Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Counting Costs under Severe Financial Constraints: A Cost-of-Illness Analysis of Spondyloarthropathies in a Tertiary Hospital in Greece

Niki Tsifetaki, Michail P. Migkos, Charalampos Papagoras, Paraskevi V. Voulgari, Kostas Athanasakis and Alexandros A. Drosos
The Journal of Rheumatology June 2015, 42 (6) 963-967; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141277
Niki Tsifetaki
From the Department of Rheumatology, General Hospital “G. Hatzikosta”; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Laboratory of Molecular Hematology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis; Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michail P. Migkos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charalampos Papagoras
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paraskevi V. Voulgari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kostas Athanasakis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandros A. Drosos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adrosos@cc.uoi.gr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the total annual direct cost of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) in Greece.

Methods. Retrospective study with 156 patients diagnosed and followed up in the rheumatology clinic of the University Hospital of Ioannina. Sixty-four had ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 92 had psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Health resource use for each patient was elicited through a retrospective chart review that documented the use of monitoring visits, medications, laboratory/diagnostic tests, and inpatient stays for the previous year from the date that the review took place. Costs were calculated from a third-party payer perspective and are reported in 2014 euros.

Results. The mean ± SD annual direct cost for the patients with SpA reached €8680 ± 6627. For the patients with PsA and AS, the cost was estimated to be €8097 ± 6802 and €9531 ± 6322, respectively. The major cost was medication, which represented 88.9%, 88.2%, and 89.3% of the mean total direct cost for SpA, AS, and PsA, respectively. The annual amount of the scheduled tests for all patients corresponded to 7.5%, and for those performed on an emergency basis, 1.1%. Further, the cost for scheduled and emergency hospitalization, as well as the cost of scheduled visits to an outpatient clinic, corresponded to 2.5% of the mean total annual direct cost for the patients with SpA.

Conclusion. SpA carries substantial financial cost, especially in the era of new treatment options. Adequate access and treatment for patients with SpA remains a necessity, even in times of fiscal constraint. Thus, the recommendations of the international scientific organizations should be considered when administering high-cost drugs such as biological treatments.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES
  • PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
  • ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
  • ANNUAL COST
  • DIRECT COST

The term spondyloarthritis (SpA) refers to a heterogeneous group of rheumatic diseases with common clinical and laboratory features. Its main clinical manifestation is inflammatory lumbar pain. The diseases can also manifest with symptoms other than axial involvement, such as asymmetrical oligoarthritis, polyarthritis indistinguishable from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), enthesitis, dactylitis, as well as with extraarticular manifestations with symptoms from involvement of the eye, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal system, and others1,2,3. The family of SpA includes ankylosis spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), inflammatory arthritis-associated inflammatory bowel disease, juvenile SpA, reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated SpA4.

The etiology of SpA is largely unknown, and reflects a complexity of environmental, immunological, and genetic interactions. There is a strong association between the susceptibility of SpA and tissue antigen HLA-B275,6,7. Several gastrointestinal and genitourinary pathogen species such as Campylobacter, Chlamydia, Salmonella, and Shigella have been associated8,9.

The prevalence of SpA in Europe has been reported as 0.3–1.9%4,9,10,11,12. The prevalence and incidence, according to different studies, vary because of differences in the genetics (HLA-B27) of the population, environmental triggers, and differences in study designs. In addition, there are no widely well-accepted classification criteria. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) has published13,14 criteria for the classification of both axial and peripheral SpA.

SpA is a family of chronic diseases that require serious monitoring and managing because they can lead to limitations of functional capacity, decreased ability to work, and reduced overall quality of life, with significant social and financial cost. At the same time, the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologic agents in the treatment of SpA contributes to the increase in the financial burden of these diseases15,16,17.

In the United States, it is estimated that for 1.4 million patients with PsA or psoriasis, the total annual cost has risen to US $649.6 million. The cost of outpatient visits accounted for US $86.6 million, and US $357.2 million and US $30.5 million for over-the-counter medications and hospitalization, respectively18,19. According to the literature, the disease is also reported to entail a significant financial burden in European countries, as well as in Canada, Brazil, Mexico, and others20.

In light of this and in the absence of a previous estimate for Greece, a country under severe financial constraints, the purpose of our study was to estimate the total annual direct cost of SpA within the context of the Greek healthcare setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample included patients who had visited the outpatient rheumatology clinic of the tertiary University Hospital of Ioannina on a scheduled or an emergency visit between June 1, 2013, and December 31, 2013. From 166 diagnosed patients according to the ASAS criteria for SpA, 156 were recruited for the study. Six patients had enteropathic arthritis and were evaluated by a gastroenterologist. These patients were excluded because of a lack of data. Four patients with undifferentiated SpA were also excluded. Three of them refused any diagnostic and therapeutic intervention, and 1 was lost to followup. Sixty-four patients were diagnosed with AS and 92 patients with PsA. The patients with PsA fulfilled the CASPAR (Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria, and those with AS, the New York classification criteria21,22. For these patients, we investigated retrospectively their medical records for 1 year, and we recorded the information on health resource use (reported in detail below).

For each patient, the health resource use/consumption pattern was elicited through a retrospective chart review for a period of 365 days before the date of the review. Data also included the number of monitoring visits (scheduled or unscheduled) and days of inpatient hospitalization, and laboratory, imaging, and other tests that were conducted on a scheduled or emergency basis. In particular, total annual direct laboratory use included the tuberculosis skin test (Mantoux test), blood examinations, radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, ultrasound, gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and electromyography. Resource use and subsequent costs were disaggregated for the tests conducted on scheduled patients and those conducted on an emergency basis.

For the patients treated with biologic agents administered in the hospital, the cost of the nursing staff and the cost of consumable materials used for the infusion were also recorded. It should be mentioned that only the costs that were attributable to SpA were recorded and not those related to the comorbid conditions.

All resources, including medications, were costed under the perspective of the third-party payer by applying all relevant prices and tariffs, as reported by the latest applicable official price lists at the time that the analysis took place. Cost values are reflected in euros as of 2014.

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and all patients provided informed consent.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 52 ± 13 years and the mean ± SD disease duration was 17 ± 11 years. All demographic data of the patients are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of the patients with SpA. Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified.

From the 64 patients with AS, 48 of them were under treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). Of the 92 patients with PsA, 50 patients were treated with biologic DMARD and 42 were treated with nonbiologic DMARD (Table 1).

From the conducted study, the mean annual direct cost per patient with SpA reached €8680 ± 6627. For the subgroup of patients with PsA and AS, the annual direct cost was estimated to be €8097 ± 6802 and €9531 ± 6322, respectively. A major part of the cost was the medications; in our study, 88.9%, 88.2%, and 89.3% of the mean total direct cost represented pharmaceutical expenditures for patients with SpA, AS, and PsA, respectively. We found that the total annual pharmaceutical expenditures for each patient reached €7717 ± 6615. Of this total cost, 97.1% (€7499 ± 6607) was the cost of the treatment with biologic DMARD, and only 2.8% (€218 ± 455) was the cost of the annual nonbiologic pharmaceutical expenditures for the whole group of patients with SpA. Analysis of the subgroups showed that for the 92 patients with PsA, the total cost of pharmaceuticals was €7234 ± 6890, of which 95.1% represented the cost of treatment with biologic DMARD (€6880 ± 6847). The cost of nonbiologic pharmaceutical treatment was 4.9% (€353 ± 551). The patients with AS showed a slightly higher pharmaceutical expenditure: €8413 ± 6186, of which 99.7% represented the cost of biologic DMARD (€8388 ± 6191) and 0.3% the expenditure for nonbiologic treatment (€24 ± 84).

In the present study, the total annual direct cost included the cost of laboratory tests, imaging, and other procedures (Table 2 and Table 3), as well as the cost of hospital care and clinical examination in the outpatient clinic (Table 4). The mean annual cost of the scheduled tests for each of the 156 patients corresponded to 7.5% (€655 ± 518) of the mean annual direct cost. The cost for the tests performed on an emergency basis represented 1.1% (€98 ± 265) of the latter.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Annual costs (€) by specific tests on a scheduled and emergency basis in patients with SpA. Values are mean ± SD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Annual total costs (€) of tests done on a scheduled and emergency basis in patients with SpA. Values are mean ± SD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Annual financial burden (€) for the national healthcare system (hospitalization and outpatient clinic). Values are mean ± SD.

The data showed small differences for the subgroup of patients with AS. The annual cost of scheduled tests for the current subgroup corresponded to 7.5% (€720 ± 503) of the total. The tests performed on an emergency basis represented 0.65% of the mean annual direct cost (€62 ± 144). For patients with PsA, the scheduled tests also represented 7.5% of the mean annual direct cost. For the tests conducted on emergency basis for these patients, the cost was slightly higher, reaching 1.5% (€123 ± 323) of the total mean annual direct cost.

Further, the cost of scheduled and emergency hospitalization, as well as the cost of scheduled visits to the outpatient clinic, corresponded to 2.5% of the mean total annual direct cost for the patients with SpA. For the patients with PsA, it represented 1.7%. For the patients with AS, the rate was up to 3.65% of the mean total annual direct cost.

Finally, the annual cost of biologic agents in Greece was estimated, for the 62 patients receiving infliximab, to be €11,286 ± 4016. The cost was higher in patients with PsA compared with those with AS (€12,190 ± 3886 and €10,633 ± 4036, respectively). For the biologic agents that were administered subcutaneously [etanercept (ETN) and adalimumab (ADA)], the mean price was higher. For each of the 36 patients receiving ETN or ADA, the cost reached €12,643 ± 1522. For the patients with PsA, the total annual amount was €12,886 ± 920, and for the 12 patients with AS, it reached €12,757 ± 973.

DISCUSSION

SpA incurs a high economic burden, similar to other rheumatologic diseases23. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to analyze the direct cost of SpA, and more particularly PsA and AS in Greece, and one of the very few to include patients receiving biologic agents, despite the limits of a retrospective study. Considering the financial environment and the spending cuts in the public health sector as a result of the financial crisis, understanding the financial burden associated with these diseases is crucial for optimal use of scarce healthcare resources.

As previously stated, the total annual direct cost per patient of these diseases reached €8680 ± 6627. For the patients with PsA, this cost was estimated to be €8097 ± 6802, and €9531 ± 6322 for those with AS. It should be noted that our clinic is a reference center and most of the patients with PsA were refractory to treatment with synthetic DMARD. The latter may result in an overestimation of the cost. More than 88% of the total annual cost of the 2 diseases represents the cost of pharmaceutical treatment and includes the cost of biologic agents. The total annual cost per patient of the biologic agents was €10,633 ± 4036 to €12,886 ± 920, depending on the agent that was administered.

Comparing results from various studies is challenging because of the differences in methodology and in healthcare systems in different countries. According to Huscher, et al, the mean ± SD direct annual cost for patients diagnosed with PsA reached €3156 ± 4118, not including patients treated with biologic agents24. In the study by Zhu, et al25, the annual direct cost of patients with PsA, also naive to biologic agents, reached US $4141 for every patient. It should be mentioned that the design of Zhu, et al’s study and the variables that were included in the direct cost were quite similar to the variables included in our study. According to Zhu, et al’s study, the cost of diagnostic tests represented 10% of the total annual direct cost, a rate similar to the 7.5% in our study. However, Zhu, et al reported a rather low cost contribution of medications to the total cost per patient (10%), a finding that can be attributed to the exclusion of patients undergoing newer (biologic) treatments25. In a study by Poole, et al in 2010, the mean annual direct cost for patients with PsA not treated with biologic agents ranged from £1446 ± 1756 to £4832 for the most severely affected26.

All these studies showed lower values for the annual direct cost than those estimated by our present study. An important factor is that these studies included patients naive to biologic agents. We found that the cost of biologic agents reaches about €6880 ± 6847 and represents more than 95% of the total annual cost of pharmaceutical expenditures in patients with PsA. In the study by Olivieri, et al, the use of TNF inhibitors led to a significant increase in the direct cost by €5052 because of an increase in drug costs27. Finally, in a study by Kvamme, et al, it is estimated that the direct cost of patients with PsA treated with biologic agents for 2 years reached €37,159 in comparison with €6300 for those treated with synthetic DMARD for the same 2-year period. The direct cost for these patients exceeded the annual cost that our study estimates28. It should be noted, however, that our present study, as well as the ones reported here, focused solely on the costs of treatment, and did not provide estimates with regards to treatment efficacy — the other major part of every treatment approach.

For the other part of the study sample, i.e., patients with AS, the comparison of the different studies is also challenging because of the reasons mentioned (differences in the design and methodology used, and the different indications valid in the various countries for the administration of biologic agents). However, some rough comparisons can be made. Specifically, in the study by Torres, et al29, the total mean annual direct cost (medical and nonmedical) was estimated to be US $2065, again a value lower than the one we found. The Torres, et al study included only patients not receiving biologic DMARD. The cost of medication represented 91.7% of the estimated total direct cost, similar to the results of our study29.

In the same way, a study that estimates the financial burden of AS in the Czech Republic by Petříková, et al30 estimated average total direct cost as €2588. The main reason for this difference is that in the Czech Republic, the administration of biologic DMARD is significantly less compared to the average proportion of patients with AS treated with biologic DMARD in the European Union and the United States. In that study, the proportion of the patients receiving biologic DMARD was 6.3%, a rate significantly lower than the 75% in our study. Also, it must be highlighted that according to the study by Petříková, et al, the average cost of treatment with a biologic agent per year per patient was estimated to be €17,046, a figure that exceeds the cost from our study30.

In the study by Boonen, et al31, which estimated the direct cost of AS in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, the estimated mean annual direct cost was €2837, €2570, and €1790, respectively. In the latter, patients receiving biologic DMARD were not included31. In the study by Ackland, et al, which estimated the cost of care in patients with AS and RA in Turkey, the mean annual direct cost was €3561. The cost in the Ackland, et al study is smaller than that estimated in our study, probably because of the relatively small proportion of the patients receiving biologic DMARD: 8%, 8.62%, and 8.33% for those receiving infliximab, ETN, and ADA, respectively32.

A limitation of this analysis is that the sample of patients and thus the estimate of costs per patient were derived from a specialized point of care. A discrepancy could exist between the estimates presented in our study and the cost in other points of care in the system. Although this discrepancy is very difficult to quantify, its potential existence should be taken into account when interpreting and generalizing the results for the entire population of patients in Greece.

It should be noted that SpA represent a significant financial burden, especially for a country under severe financial constraints. To endure the mandates for cost reduction and general austerity that are currently (and for the visible future) implemented in Greece, novel approaches are necessary with a purpose of securing adequate access to health services and proper treatment for SpA. The latter certainly constitutes an area of further research. Finally, the recommendations of the international scientific organizations should be considered when administering high-cost drugs such as biological treatments.

  • Accepted for publication February 24, 2015.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Braun J,
    2. Sieper J
    . Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 2007;369:1379–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Antoni C,
    3. Mease P,
    4. Clegg DO,
    5. Nash P
    . Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii14–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hannu T,
    2. Mattila L,
    3. Rautelin H,
    4. Pelkonen P,
    5. Lahdenne P,
    6. Siitonen A,
    7. et al.
    Campylobacter-triggered reactive arthritis: a population-based study. Rheumatology 2002;41:312–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zochling J,
    2. Smith EU
    . Seronegative spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:747–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brewerton DA,
    2. Hart FD,
    3. Nicholls A,
    4. Caffrey M,
    5. James DC,
    6. Sturrock RD
    . Ankylosing spondylitis and HL-A 27. Lancet 1973;1:904–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Aho K,
    2. Ahvonen P,
    3. Lassus A,
    4. Sievers K,
    5. Tiilikainen A
    . HL-A 27 in reactive arthritis. A study of Yersinia arthritis and Reiter’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 1974;17:521–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schiellerup P,
    2. Krogfelt KA,
    3. Locht H
    . A comparison of self-reported joint symptoms following infection with different enteric pathogens: effect of HLA-B27. J Rheumatol 2008;35:480–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Townes JM,
    2. Deodhar AA,
    3. Laine ES,
    4. Smith K,
    5. Krug HE,
    6. Barkhuizen A,
    7. et al.
    Reactive arthritis following culture-confirmed infections with bacterial enteric pathogens in Minnesota and Oregon: a population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1689–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rizzo A,
    2. Domenico MD,
    3. Carratelli CR,
    4. Paolillo R
    . The role of Chlamydia and Chlamydophila infections in reactive arthritis. Intern Med 2012;51:113–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Alamanos Y,
    2. Voulgari PV,
    3. Drosos AA
    . Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2008;35:1354–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Alamanos Y,
    2. Papadopoulos NG,
    3. Voulgari PV,
    4. Karakatsanis A,
    5. Siozos C,
    6. Drosos AA
    . Epidemiology of ankylosing spondylitis in Northwest Greece, 1983–2002. Rheumatology 2004;43:615–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Alamanos Y,
    2. Voulgari PV,
    3. Drosos AA
    . Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases in Greece. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1669–70.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewé R,
    4. Listing J,
    5. Akkoc N,
    6. Brandt J,
    7. et al.
    The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. Jurik AG,
    3. Hermann KG,
    4. Landewé R,
    5. van der Heijde D,
    6. Baraliakos X,
    7. et al.
    Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1520–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Temekonidis TI,
    2. Alamanos Y,
    3. Nikas SN,
    4. Bougias DV,
    5. Georgiadis AN,
    6. Voulgari PV,
    7. et al.
    Infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an open label 12 month study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:1218–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Saougou I,
    2. Markatseli TE,
    3. Papagoras C,
    4. Voulgari PV,
    5. Alamanos Y,
    6. Drosos AA
    . Sustained clinical response in psoriatic arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF agents: a 5-year open-label observational cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011;40:398–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Voulgari PV,
    2. Venetsanopoulou AI,
    3. Exarchou SA,
    4. Alamanos Y,
    5. Tsifetaki N,
    6. Drosos AA
    . Sustained clinical response and high infliximab survival in psoriatic arthritis patients: a 3-year long-term study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2008;37:293–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Olivieri I,
    2. D’Angelo S,
    3. Palazzi C,
    4. Padula A
    . Challenges in economic evaluation of psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1086–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ackermann C,
    2. Kavanaugh A
    . Economic burden of psoriatic arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 2008;26:121–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Reveille JD,
    2. Ximenes A,
    3. Ward MM
    . Economic considerations of the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Am J Med Sci 2012;343:371–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Taylor W,
    2. Gladman D,
    3. Helliwell P,
    4. Marchesoni A,
    5. Mease P,
    6. Mielants H;
    7. CASPAR Study Group
    . Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2665–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. van der Linden S,
    2. Valkenburg HA,
    3. Cats A
    . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cortesi PA,
    2. Scalone L,
    3. D’Angiolella L,
    4. Belisari A,
    5. Fusco F,
    6. Olivieri I,
    7. et al.
    Systematic literature review on economic implications and pharmacoeconomic issues of psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012;30 Suppl 73:S126–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Huscher D,
    2. Merkesdal S,
    3. Thiele K,
    4. Zeidler H,
    5. Schneider M,
    6. Zink A;
    7. German Collaborative Arthritis Centres
    . Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1175–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhu TY,
    2. Tam LS,
    3. Leung YY,
    4. Kwok LW,
    5. Wong KC,
    6. Yu T,
    7. et al.
    Socioeconomic burden of psoriatic arthritis in Hong Kong: direct and indirect costs and the influence of disease pattern. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1214–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Poole CD,
    2. Lebmeier M,
    3. Ara R,
    4. Rafia R,
    5. Currie CJ
    . Estimation of health care costs as a function of disease severity in people with psoriatic arthritis in the UK. Rheumatology 2010;49:1949–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Olivieri I,
    2. de Portu S,
    3. Salvarani C,
    4. Cauli A,
    5. Lubrano E,
    6. Spadaro A,
    7. et al;
    8. PACE working group
    . The psoriatic arthritis cost evaluation study: a cost-of-illness study on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy. Rheumatology 2008;47:1664–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kvamme MK,
    2. Lie E,
    3. Kvien TK,
    4. Kristiansen IS
    . Two-year direct and indirect costs for patients with inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases: data from real-life follow-up of patients in the NOR-DMARD registry. Rheumatology 2012;51:1618–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Torres TM,
    2. Ferraz MB,
    3. Ciconelli RM
    . Resource utilisation and cost of ankylosing spondylitis in Brazil. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2010;28:490–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Petříková A,
    2. Doležal T,
    3. Klimeš J,
    4. Vocelka M,
    5. Sedová L,
    6. Kolář J
    . The economic burden of the ankylosing spondylitis in the Czech Republic: comparison between 2005 and 2008. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:1813–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Boonen A,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewé R,
    4. Guillemin F,
    5. Rutten-van Mölken M,
    6. Dougados M,
    7. et al.
    Direct costs of ankylosing spondylitis and its determinants: an analysis among three European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:732–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ackland HM,
    2. Wolfe R,
    3. Cameron PA,
    4. Cooper DJ,
    5. Malham GM,
    6. Varma DK,
    7. et al.
    Health resource utilisation costs in acute patients with persistent midline cervical tenderness following road trauma. Injury 2012;43:1908–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Counting Costs under Severe Financial Constraints: A Cost-of-Illness Analysis of Spondyloarthropathies in a Tertiary Hospital in Greece
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Counting Costs under Severe Financial Constraints: A Cost-of-Illness Analysis of Spondyloarthropathies in a Tertiary Hospital in Greece
Niki Tsifetaki, Michail P. Migkos, Charalampos Papagoras, Paraskevi V. Voulgari, Kostas Athanasakis, Alexandros A. Drosos
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2015, 42 (6) 963-967; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141277

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Counting Costs under Severe Financial Constraints: A Cost-of-Illness Analysis of Spondyloarthropathies in a Tertiary Hospital in Greece
Niki Tsifetaki, Michail P. Migkos, Charalampos Papagoras, Paraskevi V. Voulgari, Kostas Athanasakis, Alexandros A. Drosos
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2015, 42 (6) 963-967; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141277
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES
PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
ANNUAL COST
DIRECT COST

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • One-Third of European Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Reach Pain Remission With Routine Care Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment
  • Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Positive Predictive Value of a Very High Serum IgG4 Concentration for the Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • spondyloarthropathies
  • psoriatic arthritis
  • ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
  • ANNUAL COST
  • DIRECT COST

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire