Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review

Roaa S. Alsolaimani, Sankalp V. Bhavsar, Nader A. Khalidi, Christian Pagnoux, Jennifer L. Mandzia, KengYeow Tay and Lillian J. Barra
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2016, 43 (3) 648-656; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150143
Roaa S. Alsolaimani
From the Division of Rheumatology, Western University, London; Division of Rheumatology, McMaster University, Hamilton; Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Division of Radiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Medicine, King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sankalp V. Bhavsar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nader A. Khalidi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Pagnoux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer L. Mandzia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KengYeow Tay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lillian J. Barra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lbarra2@uwo.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Involvement of intracranial arteries in giant cell arteritis (GCA) is rare. We describe the neurologic complications of intracranial GCA (IC GCA) and available treatment options.

Methods. We describe 5 IC GCA cases from 3 Canadian vasculitis centers and review the literature. We searched English-language publications reporting similar patients meeting American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for GCA and having intracranial artery involvement diagnosed by autopsy, magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography, or conventional angiography.

Results. All 5 cases of IC GCA met ACR criteria for GCA; 4 cases had a temporal artery biopsy that was consistent with GCA. All cases experienced cerebrovascular accident(s). Arteritis involved the following vessels: intracranial internal carotid (n = 1), vertebrobasilar arteries (n = 1), or both (n = 3). All cases received aspirin and oral prednisone (preceded by intravenous methylprednisone in 3 cases), combined with an immunosuppressant in 4 cases. All patients survived; 2 had complete neurological recovery, 3 had residual neurologic sequelae. The literature review included 42 cases from 28 publications. The clinical features of the reported cases were similar to those of our 5 cases. However, mortality was 100% in untreated cases (n = 2), 58% in those treated with corticosteroid alone (n = 31), and 40% in those treated with corticosteroid and an immunosuppressant (n = 10).

Conclusion. IC GCA appears to be associated with neurologic complications and mortality. In some cases corticosteroid alone was not sufficient to prevent neurologic complications. The role of additional immunosuppressive agents needs further investigation.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • GIANT CELL ARTERITIS
  • STROKE
  • CRANIAL ARTERY

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is large-vessel vasculitis affecting individuals over age 50 years, with a prevalence of about 3 in 10,0001. Complications of GCA can be serious, including blindness, stroke, and aortic dissection. Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) occur in 4% to 6% of patients with GCA2. Despite being uncommon, CVA is reported as the leading cause of mortality in GCA3,4. The causes of CVA in GCA are multifactorial and include hypercoagulability and accelerated atherosclerosis from a chronic proinflammatory state, treatment complications from longterm high-dose corticosteroids, and direct damage to blood vessels from arteritis. GCA is usually limited to extracranial vessels including the carotid artery, which can contribute to risk of stroke. It has been suggested that the inflammation in GCA usually involves the elastic tissue in the artery wall, and because the intradural portions of the artery have little or no elastic tissue, they tend to be spared4. However, cases of intracranial portions of the internal carotid and vertebral artery have been reported4,5,6,7,8. Although involvement of intracranial arteries is rare in GCA, it can lead to severe neurologic complications, such as multiple territory CVA, multiinfarct dementia, and death.

We describe 5 new cases of intracranial GCA (IC GCA) and review 42 cases in the literature to detail presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of this rare association.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case series

We reviewed medical charts of 5 patients with IC GCA in 3 Canadian vasculitis specialty centers (CanVasc). All cases were diagnosed with GCA by the treating physician and they met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for GCA9. Temporal artery biopsy was performed in all cases within 1 to 2 weeks of presentation, except Case 4 (biopsy was performed a month later). They presented with CVA and had evidence of intracranial vasculitis on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), or conventional angiography. Data regarding age, sex, GCA and neurologic symptoms, timing of neurologic symptoms, laboratory tests [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), investigation for thrombophilia and vasculitis], imaging studies, treatments, and outcomes were collected from medical records. Research Ethics Board Approval from participating institutions was obtained.

Systematic literature review

We searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase (1950-December 2012), and the Cochrane library (up to December 2012). Abstracts from ACR (2009–2012) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) annual meetings were searched (2009–2012). Our literature search combined the terms “giant cell arteritis,” “temporal arteritis,” “stroke,” and “multi-infarct dementia” (for full search strategy see Appendix 1). A hand search of references in relevant articles was also conducted to identify additional cases.

Publication selection

Two authors (RA and LB) independently conducted the literature search and screened citations. Citations were first screened by title and abstract to retrieve relevant articles. The retrieved articles were then reviewed in full, applying the following inclusion criteria: GCA diagnosed by treating physician based on clinical presentation, temporal artery biopsy, inflammatory markers, and/or imaging; ACR classification criteria for GCA with at least 3 out of 5 criteria met or a temporal artery biopsy consistent with GCA; CVA diagnosed by treating physician based on clinical symptoms and imaging; and involvement of the intracranial portions (within the skull) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and its branches, vertebral artery, or basilar artery. Intracranial involvement for ICA and vertebral artery was classified into: (1) extradural: intracranial segment of vessel prior to dural perforation; and (2) intradural: intracranial segment after piercing the dura4. This distinction was included based on reports that suggested that intradural involvement was exceedingly rare4 and may be associated with worse outcomes. Patients with only extracranial involvement were excluded. Vessel involvement had to be determined by autopsy (histologic examination), MRA, CTA, or conventional angiography. Diagnosis made by duplex ultrasonography was excluded. Articles in a language other than English were excluded.

Data extraction

From the selected articles we extracted the publication details, followup times, clinical presentation, ESR, biopsy and imaging investigations, treatment, outcomes, and, if applicable, autopsy reports. We did not collect CRP values because these were not reported in the majority of papers. Definitions of complete versus partial recovery were heterogeneous across studies. We defined “no residual neurologic symptoms” based on physician opinion as complete recovery and “any residual neurologic symptoms” as partial recovery.

RESULTS

Case series

The characteristics of our 5 cases with IC GCA are summarized in Table 1. All cases had at least 1 risk factor for atherosclerosis. All had a temporal artery biopsy that was consistent with GCA, except Case 5, who had a normal temporal artery on biopsy. Hypercoagulable state and systemic vasculitis were ruled out in all cases. All were treated with corticosteroids and aspirin (ASA; 3 at diagnosis and 2 after CVA) and 4/5 with additional immunosuppressant(s). In applicable cases, the management of cardiovascular risk factors was optimized. Classic GCA symptoms improved within 48 h of starting treatment. All patients survived with no relapses requiring increased corticosteroids or the additional immunosuppressive agents during their followup. Two of the 5 had complete neurologic recovery and the remaining had mild impairments; improvement in neurologic symptoms occurred slowly over the course of followup.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of 5 patients with intracranial giant cell arteritis (IC GCA)

Case 1

A 75-year-old man presented with headaches and painless vision loss. He had evidence of arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy in the left eye. Prednisone 80 mg was initiated. Two weeks later, he presented with disorientation, receptive aphasia, behavior changes, acute apraxia, and right-side weakness. MRA of the head showed severe narrowing of the left ICA and irregularities in both posterior cerebral arteries (Figure 1A). He was given ASA and high-dose prednisone 80 mg was continued. A month later, he presented with worsening confusion and personality changes. MRA of the head showed 2 new infarcts within the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory in the left frontal lobe. CTA of the head showed progressive narrowing of the left ICA lesion to the point of near occlusion distally. He started intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC) 1 g monthly for 6 doses followed by subcutaneous (SC) methotrexate (MTX) 25 mg/week. His prednisone was continued at 80 mg daily, then gradually tapered to 5 mg daily over a 5-month period. Over the 3-year followup, his cognition and weakness improved. He has not developed any new deficits or strokes. MRA performed 1 year after diagnosis did not show any disease progression.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Imaging of intracranial vessels. A: Case 1. Maximum intensity projections of flow-sensitive magnetic resonance angiography show severe stenosis at the supraclinoid left internal carotid artery (thin white arrow) and irregularity of the left posterior cerebral artery (white arrowhead). B: Case 2. Computed tomography angiogram shows near occlusion of the right intradural vertebral artery (left). Post-contrast MRI shows abnormal mural enhancement of the basilar artery (top right) and vertebral arteries bilaterally (bottom right). C: Case 3. Digital subtraction angiogram shows severe narrowing at the anterior genu of the left internal carotid artery.

Case 2

An 82-year-old man with polymyalgia rheumatica presented with a 2-week history of right scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, vertigo, blurry vision, and diplopia. Subsequently he had dysarthria, right-side arm weakness, and a facial droop. He was treated acutely with IV tissue plasminogen activator. He had scattered cerebellar infarcts and left pontine infarct on cerebral MRI. CTA showed caliber irregularities along the cervical vertebral arteries bilaterally. The intradural right vertebral artery was almost occluded, while the left intradural vertebral artery and basilar artery were irregular in caliber. There was abnormal mural enhancement of both the intradural vertebral artery and the basilar artery (Figure 1B). He was treated with IV methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 days followed by prednisone 70 mg/day. He was given IV CYC 1 g monthly for 7 doses, followed by MTX 25 mg/week SC for maintenance. His prednisone was tapered to 5 mg daily. ASA was continued. He recovered completely except for some mild dysphagia and is doing well 10 months after his initial presentation. MRA performed 1 year after diagnosis did not show any disease progression.

Case 3

A 66-year-old woman with GCA who was treated with prednisone 80 mg/day developed symptoms of confusion, aphasia, mild dysarthria, right facial droop, right-side weakness, and sensory impairment during 1 week when the prednisone was diminished to 40 mg/day. CT of the head showed new infarcts in the left frontal lobe. Cerebral CTA and MRA showed a high-grade stenosis in the left ICA in the cavernous/anterior genu segments, mild stenosis in the right ICA, and vessel irregularity in the distal branches of the external carotid artery. The intracranial and extracranial vertebral arteries were small and irregular as was the basilar artery. Findings were further confirmed with conventional angiography (Figure 1). The patient was treated with ASA and IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone 70 mg/day and IV CYC 1 g monthly for 6 doses. She also had a left cavernous ICA angioplasty because of progressive worsening of the stenosis over time. Clopidogrel 75 mg daily was added. Five years later, she has mild right facial droop and mild decrease in power on the right side and has not had any recurrent strokes. MRA performed 1 year after diagnosis did not show any disease progression.

Case 4

A 40-year-old man presented with bilateral occipital headaches10. A month later he presented with left-side facial droop, left facial numbness, decreased blinking, and dysarthria. He was diagnosed with Bell’s palsy and was treated with prednisone 40 mg/day for 5 days and ASA. His facial palsy resolved but headache continued. A month later he developed left upper limb sensory disturbance. Lumbar puncture revealed inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid. A brain MRI showed several punctate areas of restricted diffusion within the deep white matter of the right MCA and right posterior inferior cerebellar artery territories. Conventional cerebral angiogram showed diffuse areas of multifocal narrowing and irregularities within the right anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and distal MCA branches; milder irregularities were found in the left ACA and bilateral posterior circulation vessels. A temporal artery biopsy was performed and was consistent with GCA. Prednisone 80 mg daily was initiated with complete resolution of symptoms. He continued to do well with gradual prednisone taper and did not develop recurrent neurologic symptoms over 2 years of followup.

Case 5

A 70-year-old woman with new-onset GCA, treated with prednisone 50 mg daily and ASA, developed word-finding difficulty, dysarthria, and right hemiparesis 3 weeks later. MRI of the head revealed an acute ischemic infarct in the left frontal lobe, and bilateral critical stenosis or near-occlusion of the terminal portion of both ICA in the supraclinoid region, with some milder stenosis within the petrous segments of both ICA. This stenosis was in relative isolation with no other changes of significant atherosclerosis within the ICA bulbs, proximal vessels, or aortic arch. She was treated with clopidogrel 75 mg daily, IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 5 days, followed by prednisone 50 mg and MTX 25 mg orally weekly. Three years later she is still in complete remission, taking MTX and prednisone.

Literature review

Search results are shown in Figure 2; 28 articles and 42 cases met our inclusion criteria3,4,7,8,11–34. In our analysis we also included our 5 cases for a total of 47 cases with IC GCA. Our cases had characteristics similar to those found in the literature. We had 1 patient who was under 50 years of age; however, this patient had a temporal artery biopsy consistent with GCA10.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Literature search results. “Not meeting diagnostic criteria”: cranial vasculitis not proven on magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography, or autopsy. ACR: American College of Rheumatology; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism; CNS: central nervous system.

Demographics and clinical features of IC GCA cases

Forty-five cases (96%) were over age 50 years and the mean age at the time of neurologic symptoms was 71 years. There were 19 women (42%). Data on cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and smoking) were available for 22 cases (47%). Of those, 10 (45%) had 1 risk factor, 8 (36%) had 2 or more risk factors, and 4 (18%) had no risk factors.

The majority of cases (30/47; 64%) developed CVA after GCA symptoms or diagnosis. The median time until CVA was 60 days (range 7 to 6205). Eight (17%) developed CVA at the same time they presented with GCA symptoms. Nine (19%) had no GCA symptoms at any point during the disease course, but met ACR criteria by having a positive temporal artery biopsy (7 cases) or a positive histopathology of temporal artery postmortem (1 case).

Table 2 summarizes the clinical features of the 47 cases. As expected, the most common GCA symptom was headache, in 34 cases (72%). A high proportion (26%) experienced unilateral blindness. Only 30 cases (64%) had an elevated ESR at the time of diagnosis. The most common neurologic manifestations were cerebellar (34 cases; 72%), motor impairment (29 cases; 62%), and altered level of consciousness (23 cases; 49%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Clinical features of IC GCA and distribution of affected vessels (n = 47).

Treatment and outcomes of patients with IC GCA

Drug therapies used in the IC GCA cases are summarized in Table 3. Twenty-nine cases were not receiving corticosteroid at the time of stroke. Of these, 8 had stroke as the presenting feature of GCA, 8 had no classic GCA symptoms, 12 had a missed diagnosis of GCA, and 1 could not tolerate prednisone. Three cases had been tapered to doses of prednisone below 10 mg daily at the time of stroke. Ten cases received an immunosuppressive agent in addition to high-dose corticosteroids; of these, 1 had angioplasty. Another case had angioplasty in addition to corticosteroids. Three out of 45 cases were receiving ASA prior to stroke. After the diagnosis of stroke, 10 were started on ASA, 6 on clopidogrel, and 12 on anticoagulation. Twenty-seven cases (57%) were not reported to be receiving any antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Treatments and outcomes of IC GCA cases (n = 45).

The overall mortality was high (24/45; 53%). Of the survivors, 10 cases (22%) had complete neurologic recovery. The cause of death was attributable to complications of IC GCA in most cases; 4 cases (9%) died from infectious complications. Mortality was 60% (10/17) when vertebrobasilar arteries were involved and 81% (9/11) for extradural disease compared to 48% (16/33) for intradural disease. Mortality in the cases not treated with corticosteroids or who were receiving prednisone doses below 10 mg daily at the time of stroke was similar to those receiving higher doses of corticosteroids (56% vs 50%, respectively). Two cases were not receiving any treatment throughout the course of their disease and both died from cerebrovascular complications. Cases treated with an immunosuppressive agent in addition to corticosteroids had lower mortality, 4 out of 10 (40%) versus 18 out of 31 (58%) in the cases treated with corticosteroids only. Four of 8 cases treated with CYC died: 1 from pneumonia, 1 from line sepsis post-angioplasty, and 2 died shortly after presentation from severe stroke complications.

Discussion

We describe a total of 47 GCA cases (5 new) with IC involvement. Cerebral vascular events occurred after the diagnosis of GCA in 64%, with a median duration of 60 days. A large proportion of cases were not receiving prednisone (64%) or aspirin (93%) at the time of CVA. Significant morbidity and mortality was associated with IC GCA: mortality was 53% with a median time to death of 12 days; of the cases who survived, 24% had residual neurologic deficits.

Given the significant complications associated with IC GCA, it is important to identify these patients early. There are no published studies that investigate predictors for intracranial vasculitis in patients with GCA. We found that in IC GCA, the proportion of males (58%) and prevalence of blindness (26%) was higher, and the prevalence of polymyalgia rheumatica and jaw claudication was lower (21% and 23%, respectively) than previously reported for GCA2,35,36. However, we cannot make any conclusions regarding screening, especially because the incidence of IC GCA is unknown. CVA in GCA is reported to occur in 4%–6%2, but the proportion attributable to IC vasculitis versus atherosclerosis remains unclear. The presence of active GCA symptoms at the time of CVA may suggest IC vasculitis. However, we found that 19% of cases did not have any GCA symptoms before or at the time of CVA, and upon autopsy some of these cases were shown to have active IC arteritis.

We also observed that IC GCA commonly presented with multiterritory CVA, with a predilection for vertebrobasilar arteries. This can be distinguished from atherosclerotic disease, which more commonly affects the middle cerebral arteries4,37.

The diagnosis of IC GCA is also limited by the available imaging modalities. Although conventional angiography is the most sensitive, it is not specific for vasculitis, particularly in patients with concomitant atherosclerotic disease. Findings that support vasculitis include alternating areas of stenosis and dilatation in the second- and third-order arterial branches and venous territories; and less commonly, long-segment stenosis and pseudoaneurysms38. CTA and MRA evaluate the vessel wall and lumen39. However, specific signs of vasculitis (vessel wall edema, mural contrast enhancement, and circumferential vessel wall thickness) may not be detected in smaller vessels, especially when not using 3-T MRI18. Positron emission tomography has been shown to be more sensitive than MRI40, but it is not widely available, provides limited anatomical visualization, and may be falsely positive in acute atherosclerotic vascular disease41.

If IC GCA is suspected, there are no controlled or observational studies to guide treatment decisions. We found lower mortality in patients who started receiving immunosuppressive agents in conjunction with corticosteroids compared to those who received corticosteroids alone (40% vs 58%, respectively). Prednisone and methylprednisone inefficiently cross the blood-brain barrier, which may make treating central nervous system vasculitis with these agents difficult; this raises the question whether dexamethasone should be used42. However, only one of the reported cases used dexamethasone, so there is insufficient information to comment on its effectiveness in treating IC GCA compared to other corticosteroids. Several studies examined using immunosuppressive agents in conjunction with corticosteroids in GCA43,44,45. In a metaanalysis, MTX was shown to be better than placebo in preventing relapse of GCA. It is also an effective steroid-sparing agent45. CYC has also shown potential benefit as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in patients with GCA43, and there is evidence supporting its use in primary angiitis of the central nervous system46.

Given that a large proportion of IC GCA cases had at least 1 risk factor for atherosclerotic disease (> 80%), and that GCA bears an increased risk of cardiovascular events47 and possible worsening of preexisting cardiovascular comorbidities by corticosteroids, the management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in GCA is critical. Unfortunately, the majority of the articles included in this review did not report how cardiovascular risk factors were managed. Based on 2 recently published metaanalyses, antiplatelet therapy appears to be beneficial in subjects with GCA48,49. Only 57% of the reported IC GCA cases were started on an antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy although they all experienced a CVA.

Our study has several strengths: we carefully characterized vascular risk factors, imaging findings, treatment, and outcomes. Our newly reported cases were managed in an interdisciplinary clinic (rheumatology, neurology, ophthalmology, pathology, and neuroradiology); several imaging modalities were used to confirm diagnosis of IC GCA and atherosclerotic CVA was ruled out. The cases had very good neurological outcomes. The presentation and clinical outcomes of our cases were similar to those in a recent series that described 4 cases of IC GCA that were also treated aggressively with combinations of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants50. From the literature review, the mortality of IC GCA may be an overestimate, because severe cases tend to be more commonly reported. Alternatively, underreporting might also be a problem: CVA secondary to GCA might be misdiagnosed because of the lack of classic GCA symptoms, or CVA in patients with GCA may be wrongly attributed to atherosclerotic disease.

IC GCA is a serious condition and may be associated with neurologic complications and mortality. When GCA is diagnosed, physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for intracranial involvement, particularly in patients with neurologic symptoms and vision loss. If IC GCA is suspected, imaging should be performed to confirm intracranial vasculitis and to distinguish it from atherosclerotic disease. Controlled drug studies for IC GCA are lacking. However, it can be treated like complicated GCA following current published guidelines with IV methylprednisolone followed by 1 mg/kg prednisone. Alternatively, dexamethasone may be a better corticosteroid option for IC GCA, as it crosses the blood-brain barrier more efficiently42. Concomitant cardiovascular risk factors are common in IC GCA and must be managed. Antiplatelet therapy should be considered for all patients with GCA and should be initiated in patients with arterial thromboembolic events without contraindications. We found that in some cases corticosteroid alone was not sufficient to prevent neurologic complications; it may be necessary to add other immunosuppressive agents, such as MTX or CYC depending on the severity of the disease. Larger studies are needed to better characterize IC GCA, determine optimal treatment, and improve outcomes.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge CanVasc members Simon Carette, Rae Yeung, Nataliya Milman, Tanveer Towheed, Leilani Famorca, Carter Thorne, Patrick Liang, Michelle Goulet, Christian Pineau, Judith Trudeau, Paul Fortin, Volodko Bakowsky, Christine Dipchand, Kam Shojania, David Cabral, Elaine Yacyshyn, Aurore Fifi-Mah, Susan Benseler, Navjot Dhindsa, Regina Taylor-Gjevre, and Majed Khraishi. The authors also thank Brad Dishan, Medical Librarian, for assisting in the literature search.

APPENDIX 1.

APPENDIX 1. Complete search strategy

EMBASE

  1. Keywords: Giant cell arteritis or GCA or temporal arteritis or Giant cell angiitis. EMTREE: Giant cell arteritis

  2. Keywords: cerebrovascular accident or CVA or stroke or brain/ cerebral/ cerebellar/ cerebral artery infarct or transient ischemic attack or TIA or intracranial/cerebral AND thromb or dementia or internal carotid/ vertebral/ basilar/ vertebrobasilar AND occlusion/ stenosis/ insufficiency or posterior circulation or neurology

EMTREE: cerebrovascular disease or brain ischemia or transient ischemic attack or brain infarction/ brainstem infarction/ cerebellum infarction or occlusive cerebrovascular disease or basilar artery obstruction or middle cerebral artery occlusion or vertebral artery stenosis or cerebral artery disease or vertebrobasilar insufficiency or cerebrovascular accident or lacunar stroke or anterior cerebral artery/ middle cerebral artery/ posterior cerebral artery/ basilar artery/ anterior communicating artery/ posterior communicating artery/ posterior inferior cerebellar artery/ brain circulus arteriosus/ meningeal artery

Medline:

  1. Keywords: Giant cell arteritis or GCA or temporal arteritis or Giant cell angiitis. MeSH: Giant cell arteritis

  2. Keywords: cerebrovascular accident or CVA or stroke or brain/ cerebral/ cerebellar/ cerebral artery infarct or transient ischemic attack or TIA or intracranial/cerebral AND thromb or dementia or internal carotid/ vertebral/ basilar/ vertebrobasilar AND occlusion/ stenosis/ insufficiency or posterior circulation or neurology

MeSH: cerebrovascular disorders or brain ischemia or brain infarction or ischemic attack, transient or vertebrobasilar insufficiency or cerebral small vessel disease, stroke, lacunar or dementia, vascular or dementia, multi-infarct or intracranial arterial disease or cerebral arterial disease or infarction (anterior, middle, posterior) cerebral artery or intracranial thrombosis or stroke or vasculitis, central nervous system

Cochrane:

  1. Keywords: Giant cell arteritis or GCA or temporal arteritis or Giant cell angiitis. MeSH: Giant cell arteritis

  2. Keywords: cerebrovascular accident or CVA or stroke or brain/ cerebral/ cerebellar/ cerebral artery infarct or transient ischemic attack or TIA or intracranial/cerebral AND thromb or dementia or internal carotid/ vertebral/ basilar/ vertebrobasilar AND occlusion/ stenosis/ insufficiency or posterior circulation or neurology

  • Accepted for publication August 28, 2015.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lawrence RC,
    2. Felson DT,
    3. Helmick CG,
    4. Arnold LM,
    5. Choi H,
    6. Deyo RA,
    7. et al.
    Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:26–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gonzalez-Gay MA,
    2. Barros S,
    3. Lopez-Diaz MJ,
    4. Garcia-Porrua C,
    5. Sanchez-Andrade A,
    6. Llorca J
    . Giant cell arteritis: disease patterns of clinical presentation in a series of 240 patients. Medicine 2005;84:269–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Save-Soderbergh J,
    2. Malmvall BE,
    3. Andersson R,
    4. Bengtsson BA
    . Giant cell arteritis as a cause of death. Report of nine cases. JAMA 1986;255:493–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wilkinson IM,
    2. Russell RW
    . Arteries of the head and neck in giant cell arteritis. A pathological study to show the pattern of arterial involvement. Arch Neurol 1972;27:378–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bogousslavsky J,
    2. Deruaz JP,
    3. Regli F
    . Bilateral obstruction of internal carotid artery from giant-cell arteritis and massive infarction limited to the vertebrobasilar area. Eur Neurol 1985;24:57–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cardell BS,
    2. Hanley T
    . A fatal case of giant-cell or temporal arteritis. J Pathol Bacteriol 1951;63:587–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sheehan MM,
    2. Keohane C,
    3. Twomey C
    . Fatal vertebral giant cell arteritis. J Clin Pathol 1993;46:1129–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Thielen KR,
    2. Wijdicks EF,
    3. Nichols DA
    . Giant cell (temporal) arteritis: involvement of the vertebral and internal carotid arteries. Mayo Clin Proc 1998;73:444–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hunder GG,
    2. Bloch DA,
    3. Michel BA,
    4. Stevens MB,
    5. Arend WP,
    6. Calabrese LH,
    7. et al.
    The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1122–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. McGeoch L,
    2. Silecky WB,
    3. Maher J,
    4. Carette S,
    5. Pagnoux C
    . Temporal arteritis in the young. Joint Bone Spine 2013;80:324–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ahdab R,
    2. Thabuy F,
    3. Menager de Froberville E,
    4. Brugieres P,
    5. Hosseini H
    . Reversible vertebral artery stenosis following corticotherapy in giant cell arteritis. Eur Neurol 2008;59:331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Akdal G,
    2. Thurtell MJ,
    3. Halmagyi GM
    . Giant cell arteritis presenting with bilateral vertebral and axillary artery occlusions. Intern Med J 2008;38:741–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Buttner T,
    2. Heye N,
    3. Przuntek H
    . Temporal arteritis with cerebral complications: report of four cases. Eur Neurol 1994;34:162–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Chowdhary V,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Fulgham J,
    4. Meyer F,
    5. Matteson EL
    . Recurrent spells and bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis in a diabetic male: A test of patien-ce(-ts). Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1098–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Dementovych N,
    2. Mishra R,
    3. Shah QA
    . Angioplasty and stent placement for complete occlusion of the vertebral artery secondary to giant cell arteritis. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:110–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Ely GM
    . Giant cell arteritis complicated by multi-infarct dementia. J Clin Rheumatol 1998;4:209–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Galetta SL,
    2. Balcer LJ,
    3. Liu GT
    . Giant cell arteritis with unusual flow-related neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Neurology 1997;49:1463–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Geiger J,
    2. Uhl M,
    3. Peter HH,
    4. Langer M,
    5. Bley TA
    . 3-T MRI detects inflammatory stenosis of the vertebral artery in giant cell arteritis. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:663–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Gibb WR,
    2. Urry PA,
    3. Lees AJ
    . Giant cell arteritis with spinal cord infarction and basilar artery thrombosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:945–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.
    1. Kjeldsen MH,
    2. Reske-Nielsen E
    . Pathological changes of the central nervous system in giant-cell arteritis. Acta Ophthalmol 1968;46:49–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Lempel J,
    2. Bernstein S,
    3. Kalina P
    . Infarction of the corpus callosum: a manifestation of giant cell arteritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E182–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Lu-Emerson C,
    2. Walker M,
    3. Huber BR,
    4. Ghodke B,
    5. Longstreth WT Jr,
    6. Khot SP
    . Lethal giant cell arteritis with multiple ischemic strokes despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapy J Neurol Sci 2010;295:120–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. McLean CA,
    2. Gonzales MF,
    3. Dowling JP
    . Systemic giant cell arteritis and cerebellar infarction. Stroke 1993;24:899–902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    1. Ronthal M,
    2. Gonzalez RG,
    3. Smith RN,
    4. Frosch MP
    . Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 21–2003. A 72-year-old man with repetitive strokes in the posterior circulation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:170–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Ruegg S,
    2. Engelter S,
    3. Jeanneret C,
    4. Hetzel A,
    5. Probst A,
    6. Steck AJ,
    7. et al.
    Bilateral vertebral artery occlusion resulting from giant cell arteritis: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 2003;82:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Salvarani C,
    2. Giannini C,
    3. Miller DV,
    4. Hunder G
    . Giant cell arteritis: involvement of intracranial arteries. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:985–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.
    1. Semmler A,
    2. Urbach H,
    3. Klockgether T
    . Giant cell arteritis causing multiple vertebrobasilar infarcts. Neurology 2002;58:1399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.
    1. Solans-Laque R,
    2. Bosch-Gil JA,
    3. Molina-Catenario CA,
    4. Ortega-Aznar A,
    5. Alvarez-Sabin J,
    6. Vilardell-Tarres M
    . Stroke and multi-infarct dementia as presenting symptoms of giant cell arteritis: report of 7 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 2008;87:335–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Stark CD,
    2. Hughes A
    . Atypical temporal arteritis causing posterior circulation stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2010;17:1206–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Thomson GT,
    2. Johnston JL,
    3. Sharpe JA,
    4. Inman RD
    . Internuclear ophthalmoplegia in giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 1989;16:693–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Thystrup J,
    2. Knudsen GM,
    3. Mogensen AM,
    4. Fledelius HC
    . Atypical visual loss in giant cell arteritis. Acta Ophthalmol 1994;72:759–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.
    1. Topakian R,
    2. Stieglbauer K,
    3. Nussbaumer K,
    4. Dreer B,
    5. Sonnberger M,
    6. Aichner FT
    . Reversibility of basilar artery stenosis following timely treatment of temporal arteritis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:204–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Wiszniewska M,
    2. Devuyst G,
    3. Bogousslavsky J
    . Giant cell arteritis as a cause of first-ever stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;24:226–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Zwicker J,
    2. Atkins EJ,
    3. Lum C,
    4. Sharma M
    . An atypical presentation of giant cell arteritis. CMAJ 2011;183:E301–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Gonzalez-Gay MA,
    2. Garcia-Porrua C,
    3. Llorca J,
    4. Hajeer AH,
    5. Branas F,
    6. Dababneh A,
    7. et al.
    Visual manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Trends and clinical spectrum in 161 patients. Medicine 2000;79:283–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Salvarani C,
    2. Hunder GG
    . Musculoskeletal manifestations in a population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1259–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Turney TM,
    2. Garraway WM,
    3. Whisnant JP
    . The natural history of hemispheric and brainstem infarction in Rochester, Minnesota. Stroke 1984;15:790–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Calabrese LH,
    2. Duna GF,
    3. Lie JT
    . Vasculitis in the central nervous system. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1189–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Gotway MB,
    2. Araoz PA,
    3. Macedo TA,
    4. Stanson AW,
    5. Higgins CB,
    6. Ring EJ,
    7. et al.
    Imaging findings in Takayasu’s arteritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1945–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Belhocine T,
    2. Blockmans D,
    3. Hustinx R,
    4. Vandevivere J,
    5. Mortelmans L
    . Imaging of large vessel vasculitis with (18)FDG PET: illusion or reality? A critical review of the literature data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1305–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yun M,
    2. Yeh D,
    3. Araujo LI,
    4. Jang S,
    5. Newberg A,
    6. Alavi A
    . F-18 FDG uptake in the large arteries: a new observation. Clin Nucl Med 2001;26:314–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Balis FM,
    2. Lester CM,
    3. Chrousos GP,
    4. Heideman RL,
    5. Poplack DG
    . Differences in cerebrospinal fluid penetration of corticosteroids: possible relationship to the prevention of meningeal leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:202–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. 43.↵
    1. de Boysson H,
    2. Boutemy J,
    3. Creveuil C,
    4. Ollivier Y,
    5. Letellier P,
    6. Pagnoux C,
    7. et al.
    Is there a place for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of giant-cell arteritis? A case series and systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013;43:105–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. De Silva M,
    2. Hazleman BL
    . Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind study. Ann Rheum Dis 1986;45:136–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Mahr AD,
    2. Jover JA,
    3. Spiera RF,
    4. Hernandez-Garcia C,
    5. Fernandez-Gutierrez B,
    6. Lavalley MP,
    7. et al.
    Adjunctive methotrexate for treatment of giant cell arteritis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2789–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Langford CA
    . Management of systemic vasculitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001;15:281–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Tomasson G,
    2. Peloquin C,
    3. Mohammad A,
    4. Love TJ,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Choi HK,
    7. et al.
    Risk for cardiovascular disease early and late after a diagnosis of giant-cell arteritis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:73–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Martinez-Taboada VM,
    2. Lopez-Hoyos M,
    3. Narvaez J,
    4. Munoz-Cacho P
    . Effect of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy on severe ischemic complications in patients with giant cell arteritis: a cumulative meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:788–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Jeong J,
    2. Barra L
    . The use of anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant agents in the prevention of large vessel vasculitis-associated ischemic complications: a meta-analysis. OJRA 2014;4:114–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lariviere D,
    2. Sacre K,
    3. Klein I,
    4. Hyafil F,
    5. Choudat L,
    6. Chauveheid MP,
    7. et al.
    Extra- and intracranial cerebral vasculitis in giant cell arteritis: an observational study. Medicine 2014;93:e265
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 43, Issue 3
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review
Roaa S. Alsolaimani, Sankalp V. Bhavsar, Nader A. Khalidi, Christian Pagnoux, Jennifer L. Mandzia, KengYeow Tay, Lillian J. Barra
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2016, 43 (3) 648-656; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Severe Intracranial Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: 5 Cases and Literature Review
Roaa S. Alsolaimani, Sankalp V. Bhavsar, Nader A. Khalidi, Christian Pagnoux, Jennifer L. Mandzia, KengYeow Tay, Lillian J. Barra
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2016, 43 (3) 648-656; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150143
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • APPENDIX 1.
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

GIANT CELL ARTERITIS
STROKE
CRANIAL ARTERY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Tocilizumab in Behçet Disease: A Multicenter Study of 30 Patients
  • The National Prevalence of Clinically Diagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis in Sweden in 2017
  • Biological Sex Inequality in Rheumatology Wait Times During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • giant cell arteritis
  • stroke
  • CRANIAL ARTERY

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire