Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Outcome of Takayasu Arteritis with Inactive Disease at Diagnosis: The Extent of Vascular Involvement As a Predictor of Activation

Seokchan Hong, Seung-Hyeon Bae, Soo Min Ahn, Doo-Ho Lim, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee and Bin Yoo
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2015, 42 (3) 489-494; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140981
Seokchan Hong
From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seung-Hyeon Bae
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soo Min Ahn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doo-Ho Lim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong-Gil Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chang-Keun Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bin Yoo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: byoo@amc.seoul.kr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Some patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA) have inactive disease at the time of diagnosis. The objective of our study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and factors that predict disease activation in patients with clinically inactive TA.

Methods. The medical records of patients diagnosed with TA between 1990 and 2012 were reviewed. At the time of diagnosis, patients were identified as having inactive disease according to the National Institutes of Health definition. Patients who went on to develop active disease during followup were classified as the “activation group”. The pattern of vascular involvement was classified according to the International Conference on TA, 1994.

Results. A total of 59 patients with TA were classified as having inactive disease at the time of diagnosis. During the followup, 13 (22.0%) of these experienced TA activation (median followup, 37.0 mos; activation group). The remaining 46 (78.0%) did not experience disease activation (stable group). Renovascular hypertension was more common in the activation group than in the stable group (5/13, 38.5% vs 4/46, 8.7%, p = 0.019). Further, type V, which is the most extensive, was more common in the activation group (12/13, 92.3%) than in the stable group (18/46, 39.1%, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis identified type V disease (OR 10.969, 95% CI 1.144–105.182, p = 0.038) as being significantly associated with an increased risk of disease activation.

Conclusion. Substantial portions of patients with clinically inactive TA at the time of diagnosis experienced disease activation during followup. Type V disease may be an important predictive factor for disease activation in patients with clinically inactive TA.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • TAKAYASU ARTERITIS
  • DISEASE ACTIVITY
  • RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION
  • ANGIOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a large vessel vasculitis that primarily affects the aorta and its main branches1,2. It occurs most commonly in young women, resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality because of major vessel involvement. Inflammation in the vessel wall can lead to stenosis or occlusion, causing ischemic symptoms. In some cases, the disease presents with constitutional symptoms, such as fever, associated with systemic inflammation1,2,3. TA typically exhibits a chronic, persistent nature, with some patients experiencing frequent relapse during followup4. Thus, patients with TA are usually treated with immunosuppressants, including glucocorticoids.

However, some patients show a monophasic pattern in which the disease is quiescent after initial diagnosis1,5,6. At the time of diagnosis, about 10–20% of patients with TA show no symptoms or signs suggestive of active inflammation or ischemia1,6,7,8, and such patients do not usually receive immunosuppressive treatment. However, data regarding the longterm outcome of patients with clinically inactive disease at the time of diagnosis are quite limited. Indeed, it is unclear whether clinically quiescent patients will experience activation throughout the natural course of the disease.

Therefore, we examined the longterm outcome of patients with clinically inactive TA, and addressed whether baseline clinical variables, including the pattern of angiographic involvement, were associated with disease activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients with TA at a tertiary hospital in South Korea between January 1990 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients fulfilled the 1990 revised American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TA9 except age of onset before 40 years, because delayed diagnosis of TA was possible in patients with clinically inactive disease. Patients were excluded from the analysis if clinical outcome data were not available at followup. All patients underwent an aortic angiography and/or an aortic computed tomography (CT) scan at the time of TA diagnosis. Clinical manifestations such as abnormal vascular findings (e.g., decreased pulse, asymmetric blood pressure, and vascular bruit) were addressed. Laboratory data, including complete blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and creatinine levels were collected. Disease activity was classified according to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) definition of active TA1. This definition included the following systemic features: fever and musculoskeletal symptoms; elevated ESR; features of vascular ischemia or inflammation, including claudication, diminished or absent pulse, bruit, vascular pain, and asymmetric blood pressure in either the upper or lower extremities; and typical angiographic findings. New onset or worsening of 2 or more of the above features was defined as active disease.

The pattern of vascular involvement was classified according to the International Conference on TA in Tokyo 1994 angiographic classification10. There are 5 types: type I (branches of the aortic arch), type IIa (ascending aorta, aortic arch, and aortic arch branches), type IIb (ascending aorta, aortic arch and its branches, and descending thoracic aorta), type III (descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and/or renal arteries), type IV (abdominal aorta and/or renal arteries), and type V (combined features of types IIb and IV). The medical records, including imaging studies, were reviewed and the longterm outcomes during followup were assessed. During followup, TA activation was defined if the patients met any of the criteria for active disease according to the NIH definition of active TA1.

Categorical data between groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. The Student t test was used to compare quantitative variables for univariate analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test was used when continuous variables were expressed as the median or range. Multivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression analysis. After identifying relevant risk factors by univariate analysis, those with p values < 0.30 were entered into multivariate analysis. The results were expressed as OR with 95% CI. The cumulative probability of disease activation during followup was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and data were compared using the log-rank test. All significance tests were 2-sided and p < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS Inc.).

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study subjects

Of the 199 patients diagnosed with TA between 1990 and 2012, 59 (29.6%) showed no evidence of active disease according to the NIH definition of active TA at the time of diagnosis. The baseline clinical characteristics of these clinically inactive patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the study patients was 42.9 ± 12.9 years and 50 patients were women (84.7%). Forty-three (72.9%) of the 59 inactive patients were classified as “older age” (above 35 yrs). The median interval from symptom onset to diagnosis was 12.0 months [interquartile range (IQR) 3.0–60.0 mos], and diagnosis was delayed for 2 years more in 28 patients (47.5%). Renovascular hypertension (HTN) was found in 9 patients (15.3%). History of vascular events, such as stroke, transient ischemic attack, and angina, was documented in 4 (6.8%), 3 (5.1%), and 8 (13.6%) patients, respectively. However, no patients showed active symptoms suggestive of ongoing ischemia or systemic inflammation at the time of diagnosis. Imaging studies for diagnosing TA included aortic CT angiography (42, 71.2%), conventional angiography (29, 49.2%), and magnetic resonance angiography (2, 3.4%). Stenosis (51, 86.4%) was the most commonly observed pattern of vascular involvement, followed by occlusion (38, 64.4%), dilatation (13, 22%), and aneurysm (11, 18.6%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the 59 patients with clinically inactive TA. Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified.

At the time of diagnosis, histopathologic data were available for 3 patients who underwent bypass surgery or valve replacement. Of the 3 patients, 2 showed chronic inflammation with fibrosis and calcification in the vessels. All patients were classified according to the Tokyo 1994 classification, which is based on the distribution of major vessel involvement10. Type V (30, 50.8%) was the most common pattern, and the other types were as follows: type I (13, 22.0%), type IIa (2, 3.4%), type IIb (11, 18.6%), type III (3, 5.1%), and type IV (0, 0.0%). At the time of diagnosis, 10 patients underwent a whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Most of these patients (9/10, 90.0%) showed no evidence of abnormal hypermetabolic lesions in the vessels, whereas 1 patient showed mild hypermetabolic activity in the abdominal aorta. None of the patients received immunosuppressants, including glucocorticoids, after TA diagnosis, since there was no evidence of active inflammation and/or ischemia.

Activation of clinically inactive TA

The median followup time until last visit was 58 months (IQR 37.0–107.0). During followup, 13 patients (22.0%) experienced disease activation (median followup time 37.0 mos, IQR 23.5–46.5; activation group). The remaining 46 (78.0%) did not experience disease activation (stable group). Manifestations apparent at the time of TA activation included the development of constitutional symptoms, such as malaise and mild fever (n = 5). New-onset vascular ischemia presented as limb claudication (n = 3) and stroke (n = 2). TA activation was also manifested by abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 2) and aortic regurgitation (n = 1). All patients showed an increase in the levels of acute-phase reactants, including ESR, when they experienced active symptoms, suggesting the development of an active inflammatory response. Pathologic data obtained from patients who had surgical procedures showed the chronic lesion consisting of fibrosis rather than active vasculitis (n = 3). Baseline factors associated with activation were determined by comparing the baseline characteristics of the activation and stable groups (Table 2). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, including age and sex, between the 2 groups. Both groups were similar in terms of the proportion of older age patients (> 35 yrs at diagnosis) and delay in diagnosis (> 2 yrs until diagnosis). Also, there was no difference in the ESR and CRP levels between patients who developed active TA and those who did not. However, renovascular HTN was more common in the activation group than in the stable group (5/13, 38.5% vs 4/46, 8.7%, p = 0.019).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between patients with (n = 13) and without (n = 46) disease activation. Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified.

It is notable that there was a significant difference in the vascular involvement depending on the angiographic classification of TA (p = 0.008). Type V, which is the most extensive type, was more common in the activation group (12/13, 92.3%) than in the stable group (18/30, 39.1%). Next, we performed multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with TA activation. Variables such as age and CRP were categorized and analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model (Table 3). The presence of renovascular HTN and high CRP levels were associated with TA activation, but the data did not reach statistical significance (OR 3.446, 95% CI 0.900–13.201, p = 0.071 and OR 7.668, 95% CI 0.725–81.042, p = 0.090, respectively). Notably, type V (OR 10.969, 95% CI 1.144–105.182, p = 0.038) was significantly associated with an increased risk of disease activation in patients with clinically inactive TA. In addition, the cumulative probability of disease activation was significantly higher in patients with TA with type V than in those without type V (p = 0.005; Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cumulative probability of activation in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA) according to type of TA (p = 0.005).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors related to activation in patients with clinically inactive TA.

Followup imaging of patients who did not experience disease activation

Followup images were available for 24 of the 47 patients who did not experience disease activation (stable group). Aortic CT scanning was performed at a median of 38 months (IQR 21.75–72.25 mos) after the initial diagnosis of TA. There was no significant change in 21/24 patients (87.5%), and improvement of vascular stenosis was observed in 2 patients. A new lesion was detected on the followup imaging scan in only 1 patient (1/24, 4.2%).

DISCUSSION

Persistent vascular inflammation can lead to vascular dysfunction and ischemia, and the disease often follows a chronic/relapsing course. Therefore, patients with TA are usually treated with longterm immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, some patients have inactive disease at the time of diagnosis1,6,7,8. Historically, patients with TA show different patterns in terms of clinical course, with the disease plateauing or following a decreasing pattern5. In our present study, 59/199 patients (29.6%) were classified as having inactive disease, which is similar to previous studies reporting that about 10–20% patients are clinically asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis1,6,7,8. However, the longterm prognosis and risk factors associated with disease activation in such patients are largely unknown. Ours, to the best of our knowledge, is the first study to report the outcomes of such patients and to identify predictors of TA activation in patients that show no evidence of active disease at the time of diagnosis. None of the patients in our study received immunosuppressants during followup; thus, we were able to observe the natural course of clinically inactive TA. We found that a substantial portion of patients (13/59, 22.0%) with inactive TA at the time of diagnosis went on to experience disease activation, and that angiographic classification may be an important predictor for activation.

Angiographic classification was proposed in TA according to the extent of lesions in the aorta and its major branches10. There are 5 categories. Type V is the most extensive and involves major vessels from the ascending aorta to the abdominal aorta. Type V is the most common type observed in patients with TA7,11,12,13,14. However, it is unclear whether this angiographic classification plays a role in the longterm outcome of TA2,15. Here, we found that type V was a significant independent predictor of TA activation during followup. We can speculate that patients with type V have a more severe disease burden because of more extensive involvement of the vascular lesions. Indeed, it has been suggested that type V may be associated with an unfavorable outcome because it is likely to be accompanied by systemic HTN and aortic regurgitation7,8,13.

While there is limited data regarding prognosis and the factors that affect the outcome for patients with TA, it is reported that baseline variables, including age at diagnosis, delay in diagnosis, and ESR levels, are associated with a poor prognosis11,16. However, we found no significant association between older age at the time of diagnosis (> 35 yrs) or a delay in diagnosis (> 2 yrs) and disease activation. Also, we did not find a significant association between the levels of acute-phase reactants and disease activation, although high CRP levels (> 0.6 mg/dl) tended to increase the risk of activation (Table 3). It is difficult to identify the factors that caused our results to be different from those in previous reports. One important reason, however, may be that our study examined only clinically inactive patients.

TA is often undiagnosed (or the diagnosis is delayed) in many patients, which may contribute to morbidity in young patients that results from major vascular events3,16,17. In particular, this might be more problematic in subjects who show no active symptoms. Here, we found that about half of patients had a delayed diagnosis (for 2 yrs more; Table 1). A substantial portion of patients (13/59, 22.0%) with clinically inactive TA experienced disease activation that presented as major vascular events such as stroke. Therefore, it is important that clinicians are aware of a possible diagnosis of TA in young female subjects who present with abnormal vascular findings, such as difference in blood pressure, pulse, and/or HTN3.

In our present study, patients aged over 40 years were included in our analysis, indicating that it may be indistinguishable from giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, the prevalence of GCA in Asia is much lower than in Western countries18,19. In addition, we found that diagnosis was delayed for 2 years more in substantial portions of patients (28/59, 47.5%) in our cases. Thus, some patients may have already developed TA before the age of 40, although they were diagnosed with the disease at the age of 40 years or older. Further, when considering that TA and GCA might be the same disease with different clinical manifestations20, it is an interesting issue to study the clinical outcome of GCA with inactive disease, such as incidentally detected aneurysm of large vessels21.

It is challenging to evaluate the disease activity of TA22,23. Although new tools have been proposed to assess disease activity in TA24, validated measure remains under investigation. Here, we classified patients as active or inactive based on the NIH criteria for the definition of active TA1. These criteria are simply based on the presence of active (new-onset or worsening) symptoms that are suggestive of inflammation and/or ischemia1, and thus are not perfect in assessing disease activity in TA. The best way of assessing disease activity in TA may be the integrated use of noninvasive imaging methods, patient symptoms, clinical findings, and acute-phase reactants. Indeed, developed measures such as the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score contained various items including clinical activity, acute-phase reactants, and imaging findings to evaluate disease activity more accurately24. Therefore, the NIH criteria, a somewhat ambiguous definition, could include patients who have experienced the recent onset of mild, nonspecific symptoms. However, in our present study, we found that there was a long time between diagnosis and definite disease activation (median 37.0 mos, IQR 23.5–46.5), and no patient experienced activation within 1 year of diagnosis. In addition, while 1 patient had a mild hypermetabolic lesion, the majority (9/10, 90.0%) showed no abnormal hypermetabolic lesions in the vessels when examined using a whole-body PET scan, which might be a more sensitive method of assessing disease activity25. Therefore, it is likely that most of the patients with TA included in our present study had quiescent disease at baseline.

Additionally, we studied the progression of vascular lesions in patients who did not show clinically evident activation of TA. It is reported that vascular inflammation might persist or even progress in patients with clinically inactive TA1,26. Thus, one of the major concerns in our present study was that even quiescent patients (stable group) may progress without any clinical evidence of activation. However, followup CT imaging showed aggravation of vascular stenosis in only 1 of 24 patients at a median duration of 38 months (IQR 21.75–72.25 mos) after the initial diagnosis of TA. The lesions in this patient mainly involved vessel calcification rather than enhanced thickening. Further, pathologic examination in patients who underwent surgical interventions at the time of disease activation as well as at the time of diagnosis showed chronic lesions rather than active vasculitis. Thus, the majority of patients with inactive TA showed no evidence of chronic and persistent inflammation, indicating a clinical course involving a monophasic pattern16,27.

The data presented herein show that a substantial portion of patients with clinically inactive TA at the time of diagnosis experienced disease activation during followup. Involvement of type V was significantly associated with an increased risk of TA activation. These findings suggest that a type V angiographic pattern may be an important predictor for disease activation. Thus, careful observation is required, even in patients with clinically inactive TA.

  • Accepted for publication October 23, 2014.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kerr GS,
    2. Hallahan CW,
    3. Giordano J,
    4. Leavitt RY,
    5. Fauci AS,
    6. Rottem M,
    7. et al.
    Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:919–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Johnston SL,
    2. Lock RJ,
    3. Gompels MM
    . Takayasu arteritis: a review. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:481–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mason JC
    . Takayasu arteritis—advances in diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6:406–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K,
    2. Hoffman GS
    . Takayasu arteritis: what is the long-term prognosis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:777–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ishikawa K
    . Patterns of symptoms and prognosis in occlusive thromboaortopathy (Takayasu’s disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:1041–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Vanoli M,
    2. Daina E,
    3. Salvarani C,
    4. Sabbadini MG,
    5. Rossi C,
    6. Bacchiani G,
    7. et al.
    Takayasu’s arteritis: a study of 104 Italian patients. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:100–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lee GY,
    2. Jang SY,
    3. Ko SM,
    4. Kim EK,
    5. Lee SH,
    6. Han H,
    7. et al.
    Cardiovascular manifestations of Takayasu arteritis and their relationship to the disease activity: analysis of 204 Korean patients at a single center. Int J Cardiol 2012;159:14–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Park MC,
    2. Lee SW,
    3. Park YB,
    4. Chung NS,
    5. Lee SK
    . Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Takayasu’s arteritis: analysis of 108 patients using standardized criteria for diagnosis, activity assessment, and angiographic classification. Scand J Rheumatol 2005;34:284–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Arend WP,
    2. Michel BA,
    3. Bloch DA,
    4. Hunder GG,
    5. Calabrese LH,
    6. Edworthy SM,
    7. et al.
    The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1129–34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hata A,
    2. Noda M,
    3. Moriwaki R,
    4. Numano F
    . Angiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: new classification. Int J Cardiol 1996;54 Suppl:S155–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schmidt J,
    2. Kermani TA,
    3. Bacani AK,
    4. Crowson CS,
    5. Cooper LT,
    6. Matteson EL,
    7. et al.
    Diagnostic features, treatment, and outcomes of Takayasu arteritis in a US cohort of 126 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:822–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Arnaud L,
    2. Haroche J,
    3. Limal N,
    4. Toledano D,
    5. Gambotti L,
    6. Costedoat Chalumeau N,
    7. et al.
    Takayasu arteritis in France: a single-center retrospective study of 82 cases comparing white, North African, and black patients. Medicine 2010;89:1–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Soto ME,
    2. Espinola N,
    3. Flores-Suarez LF,
    4. Reyes PA
    . Takayasu arteritis: clinical features in 110 Mexican Mestizo patients and cardiovascular impact on survival and prognosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26 Suppl 49:S9–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bicakcigil M,
    2. Aksu K,
    3. Kamali S,
    4. Ozbalkan Z,
    5. Ates A,
    6. Karadag O,
    7. et al.
    Takayasu’s arteritis in Turkey — clinical and angiographic features of 248 patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009;27 Suppl 52:S59–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Terao C,
    2. Yoshifuji H,
    3. Mimori T
    . Recent advances in Takayasu arteritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2014;17:238–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ishikawa K,
    2. Maetani S
    . Long-term outcome for 120 Japanese patients with Takayasu’s disease. Clinical and statistical analyses of related prognostic factors. Circulation 1994;90:1855–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nazareth R,
    2. Mason JC
    . Takayasu arteritis: severe consequences of delayed diagnosis. QJM 2011;104:797–800.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kobayashi S,
    2. Yano T,
    3. Matsumoto Y,
    4. Numano F,
    5. Nakajima N,
    6. Yasuda K,
    7. et al.
    Clinical and epidemiologic analysis of giant cell (temporal) arteritis from a nationwide survey in 1998 in Japan: the first government-supported nationwide survey. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:594–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pereira LS,
    2. Yoon MK,
    3. Hwang TN,
    4. Hong JE,
    5. Ray K,
    6. Porco T,
    7. et al.
    Giant cell arteritis in Asians: a comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:214–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K,
    2. Clark TM,
    3. Hoffman GS
    . Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis: a spectrum within the same disease? Medicine 2009;88:221–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Liang KP,
    2. Chowdhary VR,
    3. Michet CJ,
    4. Miller DV,
    5. Sundt TM,
    6. Connolly HM,
    7. et al.
    Noninfectious ascending aortitis: a case series of 64 patients. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2290–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Aydin SZ,
    2. Yilmaz N,
    3. Akar S,
    4. Aksu K,
    5. Kamali S,
    6. Yucel E,
    7. et al.
    Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis with Disease Extent Index-Takayasu. Rheumatology 2010;49:1889–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Direskeneli H,
    2. Aydin SZ,
    3. Merkel PA
    . Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011;29 Suppl 64:S86–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Misra R,
    2. Danda D,
    3. Rajappa SM,
    4. Ghosh A,
    5. Gupta R,
    6. Mahendranath KM,
    7. et al.
    Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). Rheumatology 2013;52:1795–801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lee SG,
    2. Ryu JS,
    3. Kim HO,
    4. Oh JS,
    5. Kim YG,
    6. Lee CK,
    7. et al.
    Evaluation of disease activity using F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Clin Nucl Med 2009;34:749–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K,
    2. Clark TM,
    3. Hoffman GS
    . Limitations of therapy and a guarded prognosis in an American cohort of Takayasu arteritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1000–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ohigashi H,
    2. Haraguchi G,
    3. Konishi M,
    4. Tezuka D,
    5. Kamiishi T,
    6. Ishihara T,
    7. et al.
    Improved prognosis of Takayasu arteritis over the past decade—comprehensive analysis of 106 patients. Circ J 2012;76:1004–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 3
1 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outcome of Takayasu Arteritis with Inactive Disease at Diagnosis: The Extent of Vascular Involvement As a Predictor of Activation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Outcome of Takayasu Arteritis with Inactive Disease at Diagnosis: The Extent of Vascular Involvement As a Predictor of Activation
Seokchan Hong, Seung-Hyeon Bae, Soo Min Ahn, Doo-Ho Lim, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2015, 42 (3) 489-494; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140981

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Outcome of Takayasu Arteritis with Inactive Disease at Diagnosis: The Extent of Vascular Involvement As a Predictor of Activation
Seokchan Hong, Seung-Hyeon Bae, Soo Min Ahn, Doo-Ho Lim, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2015, 42 (3) 489-494; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140981
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

TAKAYASU ARTERITIS
DISEASE ACTIVITY
RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION
ANGIOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Vasculitis: What Have We Learned in the Last 50 Years?
  • Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)–associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies
  • The Association of Illness-related Uncertainty With Mental Health in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Takayasu arteritis
  • disease activity
  • RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION
  • ANGIOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire