Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

Preconceptional Cardiovascular Health and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Amanda M. Eudy, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Stephanie M. Engel, Nora Franceschini, Annie Green Howard, Megan E.B. Clowse and Michelle Petri
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2019, 46 (1) 70-77; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.171066
Amanda M. Eudy
From the Department of Epidemiology, and the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amanda.eudy{at}duke.edu
Anna Maria Siega-Riz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie M. Engel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nora Franceschini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annie Green Howard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan E.B. Clowse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Petri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the effects of preconceptional cardiovascular (CV) health, measured by American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, on pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods. The study included patients in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort. Body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, and blood pressure (BP) in the most recent clinic visit prior to conception or first trimester were used to determine CV health (ideal, intermediate, or poor health) based on AHA definitions. Outcomes included preterm birth, gestational age at birth, and small for gestational age (SGA). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations estimated the association of each CV health factor and outcome.

Results. The analysis included 309 live births. There were 95 preterm births (31%), and of the 293 pregnancies with birth weights, 18% were SGA. Ideal BMI, total cholesterol, and BP were reported in 56%, 85%, and 51% of pregnancies, respectively. Intermediate BMI was associated with decreased odds of SGA (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.63), adjusted for race and prednisone use. Intermediate/poor total cholesterol was associated with increased odds of preterm birth (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06–4.62). Intermediate/poor BP was associated with decreased gestational age at birth (β −0.96, 95% CI −1.62 to −0.29).

Conclusion. Poor/intermediate preconception CV health affects pregnancy outcomes of preterm birth and SGA infants among women with SLE. Efforts to maintain BMI, total cholesterol, and BP within the recommended ideal range prior to pregnancy is important to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • BIRTH WEIGHT
  • CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
  • PREGNANCY
  • PREMATURE BIRTH
  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that largely affects women, with disease onset typically occurring between ages 15 and 441. Although pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE have improved, the prevalence of preterm birth and infants born small for gestational age (SGA) remains 2 to 6 times greater in women with SLE compared to the general population2,3,4. Well-established risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in the general population, such as body mass index (BMI), cholesterol, physical activity, and diet, have not been investigated in SLE.

The American Heart Association (AHA)’s 2020 Impact Goals included the development of the concept of “ideal cardiovascular health,” which focuses on primary prevention and is composed of seven modifiable cardiovascular (CV) metrics: health factors [glucose, total cholesterol, and blood pressure (BP)] and health behaviors (BMI, physical activity, diet, and cigarette smoking)5. Meeting these metrics for ideal CV health is associated with lower CV disease risk, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality among adults in the United States6,7.

Longitudinal cohort studies report that hypertension (HTN), dyslipidemia, and obesity are common comorbidities in SLE, affecting 30–60% of patients8,9,10. Maternal CV health at conception and during early pregnancy has implications for the in utero environment. Obesity at conception can lead to alterations in metabolic adjustments during gestation, affecting placental, embryonic, and fetal growth. Increased body fat is associated with increased levels of proinflammatory proteins, and obese women are more likely to enter pregnancy in a state of subclinical inflammation11,12,13. In the general population, maternal obesity increases the risk of preeclampsia and delivering a large for gestational age (LGA) infant14,15,16,17,18.

Studies have shown that HTN is a risk factor for preterm birth in the general population19,20,21. Additionally, compared to woman without HTN, women with chronic hypertension have 5.5 times the risk of delivering a preterm, SGA infant and 1.5–1.7 times the risk of delivering a term, SGA infant19,20,22. Previous research, although limited, has demonstrated that increased total cholesterol during the first trimester is associated with preterm birth in the general population, with possible modification by maternal inflammation21,23,24.

It has been theorized that maternal risk factors for CV disease may also be risk factors for fetal growth restriction and fetal programming25. Because SLE is a chronic inflammatory disease, it is important to understand the way these CV health factors affect preterm birth and fetal growth during SLE pregnancies, because they could be targeted for improved pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this analysis is to determine the proportion of pregnant women with SLE meeting the AHA’s guidelines for ideal CV health and to estimate the effects of poor and intermediate CV health on pregnancy outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort has prospectively followed pregnant patients with SLE since 1987, with data available through February 2015. All patients met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE26,27,28 and were enrolled following informed consent. This study is approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board (Study #13-3942). Pregnant patients were seen every 4–6 weeks by a single rheumatologist. Weight, BP, SLE disease activity [physician’s global assessment of disease activity (PGA) and Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index29,30], and laboratory tests were measured at each visit. Laboratory tests included complete blood count, complement levels (C3/C4), autoantibodies, total cholesterol, and urinalysis. Pregnancy outcome data were collected from patients at the first postpartum visit or through telephone or e-mail.

Preconceptional CV health

Given the lack in information on smoking, physical activity, diet, and fasting glucose, preconceptional CV health was defined according to 3 available AHA metrics: BMI, total cholesterol, and BP. The following criteria were used: BMI [poor health (obese): ≥ 30 kg/m2; intermediate health (overweight): 25–29.9 kg/m2; ideal health (low/normal BMI): < 25 kg/m2], total cholesterol (poor health: ≥ 240 mg/dl; intermediate health: 200–239 mg/dl or treated to goal; ideal health: < 200 mg/dl), and BP (poor health: systolic ≥ 140 or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg; intermediate health: systolic 120–139 or diastolic 80–89 mmHg or treated to goal; ideal health: < 120/< 80 mmHg). Each metric was coded as a categorical variable, with “ideal health” as the referent group. Because of the small sample size, poor health and intermediate health were collapsed into 1 exposure category for total cholesterol and BP. Each metric was also analyzed as a continuous variable.

BMI, total cholesterol, and BP at the most recent clinic visit in the 1 year prior to conception were used to classify CV health. If a clinic visit prior to conception was unavailable, the first measurement taken during the first trimester served as a surrogate for preconception health, because minimal changes during the first trimester have been demonstrated31,32.

Pregnancy outcomes

Pregnancy outcomes of interest included gestational age at birth and birth weight for gestational age Z score. Gestational age at birth was based on the last menstrual period and categorized as preterm (< 37 weeks) and term (≥ 37 weeks), and analyzed as a continuous variable. Birth weight for gestational age Z score was based on US population reference percentiles of birth weight, stratified by infant sex33. Birth weight for gestational age Z score was analyzed as a continuous variable, as well as < 10th percentile (SGA) and > 90th percentile (LGA).

Covariates

Covariates of interest included race, education, age at conception, duration of SLE, and infant birth date (prior to January 1999 and January 1999–February 2015). Medication use [low-dose aspirin, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), immunosuppressants, prednisone, and prednisone ≥ 7.5 mg/day] was defined as use ever during pregnancy. Clinical characteristics during pregnancy were defined as ever occurring during pregnancy: renal involvement (renal Lupus Activity Index > 1), elevated serum creatinine (> 1 mg/dl), high PGA (PGA ≥ 2), low C3/C4, and anti-dsDNA (ever positive). Organ system damage at conception was measured by the SLICC/ACR Damage Index, with a score of ≥ 1 representing the presence of any damage.

Analysis

Differences in the prevalence of preterm birth, SGA, and LGA among live births by preconceptional CV health were analyzed descriptively by Fisher’s exact test. Unadjusted differences in mean gestational age and mean birth weight for gestational age Z score by preconceptional CV health were analyzed by ANOVA. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated OR and 95% CI for the association of each maternal CV health factor and categorical pregnancy outcome of interest. Multivariable linear regression models estimated associations of each maternal CV health factor with continuous outcome measures. To account for correlation between multiple births in the same patient, generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable correlation structure were used34. Confounders were assessed based on combined directed acyclic graph minimally sufficient set that was reduced based on a 10% change in β estimates for parsimony. Models with BMI as the exposure were adjusted for prednisone use during pregnancy and patient race, and BP models were adjusted for renal involvement during pregnancy and patient race. For the exposure of total cholesterol, 3 adjusted models were estimated: (1) adjusted for patient race and prednisone use during pregnancy; (2) adjusted for patient race and HCQ use during pregnancy; and (3) adjusted for patient race, prednisone use during pregnancy, and HCQ use during pregnancy. All analyses were conducted with SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc.).

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 515 pregnancies, of which 431 were live births. Pregnancies without any CV metrics available in the 1 year prior to conception or first trimester were excluded (n = 122). Of the 431 births, 309 (72%) had at least 1 CV measure (n = 291 BMI, n = 275 total cholesterol, n = 309 BP). Of the 309 pregnancies included, 63% had a CV health measurement in the 1 year prior to conception; the remaining had the measure during the first trimester. More than 1 singleton live birth per patient was allowed in the analysis (309 births to 261 patients).

A greater proportion of live births excluded from the analysis because of missing CV health data were to black mothers and had a pregnancy outcome date prior to 1999, compared to the selected sample. Additionally, excluded patients had shorter disease duration, lower frequency of HCQ use during pregnancy, and lower frequency of low C3/C4. There were no observed differences in live birth outcomes among included patients compared to excluded patients. Patients with a CV health measurement in the 1 year prior to conception had a longer disease duration and higher frequency of HCQ and immunosuppressant use than patients with a first trimester measurement. No differences were seen in live birth outcomes or classification of CV health among patients with preconception measures compared to patients with first trimester measures.

The majority of the 309 pregnancies included in the analysis were to white mothers, with a median age at conception of 30 years (Table 1). HCQ, prednisone, and immunosuppressant use during pregnancy were reported in 60%, 51%, and 15% of pregnancies, respectively. Immunosuppressant use was almost exclusively limited to azathioprine. There were 95 preterm births (31%), and of the 293 pregnancies with birth weights, 18% were SGA and 4% were LGA (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Population characteristics in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort. Values are n (%) or median (IQR).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Birth outcomes in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort (n = 309 pregnancies). Values are n (%) or median (IQR).

BMI, total cholesterol, and BP were reported to be within the ideal range in 56%, 85%, and 51% of pregnancies, respectively (Figure 1). Patients who had low/normal BMI had higher education, a lower prevalence of renal involvement, lower BP, and were more frequently nonblack, compared to overweight and obese women. Patients with ideal total cholesterol had higher education, higher frequency of HCQ use, and lower BMI, compared to patients with intermediate/poor total cholesterol. Patients with ideal BP had higher education, lower frequency of prednisone use, lower PGA, lower BMI, and were more frequently nonblack, compared to patients with intermediate/poor BP.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Preconceptional cardiovascular health according to American Heart Association criteria* in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort (n = 309 pregnancies). *BMI: poor health (obese) ≥ 30 kg/m2, intermediate health (overweight) 25–29.9 kg/m2, ideal health (low/normal BMI) < 25 kg/m2; total cholesterol: poor health ≥ 240 mg/dl, intermediate health 200–239 mg/dl or treated to goal, ideal health < 200 mg/dl; blood pressure: poor health (systolic ≥ 140 or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg), intermediate health (systolic 120–139 or diastolic 80–89 mmHg or treated to goal), ideal health < 120/< 80 mmHg. BMI: body mass index.

In descriptive models, there was a lower frequency of preterm birth among patients who were obese (20%) compared to patients who were overweight and had low/normal BMI (39% and 31%, respectively). Frequency of SGA was lowest in patients who were overweight (8%) compared to obese and low/normal BMI (22% and 21%, respectively). The frequency of preterm birth was highest in patients with poor total cholesterol (75%) compared to patients with intermediate and ideal total cholesterol (38% and 27%, respectively). The mean gestational age at birth was lower in patients with poor BP (35.8 weeks) compared to patients with intermediate and ideal BP (36.4 weeks and 37.4 weeks, respectively; Table 3). In a sensitivity analysis of only patients with a pre-pregnancy CV measurement (n = 195), there were no differences in the associations between CV health and pregnancy outcomes (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Mean gestational age and birth weight Z scores by preconceptional CV health*, with ANOVA tests for differences in means in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort (n = 309 pregnancies). Values are mean (SD) unless otherwise specified.

In adjusted analyses for race and prednisone use (Table 4), overweight was associated with decreased odds of SGA compared to low/normal BMI (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.63). In linear regression models, after adjusting for race and prednisone use, gestational age at birth increased with each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI (β 0.06, 95% CI 0.001–0.11), and overweight was associated with a higher birth weight-for-gestational-age Z score (β 0.32, 95% CI 0.06–0.59; Table 5). Additional adjustment for low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy in these models did not change the point estimates.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression models for association of preconceptional CV health and pregnancy outcomes in SLE in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort (n = 309 pregnancies).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Multivariable linear regression models for association of preconceptional CV health and pregnancy outcomes in SLE in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort (n = 309 pregnancies).

In logistic regression models adjusted for race and antimalarial use (Table 4), intermediate/poor total cholesterol was associated with increased odds of preterm birth (OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.96–3.79). No association was seen between cholesterol and SGA. In linear regression models (Table 5), no associations were observed between total cholesterol and gestational age at birth or birth weight for gestational age Z score. Additional adjustment for disease activity in these models did not affect the results.

The odds of preterm birth were only slightly increased and were not significant for patients with intermediate/poor BP in logistic regression models (Table 4) after adjustment for race and renal involvement (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.67–1.79), and no association was observed between BP and SGA. However, in linear regression models (Table 5), intermediate/poor BP was associated with decreased gestational age at birth (β −0.96, 95% CI −1.62 to −0.29), adjusted for race and renal involvement.

DISCUSSION

The analysis highlights the importance of patients with SLE having BMI, total cholesterol, and BP within the ideal range prior to pregnancy to improve pregnancy outcomes. In unadjusted analyses, women with ideal weight, cholesterol, or BP had fewer preterm deliveries, and the mean gestational age at birth increased when preconceptional BP was in the ideal range.

In the general population, an analysis of women of reproductive age (20–44 yrs) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey estimated the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the US 2003–2008 to be 23% and 29%, respectively35. Our cohort had a similar distribution of pre-pregnancy BMI, with 24% and 20% of women overweight and obese, respectively. Analyses of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample reported that the diagnosis of HTN prior to pregnancy is more common among women with SLE than women without SLE3. Additionally, among women who gave birth in the United States in 2002, women with SLE had almost 3 times the prevalence of hypertensive disorders than the general population, with 8% of the general population having a hypertensive disorder36. As expected, the prevalence of poor and intermediate prepregnancy BP was high in this cohort, with about half of patients having BP ≥ 120/≥ 80 mmHg or BP treated to goal.

The effects of preconceptional CV health on preterm birth seen in this analysis were consistent with studies of the general population. In the general population, there is a U-shaped association of prepregnancy BMI and preterm birth, with the frequency of preterm birth highest among underweight women and obese women16,37. It is important to note, however, that the indication for preterm birth should be considered. Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk of indicated preterm birth but decreased risk of spontaneous preterm birth in obese patients38,39,40. Although data are limited, studies have reported that 70–75% of preterm births in women with SLE are medically indicated41,42. Reasons for a medically indicated preterm delivery in SLE include maternal BP, preeclampsia, proteinuria, decreased amniotic fluid volume, intrauterine growth restriction, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count) syndrome, and SLE flare43. A limitation of the present analysis is data specifying indication for preterm births were not collected; therefore, we were unable to determine whether preconception CV health increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, indicated preterm birth, or both.

Our finding of increased risk of preterm birth in patients with intermediate and poor preconception cholesterol is supported by previous general population studies. The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study reported a U-shaped association of prepregnancy cholesterol and preterm birth, with the lowest and highest tertiles of prepregnancy cholesterol increasing the risk of preterm birth44. This association was supported by a case-control analysis in the Pregnancy Exposures and Preeclampsia Prevention (PEPP) study, which found the risk of preterm birth in patients with high cholesterol during the first 15 weeks of pregnancy to be almost 3 times the risk of patients with normal cholesterol23.

The results of our linear regression models show a decrease in gestational age at birth in patients with intermediate and poor preconception BP. This supports previous findings in both the general population and SLE cohorts that HTN is associated with gestational age at birth19,20,21,45.

Infant size did not appear to be associated with maternal cholesterol or BP, but overweight women had the fewest SGA infants. In adjusted models, overweight women had an almost 40% increased risk of preterm birth compared to low/normal BMI women; however, somewhat surprisingly, overweight women had a 74% decreased risk of an SGA infant compared to women with low/normal BMI. In linear models, overweight women had a greater birth weight for gestational age Z score compared to women with low/normal BMI in linear models. While studies show that low-dose aspirin may decrease the risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth among women with a high risk of these complications, additional adjustment for low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy did not change our results. It is possible that our small sample size did not have sufficient power to detect an effect of aspirin use with pregnancy outcomes. Of particular interest, there was no observed difference in the frequency of LGA births by preconceptional BMI, which is in contrast to pregnancies in the general population17,46,47. However, because power was limited by the low frequency of LGA births in the analysis, these results should be considered preliminary.

Our study had some limitations. CV health data were not available for all live births in the cohort, and it is unknown how the CV health of these patients differed. Data were also unavailable for the 4 remaining AHA CV metrics (glucose, physical activity, diet, and cigarette smoking); therefore, we were unable to assess the combined effects of CV risk factors. Because these are important factors for pregnancy outcomes in the general population, poor health in each of these metrics may be associated with an increased risk of preterm birth among patients with SLE. Additionally, the data were collected at a single academic center and therefore may not be representative of all patients with SLE. Finally, the sample size of the analytic cohort limited our statistical power, particularly for discrete outcomes (preterm birth, SGA, and LGA). While the cohort was larger than other SLE pregnancy cohorts, the modest sample size did not provide sufficient power to detect small differences in outcomes. Even so, the results of analyses with continuous variable mirrored that of categorical variables, giving us confidence in our results.

The findings of our analysis have important implications for patients with SLE during pregnancy. Of particular interest is the apparent inverse association of preterm birth in obese patients, but an increased risk of preterm birth in overweight patients. This suggests that efforts to normalize maternal weight prior to pregnancy may improve pregnancy outcomes, but the finding warrants further study. Additionally, having a further understanding of patients with SLE who are able to maintain ideal CV health will be important to develop future targeted interventions. Previous studies have found that among patients with SLE, pregnancy increases the risk of future major CV events and a poor pregnancy outcome increases the risk of CV mortality48. Interventions to improve the CV health of patients prior to pregnancy would improve pregnancy outcomes, as well as benefit the longterm health of patients with SLE.

To our knowledge, this analysis is the first to examine the AHA’s guidelines for CV health in patients with SLE prior to conception, as well as the first to determine the effects of suboptimal preconceptional CV health on live birth outcomes. Our results suggest that ideal CV health, in addition to well managed SLE disease activity, is an important component to a successful pregnancy outcome. This finding underscores the importance of prepregnancy counseling for women with SLE to ensure that prior to pregnancy their CV health is optimized in accordance with the AHA’s guidelines, to reduce the risk of preterm births and improve the overall CV health of patients with SLE. Interventions to improve preconceptional CV health may involve weight loss, increased exercise, and appropriate BP control. This analysis increases our perspective on risk factors for pregnancy complications in women with SLE beyond measures of SLE disease activity and management.

Footnotes

  • The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is funded by US National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases AR 43727 and 69572.

  • Accepted for publication May 29, 2018.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Danchenko N,
    2. Satia JA,
    3. Anthony MS
    . Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of worldwide disease burden. Lupus 2006;15:308–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Daly RP,
    3. Pushparajah D
    . Healthcare costs of pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus: retrospective observational analysis from a US health claims database. J Med Econ 2015;18:967–73.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Clowse ME,
    2. Jamison M,
    3. Myers E,
    4. James AH
    . A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:127.e1–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barnabe C,
    2. Faris PD,
    3. Hude Q
    . Canadian pregnancy outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheumatol 2011;2011:345727.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lloyd-Jones DM,
    2. Hong Y,
    3. Labarthe D,
    4. Mozaffarian D,
    5. Appel LJ,
    6. Van Horn L,
    7. et al;
    8. American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee
    . Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction the American Heart Association’s Strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010;121:586–613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Cogswell ME,
    3. Flanders W,
    4. Hong Y,
    5. Zhang Z,
    6. Loustalot F,
    7. et al.
    Trends in cardiovascular health metrics and associations with all-cause and CVD mortality among US adults. JAMA 2012;307:1273–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ford ES,
    2. Greenlund KJ,
    3. Hong Y
    . Ideal cardiovascular health and mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system among adults in the United States. Circulation 2012;125:987–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bertoli AM,
    2. Alarcón GS,
    3. Calvo-Alén J,
    4. Fernández M,
    5. Vilá LM,
    6. Reveille JD;
    7. LUMINA Study Group
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort: clinical features, course, and outcome in patients with late-onset disease. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1580–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman DD
    . Atherosclerosis and lupus — the SLICC study. Lupus 2007;16:925–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman D,
    3. Ibañez D,
    4. Fortin P,
    5. Sanchez-Guerrero J,
    6. Bae S,
    7. et al.
    Clinical manifestations and coronary artery disease risk factors at diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: data from an international inception cohort. Lupus 2007;16:731–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Greenberg AS,
    2. Obin MS
    . Obesity and the role of adipose tissue in inflammation and metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83:461S–5S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. King JC
    . Maternal obesity, metabolism, and pregnancy outcomes. Annu Rev Nutr 2006;26:271–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Godfrey KM,
    2. Barker DJ
    . Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr 2001;4:611–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cedergren MI
    . Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:219–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wolf M,
    2. Kettyle E,
    3. Sandler L,
    4. Ecker JL,
    5. Roberts J,
    6. Thadhani R
    . Obesity and preeclampsia: the potential role of inflammation. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:757–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bhattacharya S,
    2. Campbell D,
    3. Liston W,
    4. Bhattacharya S
    . Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies. BMC Public Health 2007;7:168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ehrenberg HM,
    2. Mercer BM,
    3. Catalano PM
    . The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:964–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lu GC,
    2. Rouse DJ,
    3. DuBard M,
    4. Cliver S,
    5. Kimberlin D,
    6. Hauth JC
    . The effect of the increasing prevalence of maternal obesity on perinatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:845–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gilbert WM,
    2. Young AL,
    3. Danielsen B
    . Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic hypertension: a population-based study. J Reprod Med 2007;52:1046–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Catov JM,
    2. Nohr EA,
    3. Olsen J,
    4. Ness RB
    . Chronic hypertension related to risk for preterm and term small for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:290–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chatzi L,
    2. Plana E,
    3. Daraki V,
    4. Karakosta P,
    5. Alegkakis D,
    6. Tsatsanis C,
    7. et al.
    Metabolic syndrome in early pregnancy and risk of preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:829–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Haelterman E,
    2. Bréart G,
    3. Paris-Liado J,
    4. Dramaix M,
    5. Tchobroutsky C
    . Effect of uncomplicated chronic hypertension on the risk of small-for-gestational age birth. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:689–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Catov JM,
    2. Bodnar LM,
    3. Kip KE,
    4. Hubel C,
    5. Ness RB,
    6. Harger G,
    7. et al.
    Early pregnancy lipid concentrations and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:610.e1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Catov JM,
    2. Bodnar LM,
    3. Ness RB,
    4. Barron SJ,
    5. Roberts JM
    . Inflammation and dyslipidemia related to risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:1312–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sattar N,
    2. Greer IA
    . Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ 2002;325:157–60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tan EM,
    2. Cohen AS,
    3. Fries JF,
    4. Masi AT,
    5. McShane DJ,
    6. Rothfield NF,
    7. et al.
    The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hochberg MC
    . Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Orbai AM,
    3. Alarcón GS,
    4. Gordon C,
    5. Merrill JT,
    6. Fortin PR,
    7. et al.
    Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Buyon J,
    3. Kim M
    . Classification and definition of major flares in SLE clinical trials. Lupus 1999;8:685–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Petri MA,
    3. Kim MY,
    4. Kalunian KC,
    5. Grossman J,
    6. Hahn BH,
    7. et al.
    The effect of combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:953–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Potter JM,
    2. Nestel PJ
    . The hyperlipidemia of pregnancy in normal and complicated pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133:165–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Fattah C,
    2. Farah N,
    3. Barry SC,
    4. O’Connor N,
    5. Stuart B,
    6. Turner MJ
    . Maternal weight and body composition in the first trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:952–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Oken E,
    2. Kleinman K,
    3. Rich-Edwards J,
    4. Gillman M
    . A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003;3:6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Liang KY,
    2. Zeger SL
    . Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Tinker SC,
    2. Hamner HC,
    3. Berry RJ,
    4. Bailey LB,
    5. Pfeiffer CM
    . Does obesity modify the association of supplemental folic acid with folate status among nonpregnant women of childbearing age in the United States? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012;94:749–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Chakravarty EF,
    2. Nelson L,
    3. Krishnan E
    . Obstetric hospitalizations in the United States for women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:899–907.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Haas JS,
    2. Fuentes-Afflick E,
    3. Stewart AL,
    4. Jackson RA,
    5. Dean ML,
    6. Brawarsky P,
    7. et al.
    Prepregnancy health status and the risk of preterm delivery. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:58–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Nohr EA,
    2. Bech BH,
    3. Vaeth M,
    4. Rasmussen KM,
    5. Henriksen TB,
    6. Olsen J
    . Obesity, gestational weight gain and preterm birth: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:5–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Smith GC,
    2. Shah I,
    3. Pell JP,
    4. Crossley JA,
    5. Dobbie R
    . Maternal obesity in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous and elective preterm deliveries: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Public Health 2007;97:157–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hendler I,
    2. Goldenberg RL,
    3. Mercer BM,
    4. Iams JD,
    5. Meis PJ,
    6. Moawad AH,
    7. et al.
    The Preterm Prediction Study: Association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:882–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Carvalheiras G,
    2. Vita P,
    3. Marta S,
    4. Trovão R,
    5. Farinha F,
    6. Braga J,
    7. et al.
    Pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus: review of clinical features and outcome of 51 pregnancies at a single institution. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2010;38:302–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Eudy AM,
    2. Jayasundara M,
    3. Haroun T,
    4. Neil L,
    5. James AH,
    6. Clowse ME
    . Reasons for cesarean and medically indicated deliveries in pregnancies in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2018;27:351–6.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Clark CA,
    2. Spitzer KA,
    3. Nadler JN,
    4. Laskin CA
    . Preterm deliveries in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2127–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Catov JM,
    2. Ness RB,
    3. Wellons MF,
    4. Jacobs DR,
    5. Roberts JM,
    6. Gunderson EP
    . Prepregnancy lipids related to preterm birth risk: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:3711–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Howard D,
    3. Repke J,
    4. Goldman DW
    . The Hopkins lupus pregnancy center: 1987–1991 Update. Am J Reprod Immunol 1992;28:188–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Stuebe AM,
    2. Landon MB,
    3. Lai Y,
    4. Spong CY,
    5. Carpenter MW,
    6. Ramin SM,
    7. et al;
    8. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network, Bethesda, MD
    . Maternal BMI, glucose tolerance, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:62.e1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Khashan AS,
    2. Kenny LC
    . The effects of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Epidemiol 2009;24:697–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Soh MC,
    2. Nelson-Piercy C,
    3. Dib F,
    4. Westgren M,
    5. McCowan L,
    6. Pasupathy D
    . Association between pregnancy outcomes and death from cardiovascular causes in parous women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a study using Swedish population registries. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:2376–82.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 46, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preconceptional Cardiovascular Health and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preconceptional Cardiovascular Health and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Amanda M. Eudy, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Stephanie M. Engel, Nora Franceschini, Annie Green Howard, Megan E.B. Clowse, Michelle Petri
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2019, 46 (1) 70-77; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.171066

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Preconceptional Cardiovascular Health and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Amanda M. Eudy, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Stephanie M. Engel, Nora Franceschini, Annie Green Howard, Megan E.B. Clowse, Michelle Petri
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2019, 46 (1) 70-77; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.171066
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

BIRTH WEIGHT
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
PREGNANCY
PREMATURE BIRTH
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying the State of Mental Health Care in Canadian Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Comparison of Lupus Nephritis Onset Before and After Age 50: Effect on Presentation and Outcomes in an Inception Cohort
  • Trust in Health Information Sources Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Social Networking Era: The TRUMP2-SLE Study
Show more Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • BIRTH WEIGHT
  • CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
  • pregnancy
  • PREMATURE BIRTH
  • systemic lupus erythematosus

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire