Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
EditorialEditorial

What Is Axial Psoriatic Arthritis?

JOY FELD, VINOD CHANDRAN and DAFNA D. GLADMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology December 2018, 45 (12) 1611-1613; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180802
JOY FELD
Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for JOY FELD
VINOD CHANDRAN
Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto;
Roles: Associate Professor of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for VINOD CHANDRAN
DAFNA D. GLADMAN
Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roles: Professor of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for DAFNA D. GLADMAN
  • For correspondence: dafna.gladman@utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that has 5 disease domains: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, dactylitis, enthesitis, and skin and nail disease1. Only 2–5% of patients with PsA have isolated axial disease; most patients with axial arthritis also have peripheral arthritis2,3,4.

The prevalence of axial disease in patients with PsA varies with disease duration, occurring in 25–70% of patients with longstanding PsA3 and in 5–28% of patients with early disease5,6,7,8,9,10,11. These differences suggest that axial disease typically develops at a later stage in the disease course. In the Toronto PsA cohort, 15% of patients with PsA who did not have axial involvement at baseline developed axial PsA during 10 years of followup4. The risk factors for the development of axial disease early in the disease course were presence of HLA-B27, the presence of radiographic damage to peripheral joints, and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), whereas the risk factors for developing axial involvement later on in the disease course were the presence of nail dystrophy, a high number of radiographically damaged joints, the presence of periostitis, and an increased ESR. Additionally, a family history of PsA reduced axial disease risk early in the disease course4. This study4 highlights the fact that different patients are likely to develop axial disease at different timepoints in their PsA disease course. This poses a significant limitation in studies with a cross-sectional design that identify patients at a single timepoint in their disease course compared to longitudinal studies that can record the changing course of the disease12. About half of patients with axial PsA have radiographically present but asymptomatic axial disease13,14,15. Therefore, they present to the clinic because of disease activity in one of the other domains, and the axial disease is recognized by radiographic assessment. In these individuals, the clinical implications of axial disease are unknown, especially because disease activity indices are based on symptoms15.

In the October issue of The Journal, Mease, et al16 reported the results of their study regarding axial disease among 1530 patients with PsA enrolled in the US Corrona PsA/spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry. They reported that 12.5% of the Corrona PsA registry exhibited axial involvement at baseline. The mean disease duration at baseline was 11.5 years, so most of the patients did not have early disease. The axial disease was diagnosed according to the clinical judgment of the patient’s treating rheumatologist. Baseline features of the patients with axial PsA were compared to the nonaxial PsA group. Patients with axial involvement were younger and more likely to have prior biologic use. Patients with axial disease had worse arthritis and psoriasis as measured by several clinical variables compared to nonaxial patients. Patients with axial PsA had more body surface area covered by psoriasis, more nail psoriasis, more clinical enthesitis, and more tender joints on physical examination. They were less likely to be in a state of minimal disease activity and had higher scores of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score–C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were significantly limited by the presence of axial involvement. Patients with axial involvement reported more pain, measured using a visual analog scale (VAS); more fatigue (VAS); were significantly more likely to experience ≥ 30 min of morning stiffness; reported more impaired physical function by the Health Assessment Questionnaire; and had worse quality of life (EQ-5D–VAS). Work productivity and activity were also significantly impaired by axial involvement. Moreover, patients with axial involvement were significantly more likely to experience problems with walking, self-care, and performing usual activities, and to have more pain/discomfort and feelings of anxiety/depression at baseline compared with patients without axial involvement, as measured by the EQ-5D-3L (the 3-level version of EQ-5D).

The Mease, et al study sheds some light on axial disease in PsA. Its main advantage is that it is a national-level investigation of patients with PsA from a broad geographic distribution of a primary-to-tertiary mix of clinical centers across the United States. This provides good generalizability to the study. However, the study has some major limitations. First, it is cross-sectional in design, observing and comparing patients at different stages of their disease, because the mean disease duration at entry to cohort was variable: 11.5 (SD 10) years. Second, the diagnosis of axial disease was based upon clinical judgment of the patient’s treating rheumatologist. It is not clear how many patients had radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis, what grade was considered severe enough to define axial disease, and how many were defined as axial disease on clinical grounds alone (inflammatory back pain in the presence of decreased mobility). This limitation is not surprising because a clear universally accepted definition of axial involvement in PsA is lacking17,18,19. In ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a closely related SpA, the definition is straightforward. AS requires the presence of inflammatory type back pain and/or substantial impairment of spinal mobility in addition to the classic radiographic criteria20. By contrast, in PsA, although early studies required only minimal radiographic evidence such as unilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis for a definition of axial disease14,19,21, later studies mandated that patients meet the requirements of the modified New York (mNY) AS criteria, which include both clinical criteria and more definite radiographic criteria of at least bilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis or unilateral grade 3 or 4 sacroiliitis3,4,13. However, because only 45% of patients with axial PsA (as defined by the radiographic criteria of the mNY AS criteria) also met the clinical criteria for axial symptoms13,14, a 2017 study reverted to using only the radiographic mNY AS criteria and/or the presence of syndesmophytes to classify axial PsA22. The major limitation of the latter definition is that the optimal number of syndesmophytes that defines axial disease regarding sensitivity and specificity properties is still unknown.

Future studies of different large PsA cohorts are needed to address both the spinal and sacroiliac manifestations, to reach the best definition of axial involvement in PsA. Other features such as facet joint fusion will also need to be considered. In the Mease, et al study, because the definition used did not require radiographic evidence of disease, patients with asymptomatic axial PsA could have been misclassified as having nonaxial PsA, even though they had radiographic evidence of disease. This could explain the low prevalence of axial disease seen in this cohort. Additionally, because not all patients routinely had radiographs, a selection bias may have occurred, because the treating rheumatologist is more likely to look actively for axial disease in those patients with more severe disease, with high axial disease activity indices (BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP) influencing the results of the study.

This article also highlights another unmet need in the field of axial PsA: specific axial disease activity measures23,24. The disease activity measures used in this study (BASDAI, ASDAS, and BASFI) are used in AS and nonradiographic axial SpA. They are borrowed for the assessment of axial PsA because there are no outcome measures developed specifically for axial PsA23,24. The BASDAI has not been found to correlate well with external indicators of axial disease activity such as treatment decisions, perhaps owing to the influence of peripheral joint disease on the BASDAI score. Therefore, it seems that the validity of the BASDAI as a measure of axial disease activity in axial PsA is questionable25,26,27. Performing a short version of the BASDAI that excludes question 3, which refers to peripheral manifestations, might improve the performance of the BASDAI as an outcome measure for axial PsA28. Thus, it is important to develop additional indices specific for axial disease in PsA that would discriminate better between peripheral and axial disease. Specific disease activity indices are essential to clarify the independent contribution of the axial disease to the prognosis of these patients and the effect of treatment on the axial disease.

This study adds further information regarding axial disease in PsA. However, it also highlights some unmet needs in axial disease in PsA that deserve to be addressed in future studies.

Footnotes

  • See Axial involvement in PsA, J Rheumatol 2018;45:1389–96

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ritchlin CT,
    2. Kavanaugh A,
    3. Gladman DD,
    4. Mease PJ,
    5. Boehncke WH,
    6. de Vlam K,
    7. et al.
    Treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1387–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Taylor WJ,
    2. Zmierczak HG,
    3. Helliwell PS
    . Problems with the definition of axial and peripheral disease patterns in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:974–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gladman DD
    . Axial disease in psoriatic arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007;9:455–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chandran V,
    2. Tolusso DC,
    3. Cook RJ,
    4. Gladman DD
    . Risk factors for axial inflammatory arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:809–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Baraliakos X,
    2. Coates LC,
    3. Braun J
    . The involvement of the spine in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015;33 (5 Suppl 93):S31–5.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Torre Alonso JC,
    2. Rodriguez Perez A,
    3. Arribas Castrillo JM,
    4. Ballina Garcia J,
    5. Riestra Noriega JL,
    6. Lopez Larrea C
    . Psoriatic arthritis (PA): a clinical, immunological and radiological study of 180 patients. Br J Rheumatol 1991;30:245–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Qu L,
    3. Tian H,
    4. Yu X,
    5. Yu C
    . Prevalence and characteristics of psoriatic arthritis in Chinese patients with psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:1409–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moghaddassi M,
    2. Shahram F,
    3. Chams-Davatchi C,
    4. Najafizadeh SR,
    5. Davatchi F
    . Different aspects of psoriasis: analysis of 150 Iranian patients. Arch Iran Med 2009;12:279–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Coates LC,
    2. Conaghan PG,
    3. Emery P,
    4. Green M,
    5. Ibrahim G,
    6. MacIver H,
    7. et al.
    Sensitivity and specificity of the classification of psoriatic arthritis criteria in early psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:3150–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Niccoli L,
    2. Nannini C,
    3. Cassara E,
    4. Kaloudi O,
    5. Susini M,
    6. Lenzetti I,
    7. et al.
    Frequency of iridocyclitis in patients with early psoriatic arthritis: a prospective, follow up study. Int J Rheum Dis 2012;15:414–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nossent JC,
    2. Gran JT
    . Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis in northern Norway. Scand J Rheumatol 2009;38:251–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Feld J,
    2. Chandran V,
    3. Haroon N,
    4. Inman R,
    5. Gladman D
    . Axial disease in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a critical comparison. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018;14:363–71.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chandran V,
    2. Barrett J,
    3. Schentag CT,
    4. Farewell VT,
    5. Gladman DD
    . Axial psoriatic arthritis: update on a longterm prospective study. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2744–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hanly JG,
    2. Russell ML,
    3. Gladman DD
    . Psoriatic spondyloarthropathy: a long term prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 1988;47:386–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Queiro R,
    2. Belzunegui J,
    3. Gonzalez C,
    4. De DJ,
    5. Sarasqueta C,
    6. Torre JC,
    7. et al.
    Clinically asymptomatic axial disease in psoriatic spondyloarthropathy. A retrospective study. Clin Rheumatol 2002;21:10–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mease PJ,
    2. Palmer JB,
    3. Liu M,
    4. Kavanaugh A,
    5. Pandurengan R,
    6. Ritchlin CT,
    7. et al.
    Influence of axial involvement on clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis: analysis from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry. J Rheumatol 2018;45:1389–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lubrano E,
    2. Parsons WJ,
    3. Marchesoni A,
    4. Olivieri I,
    5. D’Angelo S,
    6. Cauli A,
    7. et al.
    The definition and measurement of axial psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2015 Nov;93:40–2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lubrano E,
    2. Spadaro A
    . Axial psoriatic arthritis: an intriguing clinical entity or a subset of an intriguing disease? Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:1027–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fernandez-Sueiro JL
    . The challenge and need of defining axial psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2633–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. van der Linden S,
    2. Valkenburg HA,
    3. Cats A
    . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Brubacher B,
    3. Buskila D,
    4. Langevitz P,
    5. Farewell V
    . Differences in the expression of spondyloarthropathy: a comparison between ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Invest Med 1993;16:1–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jadon DR,
    2. Sengupta R,
    3. Nightingale A,
    4. Lindsay M,
    5. Korendowych E,
    6. Robinson G,
    7. et al.
    Axial Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis study: defining the clinical and radiographic phenotype of psoriatic spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:701–07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Inman RD,
    3. Cook RJ,
    4. Maksymowych W,
    5. Braun J,
    6. Davis JC,
    7. et al.
    International spondyloarthritis interobserver reliability exercise—the INSPIRE study: I. Assessment of spinal measures. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1733–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Helliwell PS
    . Assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015;33 (5 Suppl 93):S44–7.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Taylor WJ,
    2. Harrison AA
    . Could the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) be a valid measure of disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:311–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Fernandez-Sueiro JL,
    2. Willisch A,
    3. Pertega-Diaz S,
    4. Tasende JA,
    5. Fernandez-Lopez JC,
    6. Villar NO,
    7. et al.
    Validity of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index for the evaluation of disease activity in axial psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:78–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Orbai AM,
    2. de Wit M,
    3. Mease P,
    4. Shea JA,
    5. Gossec L,
    6. Leung YY,
    7. et al.
    International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:673–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Eder L,
    2. Chandran V,
    3. Shen H,
    4. Cook RJ,
    5. Gladman DD
    . Is ASDAS better than BASDAI as a measure of disease activity in axial psoriatic arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:2160–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 45, Issue 12
1 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Is Axial Psoriatic Arthritis?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What Is Axial Psoriatic Arthritis?
JOY FELD, VINOD CHANDRAN, DAFNA D. GLADMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2018, 45 (12) 1611-1613; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180802

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
What Is Axial Psoriatic Arthritis?
JOY FELD, VINOD CHANDRAN, DAFNA D. GLADMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2018, 45 (12) 1611-1613; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180802
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Patient Experience of Drug Side Effects in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Intriguing Data From an Exploratory Online Survey
  • The Challenge of Addressing the Rheumatology Workforce Shortage
  • Alterations of Plasma Microbiome: A Potentially New Perspective to the Dysbiosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire