Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
LetterLetter

Monoclonal Antibodies, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Pregnancy: Insights from an Open-label Study

VANEET K. SANDHU, DANIEL J. WALLACE and MICHAEL H. WEISMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology April 2015, 42 (4) 728-730; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140952
VANEET K. SANDHU
Department of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
MD
Roles: Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIEL J. WALLACE
Department of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
MD
Roles: Associate Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAEL H. WEISMAN
Department of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
MD
Roles: Director
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: weisman{at}cshs.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

To the Editor:

Controlled clinical trials have revealed modest efficacy for the use of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)1,2. Followup of these patients has been published and of the 1458 patients who have received belimumab during phase II and III clinical trials, the most frequent events leading to discontinuation were lupus nephritis and infusion-related reactions3. We report herein the status of 47 patients who received open-label belimumab from a single-site cohort of patients whose longterm followup (mean 62 mos) could be ascertained. Pregnancy was found to be an atypical and potentially important reason for drug discontinuation that bears additional scrutiny.

Study design and patient demographics for the first 52 and 76 weeks have been reviewed and published elsewhere1,2. Our initial cohort was composed of 55 patients in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials: HGS-1056 and LBSL-02 (Figure 1). Twelve patients withdrew while blinded: 4 were receiving placebo and 8 withdrew because of pregnancy, flares (lupus nephritis, neuropsychiatric lupus), noncompliance, inefficacy, breast cancer, and the need for an exclusionary medication. Withdrawal of these 12 patients and an addition of 4 patients who were transferred from another site yielded a total of 47 patients who received belimumab on open-label extension. Of these, 17 withdrew for reasons including flares (n = 5), pregnancy-related issues (n = 5), and other concerns (n = 7). In patients withdrawing because of flares, 2 were because of lupus nephritis (worsening proteinuria confirmed by renal biopsy) requiring more aggressive therapy, while the remaining 3 were because of concomitant inflammatory arthritis, cutaneous vasculitis, and adult-onset Still’s disease.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow chart depicting 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of belimumab: HGS-1056 and LBSL-02. Initially, our cohort consisted of 55 patients divided between the 2 trials: 24 and 31, respectively. Subsequently, a total of 12 patients were withdrawn and 4 were added, generating a total of 47 patients receiving belimumab on open-label extension.

Of the pregnancy-related issues that arose during the trial, 3 women withdrew because of their desire for pregnancy and 2 were withdrawn because of positive urine pregnancy testing. Subsequently, 2 women experienced miscarriages and 1 delivered a full-term baby, but then developed lupus nephritis that led to a kidney transplant. Of those who withdrew from open-label belimumab for reasons other than pregnancy or flare, 1 developed breast cancer, 2 felt that the belimumab did not provide enough improvement to warrant continuation (inefficacy), 1 developed a concurrent illness (paranoid schizophrenia), 1 experienced a serious adverse event (myocardial infarction), and 2 were withdrawn for noncompliance.

Currently, 64% of the patients at our site are still enrolled in the open-label extension of belimumab therapy. In our cohort, withdrawal because of pregnancy-related issues was as frequent as withdrawals because of flares and greater than any individual “other” reason. Because SLE occurs disproportionately in women of childbearing age, ascertaining the safety of belimumab during pregnancy is of crucial importance.

Belimumab is a recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family member that supports B cell maturation and proliferation. There is insufficient evidence to prove absolute safety of using biologics such as belimumab during pregnancy given the lack of controlled trials and insufficient human data4. In a study where belimumab was given supratherapeutically to pregnant monkeys and followed throughout gestation, effects attributed to therapy were limited to decreased B lymphocytes in the mothers and infants, but demonstrated recovery on cessation of exposure5. With regards to humans, it has been shown that passage across the placenta of monoclonal antibody-based TNF inhibitors is not seen in the first trimester, but is notable in the third trimester. Uncontrolled immunologic-mediated disease is a threat to pregnancy; therefore, experts recommend that the drug be stopped only in the third trimester6. It is generally not recommended to terminate pregnancy after first trimester TNF-inhibitor exposure without evidence of a congenital anomaly7.

Data on belimumab in pregnancy from controlled, randomized trials is limited to 95 pregnancies reported as of March 8, 2013, to GlaxoSmithKline (personal communication). Of the reported pregnancies, there were 35 live births without congenital anomaly, 3 live births with congenital anomaly (corresponding with the national average of 3%)8, 20 elective terminations, 23 spontaneous abortions, 2 stillbirths without congenital anomaly, and 12 ongoing/unknown. Of the 3 congenital anomalies, 1 was because of Dandy-Walker syndrome, 1 was associated with the exposure to a known teratogenic drug, and the third was due to a chromosomal translocation in the mother and could not be attributed to belimumab9,10.

A pregnancy registry has been established by the manufacturer and we await the results of studies addressing the safety of belimumab in pregnant women. Experts in the field, including those dealing with inflammatory bowel disease as well as rheumatic diseases, tell us that flares of the underlying disease in early pregnancy are the most serious in terms of poor pregnancy outcomes7. That said, continuing monoclonal antibody treatment in active disease states may provide direct benefit to the mother and the pregnancy outcome, thereby outweighing a potential risk to the fetus. The frequency of arbitrary drug discontinuations in our data was surprising and a reason to reevaluate policies typically instituted in sponsored clinical trials.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Navarra SV,
    2. Guzmán RM,
    3. Gallacher AE,
    4. Hall S,
    5. Levy RA,
    6. Jimenez RE,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:721–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Furie R,
    2. Petri M,
    3. Zamani O,
    4. Cervera R,
    5. Wallace DJ,
    6. Tegzová D,
    7. et al.
    A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3918–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wallace DJ,
    2. Navarra S,
    3. Petri MA,
    4. Gallacher A,
    5. Thomas M,
    6. Furie R,
    7. et al.
    Safety profile of belimumab: pooled data from placebo-controlled phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2013;22:144–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nielsen OH,
    2. Loftus EV Jr,
    3. Jess T
    . Safety of TNF-α inhibitors during IBD pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Med 2013;11:174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Auyeung-Kim DJ,
    2. Devalaraja MN,
    3. Migone TS,
    4. Cai W,
    5. Chellman GJ
    . Developmental and peri-postnatal study in cynomolgus monkeys with belimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against B-lymphocyte stimulator. Reprod Toxicol 2009;28:443–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mahadevan U,
    2. Wolf DC,
    3. Dubinsky M,
    4. Cortot A,
    5. Lee SD,
    6. Siegel CA,
    7. et al.
    Placental transfer of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:286–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Clowse ME
    . The use of anti-TNFα medications for rheumatologic disease in pregnancy. Int J Womens Health 2010;2:199-209.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    . Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects—Atlanta, Georgia, 1978–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:1–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Peart E,
    2. Clowse ME
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy outcomes: an update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2014;26:118–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Powell M,
    2. Hill D,
    3. Eudy A,
    4. Landy H,
    5. Petri M
    . Pregnancy outcomes for systemic lupus erythematosus subjects (SLE) with conception during belimumab intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) placebo-controlled clinical trials and long term extension trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73 Suppl 2:75–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 4
1 Apr 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Monoclonal Antibodies, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Pregnancy: Insights from an Open-label Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Monoclonal Antibodies, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Pregnancy: Insights from an Open-label Study
VANEET K. SANDHU, DANIEL J. WALLACE, MICHAEL H. WEISMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2015, 42 (4) 728-730; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140952

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Monoclonal Antibodies, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Pregnancy: Insights from an Open-label Study
VANEET K. SANDHU, DANIEL J. WALLACE, MICHAEL H. WEISMAN
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2015, 42 (4) 728-730; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140952
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Promising Imaging Methods for Assessment of Structural Progression in Axial Spondyloarthritis
  • Dr. Harama et al reply
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in Polyarteritis Nodosa: Expanding Evidence From Systemic to Cutaneous Disease
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire