skin involvement in the form of erythema nodosum (Figure 2B); Patient 5 has recurrent episodes of abdominal pain that started at 7 years of age, although the frequency of abdominal pain has reduced over time. Patients 1 and 3 had received multiple courses of antibiotics for recurrent diarrhea and ear discharge episodes, respectively. Due to chronic pain, there was a history of motor delay in 3 children (Patients 1, 2, and 5), and hence Patient 1 was first seen by a neurologist.

Four patients (Patients 1, 3–5) demonstrated typical imaging features of CRMO (Supplementary Table 1, available with the online version of this article), which were more evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scans, and in keeping with established current literature. Patient 2 did not have an MRI, his bone scan was normal, and skeletal survey showed reduced bone density with ankylosis of the elbows and subchondral sclerosis.

On genetic testing, except for a few variants with high minor allele frequencies, no other biallelic, homozygous, compound heterozygous, pathogenic, or likely pathogenic variants were detected in these 5 patients. Four of the 5 identified LPIN2 variants are not reported in any public databases; however, they might be population-specific and be present at a low allele frequency in the Indian population. The in silico algorithm predictions for the effect of these variants on the protein function are summarized in Supplementary Table 2 (available with the online version of this article). According to ACMG classification, 1 variant is classified as pathogenic and 4 are classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). The c.2041delT variant creates truncated protein at the position p.Trp681Glyfs*14, which lacks the last 201 amino acid residues, including most of a C-terminal CLIP, haloacid dehalogenase-like (HAD domain; amino acids [aa] 635–837). Of 4 VUS variants, the c.1961G>A (p.Gly654Asp; CADD 29.9) substitution affects an evolutionarily conserved residue in the vicinity of a highly conserved DXDXT catalytic motif (aa 689–693), known to be essential for phosphatide phosphatase activity. The second missense variant, c.2206C>T (p.Arg736Cys; CADD 32), affects the evolutionarily conserved residue Arg736, which was previously associated with another disease variant, p.Arg736His, in a consanguineous Pakistani family.11 In this family, the proband and 2 male siblings presented with the severe form of CRMO and microcytic anemia, whereas both their parents and elder female sibling were found to be homozygous for this pathogenic variant; however, they presented with a milder phenotype of nonspecific knee/limb pain and mild anemia. The pathogenicity of 2 homozygous intronic variants is less clear. The c.2174+4_2174+5del variant is a 2bp deletion that could affect the splicing of intron 16, whereas the c.1620+5G>C variant could alter the splicing of intron 11; both are predicted to be a donor loss by SpliceAl. The probability that these 2 variants disrupt splicing at their respective chromosomal positions are 0.97 and 0.7. Parental Sanger sequencing confirmed heterozygosity for the intronic variants (Table 1). Functional validations of these variants have not been performed due to the nonavailability of patients’ RNA samples.

On literature review, we identified 25 patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in LPIN2, and 6 other patients12 were reported to have a homozygous mutation in LPIN2, but these variants were not described. Of these 31 patients, most are from Middle Eastern ancestry families and accompanied by single reports from India, Pakistan, China, and America.3,9,11–23 The summary of salient features and disease variants identified in these patients are depicted in Figure 1, and in Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Figure 1 (available with the online version of this article).

Of the 31 patients described in literature, clinical features were reported in 24 patients.3,9,11,13–22 Twenty out of 24 patients (83%) had bone lesions of varying severity and one presented with predominantly nocturnal pain. Twenty-one out of 24 (87.5%) patients had microcytic, hypochromic anemia; 2 were transfusion dependent.17 A minority of patients are known to present with neutrophilic dermatosis in the form of pustulosis, plaques, nodules, or ulceration, and heterozygous family members may have psoriasis.11 Skin lesions in the form of Sweet syndrome are described in 2 children, whereas pustulosis is described in 1 child.15

DISCUSSION

In 2005, Ferguson and colleagues identified a homozygous mutation in the LPIN2 gene in 6 children who presented with CRMO, microcytic hypochromic anemia, and skin lesions; this disease was termed Majeed syndrome.15 It was noted that heterozygous carriers of MJS-associated variants have no clinical manifestations consistent with MJS, but they can have psoriasis or other inflammatory dermatosis.15 In this cohort of patients, parents’ heterozygous carriers for respective likely causal variants have no features of inflammation.

Our literature review revealed that almost all the 31 patients with MJS were born of a consanguineous marriage, except for 2 patients described by Liu, et al13 and Bhuyan, et al9 from China and America, respectively. In our cohort, only Patient 3 was born of a nonconsanguineous marriage but was found to have a homozygous splice-site variant in LPIN2. All 5 patients reported here have features of CRMO and anemia, whereas skin lesions were seen in 2 patients (Patients 1 and 4; Figures 2A,B). Nocturnal bone pain was predominant in Patient 3, who was homozygous for the splice variant classified VUS. All 5 patients had failure to thrive and only 2 presented with delayed puberty (Patients 3 and 5), consistent with other reports in literature.17,19 In patients with MJS, hepatosplenomegaly was reported in 6 children, accompanied by cholestatic jaundice in 1 child (Supplementary Table 3, available with the online version of this article). Splenomegaly was observed in 1 child who later underwent splenectomy, which resolved the need for blood transfusions.17 In our cohort, only Patient 2 had severe hepatosplenomegaly mimicking a storage disorder.

Motor delay was observed in 3 patients (Patients 1, 2, and 5), which may be secondary to chronic osteomyelitis similar to findings reported by Majeed, et al.17 Patient 2 has severe contractures affecting daily activities, whereas Patients 1, 3, and 5 have only minimal contractures that improved after initiation of treatment and physiotherapy. Of note, features such as maxillary hyperplasia or prominent forehead can be seen in patients with MJS due to hyperplasia of the marrow secondary to longstanding anemia.17 The radiographic findings in our patients (Supplementary Table 1, available with the online version of this article) showed that in early stages the findings can be subtle and could be easily missed, as seen in Patient 1 (Figure 2C). A whole-body MRI in T1 and fluid-sensitive, fat-suppressed sequences are useful and may help to assess the extent of multifocal disease at diagnosis and follow-up. As seen in Patient 3 (Figure 2D), MRI with increased spatial resolution also helps in identifying the transphyseal spread of the disease, which can potentially progress to growth deformity due to formation of physeal bars.

LPIN2 gene is considered a LoF-tolerant gene based on the ratio of observed and expected (o/e) predicted LoF (pLoF) mutations reported in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/gene/ENSG00000101577?dataset=gnomad_r2_1), adjusted for sequence context, coverage, and methylation, with a pLoF o/e = 0.34 and probability of being loss-of-function intolerant (pLI) = 0. There are 17 LoF genetic variants reported in gnomAD, and they include nonsense, frameshift, and splice mutations. However, there are no individuals in gnomAD who are homozygous for any of these LoF variants. Consequently, heterozygous LoF variants in LPIN2 are likely to be identified by WES or targeted NGS gene panels in patients suspected to have a monogenic autoinflammatory disease. In such patients, unless they have a clinical history consistent with CRMO, searching for a second pathogenic variant in LPIN2 is not warranted. Recently, Bhuyan, et al9 described a structural mutation, a 17.8-Kb deletion in LPIN2, suggesting that in patients diagnosed with CRMO/MJS and carriers for 1 deleterious variant, screening for a second mutation may require different technology. The major limitation of the current report and previous reports is that most MJS-associated LPIN2 variants are not functionally validated.

Studies in lipin-2–deficient mice revealed that mice developed anemia but there was no evidence of osteomyelitis, suggesting the contribution of additional environmental or genetic factors.24 Lipin-2 has been shown to regulate the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by modulating P2X7 receptor activation. Lordén, et al demonstrated that lipin-2 ameliorates Toll-like receptor 4 signaling and maintains proper cellular lipid homeostasis, which is necessary for inhibition of purinergic receptor P2X7.8 Lipin-2 function is regulated by posttranslational modification including ubiquitination. A recent study showed that lipin-2 interacts with β–transducin repeat-containing protein (TRCP), a substrate receptor subunit of the SCFβ-TRCP E3 ligase, to undergo proteasomal degradation. A β-TRCP knockout in the murine cell line increased lipin-2 protein expression and decreased expression of IL-1β and other proinflammatory genes.25 Herlin, et al14 reported elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in 2 patients with MJS during active disease. Bhuyan, et al9 described accelerated osteoclastogenesis in M2-like macrophages of a patient with MJS, resulting from enhanced activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase and reduced Src kinase activation. Together, these data suggest that MJS is predominantly an IL-1–mediated autoinflammatory disease. Recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) and human anti–IL-1β monoclonal antibody (canakinumab) have been used successfully in patients with MJS and resulted in drastic clinical and laboratory improvement, especially after failure of TNF inhibitors.9,11,14,20,21,22 Other treatments such as bone marrow transplant or gene therapy have not yet been tried in MJS.

Due to current lack of availability of IL-1 inhibitors in India and many other countries, treating these patients is a major challenge. All 5 patients received injectable bisphosphonates, whereas Patients 1, 3, and 5 required the addition of other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate (Patient 1), and methotrexate, azathioprine, and sulfasalazine (Patients 3 and 5). In addition, Patient 5 also received TNF inhibitors etanercept and adalimumab biosimilar molecules (Supplementary Table 1, available with the online version of this article). Patient 1 has reduced frequency of bone pain and skin rash, whereas Patients 3 and 5 experience frequent flares on this treatment. Patients 2 and 4 are well controlled on injectable bisphosphonates alone, with reduced need for PRN diclofenac or naproxen, respectively.

In conclusion, patients with MJS may present to varied specialists such as neonatologists or pediatricians for fevers or irritability, neurologists for motor delay due to chronic pain, hematologists for anemia, or dermatologists for skin lesions. Thus, it is important to create awareness about MJS in the medical community. Due to limited genetic testing, the prevalence of MJS in India is probably underestimated. Consanguinity is a common sociocultural factor in many ethnic communities in India, and an abbreviated NGS gene panel for autoinflammatory diseases should include MJS. Targeted therapy for SAIDs remains a problem in India due to challenges such as nonavailability, unaffordability, and nonlicensure of IL-1 antagonists.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to thank Brynja Matthiasardottir, MSc Bioinformatics, NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, for her contribution with the in silico prediction tools described in Supplementary Table 2 (available with the online version of this article). We would also like to thank Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the collaboration in sequencing Patient 2.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

  • Accepted for publication April 29, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Rheumatology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Giedion A,
    2. Holthusen W,
    3. Masel IF,
    4. Vischer D
    . Subacute and chronic “symmetrical” osteomyelitis. Ann Radiol 1972;15:329–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cox AJ,
    2. Ferguson PJ
    . Update on the genetics of nonbacterial osteomyelitis in humans. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:521–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Majeed HA,
    2. Kalaawi M,
    3. Mohanty D,
    4. Teebi AS,
    5. Tunjekar MF,
    6. Al-Gharbawy F, et al
    . Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in three related children and the association with Sweet syndrome in two siblings. J Pediatr 1989;115:730–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cox AJ,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Ferguson PJ
    . Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and related diseases—update on pathogenesis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2017;19:18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Donkor J,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Wong S,
    4. O’Loughlin L,
    5. Dewald J,
    6. Kok BPC, et al
    . A conserved serine residue is required for the phosphatidate phosphatase activity but not the transcriptional coactivator functions of lipin-1 and lipin-2. J Biol Chem 2009;284:29968–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Valdearcos M,
    2. Esquinas E,
    3. Meana C,
    4. Gil-de-Gómez L,
    5. Guijas C,
    6. Balsinde J, et al
    . Subcellular localization and role of lipin-1 in human macrophages. J Immunol 2011;186:6004–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Valdearcos M,
    2. Esquinas E,
    3. Meana C,
    4. Peña L,
    5. Gil-de-Gómez L,
    6. Balsinde J, et al
    . Lipin-2 reduces proinflammatory signaling induced by saturated fatty acids in macrophages. J Biol Chem 2012;287:10894–904.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lordén G,
    2. Sanjuán-García I,
    3. de Pablo N,
    4. Meana C,
    5. Alvarez-Miguel I,
    6. Pérez-García MT, et al
    . Lipin-2 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome by affecting P2X7 receptor activation. J Exp Med 2017;214:511–28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bhuyan F,
    2. Jesus A,
    3. Mitchell J,
    4. Leikina E,
    5. VanTries R,
    6. Herzog R, et al
    . Novel Majeed syndrome causing LPIN2 mutations link bone inflammation to inflammatory M2 macrophages and accelerated osteoclastogenesis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:1021–32.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Richards S,
    2. Aziz N,
    3. Bale S,
    4. Bick D,
    5. Das S,
    6. Gastier-Foster J et al
    . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Roy NBA,
    2. Zaal AI,
    3. Hall G,
    4. Wilkinson N,
    5. Proven M,
    6. McGowan S, et al
    . Majeed syndrome: description of a novel mutation and therapeutic response to bisphosphonates and IL-1 blockade with anakinra. Rheumatology 2020;59:448–51.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Al-Mayouf S,
    2. Almutairi A,
    3. Albrawi S,
    4. Fathalla B,
    5. Alzyoud R,
    6. AlEnazi A, et al; ediatric Arab Rheumatology Group (PRAG)
    . Pattern and diagnostic evaluation of systemic autoinflammatory diseases other than familial Mediterranean fever among Arab children: a multicenter study from the Pediatric Rheumatology Arab Group (PRAG). Rheumatol Int 2019;40:49–56.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Hu XY,
    3. Zhao ZP,
    4. Guo RL,
    5. Guo J,
    6. Li W, et al
    . Compound heterozygous LPIN2 pathogenic variants in a patient with Majeed syndrome with recurrent fever and severe neutropenia: case report. BMC Med Genet 2019;20:182.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Herlin T,
    2. Fiirgaard B,
    3. Bjerre M,
    4. Kerndrup G,
    5. Hasle H,
    6. Bing X, et al
    . Efficacy of anti-IL-1 treatment in Majeed syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:410–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ferguson PJ,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Tayeh MK,
    4. Ochoa L,
    5. Leal SM,
    6. Pelet A, et al
    . Homozygous mutations in LPIN2 are responsible for the syndrome of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia (Majeed syndrome). J Med Genet 2005;42:551–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Majeed HA,
    2. El-Shanti H,
    3. Al-Rimawi H,
    4. Al-Masri N
    . On mice and men: an autosomal recessive syndrome of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and congenital dyserythropoietic anemia. J Pediatr 2000;137:441–2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Majeed HA,
    2. Al-Tarawna M,
    3. El-Shanti H,
    4. Kamel B,
    5. Al-Khalaileh F
    . The syndrome of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia. Report of a new family and a review. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:705–10.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Al-Mosawi ZS,
    2. Al-Saad KK,
    3. Ijadi-Maghsoodi R,
    4. El-Shanti HI,
    5. Ferguson PJ
    . A splice site mutation confirms the role of LPIN2 in Majeed syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:960–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rao AP,
    2. Gopalakrishna DB,
    3. Bing X,
    4. Ferguson PJ
    . Phenotypic variability in majeed syndrome. J Rheumatol 2016;43:1258–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Pinto-Fernández C,
    2. Seoane-Reula ME
    . Efficacy of treatment with IL-1RA in Majeed syndrome. Allergol Immunopathol 2017; 45:99–101.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Moussa T,
    2. Bhat V,
    3. Kini V,
    4. Fathalla BM
    . Clinical and genetic association, radiological findings and response to biological therapy in seven children from Qatar with non-bacterial osteomyelitis. Int J Rheum Dis 2017;20:1286–96.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Al Mosawi Z,
    2. Madan W,
    3. Al Moosawi B,
    4. Al-Wadaei S,
    5. Naser H,
    6. Ali F
    . Dramatic response of familial majeed syndrome to interleukin-1 antagonist therapy: case report. Arch Rheumatol 2019;34:352–6.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Karacan İ,
    2. Balamir A,
    3. Uğurlu S,
    4. Aydın AK,
    5. Everest E,
    6. Zor S, et al
    . Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study. Rheumatol Int 2019;39:911–9.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dwyer J,
    2. Donkor P,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Csaki L,
    5. Vergnes J,
    6. Lee JM, et al
    . Mouse lipin-1 and lipin-2 cooperate to maintain glycerolipid homeostasis in liver and aging cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:E2486–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Watahiki A,
    2. Shimizu K,
    3. Hoshikawa S,
    4. Chiba M,
    5. Kitamura H,
    6. Egusa H, et al
    . Lipin-2 degradation elicits a proinflammatory gene signature in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020;524:477–83.
    OpenUrl

ONLINE SUPPLEMENT

Supplementary material accompanies the online version of this article.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 48, Issue 12
1 Dec 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Majeed Syndrome: Five Cases With Novel Mutations From Unrelated Families in India With a Review of Literature
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Majeed Syndrome: Five Cases With Novel Mutations From Unrelated Families in India With a Review of Literature
Pallavi Pimpale Chavan, Ivona Aksentijevich, Aditya Daftary, Hiren Panwala, Chetna Khemani, Archana Khan, Raju Khubchandani
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2021, 48 (12) 1850-1855; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201663

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Majeed Syndrome: Five Cases With Novel Mutations From Unrelated Families in India With a Review of Literature
Pallavi Pimpale Chavan, Ivona Aksentijevich, Aditya Daftary, Hiren Panwala, Chetna Khemani, Archana Khan, Raju Khubchandani
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2021, 48 (12) 1850-1855; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201663
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

CRMO
dyserythropoietic anemia
LPIN2 mutation
Majeed syndrome
neutrophilic dermatosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Changes in Transition Readiness in Youth With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Longitudinal Study
  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Rituximab to Predict Early B-Cell Repopulation in Children With Inflammatory Diseases
  • The Ecological Relationship Between Food Access and Disease Activity in Canadian Children Newly Diagnosed With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Show more Pediatric Rheumatology

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CRMO
  • dyserythropoietic anemia
  • LPIN2 mutation
  • Majeed syndrome
  • neutrophilic dermatosis

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire