Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticlePsoriatic Arthritis

Epidemiology and Medication Pattern Change of Psoriatic Diseases in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013: A Nationwide, Population-based Cohort Study

James Cheng-Chung Wei, Lin-Hong Shi, Jing-Yang Huang, Xue-Fen Wu, Rui Wu and Jeng-Yuan Chiou
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2018, 45 (3) 385-392; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170516
James Cheng-Chung Wei
From the Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, and Institute of Medicine, and Department of Health Policy and Management, and Department of Medical Management, and Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang; Department of Medical Management, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin-Hong Shi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing-Yang Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xue-Fen Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rui Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tcmclinic@163.com tom@csmu.edu.tw
Jeng-Yuan Chiou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tcmclinic@163.com tom@csmu.edu.tw
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the trend of prevalence and incidence rates for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis in Taiwan, and to determine the changes in medication patterns.

Methods. Data were collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, which covered at least 95% of the population from 2000 to 2013. International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) was used to identify PsA (ICD-9 696.0) and other psoriasis (ICD-9 696.1). Medications were identified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification code. We calculated the annual age standardized prevalence and incidence rate of PsA and psoriasis in individuals aged ≥ 16 years from 2000 to 2013, and used the Poisson regression to test the trends by Wald chi-square statistic.

Results. The prevalence (per 100,000 population) of psoriatic diseases between 2000 and 2013 increased from 11.12 to 37.75 for PsA, and from 179.2 to 281.5 for psoriasis. The incidence (per 100,000 person-yrs) increased from 3.64 to 6.91 in PsA, while there was no significant change in psoriasis. Prevalence and incidence in PsA were more rapidly increased than in psoriasis. Sex ratio (men to women) of PsA decreased from 2.0 to 1.5 in 2000 and 2013, respectively. There was an increase in the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), especially biologics, which is significantly different from topical therapies.

Conclusion. The prevalence and incidence rates of psoriatic disease, especially PsA, were increasing in Taiwan. The medication pattern showed an increase in DMARD and biologics, while use of topical therapies decreased.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
  • PSORIASIS
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • MEDICATIONS
  • BIOLOGICS

Psoriatic diseases include psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and other psoriasis. Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease whose detailed etiology has not been fully understood, but both genetic agents and environmental factors have been associated with the cause. PsA is also a chronic autoimmune inflammatory joint disease and is highly heterogeneous, occurring in a subgroup of patients with psoriasis, and characterized by joint and entheseal inflammation1. A metaanalysis showed that the prevalence of psoriasis in children ranged from 0% (Taiwan) to 2.1% (Italy); in adults, it varied from 0.91% (USA) to 8.5% (Norway). The estimated incidence reported in children in the United States was 40.8/100,000 person-years. In adults, the estimated incidence varied from 78.9/100,000 person-years (USA) to 230/100,000 person-years (Italy)2. Another metaanalysis found a wide variation in the annual incidence of PsA, ranging from 0.1 to 23.1 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (median 6.4), with large differences between countries. Prevalence rates also varied between 1/100,000 (Japan) to 420/100,000 (Italian) inhabitants3. These data showed an increase in the prevalence and incidence rates in Western countries. However, reported prevalence and incidence rates in Asia appear to be relatively lower than in Western countries4,5.

Therapies for psoriatic diseases include systemic and topical ones. Systemic therapies include medications such as methotrexate (MTX), a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Biological therapies for treating psoriasis include antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents [such as adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETN), and infliximab], and monoclonal antibodies against interleukins (IL) 12 and 23 (ustekinumab), and IL-17 (secukinumab). Moreover, patients with PsA should be treated in a timely manner to improve symptoms and possibly inhibit damage to joint structural tissues. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and local intraarticular injections with corticosteroids can be used successfully in clinical practice in patients with mild PsA. For those patients with moderate to severe PsA, nonbiologic (nb-) DMARD [including MTX and sulfasalazine (SSZ)], small molecules (including phosphodiesterase and Janus kinase inhibitors), and biologic agents (including TNF, IL-12/23, and IL-17 blockers) have all showed clinical efficacy6,7,8,9. There is evidence demonstrating that biologics can effectively improve patients’ functionality and quality of life by reducing skin and joint involvement, and preventing permanent joint damage. As a result, the use of biologics is becoming more widespread10. In our study, we investigated the changes in the prevalence and incidence of psoriatic diseases in Taiwan, and assessed the patterns of medication use between 2000 and 2013.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data resource

Our study protocol was approved by Chung Shan Medical University Hospital’s Institutional Review Board (IRB number CS15143). Data were collected from Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Research Database (LHIRD), which contains 14 years of LHIRD claims data for ≥ 95% of Taiwan’s population (about 23 million). The LHIRD contains information on outpatient and inpatient services, dental care services, prescription drugs, preventive medicine, and even Chinese herbal remedies, as well as the medical records of patients with psoriatic disease. The LHIRD contains registration files and reimbursement claim data, such as dates of discharge and admission, diagnostic codes, demographic characteristics, details of prescriptions, and procedures performed. Therefore, LHIRD offers an opportunity to study the population-based epidemiology of psoriatic diseases in real-world settings in Taiwan. The large sample sizes it provides allow researchers to identify patterns of medication use over time.

Study design

We estimated the annual epidemiological data of PsA and psoriasis in Taiwan, including prevalence and incidence rates from 2000 to 2013. The International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) was used to identify psoriatic arthritis (ICD-9 696.0) and other psoriasis (ICD-9 696.1). For annual prevalence rate, the denominator was set according to the annual list of Registry for Beneficiaries, and the numerator was the number of patients who had PsA and psoriasis with ≥ 3 outpatient visits or ≥ 1 admission for treatment of psoriatic disease in every calendar year. For annual incidence rate, we excluded the prevalent cases or individuals not at risk from the denominator and numerator, respectively, from 2001 to 2013 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow chart of study design. PsA: psoriatic arthritis.

Medications were identified by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification code: NSAID (M01A); biological (b-) DMARD [including abatacept (L04AA24), ADA (L04AA17, L04AB04), ETN (L04AA11, L04AB01), golimumab (L04AB06), rituximab (L01XC02), tocilizumab (L04AC07), ustekinumab (L04AC05), and tofacitinib (L04AA29)]; nbDMARD [including azathioprine (L04AX01), cyclosporine (L04AD01), hydroxychloroquine (P01BA02), leflunomide (L04AA13), MTX (L01BA01, L04AX03), minocycline (J01AA08), and SSZ (A07EC01)]; antipsoriatics for topical use [including tars (D05AA), calcipotriol (D05AX02, D05AX52), calcitriol ointment (D05AX03), and tazarotene (D05AX05)]; antipsoriatics for systemic use [including acitretin (D05BB02), etretinate (D05BB01), methoxsalen (D05BA02), and trioxysalen (D05BA01)]; ultraviolet B phototherapy (insurance claim code 51019B); corticosteroids for dermatological treatment (D07); and oral corticosteroids (H02AB, H02B, M01BA).

Statistical analyses

Epidemiological data of PsA and psoriasis in individuals aged ≥ 16 years, including prevalence and incidence rates from 2000 to 2013, were analyzed and stratified by age and sex (Supplementary Data available from the authors upon request). The medication prescription patterns were also analyzed. The age-standardized prevalence and incidence were estimated using the standard population in 2000. We used the Poisson regression to calculate the 95% CI and we tested the trend of prevalence and incidence by Wald chi-square test. SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used to perform the analyses, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Prevalence and incidence rates of PsA and psoriasis

From 2000 to 2013, the prevalence rates (per 100,000 persons) increased for PsA (from 11.12 to 37.75) and other psoriasis (from 179.2 to 281.5; Table 1). The prevalence rates for PsA increased more rapidly over time. The period of analysis was divided into 3 stages: 2000 to 2004, 2005 to 2010, and 2011 to 2013. Each stage showed an increase of > 3%, even reaching 4%. In the last stage, the prevalence rate of PsA increased significantly over time, with a rate of 28.90 (2011), 31.90 (2012), and 37.75 (2013). The prevalence rates for psoriasis increased over time as well, but there were no obvious linear increases among years between 2005 and 2010. The incidence rates (per 100,000 person-yrs) increased from 3.64 to 6.91 for PsA, but there was no significant increase in psoriasis (from 42.02 to 30.34). The number of PsA incident cases increased strikingly from 2000 to 2013, and the incidence rate reached 8.10 in 2012. The incidence rates for psoriasis seemed to remain roughly the same over time, and even decreased in 2007 and 2008 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Annual prevalence and incidence of PsA and other psoriasis in individuals aged ≥16 years.

Sex difference

For PsA, the prevalence and incidence rates showed an increasing trend per year in both men (prevalence = 9%, incidence = 6%) and women (prevalence = 11%, incidence = 10%). For psoriasis, the linear tread of prevalence and incidence rates was estimated by Poisson regression and it showed an increasing prevalence rate but a decreasing incidence rate in both men (prevalence: 4% increasing per year; incidence: 2% decreasing per year) and women (prevalence: 3% increasing per year; incidence: 1% decreasing per year; Figure 2A and 2B). There was a higher proportion of men than women with psoriatic disease: the sex ratio (men to women) of prevalence for PsA was 1.82 and 1.58 in 2001 and 2013, respectively. After 2004, the sex ratio of PsA prevalence gradually decreased over time. The sex ratio of incidence for PsA was 1.75 and 1.20 in 2001 and 2013, respectively. The sex ratio of prevalence for psoriasis increased over time, at 1.69 and nearly 1.82 in 2001 and 2013, respectively. The sex ratio of incidence for psoriasis decreased over time, at 1.43 and 1.25 in 2001 and 2013, respectively.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Age-standardized prevalence or incidence rate (per 100,000 persons) of (A) psoriatic arthritis and (B) other psoriasis.

Medication pattern

For overall psoriatic disease, the primary medications used were DMARD, particularly bDMARD. There was an increase of bDMARD from 0% to 11.61% for PsA (p < 0.0001), and from 0% to 1.56% for psoriasis (p < 0.0001). In addition, there was a significant difference between bDMARD use in PsA and psoriasis in 2009 (0.94% in PsA, and 0.24% in psoriasis), or from 2009 to 2013 (from 0.94% to 11.61% in PsA, and from 0.24% to 1.56% in psoriasis). For PsA, there was a decrease in the use of topical antipsoriatics (from 61.62% to 43.45%), systemic use of antipsoriatics (from 17.17% to 5.65%), and corticosteroids for dermatological psoriasis (from 86.87% to 69.05%). However, there were no significant trends in the use of NSAID (from 85.86% to 80.65%), nbDMARD (from 47.47% to 57.14%), and oral corticosteroids (from 53.54% to 45.54%). For psoriasis other than PsA, there was a significant increase in nbDMARD (from 8.72% to 15.07%). There was a significant decrease in the use of topical antipsoriatics (from 51.28% to 41.99%), systemic antipsoriatics (from 7.80% to 4.94%), corticosteroids for dermatological psoriasis (from 94.56% to 89.79%), and oral corticosteroids (from 39.54% to 27.15%). As for ultraviolet B phototherapy, both PsA and psoriasis showed no obvious change (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Changes in medications used on PsA and other psoriasis. Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified.

DISCUSSION

Our study showed that the prevalence rates of psoriatic disease in individuals aged ≥ 16 years, especially PsA, increased in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013. The incidence rates of PsA were significantly higher than those of psoriasis. Our results confirmed that psoriatic disease predominantly affected men. The medication pattern in Taiwan showed an increased usage of DMARD and biologics, while the use of topical therapies decreased.

The prevalence of psoriatic diseases was about 2% in most previous studies. A study by Sheane and Chandran found that PsA accounted for almost 30% of psoriasis10. Our study found that although the prevalence rates for PsA increased, no significant increases were found for psoriasis, and PsA rates were lower than those reported in Western countries. This phenomenon may be explained, at least in part, by the lower awareness of PsA in Taiwan than in other developed countries, even though an increasing trend was observed in our data (Table 3A and 3B). Because it is a disease with a variety of manifestations, early PsA may not be diagnosed in some patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3A.

No. visits for PsA diagnosis by department. Values are n (%), where percent is annual number of visits for PsA in all departments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3B.

Number of visits for psoriasis diagnosis by department. Values are n (%), where percent is annual number of visits for psoriasis in all departments.

It is possible that a proportion of patients with psoriasis progressed to PsA as a result of comorbidities (e.g., hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and certain risk factors (e.g., smoking, obesity, and low socioeconomic status), which can accelerate development of psoriasis into PsA11,12,13,14,15. In our data, about 50–60% of PsA diagnoses were relative to psoriasis and a mean duration in months (SD) of psoriasis until diagnosis of PsA was 51.81 (36.43; Supplementary Table 3, available from the authors upon request). However, the duration was still underestimated. A review by Ogdie suggested the duration may be 3–5 years12, which is similar to our findings. The second possibility is that risk factors might also be a trigger for the onset of PsA12. The third possibility is that psoriasis and PsA are 2 different diseases. A review study by Boehncke, et al suggested that psoriasis does contribute to PsA16. Based on clinical observations, the authors postulated that psoriasis and PsA were 2 separate entities with no direct pathogenetic link. In genetic studies, a different genetic architecture was found. IL-17 and IL-23 are relevant to psoriasis as well as PsA, while CD8+ T cells might be particularly important in the pathophysiology of PsA. In animal models, both diseases can be readily distinguished from each other, because distinct pathomechanisms contribute to their respective etiologies. In clinical trials, different gene expression in PsA and psoriasis has been demonstrated, with PsA showing a stronger IL-17 gene signature. Taken together, the evidence suggests that psoriasis and PsA may be regarded as 2 sides of the same coin.

In addition, the increasing prevalence and incidence rates in PsA rather than psoriasis might be attributed to the increasing awareness of the disease. Patient and physician knowledge about PsA appears to be gradually increasing. Further, the development of screening tools has likely increased the prevalence and incidence of PsA17. As is analyzed in a Danish nationwide register linkage study from 1997 to 2011, some reasons are thought provoking; that is, use of questionnaires increased educational initiatives for both patients and physicians. The introduction of the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis criteria may have updated specific symptoms, which would also result in earlier recognition18.

Our study demonstrated that there was a higher proportion of men than women with psoriatic disease (M:F = 1.82 in 2001; 1.58 in 2013), which is consistent with the finding of a study by Yamamoto, et al in Japan, where the sex ratio (male to female) was 1.9:1 in 2014–201519. In contrast, Egeberg, et al found that in Denmark, there was a female predominance from 1998 to 201017. In our study, there were significantly increasing trends of PsA in individuals aged 16–31, 32–47, and 48–63 years from 2001 to 2013. Interestingly, some studies have reported that variations in sex ratio in incidence rates differed across all age bands. Two peaks for age of onset in women were found at around 20–29 and 50–59 years of age (Huerta, et al)20, whereas onsets in men were found at around 30–39, 60–69, and 70–79 years of age (Icen, et al)21. The male population in our study ranged in age from 16 to 47 years; therefore, the second peak might not easily be seen in our 2000 LHIRD, which might account for the decreased sex ratio in our study from 2000 to 2013.

Biologics and DMARD are classes of medications used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and psoriatic arthritis. Psoriatic diseases have a variety of symptoms, ranging from skin psoriasis to tenosynovitis22,23,24,25. Interestingly, in addition to the use of biologics, DMARD are increasingly being applied in dermatological treatments26. The use of many medications, such as oral corticosteriods and NSAID, has decreased significantly, and this decrease may have contributed to the development of new DMARD and biologics. Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of moderate to severe psoriatic diseases27, including both psoriasis and PsA. Even though the use of biologics in Taiwan has increased significantly, the overall rate of usage is still less than that in Western countries, possibly in part because of the strict health insurance reimbursement policy in Taiwan. However, biologics should be used with caution for a number of reasons. Studies in Poland and Denmark showed notable differences before and after diagnosis with PsA in social cost and socioecnomic status, and strikingly, the speed of the rise in treatment cost outpaced the increases in prevalence and incidence rates28,29. As treatment choices mainly vary according to longterm remission goals, comorbidities, and medication costs, it is imperative to conduct a comprehensive assessment of patients on an individual basis30,31,32,33.

There are some limitations in our study. First, only medications that are covered by reimbursement in the National Health Insurance program are recorded in the LHIRD, so information on self-paid drugs taken by patients were not included in the analysis. Second, the LHIRD does not contain data on disease or symptom severity, laboratory examinations, or lifestyle habits. Third, the diagnostic codes used in the LHIRD for coding early PsA might have been misclassified as a result of wrong coding or underdiagnosis, which may have led to an underestimation of the prevalence and incidence rates of PsA. Finally, based on the limited data from 2000 to 2013, the incident cases might be the recurrent or remissive patients.

There are some strengths in our study. First, this was a population-based study of physician-diagnosed PsA, so it was more representative than a survey from multiple centers. Second, the LHIRD is essentially a 14-year cohort and thus we could determine change in disease prevalence, incidence, and patterns of medication use from 2000 to 2013.

In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we found that prevalence and incidence of PsA are increasing, but incidence of psoriasis remains stable. Medication patterns increased for biologics and DMARD, while use of topical therapies decreased.

Footnotes

  • Funded by a grant from Chung Shan Medical University (CSMU-INT-104-04).

  • Accepted for publication October 18, 2017.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Egeberg A
    . Psoriasis and comorbidities. Epidemiological studies. Dan Med J 2016;63:B5201.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ogdie A,
    2. Weiss P
    . The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2015;41:545–68.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Parisi R,
    2. Symmons DP,
    3. Griffiths CE,
    4. Ashcroft DM;
    5. Identification and Management of Psoriasis and Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT) project team
    . Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133:377–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kerschbaumer A,
    2. Fenzl KH,
    3. Erlacher L,
    4. Aletaha D
    . An overview of psoriatic arthritis - epidemiology, clinical features, pathophysiology and novel treatment targets. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016;128:791–5.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Alamanos Y,
    2. Voulgari PV,
    3. Drosos AA
    . Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2008;35:1354–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Harrold LR,
    2. Stolshek BS,
    3. Rebello S,
    4. Collier DH,
    5. Mutebi A,
    6. Wade SW,
    7. et al.
    Impact of prior biologic use on persistence of treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis enrolled in the US Corrona registry. Clin Rheumatol 2017;36:895–901.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rajagopalan M,
    2. Mital A
    . Biologics use in Indian psoriasis patients. Indian Dermatol Online J 2016;7:489–97.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Papoutsaki M,
    2. Costanzo A
    . Treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. BioDrugs 2013;27 Suppl 1:3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Saad AA,
    2. Ashcroft DM,
    3. Watson KD,
    4. Symmons DP,
    5. Noyce PR,
    6. Hyrich KL;
    7. BSRBR
    . Efficacy and safety of anti-TNF therapies in psoriatic arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Rheumatology 2017;56:672–3.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sheane BJ,
    2. Chandran V
    . Investigational drugs for treating psoriatic arthritis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2014;23:1001–16.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Oh EH,
    2. Ro YS,
    3. Kim JE
    . Epidemiology and cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with psoriasis: A Korean nationwide population-based cohort study. J Dermatol 2017;44:621–9.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ogdie A
    . The preclinical phase of PsA: a challenge for the epidemiologist. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1481–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Takeshita J,
    2. Grewal S,
    3. Langan SM,
    4. Mehta NN,
    5. Ogdie A,
    6. Van Voorhees AS,
    7. et al.
    Psoriasis and comorbid diseases: epidemiology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:377–90.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wu JJ,
    2. Penfold RB,
    3. Primatesta P,
    4. Fox TK,
    5. Stewart C,
    6. Reddy SP,
    7. et al.
    The risk of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:1168–75.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lee MS,
    2. Yeh YC,
    3. Chang YT,
    4. Lai MS
    . All-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with psoriasis in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. J Invest Dermatol 2017;137:1468–73.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Boehncke WH
    . Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: flip sides of the coin? Acta Derm Venereol 2016;96:436–41.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Karreman MC,
    2. Weel AE,
    3. van der Ven M,
    4. Vis M,
    5. Tchetverikov I,
    6. Nijsten TEC,
    7. et al.
    Performance of screening tools for psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study in primary care. Rheumatology 2017;56:597–602.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Egeberg A,
    2. Kristensen LE,
    3. Thyssen JP,
    4. Gislason GH,
    5. Gottlieb AB,
    6. Coates LC,
    7. et al.
    Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in Denmark: a nationwide register linkage study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1591–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yamamoto T,
    2. Ohtsuki M,
    3. Sano S,
    4. Igarashi A,
    5. Morita A,
    6. Okuyama R,
    7. et al.
    Epidemiological analysis of psoriatic arthritis patients in Japan. J Dermatol 2016;43:1193–6.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Huerta C,
    2. Rivero E,
    3. Rodriguez LA
    . Incidence and risk factors for psoriasis in the general population. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1559–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Icen M,
    2. Crowson CS,
    3. McEvoy MT,
    4. Dann FJ,
    5. Gabriel SE,
    6. Maradit Kremers H
    . Trends in incidence of adult-onset psoriasis over three decades: a population-based study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:394–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kellen R,
    2. Goldenberg G
    . Biosimilars in psoriasis: the future or not? Cutis 2017;99:116–20.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Menter MA,
    2. Griffiths CE
    . Psoriasis: the future. Dermatol Clin 2015;33:161–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tan KW,
    2. Griffiths CE
    . Novel systemic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016;17:79–92.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Raychaudhuri SP,
    2. Raychaudhuri SK
    . Biologics: target-specific treatment of systemic and cutaneous autoimmune diseases. Indian J Dermatol 2009;54:100–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Eyerich K
    . DMARDs in psoriasis: a critical appraisal. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:388.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mease P
    . A short history of biological therapy for psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015;33:S104–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kristensen LE,
    2. Jorgensen TS,
    3. Christensen R,
    4. Gudbergsen H,
    5. Dreyer L,
    6. Ballegaard C,
    7. et al.
    Societal costs and patients’ experience of health inequities before and after diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis: a Danish cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1495–501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Raciborski F,
    2. Sliwczynski A,
    3. Klak A,
    4. Kwiatkowska B,
    5. Brzozowska M,
    6. Tlustochowicz M
    . Prevalence of psoriatic arthritis and costs generated by treatment of psoriatic arthritis patients in the public health system - the case of Poland. Reumatologia 2016;54:278–84.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Balakrishnan C,
    2. Madnani N
    . Diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2013;79:S18–24.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sharma A,
    2. Dogra S
    . Management of psoriatic arthritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:645–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Evans C
    . Managed care aspects of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Am J Manag Care 2016;22:s238–43.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Dewing KA
    . Management of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Nurse Pract 2015;40:40–6.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 45, Issue 3
1 Mar 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epidemiology and Medication Pattern Change of Psoriatic Diseases in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013: A Nationwide, Population-based Cohort Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Epidemiology and Medication Pattern Change of Psoriatic Diseases in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013: A Nationwide, Population-based Cohort Study
James Cheng-Chung Wei, Lin-Hong Shi, Jing-Yang Huang, Xue-Fen Wu, Rui Wu, Jeng-Yuan Chiou
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2018, 45 (3) 385-392; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170516

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Epidemiology and Medication Pattern Change of Psoriatic Diseases in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013: A Nationwide, Population-based Cohort Study
James Cheng-Chung Wei, Lin-Hong Shi, Jing-Yang Huang, Xue-Fen Wu, Rui Wu, Jeng-Yuan Chiou
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2018, 45 (3) 385-392; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170516
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
PSORIASIS
EPIDEMIOLOGY
MEDICATIONS
BIOLOGICS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Canadian Adalimumab Postmarketing Observational Epidemiological Study Assessing Effectiveness in Psoriatic Arthritis (COMPLETE-PsA): 12-month Results of Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab and nbDMARDs
  • Evaluation of Clinical Diagnosis of Axial Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Elevated Patient-reported Spine Pain in CorEvitas’ PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry
  • The Association of Psoriatic Arthritis With All-cause Mortality and Leading Causes of Death in Psoriatic Arthritis
Show more Psoriatic Arthritis

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • psoriatic arthritis
  • psoriasis
  • epidemiology
  • MEDICATIONS
  • biologics

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire