Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Four Anti-dsDNA Antibody Assays in Relation to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Specificity and Activity

Helena Enocsson, Christopher Sjöwall, Lina Wirestam, Charlotte Dahle, Alf Kastbom, Johan Rönnelid, Jonas Wetterö and Thomas Skogh
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2015, 42 (5) 817-825; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140677
Helena Enocsson
From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, and the Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: helena.enocsson@liu.se
Christopher Sjöwall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lina Wirestam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Dahle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alf Kastbom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Rönnelid
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Wetterö
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Skogh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Anti-dsDNA in patients with SLE and control groups as measured by CLIFT (A), FIDIS (B), EliA (C), and EUROLINE (D). SLE disease specificity of different anti-dsDNA antibody assays was calculated in relation to control groups (RA, pSS, and HC). The dashed lines indicate cutoff for positivity according to laboratory reference (A), manufacturer’s recommendation (lower line in panel B–D), or double manufacturers’ references (upper line in panel B–D). Specificity and sensitivity for the respective cutoff limits are denoted in the tables above the graphs. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; CLIFT: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test; FIDIS: bead-based multiplex assay; EliA: fluoroenzyme-immunoassay; EUROLINE: line blot; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; pSS: primary Sjögren syndrome; HC: healthy controls; N/A: not applicable.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Correlation and concordance of anti-dsDNA assays in cross-sectional SLE samples. Panels (A–F) are sorted according to correlation. Certain dots represent more than 1 patient. Zero values are replaced with 1 for CLIFT and 0.5 for EUROLINE, to be contained in the log-scale of the axes. Dashed lines indicate the manufacturer’s cutoff for positivity (EliA, FIDIS, and EUROLINE) or laboratory reference (CLIFT), and numbers designate the sum of patients in the specific quadrant. Values of p and rho are from Spearman correlation. Values below cutoff were given a value of 0 to avoid unwanted influence of double-negative samples in the correlation analyses. The rho values and assay concordances when adopting a cutoff limit double the manufacturer’s recommendation are given in parentheses. Concordance is the sum of double-positive samples and double-negative samples, divided by the total number of patients (n = 178). SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; CLIFT: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test; EUROLINE: line blot; EliA: fluoroenzyme-immunoassay; FIDIS: bead-based multiplex assay.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The graphs illustrate disease activity (PGA and SLEDAI-2K*), manifestations at flare, and anti-dsDNA levels in 9 patients (A–I) who were followed consecutively. Description of axes and lines are found in panel A. Axes scales are different among the graphs. Disease flare manifestations of patients with several flares were serositis and arthritis at first flare, and serositis at second flare (B); rash, nephritis, and fever at first flare, and rash, nephritis, and vasculitis at second flare (E); serositis and leukopenia at first flare, and nephritis at second flare (F); serositis and nephritis at first flare, and nephritis at second flare (G); epilepsy and serositis at first flare, and arthritis, rash, and epilepsy at second flare, and rash, alopecia, and epilepsy at third flare, and rash, alopecia, oral ulcers, and epilepsy at fourth flare (H). * Item for anti-dsDNA in SLEDAI was excluded. PGA: physician global assessment; SLEDAI-2K: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; EliA: fluoroenzyme-immunoassay; FIDIS: bead-based multiplex assay; CLIFT: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Association of SLE disease criteria and anti-dsDNA assessed by 4 different assays. The analysis (Fisher’s exact test) is not adjusted for multiple comparisons.

    Cumulative ACR-82 Criteria* (% fulfilling the criterion)FIDISEliACLIFTEUROLINE
    pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)
    1. Malar rash (45%)0.3251.41 (0.74–2.69)0.7531.12 (0.60–2.08)0.7260.84 (0.42–1.70)0.8701.08 (0.57–2.05)
    2. Discoid rash (17%)0.0840.40 (0.14–1.10)0.3020.60 (0.25–1.43)0.3560.55 (0.20–1.54)0.3910.62 (0.25–1.54)
    3. Photosensitivity (56%)0.0470.49 (0.26–0.95)0.7520.86 (0.46–1.60)0.0030.33 (0.16–0.67)0.1040.58 (0.31–1.11)
    4. Oral ulcers (10%)0.5871.32 (0.46–3.79)0.0353.00 (1.08–8.31)0.2491.83 (0.63–5.28)0.4051.70 (0.61–4.73)
    5. Arthritis (78%)0.6920.81 (0.38–1.73)0.4470.71 (0.34–1.47)0.6741.30 (0.55–3.10)1.00.97 (0.45–2.11)
    6. Serositis (38%)0.3151.42 (0.73–2.72)0.7460.87 (0.46–1.65)0.5881.26 (0.63–2.55)0.7370.86 (0.44–1.67)
    7. Renal disorder (21%)0.012.70 (1.29–5.68)0.0042.98 (1.43–6.23)0.0542.23 (1.03–4.85)0.1711.69 (0.80–3.57)
    8. Neurologic disorder (6%)1.00.98 (0.25–3.98)0.3211.95 (0.54–7.00)1.00.77 (0.15–3.79)0.1740.41 (0.11–1.49)
    9. Hematologic disorder (57%)0.0132.42 (1.21–4.83)0.5251.28 (0.69–2.41)0.4801.35 (0.67–2.73)0.6211.23 (0.65–2.35)
    1, 2, or 3. Skin (75%)0.0860.51 (0.25–1.04)1.01.04 (0.51–2.14)0.0010.29 (0.14–0.60)0.0910.53 (0.26–1.08)
    • Significant data are in bold face.

    • ↵* Immunologic disorder (ACR criterion 10, 49% of patients) and antinuclear antibodies (ACR criterion 11, 98% of patients) are not reported because all anti-dsDNA–positive patients by CLIFT fulfill these criteria. Manufacturer’s cutoff (FIDIS, EliA, and EUROLINE) or laboratory reference cutoff (CLIFT) for positivity were used. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; ACR-82: American College of Rheumatology 1982 criteria; FIDIS: bead-based multiplex assay; EliA: fluoroenzyme-immunoassay; CLIFT: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test; EUROLINE: line blot.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Spearman correlation between disease variables and anti-dsDNA antibody levels assessed by 4 assays. Variables are organized according to correlation coefficient.

    VariablesFIDISEliACLIFTEUROLINE
    rhoprhoprhoprhop
    Classical complement function, n = 169−0.552< 0.0005−0.426< 0.0005−0.333< 0.0005−0.1950.011
    C4, n = 177−0.495< 0.0005−0.362< 0.0005−0.284< 0.0005−0.2090.005
    C3, n = 178−0.371< 0.0005−0.2510.001−0.2180.003−0.1540.040
    IFN-α, n = 1780.323< 0.00050.269< 0.00050.2150.0040.1370.068
    ESR, n = 1780.1930.0100.1760.0190.1120.1350.0810.280
    SLEDAI-2K*, n = 1780.1480.0480.1210.1090.0960.2030.0340.657
    PGA, n = 1780.1090.1480.1600.033−0.0010.9840.0120.876
    • ↵* Item for anti-dsDNA (by CLIFT) excluded. FIDIS: bead-based multiplex assay; EliA: fluoroenzyme-immunoassay; CLIFT: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test; EUROLINE: line blot; IFN-α: interferon-α; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; SLEDAI-2K: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; PGA: physician global assessment.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 5
1 May 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Four Anti-dsDNA Antibody Assays in Relation to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Specificity and Activity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Four Anti-dsDNA Antibody Assays in Relation to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Specificity and Activity
Helena Enocsson, Christopher Sjöwall, Lina Wirestam, Charlotte Dahle, Alf Kastbom, Johan Rönnelid, Jonas Wetterö, Thomas Skogh
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2015, 42 (5) 817-825; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140677

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Four Anti-dsDNA Antibody Assays in Relation to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Specificity and Activity
Helena Enocsson, Christopher Sjöwall, Lina Wirestam, Charlotte Dahle, Alf Kastbom, Johan Rönnelid, Jonas Wetterö, Thomas Skogh
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2015, 42 (5) 817-825; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140677
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
DOUBLE-STRANDED DNA
IMMUNOASSAY
AUTOANTIBODIES
INFLAMMATION
RHEUMATIC DISEASE

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • One-Third of European Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Reach Pain Remission With Routine Care Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment
  • Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Positive Predictive Value of a Very High Serum IgG4 Concentration for the Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • DOUBLE-STRANDED DNA
  • IMMUNOASSAY
  • autoantibodies
  • inflammation
  • RHEUMATIC DISEASE

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire