Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Coronary, Carotid, and Lower-extremity Atherosclerosis and Their Interrelationship in Danish Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Susan Due Kay, Mikael Kjaer Poulsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen and Anne Voss
The Journal of Rheumatology February 2016, 43 (2) 315-322; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150488
Susan Due Kay
From the Department of Rheumatology, and Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: susan.due.kay{at}rsyd.dk
Mikael Kjaer Poulsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Voss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Atherosclerosis is highly prevalent among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but has been demonstrated predominantly in non-European SLE cohorts and few investigations have included more than 1 imaging modality. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of atherosclerosis in 3 frequently affected vascular territories, the coronary, carotid, and lower-extremity arteries, in a Danish, predominantly population-based SLE cohort.

Methods. Patients with SLE without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD; n = 103) were screened for coronary artery calcification, carotid intima-media thickening and plaque, and abnormal ankle-brachial index by means of cardiac computed tomography, ultrasound of the carotid arteries, and ankle systolic blood pressure.

Results. In patients with SLE, the prevalence of atherosclerosis in any vascular territory was 41%. The distribution of the atherosclerotic manifestations showed an overlap with 45% of the patients having involvement in more than 1 vascular territory. However, more than one-third of the patients with SLE with coronary, carotid, or lower-extremity atherosclerosis exclusively demonstrated this particular manifestation. Based on a multiple logistic regression model, age (p < 0.001), current smoking (p = 0.009), and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC; p = 0.008) were significant independent risk factors for atherosclerosis at any vascular territory.

Conclusion. Atherosclerosis is highly prevalent among Danish patients with SLE without prior CVD. Screening for atherosclerosis in 1 vascular territory is insufficient in diagnosing atherosclerosis in patients with SLE. In Danish patients with SLE, the presence of atherosclerosis was not only assigned to traditional CV risk factors, but also associated with SLICC.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
  • ATHEROSCLEROSIS
  • CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM
  • CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS
  • CAROTID PLAQUE
  • ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX

A bimodal mortality pattern in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been described with a first peak within the first year after diagnosis, mostly attributable to active disease and infection, and a second peak occurring later, mainly attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD)1. The survival in SLE has improved significantly over the last 50 years; however, CVD has remained a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE2,3,4,5.

Compared with the general population, patients with SLE have an up to 9-fold greater risk of CVD, with the risk being particularly marked in women younger than 55 years of age6,7,8.

Accelerated atherosclerosis is thought to be involved in the excess CVD burden in SLE.

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) and carotid plaque are closely associated with atherosclerosis and serve as surrogate markers of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis. CAC and carotid plaque have been found to be predictive for future CV events in the general population9,10,11. Abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) is associated with atherosclerosis in the lower-extremity arteries and correlates with increased mortality in the general population12.

In patients with SLE without prior CVD, CAC has been found to be more frequent compared with healthy controls (30.7% vs 8.7%) and was identified at a younger age in the patients with SLE13. In another study of CAC in young, asymptomatic patients with SLE (20–48 yrs), 28% had signs of coronary atherosclerosis14.

Roman, et al found increased rates of carotid plaque (37.1% vs 15.2%) in patients with SLE compared with controls15. Similarly, a prevalence of carotid plaque of 40% was found in a study by Manzi, et al16.

The increased prevalence of atherosclerosis in patients with SLE has been demonstrated predominantly in non-European SLE cohorts and few investigations include more than 1 imaging modality.

In our study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of atherosclerosis by investigation of CAC, carotid intima-media thickening and plaque, and abnormal ABI in a Danish, predominantly population-based SLE cohort. Further, we examined the interrelationship between these observed atherosclerotic manifestations and identified risk factors contributing to these manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

In this cross-sectional study, we investigated a predominantly population-based SLE cohort. Patients were adults (age > 18) recruited from a longterm, prospective SLE cohort that includes a population-based cohort from the County of Funen, Southern Denmark17, and a clinic-based cohort from the rest of Southern Denmark. All patients were diagnosed according to Fries and Holman18 and classified according to the revised 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria19.

Patients with a history of CVD (including myocardial infarction, arterial revascularization, stroke, or symptomatic lower-extremity disease) were excluded from our study. Pregnant patients were also excluded.

All patients underwent a structured study program, including extended interview, clinical examination, blood sampling, cardiac computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) of the carotid arteries, and ankle systolic blood pressure measurements.

Our study was carried out according to Good Clinical Practice, followed the Helsinki II Declaration, and was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (project-ID: S-20110111). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Clinical assessments

Anthropometric measurements (height, weight, and waist and hip circumference) of all subjects were obtained. Blood pressure was measured after a resting period of 20 min. Hypertension (HTN) was defined as either a resting systolic or diastolic blood pressure > 140/90 or treatment with antihypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus was defined as glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 48 mmol/mol or the use of antidiabetic agent. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a total cholesterol ≥ 5.0 mmol/l, low-density lipoprotein ≥ 3.0 mmol/l, or receiving lipid-lowering medication. Nephropathy was defined as s-creatinine > 120 µmol/l. Smoking status was recorded as either past or current smoker. Using the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) based on age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol20, the total CV mortality risk within 10 years was estimated. Individuals were classified into 4 categories: low risk (< 1%), moderate risk (≥ 1% to < 5%), high risk (≥ 5% to < 10%), and very high risk (≥ 10%). Information was also collected on family history of CVD defined as a first-degree relative having myocardial infarction or stroke before the age of 55 years in men and 65 years in women.

SLE-related risk factors including disease duration and cumulative clinical manifestations of SLE were obtained19. SLE disease activity and cumulative organ damage were measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)21 and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SLICC)22. Information was provided on past and current use of corticosteroid, hydroxychloroquine, and immunosuppressants including cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. Also, past and current uses of antiaggregants and anticoagulants were recorded. Laboratory analyses consisted of tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-dsDNA antibodies, and serum complement C3 and C4 levels. ANA were determined by indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cell monolayers. Anti-dsDNA was measured by ELISA.

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) was obtained. Demonstration of lupus anticoagulant, β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies, and/or cardiolipin antibodies in 2 consecutive measurements after SLE diagnosis was considered positive for aPL. Patients positive for aPL and with a history of venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity were considered as having aPL syndrome (APS).

CAC measurement

CAC was assessed using a GE 64-slice CT scanner (Discovery VCT; GE Healthcare) with the following technical settings: gantry rotation time 500 ms, 16 × 2.5 mm collimation, 120 kV tube voltage, 200 mA tube current, and a prospectively echocardiogram-triggered scan acquisition gating at 50% of the R-R interval. The scan data were acquired during an inspiratory breath hold. CAC was quantified using dedicated software, Smartscore (GE Healthcare), and was expressed as Agatston score calculated by summing scores from each focus in the coronary arteries and classified as none (Agatston 0 U), mild (Agatston 1–99 U), moderate (Agatston 100–399 U), and high CAC (Agatston ≥ 400 U)23. Coronary atherosclerosis in this investigation was defined as Agatston > 99 U.

All analyses of CT scans were performed by 1 experienced examiner.

Carotid atherosclerosis

B-mode US scans were performed to image the carotid arteries using a LOGIQ E9, GE Healthcare US machine with an 11-MHz linear transducer. Each image contained 2 cine loops and was stored digitally for later blinded analysis. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) was measured between the lumen-intima and media-adventitia interfaces in the far wall of 2 segments of the carotid artery (common carotid artery and carotid bifurcation) on both sides. The analysis of IMT was performed semiautomatically as a mean of minimum 200 measurements per location site. IMT was measured using 2 separate images at end-diastole in each segment (1 cm proximally to the bifurcation and in the bulb). Each image was also investigated for plaques using the definition from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study24. Epidemiological data on B-mode US scan of the carotid arteries have shown that IMT > 1.00 mm is associated with a significantly increased CV risk25,26,27. Therefore, carotid atherosclerosis was defined as mean IMT > 1.00 mm and/or the presence of a carotid plaque at any carotid location. All the US scans were performed by 1 experienced examiner.

Lower-extremity atherosclerosis

Systolic blood pressure was measured in both arms. Subsequently, the systolic blood pressure was measured twice in the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries bilaterally using a hand-held Doppler probe. The highest value of the arm pressures and the highest value of the ankle pressures were used to calculate the ABI. Patients were classified as having peripheral arterial disease (PAD) if ABI ≤ 0.9028 and poorly compressible arteries (PCA) if ABI ≥ 1.429. Lower-extremity atherosclerosis was defined as PAD or PCA. All the measurements were performed by 1 experienced examiner.

Atherosclerosis was defined as the presence of coronary atherosclerosis, carotid atherosclerosis, or lower-extremity atherosclerosis.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean (± SD) or median (range), and categorical variables are given as frequencies and percentages. The Student t test (Gaussian distributed data) and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (non-Gaussian distributed data) were used to test for differences between independent continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used to test for differences between categorical variables.

To define potential explanatory variables of atherosclerosis, univariate logistic regression was applied on demographic and clinical variables. To prevent Type 2 errors, a p value < 0.2 was required to be included in a multivariate logistic regression model, in which stepwise subset selection was applied for adjustment. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The analysis was performed using STATA 13.1.

RESULTS

Study population

A total of 126 patients with SLE were invited to our study, 92 patients from the population-based cohort and 34 patients from the clinic-based cohort. The 2 cohorts were alike based on demographic and SLE-related characteristics (data not shown). Of the 126 patients with SLE initially included, 21 had a history of CVD at the time of enrollment. Because of inadequate data, 2 patients were excluded, resulting in a study population of 103 patients.

The study population included 89% women and 98% were white. Mean age was 49.2 ± 14.1 years and mean disease duration was 11.1 ± 8.5 years. Cumulative SLE clinical manifestations included skin rash (malar/discoid; 57%), photosensitivity (63%), ulcers (26%), arthritis (88%), serositis (46%), renal disorder (24%), neurologic disorder (13%), hematologic disorder (55%), anti-dsDNA positivity (90%), and ANA positivity (100%).

The characteristics of the study population are detailed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of patients with SLE with and without atherosclerosis. Values are mean ± SD, median (range), or n (%) unless otherwise specified.

Prevalence and distribution of atherosclerosis

Overall, 44 patients (42.7%) had signs of CAC (Agatston > 0 U) with scores ranging from 1 U to 9725 U. Mild CAC was found in 19 patients (18.4%), moderate CAC in 10 patients (9.7%), and high CAC in 15 patients (14.6%). CAC > 99 U was found in 25 patients (24.7%). The mean carotid IMT was 0.71 ± 0.27 mm. Carotid atherosclerosis was found in 27 patients (26.2%), with the presence of plaques at any location in 16 patients (15.5%). Lower-extremity atherosclerosis was found in 12 patients (11.6%) distributed with PAD in 5 patients and PCA in 7 patients.

Atherosclerosis, as defined above, was found in 42 patients (41%).

According to the total CV mortality risk measured by SCORE, there were more patients with a low risk among patients without atherosclerosis; however, 36% of the patients with atherosclerosis achieved a low risk. There were more patients with a high or a very high risk among patients with atherosclerosis than among those without.

Figure 1 shows the prevalence of atherosclerosis stratified by age category (< 35, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and > 64 yrs). In the age groups < 35 years and 35–44 years, 13.3% and 20.0% of the patients with SLE had atherosclerosis, respectively. Throughout the age groups, the prevalence of atherosclerosis increased, with a very large increase between the age groups 45–54 years and 55–64 years.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis stratified by age category.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Prevalence of atherosclerosis stratified by age category.

The distribution of the atherosclerotic involvement in the 3 vascular beds is shown in Figure 2.

The distribution of the atherosclerotic involvement in the three vascular beds.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The distribution of the atherosclerotic involvement in the three vascular beds.

If examination for atherosclerosis only included cardiac CT, 11 of 27 patients with carotid atherosclerosis and 8 of 12 patients with lower-extremity atherosclerosis would not have been identified. If only carotid US had been performed, atherosclerotic manifestations in 9 of 25 patients with coronary atherosclerosis and 7 of 12 patients with lower-extremity atherosclerosis had remained unidentified. Correspondingly, investigation exclusively with systolic ankle blood pressure measurements would leave more than 80% of the patients with coronary atherosclerosis and carotid atherosclerosis without a proper diagnosis of atherosclerosis.

Comparison of patients with and without atherosclerosis in univariate analysis

In univariate analysis, the presence of atherosclerosis was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.006), waist circumference (p = 0.020), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.001), current smoking (p = 0.029), and SLICC (p = 0.005).

HTN had a borderline association to atherosclerosis (p = 0.067); nevertheless, patients with atherosclerosis demonstrated a significantly higher systolic blood pressure (p = 0.015).

The presence of aPL was more common in patients without atherosclerosis, but not significantly. When the components of aPL status were examined individually, lupus anticoagulant was significantly less common in patients with atherosclerosis (p = 0.008).

There were no differences in the presence of APS between patients with and without atherosclerosis.

All variables that in the univariate analysis demonstrated a p value < 0.2 were included in the multivariate analysis. This included age, sex, current smoking, waist circumference, diabetes, cumulative renal disorder, aPL, cumulative use of hydroxychloroquine, SLICC, hypercholesterolemia, triglycerides, complement C3, and HTN.

In the multiple logistic regression model, age (p < 0.001), SLICC (p = 0.008), and current smoking (p = 0.009) remained statistically significant independent risk factors for atherosclerosis. The presence of aPL was in the multiple logistic regression model negatively associated to atherosclerosis (p = 0.011; Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Independent explanatory factors for the presence of atherosclerosis in a multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Several previous studies of atherosclerosis in patients with SLE have been performed, but only a few are population-based and of European origin, and more than 1 imaging modality is rarely used.

This cross-sectional study demonstrated signs of atherosclerosis in 1 or more territories among more than 40% of Danish patients with SLE. However, the overlap between the atherosclerotic manifestations detectable in the vascular territories was not sufficient to examine just 1 single vascular territory in diagnosing atherosclerosis.

In an American multiethnic cohort, consisting of predominately women and with a mean age of 44 years, the prevalence of CAC was 43% and a CAC > 100 U was found in 9%30. These results correspond to our results to a certain extent. However, we found a much higher prevalence of CAC > 100 U, indicating more patients with a greater extent of coronary atherosclerosis. In the same study, carotid plaque was found in 18% of the patients with SLE, which corresponds to our results30.

In a study of a mixed African American and white SLE cohort, CAC was found in 42% and carotid plaque in 30% of the patients31. The prevalence of CAC was in accordance with our findings, while the prevalence of carotid plaque was higher than ours. This may be because of the use of a different plaque definition, which includes a distinct area protruding into the vessel lumen that is at least 50% thicker than the surrounding areas. However, ethnic differences could also be of importance because significantly more African American patients were diagnosed with plaque.

Although atherosclerosis has been found to have an early onset in patients with SLE compared with the general population, age remains a risk factor for atherosclerosis in patients with SLE32. In our study, we also observed an early onset of atherosclerosis and a substantial increment in the prevalence of atherosclerosis when the patients with SLE reached an age of 55 years. This pattern is in accordance with the trend in the general Danish population, where atherosclerosis has been found to have an onset around middle age33. The combination of SLE and age-related risk may explain the very high prevalence of atherosclerosis among middle-aged patients with SLE.

Autopsy studies in the general population have demonstrated a close relationship between the presences of atherosclerosis in the 3 vascular territories where atherosclerosis often is encountered: the coronary, carotid, and lower-extremity arteries34,35. In accordance with this, we found an overlap between coronary atherosclerosis, carotid atherosclerosis, and lower-extremity atherosclerosis (Figure 2). However, the relationship between atherosclerosis in the vascular territories did not allow us to examine just 1 single vascular territory, because 33% of the patients with carotid atherosclerosis and 32% with coronary atherosclerosis exclusively had this single atherosclerotic manifestation.

The study population was comparable to other cohorts concerning SLE manifestations, even if renal disorder was relatively infrequent (24%). In the total population of 126 patients with SLE, the prevalence of renal disorder was 29%, which fairly corresponds with previous enumerations in the cohort36. However, a small number of patients with SLE from the population-based cohort may not have participated in the study.

Traditional CV risk factors fail to fully account for the accelerated atherosclerotic process37. However, it has been shown that the high risk of CVD in patients with SLE appears to be mediated by the increase in traditional risk factors and that this increase in risk factors diverges from controls38. It has been speculated that patients with SLE may be more sensitive to the effects of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis than the general population, resulting in an excess risk of atherosclerosis39.

In our present study, we found that patients with atherosclerosis had a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia compared with those without. Nevertheless, hypercholesterolemia showed not to be significantly associated to atherosclerosis in the multiple regression model.

Although HTN is not an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis in our study, we found that patients with atherosclerosis had a significantly higher mean systolic blood pressure than patients without. A recent review on treatment of HTN in patients with SLE concluded that current HTN therapeutic guidelines may not adequately apply to patients with SLE, and large-scale clinical trials are needed to confirm their value in reducing CVD risk in SLE40.

It has been indicated that chronic inflammation and autoimmunity are involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis41, corresponding to the demonstration of increased SLEDAI associated with an increased risk of CVD of 5%42. The increase in time-adjusted mean SLEDAI, which is cumulative disease activity, has also been found to correlate with increased risk of CVD43. In our study, we did not find any association between inflammatory markers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and SLEDAI and the presence of atherosclerosis. However, in our study design, we provide only a cross-sectional measure of inflammation.

Although aPL have been described to be implicated in atherogenesis, our study, as well as other investigations, found no positive association between aPL and atherosclerosis15. In our study, we found a significantly negative association between aPL and atherosclerosis. Interestingly, this association was absent in the patients whose clinical manifestation to aPL was venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity.

Cumulated organ damage measured as SLICC was significantly associated with atherosclerosis, in our multivariate model. This trend has been demonstrated by others as well16. SLICC has been found to be associated with disease activity and medical treatment including corticosteroids44 and therefore in our study, the cumulative disease activity is probably best measured by SLICC.

An association between SLICC and atherosclerosis may indicate that disease activity is involved in the accelerated atherogenesis of patients with SLE.

High and very high SCORE were significantly more frequent in patients with atherosclerosis, but SCORE fails to identify 36% of patients with SLE with atherosclerosis. Similar results were found in asymptomatic middle-aged Danes in which 37% of those with CAC had low SCORE45. The SCORE is based on age, sex, smoking status, blood pressure, and cholesterol level. All these factors were risk factors for atherosclerosis in our study. Nevertheless, the SD for age among the patients with atherosclerosis is wide and therefore some young patients with SLE tend to have low SCORE. Additionally, a recent study on the general population in Asia showed that the SCORE fails to identify atherosclerosis in women46.

One of the limitations of our study is the cross-sectional design, which means that selection and temporal biases may have occurred. Especially in terms of variables related to disease activity and inflammation, the cross-sectional design limits the investigation of the effect of cumulative disease activity and inflammation on atherosclerosis. Likewise, the use of dichotomized medications may be insensitive during calculation, but variables of cumulated doses were unfortunately not available.

An additional limitation is the inclusion of a relatively small study population. Also, a small number of patients with SLE from the population-based cohort may not have participated in our study, perhaps leading to selection biases.

Atherosclerosis is highly prevalent but differently distributed in 3 vascular beds among Danish patients with SLE without prior CVD. Our results indicate that screening for atherosclerosis in 1 vascular territory is insufficient and that patients with SLE with an increased risk of CVD would not be identified using SCORE. Traditional CV risk factors are important, but not alone responsible for the accelerated development of atherosclerosis in SLE. Patients with a high SLICC are at greater risk of having atherosclerosis.

Acknowledgment

We thank the study participants and the funding agencies. We thank the dedicated staff at the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital.

Footnotes

  • Supported by the Danish Rheumatism Association (grant R94-A1779), University of Southern Denmark, and the Odense University Hospital.

  • Accepted for publication October 2, 2015.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Bookman AA,
    3. Koehler BE,
    4. Gordon DA,
    5. Smythe HA,
    6. Ogryzlo MA
    . The bimodal mortality pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 1976;60:221–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Voss A,
    2. Laustrup H,
    3. Hjelmborg J,
    4. Junker P
    . Survival in systemic lupus erythematosus, 1995–2010. A prospective study in a Danish community. Lupus 2013;22:1185–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Björnådal L,
    2. Yin L,
    3. Granath F,
    4. Klareskog L,
    5. Ekbom A
    . Cardiovascular disease a hazard despite improved prognosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a Swedish population based study 1964–95. J Rheumatol 2004;31:713–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Tom BD,
    4. Ibañez D,
    5. Farewell VT
    . Changing patterns in mortality and disease outcomes for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2008;35:2152–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Thomas G,
    2. Mancini J,
    3. Jourde-Chiche N,
    4. Sarlon G,
    5. Amoura Z,
    6. Harlé JR,
    7. et al.
    Mortality associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in France assessed by multiple-cause-of-death analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2503–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Manzi S,
    2. Meilahn EN,
    3. Rairie JE,
    4. Conte CG,
    5. Medsger TA Jr,
    6. Jansen-McWilliams L,
    7. et al.
    Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:408–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bengtsson C,
    2. Ohman ML,
    3. Nived O,
    4. Rantapää Dahlqvist S
    . Cardiovascular event in systemic lupus erythematosus in northern Sweden: incidence and predictors in a 7-year follow-up study. Lupus 2012;21:452–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ward MM
    . Premature morbidity from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:338–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Folsom AR,
    2. Kronmal RA,
    3. Detrano RC,
    4. O’Leary DH,
    5. Bild DE,
    6. Bluemke DA,
    7. et al.
    Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1333–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chambless LE,
    2. Folsom AR,
    3. Clegg LX,
    4. Sharrett AR,
    5. Shahar E,
    6. Nieto FJ,
    7. et al.
    Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:478–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Vliegenthart R,
    2. Oudkerk M,
    3. Song B,
    4. van der Kuip DA,
    5. Hofman A,
    6. Witteman JC
    . Coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography and myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1596–603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Arain FA,
    2. Ye Z,
    3. Bailey KR,
    4. Chen Q,
    5. Liu G,
    6. Leibson CL,
    7. et al.
    Survival in patients with poorly compressible leg arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:400–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Asanuma Y,
    2. Oeser A,
    3. Shintani AK,
    4. Turner E,
    5. Olsen N,
    6. Fazio S,
    7. et al.
    Premature coronary-artery atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2407–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Manger K,
    2. Kusus M,
    3. Forster C,
    4. Ropers D,
    5. Daniel WG,
    6. Kalden JR,
    7. et al.
    Factors associated with coronary artery calcification in young female patients with SLE. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:846–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Roman MJ,
    2. Shanker BA,
    3. Davis A,
    4. Lockshin MD,
    5. Sammaritano L,
    6. Simantov R,
    7. et al.
    Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2399–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Manzi S,
    2. Selzer F,
    3. Sutton-Tyrrell K,
    4. Fitzgerald SG,
    5. Rairie JE,
    6. Tracy RP,
    7. et al.
    Prevalence and risk factors of carotid plaque in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:51–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Voss A,
    2. Green A,
    3. Junker P
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus in Denmark: clinical and epidemiological characterization of a county-based cohort. Scand J Rheumatol 1998;27:98–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fries JF,
    2. Holman HR
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis. Major Probl Intern Med 1975;6:v–199.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hochberg MC
    . Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Conroy RM,
    2. Pyörälä K,
    3. Fitzgerald AP,
    4. Sans S,
    5. Menotti A,
    6. De Backer G,
    7. et al;
    8. SCORE project group
    . Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987–1003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Ibañez D,
    3. Urowitz MB
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 2002;29:288–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dayal NA,
    2. Gordon C,
    3. Tucker L,
    4. Isenberg DA
    . The SLICC damage index: past, present and future. Lupus 2002;11:261–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Agatston AS,
    2. Janowitz WR,
    3. Hildner FJ,
    4. Zusmer NR,
    5. Viamonte M Jr,
    6. Detrano R
    . Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Li R,
    2. Duncan BB,
    3. Metcalf PA,
    4. Crouse JR 3rd,
    5. Sharrett AR,
    6. Tyroler HA,
    7. et al.
    B-mode-detected carotid artery plaque in a general population. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Stroke 1994;25:2377–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Simon A,
    2. Gariepy J,
    3. Chironi G,
    4. Megnien JL,
    5. Levenson J
    . Intima-media thickness: a new tool for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 2002;20:159–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Chambless LE,
    2. Heiss G,
    3. Folsom AR,
    4. Rosamond W,
    5. Szklo M,
    6. Sharrett AR,
    7. et al.
    Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:483–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Poulsen MK,
    2. Henriksen JE,
    3. Dahl J,
    4. Johansen A,
    5. Møller JE,
    6. Gerke O,
    7. et al.
    Myocardial ischemia, carotid, and peripheral arterial disease and their interrelationship in type 2 diabetes patients. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:878–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Criqui MH,
    2. Fronek A,
    3. Klauber MR,
    4. Barrett-Connor E,
    5. Gabriel S
    . The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of traditional clinical evaluation of peripheral arterial disease: results from noninvasive testing in a defined population. Circulation 1985;71:516–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Abedin M,
    2. Tintut Y,
    3. Demer LL
    . Vascular calcification: mechanisms and clinical ramifications. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:1161–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kiani AN,
    2. Post WS,
    3. Magder LS,
    4. Petri M
    . Predictors of progression in atherosclerosis over 2 years in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2011;50:2071–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rhew EY,
    2. Manzi SM,
    3. Dyer AR,
    4. Kao AH,
    5. Danchenko N,
    6. Barinas-Mitchell E,
    7. et al.
    Differences in subclinical cardiovascular disease between African American and Caucasian women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Transl Res 2009;153:51–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kiani AN,
    2. Magder L,
    3. Petri M
    . Coronary calcium in systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, but not with disease activity. J Rheumatol 2008;35:1300–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bjerrum IS,
    2. Sand NP,
    3. Poulsen MK,
    4. Nørgaard BL,
    5. Sidelmann JJ,
    6. Johansen A,
    7. et al.
    Non-invasive assessments reveal that more than half of randomly selected middle-aged individuals have evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis: a DanRisk substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:301–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dalager S,
    2. Paaske WP,
    3. Kristensen IB,
    4. Laurberg JM,
    5. Falk E
    . Artery-related differences in atherosclerosis expression: implications for atherogenesis and dynamics in intima-media thickness. Stroke 2007;38:2698–705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dalager S,
    2. Falk E,
    3. Kristensen IB,
    4. Paaske WP
    . Plaque in superficial femoral arteries indicates generalized atherosclerosis and vulnerability to coronary death: an autopsy study. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:296–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Laustrup H,
    2. Voss A,
    3. Green A,
    4. Junker P
    . SLE disease patterns in a Danish population-based lupus cohort: an 8-year prospective study. Lupus 2010;19:239–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Esdaile JM,
    2. Abrahamowicz M,
    3. Grodzicky T,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Panaritis C,
    6. du Berger R,
    7. et al.
    Traditional Framingham risk factors fail to fully account for accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2331–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Karp I,
    2. Abrahamowicz M,
    3. Fortin PR,
    4. Pilote L,
    5. Neville C,
    6. Pineau CA,
    7. et al.
    Longitudinal evolution of risk of coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2012;39:968–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Bruce IN,
    2. Urowitz MB,
    3. Gladman DD,
    4. Ibañez D,
    5. Steiner G
    . Risk factors for coronary heart disease in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Toronto Risk Factor Study. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:3159–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Tselios K,
    2. Koumaras C,
    3. Urowitz MB,
    4. Gladman DD
    . Do current arterial hypertension treatment guidelines apply to systemic lupus erythematosus patients? a critical appraisal. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;43:521–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Pereira IA,
    2. Borba EF
    . The role of inflammation, humoral and cell mediated autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Swiss Med Wkly 2008;138:534–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Karp I,
    2. Abrahamowicz M,
    3. Fortin PR,
    4. Pilote L,
    5. Neville C,
    6. Pineau CA,
    7. et al.
    Recent corticosteroid use and recent disease activity: independent determinants of coronary heart disease risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus? Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:169–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Ibañez D,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Urowitz MB
    . Adjusted mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K is a predictor of outcome in SLE. J Rheumatol 2005;32:824–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Sutton EJ,
    2. Davidson JE,
    3. Bruce IN
    . The systemic lupus international collaborating clinics (SLICC) damage index: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013;43:352–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Diederichsen AC,
    2. Sand NP,
    3. Nørgaard B,
    4. Lambrechtsen J,
    5. Jensen JM,
    6. Munkholm H,
    7. et al.
    Discrepancy between coronary artery calcium score and HeartScore in middle-aged Danes: the DanRisk study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012;19:558–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Selvarajah S,
    2. Kaur G,
    3. Haniff J,
    4. Cheong KC,
    5. Hiong TG,
    6. van der Graaf Y,
    7. et al.
    Comparison of the Framingham Risk Score, SCORE and WHO/ISH cardiovascular risk prediction models in an Asian population. Int J Cardiol 2014;176:211–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 43, Issue 2
1 Feb 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coronary, Carotid, and Lower-extremity Atherosclerosis and Their Interrelationship in Danish Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Coronary, Carotid, and Lower-extremity Atherosclerosis and Their Interrelationship in Danish Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Susan Due Kay, Mikael Kjaer Poulsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Anne Voss
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2016, 43 (2) 315-322; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150488

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Coronary, Carotid, and Lower-extremity Atherosclerosis and Their Interrelationship in Danish Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Susan Due Kay, Mikael Kjaer Poulsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Anne Voss
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2016, 43 (2) 315-322; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150488
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM
CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS
CAROTID PLAQUE
ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Disease Manifestations Associated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Nonresponse in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis
  • Clinical Meaningfulness and Improvement Thresholds of Myositis Core Set Measures: Association With Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Phoenixin-14 as a Potential Limiting Neuropeptide for Exaggerated Inflammation in Familial Mediterranean Fever and Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Cervical Adenitis: A Comparative Study
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • ATHEROSCLEROSIS
  • CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM
  • CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS
  • CAROTID PLAQUE
  • ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire