Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleAnkylosing Spondylitis

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Linda A. Bradbury, Kelly A. Hollis, Benoît Gautier, Sateesh Shankaranarayana, Philip C. Robinson, Nivene Saad, Kim-Anh Lê Cao and Matthew A. Brown
The Journal of Rheumatology June 2018, 45 (6) 771-778; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170312
Linda A. Bradbury
From the Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital; University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital; Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital; The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly A. Hollis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benoît Gautier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sateesh Shankaranarayana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip C. Robinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nivene Saad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim-Anh Lê Cao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew A. Brown
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Matt.brown@qut.edu.au
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The discriminatory capacity of DWI in active cases and back pain controls was similar to the manual SPARCC scoring system. Active cases comprise Group 1 pretreatment and Group 2, and the controls by Group 3. ROC curve analysis for ADC DWI (AUC of 91%; p = 1.5 × 10−8) and SPARCC scores (AUC of 90%; p = 1.9 × 10−7). DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; SPARCC: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada; ROC: receiver-operator characteristic; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; AUC: area under the curve.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic details of participants.

    Group 1Group 2Group 3
    PretreatmentPosttreatment
    No.182020
    Age, yrs, mean (range)38 (23–68)40.6 (23–62)37 (20–60)
    Sex (% male)565537
    BASDAI5.524.76.5
    CRP24.24.98.95.5
    ESR41.81215.315.1
    % HLA-B27 carriage1008070
    • BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    DWI ADC scores for different groups regarding each measurement in duplicate. Active group includes Group 1 pretreatment and Group 2. Duplicate measurements per side were averaged prior to the tests. Corrected values indicate sacroiliac sides subtracted from sacral and averaged.

    Group 1 PretreatmentGroup 1 PostreatmentGroup 2ActiveGroup 3
    MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
    ADC.right.10.6720.4250.4080.1440.9470.4090.8200.4340.4030.146
    ADC.right.20.6650.4140.4480.1240.9490.4230.8180.4380.4000.150
    ADC.left.10.8310.5430.5980.3560.8020.4920.8150.5090.4150.150
    ADC.left.20.8460.5170.6090.3390.8350.5020.8400.5020.4160.160
    ADC.sacrum.10.3010.1480.3570.1430.3300.1830.3170.1660.4380.137
    ADC.sacrum.20.3060.1630.3670.1400.3320.1780.8200.4340.4390.136
    Corrected score0.4500.4330.1540.230.5520.2730.5050.354−0.030.07
    • DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Comparisons of sacral and sacroiliac ADC values comparing different groups at matched sites. P values from paired t tests (Group 1 pre- vs posttreatment) or t tests (any other comparison) are displayed. Duplicate measurements per side were averaged prior to the tests. Corrected values indicate sacroiliac sides subtracted from sacral and averaged. For example, on the left side, Group 1 pretreatment scores were significantly different compared with Group 1 posttreatment scores (p = 0.0028), whereas comparing with Group 2 scores at this site was marginally significant (p = 0.05).

    Group 1 PosttreatmentGroup 2Group 3
    LeftRightSacralCorrectedLeftRightSacralCorrectedLeftRightSacralCorrected
    Group 1 pretreatment0.00280.00740.0790.00170.890.230.480.390.00110.00840.00890.00021
    Group 1 posttreatment————0.0500.00120.851.7 × 10−50.0250.260.0800.0040
    Group 2————0.000159.0 × 10−50.0852.0 × 10−9
    • ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Responsiveness analysis of ADC scores in comparison of active group with Group 3. For SPARCC scores, because the SD for Group 3 is zero, no effect size can be calculated.

    Active MeanActive SDGroup 3 MeanGroup 3 SDEffect Sizep
    ADC0.500.35−0.030.077.61010−10
    SPARCC10.6012.060.000.00NA9.6 × 10−6
    ASDAS-CRP3.421.282.770.890.7360.049
    ASDAS-ESR3.371.252.880.940.5290.14
    ESR27.8423.0815.1013.980.9110.026
    CRP16.1319.005.516.571.6180.0092
    BASDAI6.252.526.542.14−0.1350.78
    BASFI4.082.204.132.92−0.0190.94
    BASMI2.331.812.111.960.1120.78
    • ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; SPARCC: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Responsiveness measures of magnetic resonance imaging scores and other measures in comparison of Group 1 cases pre- and posttreatment.

    Group 1 PretreatmentGroup 1 PosttreatmentEffect SizeSRMp
    MeanSDMeanSD
    ADC0.450.430.150.23−0.684−0.8770.0017
    SPARCC13.4015.023.255.66−0.676−0.9110.00083
    ASDAS-CRP4.320.621.750.99−4.118−2.2737.9 × 10−8
    ASDAS-ESR4.290.691.720.99−3.701−2.3726.3 × 10−8
    ESR41.7824.0312.0012.22−1.239−1.3356.3 × 10−5
    CRP24.1818.074.884.57−1.068−1.0500.00063
    BASDAI7.941.132.011.72−5.237−3.3965 × 10−10
    BASFI5.021.452.702.02−1.599−1.0290.00063
    BASMI2.782.141.822.00−0.446−0.9530.00095
    • SRM: standardized response mean; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; SPARCC: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary material accompanies the online version of this article.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Data Supplement

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Data Supplement
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 45, Issue 6
1 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Linda A. Bradbury, Kelly A. Hollis, Benoît Gautier, Sateesh Shankaranarayana, Philip C. Robinson, Nivene Saad, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Matthew A. Brown
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2018, 45 (6) 771-778; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170312

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Linda A. Bradbury, Kelly A. Hollis, Benoît Gautier, Sateesh Shankaranarayana, Philip C. Robinson, Nivene Saad, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Matthew A. Brown
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2018, 45 (6) 771-778; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170312
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
ADALIMUMAB
DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
SENSITIVITY
SPECIFICITY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sexual Quality of Life in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis in the Biologic Treatment Era
  • Pregnancy Outcomes in Couples with Males Exposed to Longterm Anti–tumor Necrosis Factor–α Inhibitor Therapies: A Prospective Study
  • Value of Color Doppler Ultrasound Assessment of Sacroiliac Joints in Patients with Inflammatory Low Back Pain
Show more Ankylosing Spondylitis

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ankylosing spondylitis
  • spondyloarthritis
  • ADALIMUMAB
  • DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • SENSITIVITY
  • SPECIFICITY

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire