Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Use of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Digital Microvascular Function in Primary Raynaud Phenomenon and Systemic Sclerosis: A Comparison Using the Raynaud Condition Score Diary

John D. Pauling, Jacqueline A. Shipley, Darren J. Hart, Anita McGrogan and Neil J. McHugh
The Journal of Rheumatology July 2015, 42 (7) 1163-1168; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141437
John D. Pauling
From the Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases; and the Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: John.Pauling@rnhrd.nhs.uk
Jacqueline A. Shipley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren J. Hart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita McGrogan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil J. McHugh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Objective assessment of digital vascular function in a patient with SSc complicated by recurrent digital ulceration. A. A photograph demonstrating the visual appearances of the hands on arrival for assessment with evidence of digital cyanosis and shortening of index fingers because of previous necrotic episodes. B. An IRT image of baseline assessment of digital vascular function with the 3 ROI highlighted. C. LSCI images at 13-s intervals during baseline and following cold challenge (the hands disappearing from view during cold challenge). SSc: systemic sclerosis; IRT: infrared thermography; ROI: region of interest; LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline demographics of patients. Values are median (IQR) unless otherwise specified.

    CharacteristicsPrimary RP, n = 18SSc, n = 25p
    Age, yrs51.7 (19.3)59.2 (19.8)0.03
    Age at RP onset, yrs20 (24)35 (19)0.02
    Age at diagnosis, yrs43 (6)45 (19)0.61
    Male, n (%)4 (22.2)5 (20)1.00
    Female, n (%)14 (77.8)20 (80)1.00
    Vasodilatory therapy
      Any, n (%)5 (27.8)12 (48)0.22
      Calcium antagonist3 (16.7)6 (24)0.71
      ACEi0 (0)7 (28)0.03
      SSRI2 (11.1)1 (4)0.56
    ERA0 (0)2 (8)0.50
    Smoking history, n (%)
      Never10 (55.6)13 (52)1.00
      Ex7 (38.9)9 (36)1.00
      Current1 (5.5)3 (12)0.63
    Season enrolled, n (%)
      Autumn/winter10 (55.6)13 (52)1.00
      Spring/summer8 (44.4)12 (48)1.00
    • Significant data are in bold face. IQR: interquartile range; RP: Raynaud phenomenon; SSc: systemic sclerosis; ACEi: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; ERA: enthesitis-related arthritis.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    IRT and LSCI data for patients with SSc and primary RP at assessment 1. All values expressed as median (IQR).

    VariablesROIBt0t5t10t15
    IRT, °C
      SSc
    129.8 (5.5)*21.5 (2.6)†23.7 (7.1)*25.4 (9.2)*27 (9.4)*
    230.8 (7.3)21.4 (2.9)24.4 (7.9)25 (9.7)26.7 (11.1)
    328.8 (6.4)20.6 (3.0)*22.4 (6.2)*24 (8.8)*25.9 (9.4)
      Primary RP131.4 (8.0)†21.1 (3.2)†25.1 (9.5) *†31.4 (11)32.4 (10.8)
    230.8 (6.6)21.5 (3.5)25.2 (7.2)30.4 (10.5)31.7 (10.6)
    329.5 (6.7)20.7 (3.1)*23.5 (9.6)30.5 (10.5)32 (10)
    LSCI, fu
      SSc1364 (299)†188 (177)*205 (282)*243 (257)†298 (288)†
    2235 (306)**79 (84)100 (269)132 (391)128 (364)
    3632 (757)*213 (424)*320 (642)*422 (955)*479 (770)*
      Primary RP1372 (378)*179 (128)*274 (346)*452 (430)*488 (446)*
    2124 (93)81 (61)81 (81)104 (161)120 (128)
    3536 (483)*202 (135)*261 (577)*484 (604)*487 (672)*
    • ↵* p < 0.05 vs ROI 2.

    • ↵† p < 0.05 vs ROI 3.

    • ↵** p = 0.007 vs primary RP. IRT: infrared thermography; LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging; SSc: systemic sclerosis; RP: Raynaud phenomenon; IQR: interquartile range; ROI: region of interest; B: baseline assessment at 23°C; t0: assessments immediately following cold challenge; t5: perfusion 5 min post cold challenge; t10: perfusion 10 min post cold challenge; t15: perfusion 15 min post cold challenge; fu: flux unit values.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Correlation between objective and subjective assessment of RP at baseline and following cold challenge for both primary RP and SSc. Values are rs.

    Correlation between IRT and LSCI. p < 0.01 for all comparisons.
    Bt0t5t10t15
    ROI 10.730.620.810.840.75
    ROI 20.700.580.840.830.81
    ROI 30.810.650.820.820.83
    Correlation between the RCS diary and LSCI assessment at ROI. 1 p > 0.05 for all comparisons.
    Duration of RP attacks0.05−0.200.010.080.07
    Frequency of RP attacks0.02−0.19−0.080.020.02
    RCS−0.02−0.010.010.000.00
    • RP: Raynaud phenomenon; SSc: systemic sclerosis; IRT: infrared thermography; LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging; ROI: region of interest; B: baseline assessment at 23°C; t0: assessments immediately following cold challenge; t5: perfusion 5 min post cold challenge; t10: perfusion 10 min post cold challenge; t15: perfusion 15 min post cold challenge; RCS: Raynaud Condition Score.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Reproducibility of IRT and LSCI for each ROI at baseline and following cold challenge for both primary RP and SSc. Values are ICC (95% CI). N = 41, unless stated otherwise.

    ROICameraBt0t5t10t15
    1IRT*0.51 (0.24–0.71)0.61 (0.36–0.78)0.52 (0.25–0.72)0.5 (0.23–0.7)0.54 (0.28–0.73)
    LSCI0.62 (0.39–0.78)0.86 (0.75–0.92)0.52 (0.25–0.71)0.34 (0.04–0.58)0.47 (0.19–0.68)
    2IRT*0.51 (0.24–0.71)0.56 (0.3–0.75)0.54 (0.28–0.73)0.54 (0.28–0.73)0.55 (0.28–0.73)
    LSCI0.63 (0.4–0.78)0.59 (0.33–0.76)0.65 (0.43–0.79)0.54 (0.28–0.73)0.30 (0–0.55)
    3IRT**0.59 (0.33–0.76)0.6 (0.35–0.77)0.55 (0.28–0.73)0.63 (0.4–0.79)0.70 (0.5–0.83)
    LSCI*0.55 (0.29–0.73)0.79 (0.63–0.89)0.5 (0.22–0.7)0.42 (0.13–0.65)0.55 (0.29–0.73)
    • ↵* n = 40.

    • ↵** n = 39. IRT: infrared thermography; LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging; ROI: region of interest; RP: Raynaud phenomenon; SSc: systemic sclerosis; B: baseline assessment at 23°C; t0: assessments immediately following cold challenge; t5: perfusion 5 min post cold challenge; t10: perfusion 10 min post cold challenge; t15: perfusion 15 min post cold challenge.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 7
1 Jul 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Digital Microvascular Function in Primary Raynaud Phenomenon and Systemic Sclerosis: A Comparison Using the Raynaud Condition Score Diary
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Use of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Digital Microvascular Function in Primary Raynaud Phenomenon and Systemic Sclerosis: A Comparison Using the Raynaud Condition Score Diary
John D. Pauling, Jacqueline A. Shipley, Darren J. Hart, Anita McGrogan, Neil J. McHugh
The Journal of Rheumatology Jul 2015, 42 (7) 1163-1168; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141437

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Use of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Digital Microvascular Function in Primary Raynaud Phenomenon and Systemic Sclerosis: A Comparison Using the Raynaud Condition Score Diary
John D. Pauling, Jacqueline A. Shipley, Darren J. Hart, Anita McGrogan, Neil J. McHugh
The Journal of Rheumatology Jul 2015, 42 (7) 1163-1168; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141437
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

RAYNAUD PHENOMENON
SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS
IMAGING
REPRODUCIBILITY
OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing Among Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Dactylitis Is Associated With More Severe Axial Joint Damage and Higher Disease Activity in Axial Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Health Outcomes of 215 Mothers of Children With Autoimmune Congenital Heart Block: Analysis of the French Neonatal Lupus Syndrome Registry
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Raynaud phenomenon
  • systemic sclerosis
  • imaging
  • REPRODUCIBILITY
  • OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire