Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

The Crescentic Implication of Renal Outcomes in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Fanghao Cai, Fei Han, Hongya Wang, Haidongqin Han, Jingyun Le, Lan Lan, Ying Xu and Jianghua Chen
The Journal of Rheumatology April 2018, 45 (4) 513-520; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170553
Fanghao Cai
From the Kidney Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University; Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Zhejiang Province; Third Grade Laboratory under the National State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fei Han
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hanf8876@zju.edu.cn
Hongya Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haidongqin Han
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingyun Le
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lan Lan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Xu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianghua Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Comparisons of doubling SCr or ESRD long term in patients with different ranges and types of crescents. SCr: serum creatinine; ESRD: endstage renal disease.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Comparison of general information, and baseline clinical and laboratory variables. Values are mean ± SD unless otherwise specified.

    VariablesGroups
    NCSCC1C2
    No. patients59596449
    Sex, m/f7/527/526/589/40
    Age, yrs36.34 ± 10.6034.61 ± 12.1333.97 ± 11.1436.90 ± 12.69
    Hemoglobin, g/l100.26 ± 20.2097.59 ± 21.7297.89 ± 19.3990.40 ± 16.73a,c
    WBC count,109/l4.54 ± 2.324.29 ± 1.974.76 ± 2.695.73 ± 3.05b
    Platelet count, 109/l141.79 ± 68.67152.26 ± 76.00142.57 ± 67.57169.25 ± 74.69c
    Serum albumin, g/l26.89 ± 6.2828.90 ± 6.9826.35 ± 6.65b24.52 ± 6.15b
    uPCR, g/g4.08 ± 3.004.24 ± 2.825.54 ± 4.556.20 ± 3.42a,b
    SCr, mg/dl, median (IQR)0.88 (0.70–1.32)0.88 (0.67–1.40)0.89 (0.72–1.37)1.32 (0.85–2.27)a,b,c
    C3, mg/dl, median (IQR)32.90 (24.30–48.50)37.15 (24.80–50.35)37.80 (26.1–48.45)43.25 (35.08–57.10)a,c
    C4, mg/dl, median (IQR)5.60 (4.00–7.20)6.00 (4.58–8.02)6.30 (5.00–10.25)8.30 (5.80–12.00)a,b
    Anti-dsDNA positive, %54.471.2a62.963.0
    Hypertension, %55.347.750.067.7
    Acute kidney injury, %39.032.853.2b68.8a,b
    Nephrotic syndrome, %55.246.658.177.1a,b,c
    • ↵a p < 0.05 compared with NC group.

    • ↵b p < 0.05 compared with SC group.

    • ↵c p < 0.05 compared with C1 group. WBC: white blood cell; uPCR: urine protein creatinine ratio; SCr: serum creatinine; IQR: interquartile range; C3: complement factor 3; NC: noncrescent group; SC: segmental crescent group.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparisons of renal pathological data. Values are % or median (IQR) or both unless otherwise specified.

    VariablesGroups
    NCSCC1C2
    No. patients59596449
    ISN/RPS class
      Class III20.315.312.56.2a
      Class IV47.550.856.367.3a
      Class V + III/V + IV32.233.931.226.5
    Crescents, median (IQR), %06.06 (3.57–12.5)11.44 (7.55–15.19)b37.04 (30.04–62.31)b,c
      Segmental crescents06.06 (3.57–12.5)5.13 (2.45–9.30)b21.74; (13.2–27.53)b,c
      Circumferential crescents005.26 (3.23–7.48)15.63 (6.93–39.17)c
    Sclerotic glomeruli, median (IQR), %1.96 (0–10.53)0 (0–7.43)1.85 (0–8.99)4.65 (0–10)
    Mesangial proliferation1 (1–1)1 (1–1)1 (1–2)1 (1–2)a,b
    Endothelial cells proliferation78.084.584.181.6
    Karyorrhexis/fibrinoid necrosis1.710.212.5a14.3a
    Subendothelial deposit56.372.967.964.3
    Tubulitis18.633.939.1a44.9a
    Interstitial infiltration1 (1–1)1 (1–1)1 (1–1)1 (1–2)a,b,c
    Interstitial fibrosis0 (0–1)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)
    Arteriole thrombosis3.43.41.62.0
    Immunofluorescence of glomerulus
      IgM2 (1–2)2 (1–3)2 (1–2)2 (1–2)
      IgG1 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–1)
      IgA2 (1–3)2 (1–3)2 (1–3)2 (0.5–2.5)b
      C33 (2–3)3 (3–4)3 (3–3)3 (3–3)
      C41 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)
      C1q2 (1–3)3 (2–3)a2 (1.75–3)b2 (1–3)b
    • ↵a p < 0.05 compared with NC group.

    • ↵b p < 0.05 compared with SC group.

    • ↵c p < 0.05 compared with C1 group. IQR: interquartile range; ISN/RPS: International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society; IgM: immunoglobulin M; C3: complement factor 3; NC: noncrescent group; SC: segmental crescent group.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Comparisons of therapeutic protocols and outcomes. Values are % unless otherwise specified.

    VariablesGroups
    NCSCC1C2
    Followup duration, median
      (IQR), mos30.5 (10.6–66.5)29 (10–52)29.5 (12–66)21.5 (8.3–32.25)
    Induction treatment
      Methylprednisolone pulse1320.415.735a
      Prednisone23.710.2a17.210.2a
      Prednisone + IVC13.627.129.7a46.9a,b,c
      Prednisone + MMF40.732.231.320.4
      Prednisone + CNI16.920.315.610.2
      Prednisone + MMF + CNI5.110.26.212.2
    Maintenance treatment
      Prednisone26.210.619.112.9
      Prednisone + MMF45.2343425.8
      Prednisone + CNI1921.31712.9
      Prednisone + AZA4.86.46.49.7
      Prednisone + MMF + CNI010.6a6.416.1a
      Others4.8171722.6a
    Treatment response
      Complete remission72.554.556.734.8a,b,c
      Partial remission19.630.938.3a41.3a
      Treatment failure7.814.55.023.9c
    Longterm prognosis
      Relapse30.024.437.529.7
      Doubling of SCr8.513.611.128.6a,c
      ESRD6.86.87.818.4
    • ↵a p < 0.05 compared with NC group.

    • ↵b p < 0.05 compared with SC group.

    • ↵c p < 0.05 compared with C1 group. IVC: intravenous cyclophosphamide; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; AZA: azathioprine; SCr: serum creatinine; ESRD: endstage renal disease; NC: noncrescent group; SC: segmental crescent group.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Cox hazard analysis of clinical risk factors for doubling of SCr or ESRD in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

    VariablesUnivariateMultivariate
    HR95% CIpHR95% CIp
    Clinical
      Age0.9830.953–1.0130.265
      Female/male3.1761.414–7.1310.0051.5610.494–4.9350.448
      WBC count, 109/l1.1461.018–1.290.0241.0340.888–1.2050.665
      Hemoglobin, g/l0.9670.949–0.985< 0.0010.9700.947–0.9920.009
      Platelet, × 109/l0.9990.994–1.0040.705
      C3, mg/dl0.9930.972–1.0140.500
      C4, mg/dl1.0350.981–1.0930.204
      Positive anti-dsDNA0.9100.459–2.0020.959
      uPCR, g/g1.1051.306–1.1780.0021.0860.989–1.1920.084
      SCr, mg/dl1.9201.613–2.285< 0.0011.8341.465–2.296< 0.001
      Albumin, g/l0.9350.882–0.9920.0270.9670.899–1.0400.372
    Renal pathological characteristics
      Glomerular sclerosis, %1.0361.012–1.0610.0031.0310.998–1.0660.065
      Segmental crescents, %1.0241.000–1.0480.054
      Cellular crescents, %1.0431.025–1.060< 0.0011.0401.015–1.0660.002
      Fibrous crescents, %1.2851.115–1.4820.0010.9750.785–1.2100.816
      Fibrocellular crescents, %1.1161.068–1.166< 0.0011.0851.013–1.1630.020
      Fibrinoid necrosis0.6840.163–2.8710.603
      Mesangial proliferation0.616
        Mild0.4000.052–3.1000.380
        Moderate0.4520.054–3.7780.464
        Severe0.6720.081–5.5470.712
      Podocyte fusion0.705
        Localized16670–4.4 × 1080.936
        Partial34550–9.2 × 1080.930
        Extensive34230–9.1 × 1080.930
      Thrombosis1.2900.175–9.4890.803
      Tubulitis1.5680.795–3.0920.194
      Tubular atrophy< 0.001
        Mild1.9450.765–4.9490.162
        Moderate7.0451.339–37.0640.0211.2000.01–15.7390.890
        Severe10.8543.482–33.830< 0.0015.3481.278–22.3730.022
      Interstitial infiltration0.314
        Mild1.2540.430–3.6600.678
        Moderate1.7790.501–6.3100.373
        Severe5.0190.899–28.0320.066
      Interstitial fibrosis0.102
        Mild1.3800.556–3.4270.487
        Moderate3.0270.395–23.2180.287
        Severe5.7341.317–24.9630.0200.2920.045–1.8870.196
      C1q0.468
        Mild0.3080.069–1.3820.124
        Moderate0.6090.198–1.8960.392
        Severe0.7030.228–2.1700.540
    • SCr: serum creatinine; ESRD: endstage renal disease; WBC: white blood cell; C3: complement factor 3; uPCR: urine protein creatinine ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Cox hazard analysis of clinical risk factors for ESRD in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

    VariablesUnivariateMultivariate
    HR95% CIpHR95% CIp
    Age0.9790.942–1.0170.276
    Sex, f/m3.6681.410–9.5450.0081.8670.541–6.4450.323
    WBC count, × 109/l1.2521.104–1.421< 0.0011.1040.929–1.3120.261
    Hemoglobin, g/l0.9660.945–0.9880.0030.9720.943–1.0010.056
    Platelet, × 109/l1.0030.997–1.0090.705
    C3, mg/dl0.9930.968–1.0190.607
    C4, mg/dl1.0440.981–1.1120.174
    Positive anti-dsDNA1.3640.553–3.3620.5
    uPCR, g/g1.1351.060–1.216< 0.0011.1411.038–1.2530.006
    SCr, mg/dl2.0931.705–2.569< 0.0011.8761.447–2.433< 0.001
    Albumin, g/l0.9370.871–1.0080.079
    Renal pathological characteristics
      Glomerular sclerosis, %1.0371.008–1.0670.0121.0401.001–1.0810.045
      Segmental crescents, %1.0010.965–1.0390.942
      Cellular crescents, %1.0441.023–1.064< 0.0011.0411.014–1.0700.003
      Fibrous crescents, %1.2431.024–1.5090.0280.8460.617–1.1590.298
      Fibrocellular crescents, %1.1231.069–1.180< 0.0011.1041.027–1.1870.007
      Fibrinoid necrosis0.5170.069–3.8670.521
      Mesangial proliferation0.453
        Mild0.2140.026–1.7370.149
        Moderate0.3460.040–3.0040.336
        Severe0.2620.027–2.5840.251
      Podocyte fusion0.780
        Localized19290.000–1.1 × 10100.948
        Partial43210.000–2.5 × 10100.942
        Extensive30240.000–1.7 × 10100.945
      Thrombosis1.8740.251–14.0220.541
      Tubulitis1.8160.782–4.2140.165
      Tubular atrophy0.001
        Mild1.1590.393–3.4170.789
        Moderate6.7461.215–37.4570.0290.0887.138–15.7390.837
        Severe6.3262.214–31.3110.0022.2120.441–11.1060.335
      Interstitial infiltration0.643
        Mild0.9930.284–3.4730.991
        Moderate1.9250.459–8.0650.370
        Severe0.0000.00–0.000.979
      Interstitial fibrosis0.7720.248–2.4020.655
      C1q0.778
        Mild0.3880.054–2.7560.344
        Moderate0.7650.162–3.6090.735
        Severe0.8130.174–3.8030.792
    • ESRD: endstage renal disease; WBC: white blood cell; C3: complement factor 3; uPCR: urine protein creatinine ratio; SCr: serum creatinine.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 45, Issue 4
1 Apr 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Crescentic Implication of Renal Outcomes in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Crescentic Implication of Renal Outcomes in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
Fanghao Cai, Fei Han, Hongya Wang, Haidongqin Han, Jingyun Le, Lan Lan, Ying Xu, Jianghua Chen
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2018, 45 (4) 513-520; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170553

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
The Crescentic Implication of Renal Outcomes in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
Fanghao Cai, Fei Han, Hongya Wang, Haidongqin Han, Jingyun Le, Lan Lan, Ying Xu, Jianghua Chen
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2018, 45 (4) 513-520; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170553
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

CRESCENT
LUPUS NEPHRITIS
OUTCOME

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Health Literacy and Numeracy With Lupus Knowledge and the Creation of the Lupus Knowledge Assessment Test
  • A Distinct Plasma Microbiome But Not Gut Microbiome in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to Healthy Individuals
  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Risk in Pregnant Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Show more Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CRESCENT
  • lupus nephritis
  • outcome

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire