Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Fibromyalgia in Spondyloarthritis: Effect on Disease Activity Assessment in Clinical Practice

Jean Wach, Marie-Claude Letroublon, Fabienne Coury and Jacques Guy Tebib
The Journal of Rheumatology November 2016, 43 (11) 2056-2063; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.160104
Jean Wach
From the Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bènite, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Claude Letroublon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabienne Coury
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacques Guy Tebib
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jacques.tebib@chu-lyon.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease, characterized by spinal involvement, peripheral arthritis, or enthesitis with marked pain, stiffness, and fatigue. Fibromyalgia (FM) may be associated with SpA, and shares some common symptoms. We aimed to determine how FM influences assessment of SpA disease activity, which is mainly dependent on patient-based outcome measures such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS).

Methods. This single-center cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with SpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria. FM was diagnosed according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patient characteristics, BASDAI, ASDAS/C-reactive protein (CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 questionnaire were recorded and compared.

Results. The study included 103 patients with SpA; 81 with axial and 22 with peripheral forms. Eighteen patients presented with concomitant FM, of whom 12 had axial SpA and 6 peripheral SpA. Demographic characteristics did not differ except for sex, with a female predominance in the FM group that was more marked in peripheral forms. BASDAI was higher in patients with FM [median (IQR): 4.2 (4.2) vs 2.2 (3.1); p = 0.0068], whereas ASDAS-CRP was not significantly different [median (IQR): 2.7 (2) vs 2 (1.3); p = 0.1264]. Nevertheless, median ASDAS-CRP corresponded to high disease activity in patients with SpA or FM compared with moderate activity in non-FM patients.

Conclusion. FM is a frequent comorbidity in patients with SpA, especially in peripheral forms. In patients with SpA-FM, disease activity may be overestimated when measured by BASDAI and to a lesser extent by ASDAS-CRP, and this overestimation could lead to inappropriate treatment escalation.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
  • FIBROMYALGIA
  • DISEASE ACTIVITY

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease after rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with an estimated prevalence of 0.5–1.9%1. In recent decades, the pattern of the disease has moved from the well-known male-predominant ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to descriptions of more sex-balanced forms. These include on the one hand nonradiographic axial forms and on the other, peripheral forms in which joint and enthesis involvement is predominant and still dependent on a common elementary enthesitis process2. This led to the need for new classification criteria, published in 2011 by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)3. These criteria focus on clinical presentation and distinguish axial SpA (axSpA), divided into radiographic forms (previously known as ankylosing spondylitis, AS) and nonradiographic forms, and peripheral SpA (pSpA), i.e., without axial involvement but with peripheral arthritis and/or enthesitis.

Although sex influence on the severity of SpA is still a matter of debate, women generally present with worse self-reported outcome and less radiographic damage in early and advanced SpA4,5,6,7,8,9. These studies, which postulated the potential effect of a particular behavior with regard to pain discomfort in women to explain the paradoxical discrepancy between objective and subjective presentation, unfortunately did not consider the presence of concomitant fibromyalgia (FM). Yet this frequent diffuse painful syndrome of indeterminate etiology10, largely seen in women11 and often associated with inflammatory diseases12, could be one of the factors that underlie this discrepancy. In a first preliminary study comparing 18 women and 18 men with AS, Aloush and colleagues diagnosed 50% of women with concomitant FM. These patients reported higher disease activity13. Three further studies focused on FM in axial SpA, reporting a higher prevalence than in the general population (from 4.1% to 15.5%)14,15,16.

Disease activity measurement in SpA is principally based on indexes reporting the intensity of subjective discomfort. The most frequently used index, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), is calculated based on six 10-cm horizontal visual analog scales for self-measurement of subjective discomfort such as fatigue, spinal pain, peripheral joint pain and swelling, localized tenderness suggesting enthesitis, and morning stiffness17. The more recent Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) aims at a more objective approach by adding the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; ASDAS-ESR) or the C-reactive protein (CRP) level (ASDAS-CRP) to 3 items of the BASDAI (questions 2, 3, and 6 concerning spinal pain, peripheral joint pain, and duration of morning stiffness) and a patient global assessment of the activity of the disease18.

The overlap between SpA and FM symptoms such as pain, fatigue, or sleep disturbance suggests that SpA disease activity assessed with these indices may be overestimated in patients with concomitant FM. This has been demonstrated for the 28-joint DAS index in RA19,20 and it could eventually lead to an inappropriate increase in antiinflammatory treatment. Consequently, the aim of our study was to assess the effect of FM on SpA disease activity assessment measured with BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP. Functional disability and quality of life were also assessed as secondary endpoints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our single-center cross-sectional study considered for inclusion consecutive patients with SpA from the department of one of the authors (JGT) between March 2010 and May 2011. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years, fulfillment of ASAS classification criteria for axSpA3 and of Amor21 or European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) classification criteria for peripheral SpA22. ASAS classification criteria for peripheral SpA, which were published after the beginning of our study, were assessed retrospectively, using items of the previous criteria3. FM was diagnosed when patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria at the time of examination or during a previous consultation10. To meet these criteria, patients must present widespread pain for more than 3 months with 11 or more tender points at clinical examination of 18 anatomically defined sites. A consecutive FM control population defined by the 1990 ACR criteria but without inflammatory rheumatic disease was included in our study.

A standardized case report form was completed for each patient for demographic data, current treatment, disease activity reported with BASDAI17 and patient global assessment (“How active was your rheumatism on average during the last week?”, as defined in the ASDAS-CRP index)18, disability assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI; consisting of 10 self-reported questions about functional disability)23, and quality of life assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36)24. A single examiner (JGT) completed the form for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), consisting of 5 standardized measures25, number of FM tender points, number of tender and swollen joints, sacroiliac radiographic assessment, and laboratory results.

One missing value was permitted for the BASDAI, BASMI, BASFI, and ASDAS-CRP questionnaires and 2 missing values for the SF-36; if more were missing, the patient was excluded from analysis. Missing values were replaced by the mean value of the remaining patients of each of the 2 groups (patients with SpA, and FM control patients).

Observational analysis of the effect of FM was carried out on the whole population and on axial and peripheral subgroups as defined by the ASAS classification criteria by measuring primarily the differences in BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP scores with and without this disorder. Secondary endpoints were also measured such as BASFI, BASMI scores, and the SF-36 score, to assess physical and psychological effect.

The ethical review board of the Hospice Civil de Lyon checked and approved the protocol. Because of the exclusive observational design of our study, consent of the consultative committee for the protection of persons was not required. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 5.03 (GraphPad Software) and SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS). Groups of patients were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables as appropriate. Continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile range, IQR) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages). In percentage calculation for each variable, the number of missing values was excluded from the denominator. The Spearman nonparametric test was used to assess the correlation between scores. For all analyses, a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Populations

The study included 103 patients with SpA, of whom 81 presented with axSpA and 22 with pSpA. All patients diagnosed with pSpA on the basis of the Amor or ESSG criteria retrospectively fulfilled ASAS classification criteria. Eighteen patients (17.5%) had concomitant FM, including 12 patients with axSpA (14.8%) and 6 patients with pSpA (27.3%). Thirteen of the 18 patients fulfilled the ACR 1990 criteria for FM at the time of examination, whereas 5 of the 18 had fulfilled them in a previous consultation. A control group of 18 consecutive patients with FM seen during the same period agreed to complete the same form and were similarly examined.

Demographic and disease characteristics are detailed in Table 1. The proportion of women was significantly higher in the FM group than in the whole population (66.7% vs 29.4%; p = 0.0056). The sex difference was not significant in the axial subgroup (50.0% vs 26.1%; p = 0.1669), but patients with FM had less radiographic sacroiliitis. Detailed data are not presented for the subgroup with peripheral involvement but only 2 characteristics were different: women were also predominant among the patients with pSpA FM (100% vs 43.7%; p = 0.0461) and were shorter [height 159.3 cm (IQR 9.8) vs 173 cm (IQR 18); p = 0.0386]. Prescriptions did not differ between FM and non-FM patients, whether for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, analgesics, antidepressant agents, or hypnotics (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Population characteristics. Data presented as n (%) except as otherwise indicated.

Missing values

Concerning BASDAI, 3 patients had 1 missing value (item 4 for 1 patient with SpA, item 6 for 1 patient with SpA-FM, and item 4 for 1 FM control patient). Concerning ASDAS-CRP, global patient evaluation was missing in 2 patients with SpA (1 patient with SpA-FM and 1 FM control patient); CRP was missing in 4 patients with SpA and 1 FM control patient. In the axSpA subgroup, BASFI and BASMI were not analyzed in 6 and 5 patients, respectively, while 2 and 5 patients had 1 missing value. Concerning SF-36, 6 patients were excluded and 1 or 2 missing values were replaced in 13 patients.

Assessment of activity

Comparisons of BASDAI according to FM status are presented in Table 2. In the whole population, total score (p < 0.01) and questions 2, 3, and 4 (p < 0.05) were higher in the SpA-FM group. In the axial subgroup, only questions 3 and 4 were significantly higher in FM patients (p < 0.05). In the peripheral subgroup all questions except number 6 were higher (p < 0.05), but interpretation should be cautious owing to the low number of patients. ASDAS-CRP was not significantly higher in SpA FM and non-FM patients. However, median ASDAS-CRP corresponded to high disease activity in patients with SpA-FM compared with moderate activity in non-FM patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Comparison of BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, and secondary criteria in patients with spondyloarthritis according to fibromyalgia status. Data presented as median (IQR).

The number of painful joints was higher in patients with SpA-FM, whereas the number of swollen joints was not (Table 2). The same results were observed in both the axial and peripheral subgroups.

In the axSpA subgroup, there was no difference according to FM status for the BASFI [median (IQR) axSpA-FM (n = 10): 1.4 (2.7); axSpA without FM (n = 65): 0.9 (2.5), p = 0.2921], and for the BASMI [median (IQR) axSpA-FM (n = 12): 1.5 (1.8); axSpA without FM (n = 64): 1.5 (3.8), p = 0.3526; Table 2]. Correlation according to Spearman’s nonparametric test between BASFI and BASMI scores was found only in patients with axSpA without FM (n = 60; r = 0.5496; p < 0.0001) and not in patients with concomitant FM (n = 10; r = 0.2733; p = 0.4448). There was no correlation between BASDAI and BASMI in either the FM or the non-FM group (data not shown).

Quality of life assessed by the SF-36 did not differ between non-FM (n = 82) and FM patients (n = 15; data not shown), except for 1 of the 8 concepts, “physical health,” which was lower in patients with SpA-FM [median (IQR): 70 (45) vs 85 (25); p = 0.0156].

Patients with SpA-FM were compared with 18 FM control patients (Table 3). There were no differences in demographic characteristics, total BASDAI, and ASDAS-CRP, or in the tender and swollen joint counts.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Comparison of demographics and disease activity assessment in spondyloarthritis patients with concomitant fibromyalgia and fibromyalgia control patients. Data presented as median (IQR) except where indicated.

Because female predominance is a major epidemiological characteristic of FM, secondary cross-sectional analysis of the whole SPA population was performed according to sex (Table 4). Women presented significantly less axial involvement (clinical and radiographic), more peripheral manifestations, more uveitis, and were more affected by concomitant FM. BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP did not differ between men and women.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Comparison of demographics, spondyloarthritis profile, and fibromyalgia status between men and women. Data presented as median (IQR) except where indicated.

DISCUSSION

In our population of 103 patients with SpA, 18 (17.5%) were diagnosed with concomitant FM according to the ACR 1990 classification criteria. Prevalence was higher in pSpA (27.3%) than in axSpA (14.8%). Only a few previous studies have focused on FM in SpA: prevalence was 4.1% among 462 patients with AS (New York criteria) from 10 Spanish centers14, 15.5% among 71 patients with AS (New York criteria) from 1 Brazilian center15, and 14.9% among 402 Italian patients with axSpA [AS (New York criteria) and axial psoriatic arthritis (ASAS classification criteria for axSpA and psoriasis)]16. For FM classification, the first 2 studies used ACR 1990 criteria while the last used ACR 2010 criteria.

It may be supposed that some primary FM may have been misclassified as SpA. Our study was not designed to compare the accuracy of different sets of criteria. However, Baraliakos, et al in a preliminary study compared 93 FM and 91 axSpA cases26. No patient with FM (median age 50.7 yrs, 93.4% women, 7.5% HLA-B27) fulfilled ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA. Doubts may remain for peripheral SpA where prevalence of FM was higher, but patients were considered as having SpA by the treating physician (JGT) even before they were considered for inclusion, and fulfilled at least 2 sets of classification criteria (either ESSG or Amor criteria and retrospectively ASAS criteria). Moreover, ASAS criteria require 1 objective symptom (arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis) to be fulfilled3. Nevertheless, a lack of specificity of the new ASAS criteria has been disputed, particularly for nonradiographic axSpA and peripheral SpA27,28. Widespread pain and tenderness of the body in FM could be mistaken for enthesitis. Indeed, Marchesoni, et al found a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score higher among 120 patients with FM compared to 266 patients with psoriatic arthritis, which was correlated to the number of FM tender points29.

The frequencies of FM in our population of SpA (17.5%) and especially of axSpA (14.8%) are close to those of the Brazilian study of Azevedo, et al (15.5%)15 and of the Italian study of Salaffi, et al (14.9%)16. Still, prevalence was lower in the Spanish study by Almodóvar, et al14 concerning 462 AS cases from 12 centers. There may be some recruitment bias in tertiary care centers such as in our study and in the first 2 studies cited that could lead to overestimation of prevalence. Another explanation for this discrepancy may be the criteria used for SpA. Most previous studies used the New York modified criteria for AS, which represented only 55 patients in our study, with an FM prevalence of 9.1%. Still, even in the study by Almodóvar, et al, prevalence was higher than expected in the general population, as has been reported for other chronic inflammatory diseases12. Finally, this study confirms that FM prevalence is higher in SpA than in the general population.

We found a female predominance in patients with concomitant FM, as has previously been described in SpA. The sex ratio was 2 in our study, similar to the results of Almodóvar, et al in Spain (2.2)14 and Salaffi, et al in Italy (2.3)16, and higher than those of Azevedo, et al in Brazil (1.2)15, but still lower than most estimations in the general population10,11. With the exception of height, female predominance was the only significant difference between FM and non-FM patients in the whole population and in the peripheral subgroup. Female predominance in patients with SpA-FM was less marked in the axial subgroup. This is in agreement with the male predominance classically observed in radiographic axSpA, whereas the sex ratio is usually more balanced in peripheral SpA30,31,32.

However, FM prevalence in men was unexpectedly high in this clinical cohort (9.1%) compared with the frequency found in other diseases such as RA19 or in the general population11. It is however consistent with the results reported by Salaffi, et al16 and more generally with the increased incidence of FM in other chronic rheumatic diseases12. This observation may give new insight into the debate on the relationship between FM and chronic diseases such as RA or SpA: chronic inflammatory pain may induce alterations in central pain regulation mechanisms, known as central sensitization, and finally lead to chronic widespread pain and other somatic symptoms, even eventually FM, in a person who might not have developed such a condition in the absence of inflammatory disease33,34.

BASDAI was higher in patients with FM, especially in peripheral SpA, where female predominance was the highest. In axSpA, only questions 3 and 4 relating to peripheral pain were higher in patients with FM, whereas responses to questions about fatigue and morning stiffness did not differ. Because FM is a diffuse painful syndrome, we can suppose that this difference may reflect the effect of FM rather than a more severe inflammatory process. Almodóvar, et al and Azevedo, et al reported higher BASDAI in patients with axSpA-FM14,15, whereas Salaffi, et al found no significant difference in the BASDAI score between FM and non-FM patients with SpA16. Because BASDAI assesses symptoms, it may reflect the sum of the manifestations of both SpA and FM. The high BASDAI score in our control population of FM with similar demographics underlines its lack of specificity, in accordance with previous studies reporting median BASDAI (IQR) of 6.0 (2.7) in 70 patients with FM and of 4.5 (1.6) in 248 patients with FM16,35. This lack of specificity in measuring SpA inflammatory disease activity in patients with concomitant FM needs to be borne in mind when antiinflammatory therapy is discussed, with the risk of inefficacy, occurrence of adverse events, and excessive cost if TNF blockers are considered.

The ASDAS may then be of interest because it includes the ESR or CRP level as a single objective item. Salaffi, et al concluded that ASDAS may distinguish axSpA patients with disease activity from those with functional impairment related to FM, but values were similar in the axSpA and axSpA-FM groups and considerably overlapped with those of the FM group. We found no significant difference in ASDAS score between patients with SpA-FM and patients with SpA. However, with regard to clinical therapeutic decision making, median ASDAS-CRP in patients with SpA-FM was considered to indicate high disease activity, whereas the SpA non-FM group was considered to present with moderate activity, which may still lead to inappropriate treatment. The relative lack of specificity of ASDAS may be related to the usually low ESR and CRP levels in patients with SpA, as reported here and in other cohorts30,31,32. This drawback could be overcome by using high-sensitivity CRP36 or another more pertinent marker such as calprotectin37. Nevertheless, in the Spanish cohort CRP was significantly lower in 19 patients with SpA-FM than in 443 patients with SpA, whereas BASDAI was higher14. In any case, compared with the BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP still includes 4 patient-reported outcomes (patient’s global assessment and BASDAI items 2, 3, and 6), but excludes the 2 questions concerning fatigue, which are the most unspecific, and local tenderness suggestive of enthesitis, a diagnosis that may be challenging in patients who have concomitant FM.

The influence of FM on subjective assessment is also illustrated by the discrepancy observed between a high count of tender joints and a low count of swollen joints in patients with SpA-FM, as highlighted in RA19,20, and by the lack of correlation between the BASFI and the BASMI in patients with axSpA-FM. Similarly, Almodóvar, et al described higher BASFI and lower Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiographic Index in patients with AS-FM compared with non-FM patients14.

Interestingly, quality of life assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire revealed little difference between patients with FM and non-FM, except for one of the 8 concepts, “physical health,” which was poorer in SpA-FM, illustrating the complexity of such evaluation.

Our study has a number of limitations. The relatively small sample required the use of nonparametric tests that, although robust, limited the drawing of conclusions in some subgroup analyses, especially in the pSpA subgroup. However, the epidemiological characteristics and presentation of the SpA profile of this population, such as the more frequent axial involvement in men and the more frequent peripheral involvement in women (Table 4), were similar to the findings of larger studies, suggesting this sample was nevertheless representative4,5,6,7,8,9. Clinical assessment was not blinded but this did not affect our main results concerning patient-based outcome measures, and assessment by a single experienced examiner ensured accuracy38.

FM is often associated with SpA, especially in peripheral forms and in women. This concomitant FM should be considered as an important contextual factor that may account for inaccuracy in assessing disease activity in SpA, particularly pSpA. Inflammatory disease activity may be overestimated in such patients if assessed using BASDAI, and to a lesser extent using ASDAS-CRP. When interpreting these indices, physicians should be aware of the presence of concomitant FM to avoid inappropriate escalation of antiinflammatory treatment.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge with gratitude the contribution to this work of their greatly missed co-author, Marie-Claude Letroublon, who died August 30, 2015.

Footnotes

  • M.C. Letroublon died August 30, 2015.

  • Accepted for publication July 21, 2016.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Khan M,
    4. Braun J,
    5. Sieper J
    . How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis2004;63:535–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Benjamin M,
    2. McGonagle D
    . The enthesis organ concept and its relevance to the spondyloarthropathies. Adv Exp Med Biol 2009;649:57–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewé R,
    4. Akkoc N,
    5. Brandt J,
    6. Chou CT,
    7. et al.
    The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lee W,
    2. Reveille JD,
    3. Davis JC,
    4. Learch TJ,
    5. Ward MM,
    6. Weisman MH
    . Are there gender differences in severity of ankylosing spondylitis? Results from the PSOAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:633–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ibn Yacoub Y,
    2. Amine B,
    3. Laatiris A,
    4. Hajjaj-Hassouni N
    . Gender and disease features in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:293–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ortega Castro R,
    2. Font Ugalde P,
    3. Castro Villegas MC,
    4. Calvo Gutiérrez J,
    5. Muñoz Gomariz E,
    6. Zarco Montejo P,
    7. et al.
    Different clinical expression of patients with ankylosing spondylitis according to gender in relation to time since onset of disease. Data from REGISPONSER. Reumatol Clin 2013;9:221–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Slobodin G,
    2. Reyhan I,
    3. Avshovich N,
    4. Balbir-Gurman A,
    5. Boulman N,
    6. Elias M,
    7. et al.
    Recently diagnosed axial spondyloarthritis: gender differences and factors related to delay in diagnosis. Clin Rheumatol 2011;30:1075–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Roussou E,
    2. Sultana S
    . Spondyloarthritis in women: differences in disease onset, clinical presentation, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional indices (BASDAI and BASFI) between men and women with spondyloarthritides. Clin Rheumatol 2011;30:121–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tournadre A,
    2. Pereira B,
    3. Lhoste A,
    4. Dubost JJ,
    5. Ristori JM,
    6. Claudepierre P,
    7. et al.
    Differences between women and men with recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis: results from a prospective multicenter French cohort. Arthritis Care Res 2013;65:1482–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Smythe HA,
    3. Yunus MB,
    4. Bennett RM,
    5. Bombardier C,
    6. Goldenberg DL,
    7. et al.
    The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Ross K,
    3. Anderson J,
    4. Russell IJ,
    5. Hebert L
    . The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:19–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Atzeni F,
    2. Cazzola M,
    3. Benucci M,
    4. Di Franco M,
    5. Salaffi F,
    6. Sarzi-Puttini P
    . Chronic widespread pain in the spectrum of rheumatological diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011;25:165–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Aloush V,
    2. Ablin JN,
    3. Reitblat T,
    4. Caspi D,
    5. Elkayam O
    . Fibromyalgia in women with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2007;27:865–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Almodóvar R,
    2. Carmona L,
    3. Zarco P,
    4. Collantes E,
    5. González C,
    6. Mulero J,
    7. et al.
    Fibromyalgia in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: prevalence and utility of the measures of activity, function and radiological damage. Clin Exp Rheumatol Suppl 2010;28 Suppl 63:33–9.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Azevedo VF,
    2. Paiva Edos S,
    3. Felippe LR,
    4. Moreira RA
    . Occurrence of fibromyalgia in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rev Bras Reumatol 2010;50:646–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Salaffi F,
    2. De Angelis R,
    3. Carotti M,
    4. Gutierrez M,
    5. Sarzi-Puttini P,
    6. Atzeni F
    . Fibromyalgia in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: epidemiological profile and effect on measures of disease activity. Rheumatol Int 2014;34:1103–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Garrett S,
    2. Jenkinson T,
    3. Kennedy LG,
    4. Whitelock H,
    5. Gaisford P,
    6. Calin A
    . A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Van der Heijde D,
    2. Lie E,
    3. Kvien TK,
    4. Sieper J,
    5. Van den Bosch F,
    6. Listing J,
    7. et al.
    ASDAS, a highly discriminatory ASAS-endorsed disease activity score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1811–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Coury F,
    2. Rossat A,
    3. Tebib A,
    4. Letroublon MC,
    5. Gagnard A,
    6. Fantino B,
    7. et al.
    Rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia: a frequent unrelated association complicating disease management. J Rheumatol 2009;36:58–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ranzolin A,
    2. Brenol JC,
    3. Bredemeier M,
    4. Guarienti J,
    5. Rizzatti M,
    6. Feldman D,
    7. et al.
    Association of concomitant fibromyalgia with worse disease activity score in 28 joints, health assessment questionnaire, and short form 36 scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009;6:794–800.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Amor B,
    2. Dougados M,
    3. Mijiyawa M
    . Criteria of the classification of spondylarthropathies. [Article in French] Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1990;57:85–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dougados M,
    2. van der Linden S,
    3. Juhlin R,
    4. Huitfeldt B,
    5. Amor B,
    6. Calin A,
    7. et al.
    The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1218–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Calin A,
    2. Garrett S,
    3. Whitelock H,
    4. Kennedy LG,
    5. O’Hea J,
    6. Mallorie P,
    7. et al.
    A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ware JE,
    2. Sherbourne CD
    . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jenkinson TR,
    2. Mallorie PA,
    3. Whitelock HC,
    4. Kennedy LG,
    5. Garrett SL,
    6. Calin A
    . Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1694–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Baraliakos X,
    2. Regel A,
    3. Kiltz U,
    4. Kiefer D,
    5. Menne HJ,
    6. Dybowski F,
    7. et al.
    (OP0038) Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) do not fulfill classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (Axspa) but patients with axspa may fulfill classification criteria for FM. Ann Rheum Dis Suppl 2015;74 Suppl 2:80.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zeidler H,
    2. Amor B
    . The Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general: the spondyloarthritis concept in progress. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;1:1–3.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Van Tubergen A
    . The changing clinical picture and epidemiology of spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11:110–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Marchesoni A,
    2. Atzeni F,
    3. Spadaro A,
    4. Lubrano E,
    5. Provenzano G,
    6. Cauli A,
    7. et al.
    Identification of the clinical features distinguishing psoriatic arthritis and fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2012;39:849–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Collantes E,
    2. Zarco P,
    3. Muñoz E,
    4. Juanola X,
    5. Mulero J,
    6. Fernández-Sueiro JL,
    7. et al.
    Disease pattern of spondyloarthropathies in Spain: description of the first national registry (REGISPONSER) extended report. Rheumatol 2007;46:1309–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Dougados M,
    2. d’Agostino MA,
    3. Benessiano J,
    4. Berenbaum F,
    5. Breban M,
    6. Claudepierre P,
    7. et al.
    The DESIR cohort: a 10-year follow-up of early inflammatory back pain in France: study design and baseline characteristics of the 708 recruited patients. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum 2011;78:598–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. Haibel H,
    3. Baraliakos X,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Märker-Hermann E,
    6. Zeidler H,
    7. et al.
    The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:717–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Atzeni F,
    2. Masala IF,
    3. Salaffi F,
    4. Di Franco M,
    5. Casale R,
    6. Sarzi-Puttini P
    . Pain in systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015;29:42–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Clauw DJ
    . Fibromyalgia and related conditions. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:680–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Heikkilä S,
    2. Ronni S,
    3. Kautiainen HJ,
    4. Kauppi MJ
    . Functional impairment in spondyloarthropathy and fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1415–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Machado P,
    2. Navarro-Compán V,
    3. Landewé R,
    4. van Gaalen FA,
    5. Roux C,
    6. van der Heijde D
    . Calculating the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score if the conventional c-reactive protein level is below the limit of detection or if high-sensitivity c-reactive protein is used: an analysis in the DESIR cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:408–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Turina MC,
    2. Yeremenko N,
    3. Paramarta JE,
    4. De Rycke L,
    5. Baeten D
    . Calprotectin (S100A8/9) as serum biomarker for clinical response in proof-of-concept trials in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Pincus T
    . Limitations of a quantitative swollen and tender joint count to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008;66:216–23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 43, Issue 11
1 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fibromyalgia in Spondyloarthritis: Effect on Disease Activity Assessment in Clinical Practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Fibromyalgia in Spondyloarthritis: Effect on Disease Activity Assessment in Clinical Practice
Jean Wach, Marie-Claude Letroublon, Fabienne Coury, Jacques Guy Tebib
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2016, 43 (11) 2056-2063; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Fibromyalgia in Spondyloarthritis: Effect on Disease Activity Assessment in Clinical Practice
Jean Wach, Marie-Claude Letroublon, Fabienne Coury, Jacques Guy Tebib
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2016, 43 (11) 2056-2063; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160104
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
FIBROMYALGIA
DISEASE ACTIVITY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • One-Third of European Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Reach Pain Remission With Routine Care Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment
  • Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Positive Predictive Value of a Very High Serum IgG4 Concentration for the Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • spondyloarthritis
  • fibromyalgia
  • disease activity

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire