Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleVasculitis

Localized Myofascial Inflammation Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Recent-onset Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Effect of Tocilizumab Therapy

Jean-Patrick Laporte, Florent Garrigues, Anaïs Huwart, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Thierry Marhadour, Dewi Guellec, Divi Cornec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec and Alain Saraux
The Journal of Rheumatology December 2019, 46 (12) 1619-1626; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180958
Jean-Patrick Laporte
From the Radiology department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Brest; Rheumatology department, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Auto-Immunes Rares (CERAINO), CHU Brest; INSERM UMR 1227, Laboratoire d’Immunothérapie et Pathologies lymphocytaires B, Labex Immunotherapy, Graft, Oncology, Université de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florent Garrigues
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anaïs Huwart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandrine Jousse-Joulin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thierry Marhadour
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dewi Guellec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Divi Cornec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Saraux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alain.saraux{at}chu-brest.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To assess the prevalence of myofascial inflammatory lesions visible by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their changes after tocilizumab (TCZ) therapy in active polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

Methods. We conducted a posthoc analysis of data from the TENOR study of TCZ monotherapy in PMR. The 18 patients each received TCZ injections at weeks 0, 4, and 8. The shoulder and pelvic girdles were assessed at baseline then at weeks 2 and 12 using T1- and T2- short-tau inversion recovery–weighted MRI. Radiologists blinded to patient data assessed each muscle group for localized myofascial inflammation on baseline, Week 2, and Week 12 MRI. Reproducibility was estimated by having 2 radiologists assess the Week 2 MRI of 13 patients, then computing the κ coefficient.

Results. For myofascial lesion detection, intraobserver reproducibility was almost perfect (κ = 0.890) and interobserver reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.758). At baseline, all patients had at least 1 inflammatory myofascial lesion; sites involved were the shoulder in 10 (71.4%) patients, hip in 13 (86.7%), ischial tuberosity in 9 (60.0%), and pubic symphysis in 12 (80.0%). Sites involved at Week 12 were the shoulder in 8 patients (53.3%), hip in 5 (33.3%), ischial tuberosity in 1, and pubic symphysis in 3 (20.0%). At Week 12, of 103 muscle groups studied in all, 43 (41.7%) had no inflammatory lesions, compared to 33 at baseline (p = 0.002); improvements were noted in 66 (64.1%) muscle groups, worsening in 2 (1.9%), no change in 35 (34.0%; p = 0.034).

Conclusion. Localized myofascial inflammatory lesions are common in recent-onset PMR and improve during TCZ therapy. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01713842).

Key Indexing Terms:
  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA
  • MYOSITIS
  • FASCIITIS

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory disease of unknown origin whose onset usually occurs after 50 years of age1 and whose main symptoms are inflammatory pain in the shoulder and pelvic girdles with prolonged morning stiffness. When combined with laboratory evidence of systemic inflammation, these symptoms strongly suggest PMR in patients without other causes of inflammation. A rapid response to systemic glucocorticoid therapy, which is the current treatment of reference, confirms the diagnosis2,3.

Longterm glucocorticoid therapy induces adverse events4. Other treatment options are therefore needed, particularly for patients who have risk factors for intolerance to systemic glucocorticoids (osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension) or become steroid-dependent. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the proinflammatory mediator interleukin 6. In the TENOR study, first-line TCZ monotherapy was effective in patients with recent-onset PMR5. Thus, TCZ may hold promise as an alternative to glucocorticoid therapy in selected patients with PMR6,7,8. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for detecting inflammatory lesions9. Thus, most patients in the TENOR study had MRI signs of synovitis (effusion in glenohumeral and coxofemoral synovitis) or bursitis (subacromial bursitis at shoulders, trochanteric and iliopsoas bursitis at hips) at baseline (the proportions of shoulders and hips with bursitis were 93 and 100% and the corresponding proportions for intraarticular effusions/synovitis were 100 and 100%), which improved with TCZ therapy10.

The MRI performed for the TENOR study showed evidence of localized myositis and fasciitis at the shoulder and pelvic girdles. In everyday practice, myofascial lesions are not usually evaluated on MRI obtained for patients with PMR.

The primary objective of our study was to assess the prevalence and changes under TCZ therapy of myofascial lesions visualized by MRI at the shoulder and pelvic girdles in patients with active recent-onset PMR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

The population of the TENOR study is described elsewhere5. Briefly, patients were enrolled prospectively at the university hospital in Brest, France. Inclusion criteria were PMR meeting Chuang’s criteria11, onset within the past 12 months, active disease defined as PMR Disease Activity Score (PMR-AS) > 1012, no history of glucocorticoid therapy longer than 1 month and stopped at least 7 days before inclusion, age 50–80 years, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/l and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) > 40 mm/h, and no evidence of other inflammatory rheumatic or connective tissue disease. PMR-AS was computed as the sum of morning stiffness in minutes, elevation of the upper limbs rated 0–3, physician’s global assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), pain intensity determined by the patient on a 10-point VAS, and CRP level in mg/dl. Any nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy had to be stopped at least 2 days before inclusion. Exclusion criteria were clinical symptoms suggesting giant cell arteritis, immunosuppressive therapy, uncontrolled dyslipidemia or cardiovascular disease, chronic infection, evidence of hydroxyapatite crystal disease, chondrocalcinosis or severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or shoulder, symmetrical peripheral arthritis, active thyroid disease, and drug-related myalgia. Each patient received a TCZ injection at weeks 0, 4, and 8, without glucocorticoid therapy.

The study received ethics committee approval and all patients provided written informed consent before study inclusion. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01713842).

MRI protocol details

A 3T Philips Achieva was used, with a 32-channel surface antenna, to image the shoulder and pelvic girdles at weeks 0, 2, and 12. Three sequences were used: axial T1 turbo spin echo (TSE), axial T2 short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), and coronal T2 STIR. Axial TSE variables were as follows: repetition time (TR), 659 ms; echo time (TE), 20 ms; slice thickness, 4 mm; matrices, 828 × 420 for the shoulders and 720 × 404 for the pelvis; and fields of view (FOV), 53 × 32 cm for the shoulders and 46 × 31 cm for the pelvis. For the axial T2 STIR sequence, TR was 2721 ms, TE 75 ms, slice thickness 4 mm, matrices 524 × 210 (shoulders) and 468 × 264 (pelvis); and FOV 47 × 28 cm (shoulders) and 46 × 35 (pelvis). Finally, for the coronal T2 STIR sequence, TR was 4828 ms, TE 65 ms, slice thickness 5 mm (shoulders) and 4 mm (pelvis), matrices 328 × 382 (shoulders) and 356 × 420 (pelvis), and FOV 32 × 48 cm (shoulders) and 35 × 52 cm (pelvis).

Data collected

Myofascial lesions were defined as a high T2 STIR signal that was either diffuse within the muscle or formed a line surrounding the muscle. Enthesitis, tendinitis, and bursitis were not evaluated in the current study. At the shoulder girdles, myofascial lesions were sought at the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor muscles. At the pelvic girdles, the sites assessed for myofascial lesions were the gluteal, iliopsoas and pelvitrochanteric muscles at each hip; the semitendinosus, semimembranosus, and long head of the biceps femoris at each ischial tuberosity; and the adductors at the pubic symphysis. Thus, 7 muscle groups were studied in each patient. A muscle group was considered positive if at least 1 muscle in the group showed a lesion.

Reading

The MRI were read by 2 radiologists, one senior (FG) and the other junior (JPL), who were blinded to all patient data and worked independently from one another. To allow an estimation of intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of myofascial lesion detection, each radiologist assessed the Week 2 MRI on 2 separate occasions. To allow a similar assessment for the change in MRI findings over time, the Week 0 and Week 12 MRI were read once by both radiologists, who recorded the findings as no change, worsening, or improvement.

For the description of myofascial lesions, when the 2 radiologists disagreed, they worked together to reach a consensus.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were described as n (%). Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was estimated by computing Cohen’s κ coefficients, which were interpreted as follows: slight, 0–0.20; fair, 0.21–0.40; moderate, 0.41–0.60; substantial, 0.61–0.80; and almost perfect, 0.81–1. To compare values between 2 timepoints, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data and the chi-square test or McNemar test for categorical variables. All statistical tests were performed with SPSS 24.0, version 2016 (SPSS Inc.).

RESULTS

Patients

We included 18 patients, 11 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 71 years (SD 58–83 yrs) and a mean body mass index of 28 ± 1 (kg/m2). All patients met both Chuang’s criteria and those of American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR)13.

At baseline, 16 patients (89%) had shoulder girdle pain and 16 (89%) had pelvic girdle pain; at 12 weeks, these numbers had dropped to 5 (28%) and 3 (17%), respectively. Mean VAS pain score was 6 ± 0.5 at baseline and 2.2 ± 0.4 at 12 weeks. Mean serum CRP was 82 ± 16 mg/l at baseline and 3 ± 12 mg/l at 12 weeks. Mean PMR-AS was 38 ± 2 at baseline and 7 ± 1 at 12 weeks. Table 1 shows the evolution (median and interquartile range) during treatment by TCZ.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinical evolution during the tocilizumab period.

Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI assessments of localized myofascial lesions

MRI was performed at Week 2 in 13 of the 18 patients. Thus, in all, 91 (or 13 × 7) muscle groups were assessed for the presence of localized myofascial inflammatory lesions. Intraobserver reliability (κ = 0.890, 95% CI 0.842–0.938; and 0.846, 95% CI 0.79–0.902 for the senior and junior rheumatologist, respectively) was almost perfect and interobserver reliability was substantial (κ = 0.758, 95% CI 0.69–0.826).

MRI at weeks 0 and 12 were available for 15 patients (Table 2, Figure 1, and Figure 2); however, in 1 of those patients, severe shoulder pain precluded MRI of the shoulder girdle at Week 0. Thus, 103 muscle groups were studied in all. Interobserver reproducibility of the change between weeks 0 and 12 was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.601, 95% CI 0.522–0.680).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Coronal magnetic resonance imaging views showing the change in myofascial lesions from baseline (A, arrows) to 12 weeks after tocilizumab initiation (B).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Axial magnetic resonance imaging views showing the change in myofascial lesions from baseline (A, arrows) to 12 weeks after tocilizumab initiation (B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Muscle groups showing myofascial lesions by magnetic resonance imaging at baseline (Week 0) and 12 weeks after tocilizumab therapy initiation.

Localized myofascial lesions seen by MRI

At baseline (Table 2, Figure 3), all patients had at least 1 localized inflammatory myofascial lesion. These lesions were seen at the shoulder in 10 (71.4%) patients, hip in 13 (86.7%), ischial tuberosity in 9 (60.0%), and pubic symphysis in 12 (80.0%). The total number of muscle groups with myofascial lesions at baseline was 70 of 103. Involvement was bilateral at the shoulders in 7 (50.0%) patients, hips in 13 (86.7%), and ischial tuberosities in 6 (40.0%). There was at least 1 shoulder girdle lesion in 10 (71.4%) patients and at least 1 pelvic girdle lesion in 13 (86.7%) patients.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the gluteal muscles showing muscle inflammation (top, arrows) and fascial inflammation (bottom, arrows).

At 12 weeks (Table 2), 8 (53.3%) patients had shoulder lesions, 5 (33.3%) had hip lesions, and 3 (20.0%) had pubic symphysis lesions; none had ischial tuberosity lesions. There was at least 1 shoulder girdle lesion in 8 (53.3%) patients and at least 1 pelvic girdle lesion in 7 (46.7%) patients.

Changes with TCZ therapy

Of the 103 muscle groups studied in all, 70 had localized inflammatory myofascial lesions at baseline and 60 at 12 weeks (p = 0.002; Table 2). Over the 12-week period, the lesions improved in 66 (64.1%) muscle groups, worsened in 2 (1.9%), and remained unchanged in 35 (34.0%; p = 0.034; Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Changes in myofascial lesions visible by magnetic resonance imaging from baseline (Week 0) to 12 weeks after tocilizumab therapy initiation.

DISCUSSION

Localized myofascial lesions visible by MRI were common in patients with recent-onset PMR and improved during TCZ therapy. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility were good for detecting myofascial lesion and assessing their course over time.

In previous studies, MRI of the shoulder and pelvic girdles in patients with recent-onset PMR were reported to show periarticular inflammation described as extracapsular soft tissue edema14 or periarticular soft tissue edema15. Another study found that many patients had extracapsular inflammatory lesions around the shoulders and knees16. None of the study reports describe localized myofascial lesions. In our study, all patients had 1 or more localized inflammatory myofascial lesions at the shoulder and/or pelvic girdles at baseline. The lesions were usually bilateral. Nevertheless, myofascial inflammation appeared less frequently than bursitis and synovitis of the shoulder and pelvic girdles, which remain the hallmark of PMR. Thus, at baseline in the TENOR study, 93% and 100% of the patients had bursitis by MRI at the shoulders and hips, respectively, and 100% had synovitis at both sites10. In a study of ultrasound (US) and MRI abnormalities in recent-onset PMR meeting Healey’s criteria16, all patients had subacromial bursitis (bilateral in 96%)17 and trochanteric bursitis (bilateral in 90%)18.

The diagnosis of PMR is based on suggestive clinical findings and laboratory tests combined with the absence of other plausible diagnoses19,20. Criteria for PMR have been developed by Chuang, et al11, Healey16, and more recently by the ACR/EULAR, which developed a criteria set that includes US findings20. All these criteria sets have high sensitivity but limited specificity for PMR21. Conceivably, adding other investigations such as MRI might improve specificity. The main differential diagnosis is rheumatoid arthritis (RA), most notably in the variant presenting as a PMR-like disease in patients older than 60 years22. Other differential diagnoses include spondyloarthritis (SpA), crystal deposition disease, other inflammatory joint diseases, inflammatory myopathies, OA, endocrine disorders, and cancer22. In a prospective study of diagnoses in patients presenting with girdle pain and ESR elevation, no early clinical or laboratory features reliably distinguished between RA and PMR23.

Few studies have compared imaging findings between PMR and other diagnoses. Two studies by the same group compared US and MRI for detecting bursitis in cases with PMR and controls with girdle pain due to other diagnoses (RA, psoriatic arthritis, knee or hip OA, fibromyalgia, or connective tissue disease) and onset after 50 years of age18,19. In the groups with PMR, subacromial/subdeltoid and trochanteric bursitis was significantly more common and more often bilateral than in the control groups. There was no difference for glenohumeral or hip synovitis, tenosynovitis of the long head of the biceps, iliopsoas bursitis, or ischio-gluteal bursitis. A study with US found that subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis and tenosynovitis of the long head of the biceps were significantly more common in patients with PMR than those with RA presenting with bilateral shoulder pain, whereas glenohumeral synovitis was more common in the RA group24. With MRI, no difference between PMR and RA was found for synovitis, bursitis, or tenosynovitis; and extracapsular edema adjacent to the capsule or in the soft tissues in the PMR group was the only significant difference14. Thus, intracapsular inflammation may be comparable in the 2 diseases and extracapsular inflammation more common in PMR. A 2015 systematic review showed that the performance of imaging studies for diagnosing PMR cannot be quantified accurately based on the data available so far but suggested a supportive role for imaging when the diagnosis is in doubt25.

MRI muscle abnormalities have not been reported in recent-onset RA26 or SpA27. Their presence may therefore support a diagnosis of PMR. If such is the case, then adding MRI findings to diagnostic criteria sets might improve specificity. It would therefore be of interest to compare the frequency of localized inflammatory myofascial lesions in patients with PMR and in those with other diagnoses such as RA and SpA.

After 12 weeks of TCZ monotherapy, the MRI localized myofascial lesions were usually improved. Thus, 66 (64.1%) muscle groups showed less inflammation, including 43 (41.7%) with no inflammation at all. These findings are consistent with the improvements in clinical and laboratory features seen in the TENOR study: 85% of patients achieved very low disease activity (PMR-AS < 7) by Week 12, and CRP levels returned to normal5. It is also consistent with the significant decrease in maximal standardized uptake shown by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography28. The 64.1% proportion of improved muscle groups was higher than the corresponding 32% and 52% proportions of improved synovitis and bursitis, respectively, and worsening was noted for only 2% of the muscle groups compared to 10% and 5% for synovitis and bursitis, respectively10. Thus, the muscle may be the site that responds best to the therapeutic effect of TCZ. Improvements were most common (80%) at the hip and pubic symphysis muscle groups. Nevertheless, the MRI myofascial lesions remained unchanged in 34.0% of muscle groups, despite a clinical improvement. The proportion of sites with no change was 57% for synovitis and 43% for bursitis10. Thus, the MRI abnormalities seem to change more slowly than do the clinical manifestations, possibly because of the high sensitivity of MRI for inflammation. The proportion of improved sites would perhaps be higher if MRI were performed after a longer followup.

Interestingly, a recent publication by Fruth, et al29 evaluating 40 contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI of patients with PMR on a predefined scoring system also found an enhancement of the proximal rectus femoris origin in 100% and of the adductor muscles at the inferior medial pubic bone in 90% of cases.

The main limitations of our study are the small sample size and absence of controls. Given the absence of a placebo arm, whether the changes observed were induced by TCZ therapy or occurred spontaneously cannot be determined.

In addition to synovitis and bursitis, PMR causes localized myofascial inflammation of the shoulder and pelvic girdles. TCZ therapy improves the myofascial lesions, in addition to the clinical and laboratory features.

Acknowledgment

We thank the rheumatologists and general practitioners who referred their patients to the TENOR study. We are grateful to Marie Jezequel and Nathalie Bihannic (Clinical Investigations Center) for centralizing the material and to Audrey Le Goff-Coquet and Valentine Guiton (Clinical Research and Innovation Agency) for coordinating the TENOR study. We also thank the staff for their time and commitment to this work.

Footnotes

  • The TENOR study received an unconditional grant and the tocilizumab used for the study was donated by Roche-Chugai, which manufactures tocilizumab. Roche-Chugai had no role in the design or conduct of the TENOR study or the current study; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; or preparation, revision, or approval of the manuscript.

  • Accepted for publication February 20, 2019.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kermani TA,
    2. Warrington KJ
    . Polymyalgia rheumatica. Lancet 2013;381:63–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Salvarani C,
    2. Cantini F,
    3. Olivieri I,
    4. Barozzi L,
    5. Macchioni L,
    6. Boiardi L,
    7. et al.
    Corticosteroid injections in polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1470–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hernández-Rodríguez J,
    2. Cid MC,
    3. López-Soto A,
    4. Espigol-Frigolé G,
    5. Bosch X
    . Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1839–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Dasgupta B
    . Corticosteroids in polymyalgia rheumatica—a review of different treatment schedules. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:S56–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Devauchelle-Pensec V,
    2. Berthelot JM,
    3. Cornec D,
    4. Renaudineau Y,
    5. Marhadour T,
    6. Jousse-Joulin S,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy of first-line tocilizumab therapy in early polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1506–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Macchioni P,
    2. Boiardi L,
    3. Catanoso M,
    4. Pulsatelli L,
    5. Pipitone N,
    6. Meliconi R,
    7. et al.
    Tocilizumab for polymyalgia rheumatica: report of two cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013;43:113–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Izumi K,
    2. Kuda H,
    3. Ushikubo M,
    4. Kuwana M,
    5. Takeuchi T,
    6. Oshima H
    . Tocilizumab is effective against polymyalgia rheumatica: experience in 13 intractable cases. RMD Open 2015;1:e0001628.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Devauchelle-Pensec V
    . Has the time come for biotherapies in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica? Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum 2016;83:471–2.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pavlica P,
    2. Barozzi L,
    3. Salvarani C,
    4. Cantini F,
    5. Olivieri I
    . Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of PMR. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:S38–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Huwart A,
    2. Garrigues F,
    3. Jousse-Joulin S,
    4. Marhadour T,
    5. Guellec D,
    6. Cornec D,
    7. et al.
    Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica treated by tocilizumab. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:11.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chuang TY,
    2. Hunder GG,
    3. Ilstrup DM,
    4. Kurland LT
    . Polymyalgia rheumatica: a 10-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:672–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Leeb BF,
    2. Bird HA
    . A disease activity score for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1279–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. McGonagle D,
    2. Pease C,
    3. Marzo-Ortega H,
    4. O’Connor P,
    5. Gibbon W,
    6. Emery P
    . Comparison of extracapsular changes by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1837–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ochi J,
    2. Nozaki T,
    3. Okada M,
    4. Suyama Y,
    5. Kishimoto M,
    6. Akaike G,
    7. et al.
    MRI findings of the shoulder and hip joint in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Mod Rheumatol 2015;25:761–7.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mori S,
    2. Koga Y,
    3. Ito K
    . Clinical characteristics of polymyalgia rheumatica in Japanese patients: evidence of synovitis and extracapsular inflammatory changes by fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging. Mod Rheumatol 2007;17:369–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Healey LA
    . Long-term follow-up of polymyalgia rheumatica: evidence for synovitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1984;13:322–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cantini F,
    2. Salvarani C,
    3. Olivieri I,
    4. Niccoli L,
    5. Padula A,
    6. Macchioni L,
    7. et al.
    Shoulder ultrasonography in the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: a case-control study. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1049–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cantini F,
    2. Niccoli L,
    3. Nannini C,
    4. Padula A,
    5. Olivieri I,
    6. Boiardi L,
    7. et al.
    Inflammatory changes of hip synovial structures in polymyalgia rheumatica. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:462–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Seitz M
    . [Polymyalgia rheumatica: What is the current status?]. [Review in German] Z Rheumatol 2015;74:507–10.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dasgupta B,
    2. Cimmino MA,
    3. Kremers HM,
    4. Schmidt WA,
    5. Schirmer M,
    6. Salvarani C,
    7. et al.
    2012 provisional classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:943–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ozen G,
    2. Inanc N,
    3. Unal AU,
    4. Bas S,
    5. Kimyon G,
    6. Kisacik B,
    7. et al.
    Assessment of the new 2012 EULAR/ACR Clinical Classification Criteria for Polymyalgia Rheumatica: a prospective multicenter study. J Rheumatol 2016;43:893–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Matteson EL,
    2. Dejaco C
    . Polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:ITC65.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Caporali R,
    2. Montecucco C,
    3. Epis O,
    4. Bobbio-Pallavicini F,
    5. Maio T,
    6. Cimmino MA
    . Presenting features of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis with PMR-like onset: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:1021–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ruta S,
    2. Rosa J,
    3. Navarta DA,
    4. Saucedo C,
    5. Catoggio LJ,
    6. Monaco RG,
    7. et al.
    Ultrasound assessment of new onset bilateral painful shoulder in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:1383–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mackie SL,
    2. Koduri G,
    3. Hill CL,
    4. Wakefield RJ,
    5. Hutchings A,
    6. Loy C,
    7. et al.
    Accuracy of musculoskeletal imaging for the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: systematic review. RMD Open 2015;1:e000100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Østergaard M,
    2. Peterfy CG,
    3. Bird P,
    4. Gandjbakhch F,
    5. Glinatsi D,
    6. Eshed I,
    7. et al.
    The OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scoring System: updated recommendations by the OMERACT MRI in Arthritis Working Group. J Rheumatol 2017;44:1706–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Leone A,
    2. Cassar-Pullicino VN,
    3. D’Aprile P,
    4. Nasuto M,
    5. Guglielmi G
    . Computed tomography and MR imaging in spondyloarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2017;55:1009–21.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Palard-Novello X,
    2. Querellou S,
    3. Gouillou M,
    4. Saraux A,
    5. Marhadour T,
    6. Garrigues F,
    7. et al.
    Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for therapeutic assessment of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica receiving tocilizumab as first-line treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:773–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fruth M,
    2. Buehring B,
    3. Baraliakos X,
    4. Braun J
    . Use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis to describe changes at different anatomic sites which are potentially specific for polymyalgia rheumatica. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018;36 Suppl 114:86–95.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 46, Issue 12
1 Dec 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Localized Myofascial Inflammation Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Recent-onset Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Effect of Tocilizumab Therapy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Localized Myofascial Inflammation Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Recent-onset Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Effect of Tocilizumab Therapy
Jean-Patrick Laporte, Florent Garrigues, Anaïs Huwart, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Thierry Marhadour, Dewi Guellec, Divi Cornec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Alain Saraux
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2019, 46 (12) 1619-1626; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180958

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Localized Myofascial Inflammation Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Recent-onset Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Effect of Tocilizumab Therapy
Jean-Patrick Laporte, Florent Garrigues, Anaïs Huwart, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Thierry Marhadour, Dewi Guellec, Divi Cornec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Alain Saraux
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2019, 46 (12) 1619-1626; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180958
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA
MYOSITIS
FASCIITIS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors for Refractory Leg Ulcers in Cutaneous Polyarteritis Nodosa: A Case Series
  • Frailty and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Vasculitis
  • More Than Pain and Stiffness: Persistent Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance in Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Show more Vasculitis

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA
  • myositis
  • FASCIITIS

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire