Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleRheumatoid Arthritis

Utility of Dose Frequency Adjustment in Tocilizumab Administration for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Shuntaro Saito, Yuko Kaneko, Keisuke Izumi and Tsutomu Takeuchi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2017, 44 (5) 553-557; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.161047
Shuntaro Saito
From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Kaneko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keisuke Izumi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsutomu Takeuchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tsutake@z5.keio.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To assess the utility of dose frequency adjustment of tocilizumab (TCZ) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Patients who received TCZ at 3-week (n = 24) or 5-week (n = 61) interval were evaluated.

Results. Disease Activity Score at 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the 3-week group significantly improved after 3 administrations at 3-week intervals (from 4.2 to 2.7, p = 0.001). Forty-five of the patients in the 5-week group (74%) successfully continued 5-week interval administration without disease exacerbation. Lower C-reactive protein level at TCZ initiation and shorter duration to remission achievement were key to successful dose frequency reduction.

Conclusion. Adjusting the dose frequency of intravenous TCZ is a useful strategy.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • TOCILIZUMAB
  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)1. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to human IL-6 receptor, and has proven to be effective in the treatment of RA2,3.

Although the standard dose of intravenous (IV) TCZ is 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks, adjusting dose frequency of TCZ is a promising strategy from the experience on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and several basic studies4,5. However, there are few reports discussing the interval titration of TCZ. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of the dose frequency adjustment for TCZ in daily practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively registered patients with RA who had initiated IV TCZ of 8 mg/kg for every 4 weeks and treated for more than 12 weeks in our institution since January 2008 to June 2015 were included in our observational study. Shortening or prolongation of TCZ interval was performed with patient consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee (Ethics Committee of Keio University School of Medicine, approval number: 20110136). Informed consent from the patients was waived according to the regulations in Japan.

The patients who were receiving TCZ at a 3-week interval more than 3× because of insufficient response to a 4-week TCZ [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) > 2.8] were assigned to the “3-week group.” Those with a 5-week interval after achieving remission [Disease Activity Score for 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6] were assigned to the “5-week group.” The patients in the 5-week group were further classified into 2 groups: patients who experienced an RA flare within 3× of administration were defined as the “5-week failure group,” and those without RA flare as the “5-week continued group.” RA flare was defined as the increase of RA activity for which their attending physician shortened the administration interval.

Clinical information was collected from medical records, and the CDAI6 and DAS28-ESR7 were calculated. The time of dose frequency adjustment was set as Week 0, and the disease activity was collected for 3 continuous infusions. Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed on days of the TCZ administrations.

Descriptive values are expressed as median [interquartile range (IQR)]. The 3 groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the chi-square test. Comparison between the 2 groups was conducted by paired or unpaired Wilcoxon test and Fisher’s exact test. The factors related to the 5-week prolongation failure were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the threshold of variables was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under the curve (AUC). P values < 0.05 were regarded as significant. All statistical analyses were performed with JMP software 11.2.0.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics in each group

A total of 331 patients were included in our study. Among them, 24 patients were in the 3-week group and 61 patients were in the 5-week group, whereas the remaining 246 patients were treated with 4-week TCZ administration. Characteristics of the 3 groups at TCZ initiation and at dose frequency adjustment are summarized in Table 1. The difference in the CDAI and DAS28-ESR at TCZ initiation between the 3 groups was not statistically significant; however, each of the levels of component, including tender joint count, swollen joint count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR in the 3-week group at TCZ initiation were higher than in the 4-week and the 5-week groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of TCZ administration group at the initiation of TCZ and at the start of dose frequency adjustment. Values are median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated.

Dose frequency increase

Twenty-four patients (73%) were administered TCZ at a 3-week interval. The median (IQR) duration from TCZ initiation to dose frequency increase was 20 weeks (12–52 weeks). The DAS28-ESR at TCZ initiation was 5.7, and decreased from 4.2 at Week 0 to 2.7 at Week 9 (p = 0.001; Figure 1A). Changes in CDAI were similar (Supplementary Figure 1A, available with the online version of this article). Notably, the levels of CRP and ESR at dose frequency increase were higher than the normal range in almost half of the patients despite TCZ treatment, but were quickly normalized after the 3-week interval administration (Supplementary Figures 2A and 2C, respectively, available with the online version of this article). No serious adverse event was reported during the dose frequency increase.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Transition of DAS28-ESR in (A) the 3-week group, (B) the 5-week group, and (C) the 5-week continued and failure groups. ROC curve showing (D) a cutoff of CRP level and (E) the duration of TCZ administration to achieve remission, for prolongation failure. * p < 0.01 for the comparison with the value at Week 0 in each group. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; DAS28-ESR: 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on ESR; ROC: receiver-operating characteristic; CRP: C-reactive protein; TCZ: tocilizumab; AUC: area under the curve.

Dose frequency reduction

Sixty-one patients (18.4%) were administered TCZ at a 5-week interval. The median (IQR) duration from TCZ initiation to remission achievement was 16 weeks (12–40) and to interval prolongation was 80 weeks (36–108). Overall, after 3 cycles of 5-week TCZ administrations, the DAS28-ESR slightly but significantly increased from 1.3 at Week 0 to 1.6 at Week 15 (p = 0.027; Figure 1B). The CRP and ESR levels were slightly elevated after dose frequency reduction (Supplementary Figures 2B and 2D, respectively, available with the online version of this article).

Of the 61 patients in this group, 16 patients (26.2%) went to the 5-week failure group while the remaining 45 patients (73.8%) went to the 5-week continued group. Changes in the DAS28-ESR in both groups are shown in Figure 1C. The DAS28-ESR did not change (from 1.2 to 1.3, p = 0.56) in the 5-week continued group, but increased from 1.8 to 3.4 in the 5-week failure group (p < 0.001). Changes in the CDAI were similar (Supplementary Figures 1B and 1C, available with the online version of this article). The disease activity in all the 5-week failure patients returned to remission levels after several re-administration cycles of 4-week TCZ (data not shown).

The number of patients with further dose frequency reduction is summarized in Supplementary Figure 3 (available with the online version of this article).

Predictors of prolongation failure

Although no significant difference in demographic characteristics between the 5-week continued and failure groups was found (Table 2), the CRP and ESR levels at TCZ initiation were significantly lower, and the duration from TCZ initiation to remission achievement was significantly shorter in the 5-week continued group than the 5-week failure group (CRP 1.16 mg/dl vs 3.33 mg/dl, p < 0.01; ESR 33 mm/h vs 74 mm/h, p < 0.01; duration 12 weeks vs 32 weeks, p < 0.01). The DAS28-ESR at the initiation of prolongation was higher in the 5-week failure group than in the 5-week continued group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Characteristics of the 5-week continued group and the 5-week failure group. Values are median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis with possible variables including CRP at TCZ initiation, the duration to remission achievement, and DAS28-ESR at dose frequency reduction identified higher CRP level at TCZ initiation (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.47–9.92, p < 0.01), and longer duration to remission achievement (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10–1.48, p < 0.01) as independent factors for prolongation failure (Supplementary Table 1, available with the online version of this article). In addition, in another multivariate analysis including TCZ monotherapy, the number of previous biologics treatment, prednisolone dose, and methotrexate dose as a covariate did not identify them as a statistically significant risk (data not shown).

ROC analysis determined the level of CRP at TCZ initiation and the duration to remission achievement to be 2.40 mg/ml (69% sensitivity, 87% specificity, AUC = 0.78) and 24 weeks (85% sensitivity, 88% specificity, AUC = 0.93) as the threshold to discriminate the 5-week failure group from the 5-week continued group, respectively (Figures 1D and 1E, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Throughout our study, we demonstrated the utility of adjusting dose frequency of IV TCZ. Dose frequency increase to 3-week interval was useful to control disease activity in patients with insufficient response to 4-week administration. Dose frequency reduction was feasible in the majority of patients who achieved DAS28-ESR remission. A CRP level < 2.4 mg/dl at TCZ initiation and a remission achievement within 24 weeks were key to successful dose frequency reduction.

CRP is an acute-phase protein of hepatic origin induced by IL-6 signal stimulation8. Although TCZ is capable of reducing CRP significantly, CRP levels were not normalized in most of the patients with RA who showed insufficient response to 4-week TCZ, indicating that IL-6 signal was not adequately suppressed in such patients. Our study has proved that dose frequency increase of TCZ could lead to greater inhibition of IL-6 signal.

Two studies attempting TCZ discontinuation reported the rate for maintaining remission to be < 20%9,10, indicating dose frequency reduction may be favorable. To our knowledge, our study is the first report describing the utility of TCZ decreasing dose frequency, showing that about 75% of patients could maintain remission with a 5-week interval administration cycle, and further prolongation to a 6- or 7-week interval was available in more than 80% of those who attempted further prolongation. Patients with lower CRP levels at TCZ initiation may be driven by a weaker IL-6 pathway. Also, patients who have responded to TCZ more quickly are candidates for dose frequency reduction.

We should note the limitations of our study. First, ours is a single-center, prospective observational study based on daily clinical practice. Second, discretion in adjusting TCZ interval depended on the attending physicians. We need a further study to determine appropriate criteria to induce dose frequency adjustment. Third, we did not assess the effect on radiographic changes. Fourth, we did not measure serum TCZ levels, IL-6 levels, or anti-TCZ antibody. Although the detection rate of anti-TCZ antibodies is reported to be infrequent11,12, it should be further evaluated.

Dose frequency increase would provide better control of RA disease activity in some patients, and dose frequency reduction would allow some patients to take less medication, leading to greater safety and lower costs without disease exacerbation.

ONLINE SUPPLEMENT

Supplementary material accompanies the online version of this article.

Acknowledgment

We offer special thanks to Ms. Harumi Kondo and Ms. Mayumi Ohta for collecting data.

  • Accepted for publication January 25, 2017.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McInnes IB,
    2. Schett G
    . The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2205–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dougados M,
    2. Kissel K,
    3. Sheeran T,
    4. Tak PP,
    5. Conaghan PG,
    6. Mola EM,
    7. et al.
    Adding tocilizumab or switching to tocilizumab monotherapy in methotrexate inadequate responders: 24-week symptomatic and structural results of a 2-year randomised controlled strategy trial in rheumatoid arthritis (ACT-RAY). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:43–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gabay C,
    2. Emery P,
    3. van Vollenhoven R,
    4. Dikranian A,
    5. Alten R,
    6. Pavelka K,
    7. et al.
    Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet 2013;381:1541–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. van Herwaarden N,
    2. van der Maas A,
    3. Minten MJ,
    4. van den Hoogen FH,
    5. Kievit W,
    6. van Vollenhoven RF,
    7. et al.
    Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. BMJ 2015;350:h1389.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fautrel B,
    2. Pham T,
    3. Alfaiate T,
    4. Gandjbakhch F,
    5. Foltz V,
    6. Morel J,
    7. et al.
    Step-down strategy of spacing TNF-blocker injections for established rheumatoid arthritis in remission: results of the multicentre non-inferiority randomised open-label controlled trial (STRASS: Spacing of TNF-blocker injections in Rheumatoid ArthritiS Study). Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:59–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Smolen JS,
    2. Breedveld FC,
    3. Schiff MH,
    4. Kalden JR,
    5. Emery P,
    6. Eberl G,
    7. et al.
    A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology 2003;42:244–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wells G,
    2. Becker JC,
    3. Teng J,
    4. Dougados M,
    5. Schiff M,
    6. Smolen J,
    7. et al.
    Validation of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria based on C-reactive protein against disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and comparison with the DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:954–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Castell JV,
    2. Gomez-Lechon MJ,
    3. David M,
    4. Hirano T,
    5. Kishimoto T,
    6. Heinrich PC
    . Recombinant human interleukin-6 (IL-6/BSF-2/HSF) regulates the synthesis of acute phase proteins in human hepatocytes. FEBS Lett 1988;232:347–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nishimoto N,
    2. Amano K,
    3. Hirabayashi Y,
    4. Horiuchi T,
    5. Ishii T,
    6. Iwahashi M,
    7. et al.
    Drug free REmission/low disease activity after cessation of tocilizumab (Actemra) Monotherapy (DREAM) study. Mod Rheumatol 2014;24:17–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Huizinga TW,
    2. Conaghan PG,
    3. Martin-Mola E,
    4. Schett G,
    5. Amital H,
    6. Xavier RM,
    7. et al.
    Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years and the effect of tocilizumab discontinuation following sustained remission in the second and third year of the ACT-RAY study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:35–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dougados M,
    2. Kissel K,
    3. Conaghan PG,
    4. Mola EM,
    5. Schett G,
    6. Gerli R,
    7. et al.
    Clinical, radiographic and immunogenic effects after 1 year of tocilizumab-based treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: the ACT-RAY study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:803–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Vincent FB,
    2. Morand EF,
    3. Murphy K,
    4. Mackay F,
    5. Mariette X,
    6. Marcelli C
    . Antidrug antibodies (ADAb) to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-specific neutralising agents in chronic inflammatory diseases: a real issue, a clinical perspective. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:165–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 44, Issue 5
1 May 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of Dose Frequency Adjustment in Tocilizumab Administration for Rheumatoid Arthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Utility of Dose Frequency Adjustment in Tocilizumab Administration for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Shuntaro Saito, Yuko Kaneko, Keisuke Izumi, Tsutomu Takeuchi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2017, 44 (5) 553-557; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Utility of Dose Frequency Adjustment in Tocilizumab Administration for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Shuntaro Saito, Yuko Kaneko, Keisuke Izumi, Tsutomu Takeuchi
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2017, 44 (5) 553-557; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161047
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
    • Acknowledgment
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

TOCILIZUMAB
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of Aging on Rheumatoid Factor and Anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody Positivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Red Cell Distribution Width and Absolute Lymphocyte Count Associate With Biomarkers of Inflammation and Subsequent Mortality in Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Can Patients With Controlled Rheumatoid Arthritis Taper Methotrexate From Targeted Therapy and Sustain Remission? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Rheumatoid Arthritis

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tocilizumab
  • rheumatoid arthritis

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire