Retrospective Comparison of Open versus Endovascular Procedures for Takayasu Arteritis

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K,
   2. Clark TM,
   3. Hoffman GS

   . Limitations of therapy and a guarded prognosis in an American cohort of Takayasu arteritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1000–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Saadoun D,
   2. Lambert M,
   3. Mirault T,
   4. Resche-Rigon M,
   5. Koskas F,
   6. Cluzel P,
   7. et al.

   Retrospective analysis of surgery versus endovascular intervention in Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter experience. Circulation 2012;125:813–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Kermani TA,
   2. Crowson CS,
   3. Cooper LT,
   4. Matteson EL,
   5. Warrington KJ

   . Diagnostic features, treatment, and outcomes of Takayasu arteritis in a US cohort of 126 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:822–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Khalilullah M,
   2. Tyagi S

   . Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in Takayasu arteritis. Heart Vessels Suppl 1992;7:146–53.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Khalilullah M,
   2. Tyagi S,
   3. Lochan R,
   4. Yadav BS,
   5. Nair M,
   6. Gambhir DS,
   7. et al.

   Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty of the aorta in patients with aortitis. Circulation 1987;76:597–600.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Rao SA,
   2. Mandalam KR,
   3. Rao VR,
   4. Gupta AK,
   5. Joseph S,
   6. Unni MN,
   7. et al.

   Takayasu arteritis: Initial and long-term follow-up in 16 patients after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. Radiology 1993;189:173–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Cong XL,
   2. Dai SM,
   3. Feng X,
   4. Wang ZW,
   5. Lu QS,
   6. Yuan LX,
   7. et al.

   Takayasu’s arteritis: clinical features and outcomes of 125 patients in China. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:973–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Lee G,
   2. Jeon P,
   3. Do YS,
   4. Sung K,
   5. Kim DI,
   6. Kim YW,
   7. et al.

   Comparison of outcomes between endovascular treatment and bypass surgery in Takayasu arteritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2013;43:153–61.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Liang P,
   2. Tan-Ong M,
   3. Hoffman GS

   . Takayasu’s arteritis: vascular interventions and outcomes. J Rheumatol 2004;31:102–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Fields CE,
    2. Bower TC,
    3. Cooper LT,
    4. Hoskin T,
    5. Noel AA,
    6. Panneton JM,
    7. et al.

    Takayasu’s arteritis: operative results and influence of disease activity. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:64–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Perera AH,
    2. Youngstein T,
    3. Gibbs RG,
    4. Jackson JE,
    5. Wolfe JH,
    6. Mason JC

    . Optimizing the outcome of vascular intervention for Takayasu arteritis. Br J Surg 2014;101:43–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Perera AH,
    2. Mason JC,
    3. Wolfe JH

    . Takayasu arteritis: criteria for surgical intervention should not be ignored. Int J Vasc Med 2013;2013:1–8.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Hunder GG,
    2. Bloch DA,
    3. Michel BA,
    4. Stevens MB,
    5. Arend WP,
    6. Calabrese LH,
    7. et al.

    The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1122–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Harris PA,
    2. Taylor R,
    3. Thielke R,
    4. Payne J,
    5. Gonzalez N,
    6. Conde JG

    . Research electronic data capture (REDCap) — A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kerr GS,
    2. Hallahan CW,
    3. Giordano J,
    4. Leavitt RY,
    5. Fauci AS,
    6. Rottem M,
    7. et al.

    Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:919–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Isobe M

    . Takayasu arteritis revisited: current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:3–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Park HS,
    2. Do YS,
    3. Park KB,
    4. Kim DK,
    5. Choo SW,
    6. Shin SW,
    7. et al.

    Long term results of endovascular treatment in renal arterial stenosis from Takayasu arteritis: angioplasty versus stent placement. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1913–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Misra R,
    2. Danda D,
    3. Rajappa SM,
    4. Ghosh A,
    5. Gupta R,
    6. Mahendranath KM,
    7. et al.

    Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). Rheumatol 2013;52:1795–801.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Aydin SZ,
    2. Yilmaz N,
    3. Akar S,
    4. Aksu K,
    5. Kamali S,
    6. Yucel E,
    7. et al.

    Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis with Disease Extent Index-Takayasu. Rheumatology 2010;49:1889–93.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Direskeneli H,
    2. Aydin SZ,
    3. Merkel PA

    . Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011;29:S86–91.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ishihara T,
    2. Haraguchi G,
    3. Tezuka D,
    4. Kamiishi T,
    5. Inagaki H,
    6. Isobe M

    . Diagnosis and assessment of Takayasu arteritis by multiple biomarkers. Circ J 2013;77:477–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Fuchs M,
    2. Briel M,
    3. Daikeler T,
    4. Walker UA,
    5. Rasch H,
    6. Berg S,
    7. et al.

    The impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of patients with suspected large vessel vasculitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:344–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Blockmans D

    . PET in vasculitis. Ann NY Acad Sci 2011;1228:64–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed