Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 12 — International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary, May 7–11, 2014

Ultrasound as an Outcome Measure in Gout. A Validation Process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group

Lene Terslev, Marwin Gutierrez, Wolfgang A. Schmidt, Helen I. Keen, Emilio Filippucci, David Kane, Ralf Thiele, Gurjit Kaeley, Peter Balint, Peter Mandl, Andrea Delle Sedie, Hilde Berner Hammer, Robin Christensen, Ingrid Möller, Carlos Pineda, Eugene Kissin, George A. Bruyn, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo and Maria Antonietta D’Agostino on behalf of OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group
The Journal of Rheumatology November 2015, 42 (11) 2177-2181; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141294
Lene Terslev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marwin Gutierrez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Schmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen I. Keen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilio Filippucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf Thiele
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gurjit Kaeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Balint
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Mandl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Delle Sedie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hilde Berner Hammer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Christensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingrid Möller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Pineda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugene Kissin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George A. Bruyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annamaria Iagnocco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esperanza Naredo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Antonietta D’Agostino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maria-antonietta.dagostino{at}apr.aphp.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout.

Methods. Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen’s κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0–0.20 were considered poor, 0.20–0.40 fair, 0.40–0.60 moderate, 0.60–0.80 good, and 0.80–1 excellent.

Results. With an agreement of > 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The interobserver agreement was poor for aggregates and DC but moderate for the other components.

Conclusion. These first steps in evaluating the validity of US as an outcome measure for gout show that the reliability of the definitions ranged from moderate to excellent in static images and somewhat lower in patients, indicating that a standardized scanning technique may be needed, before testing the responsiveness of those definitions in a composite US score.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • ULTRASOUND
  • GOUT
  • REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS

Footnotes

  • Dr. Christensen is supported and acknowledges unrestricted grants from the Oak Foundation. Dr. Terslev is supported by the Danish Rheumatism Association.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 11
1 Nov 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ultrasound as an Outcome Measure in Gout. A Validation Process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ultrasound as an Outcome Measure in Gout. A Validation Process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group
Lene Terslev, Marwin Gutierrez, Wolfgang A. Schmidt, Helen I. Keen, Emilio Filippucci, David Kane, Ralf Thiele, Gurjit Kaeley, Peter Balint, Peter Mandl, Andrea Delle Sedie, Hilde Berner Hammer, Robin Christensen, Ingrid Möller, Carlos Pineda, Eugene Kissin, George A. Bruyn, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2015, 42 (11) 2177-2181; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141294

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Ultrasound as an Outcome Measure in Gout. A Validation Process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group
Lene Terslev, Marwin Gutierrez, Wolfgang A. Schmidt, Helen I. Keen, Emilio Filippucci, David Kane, Ralf Thiele, Gurjit Kaeley, Peter Balint, Peter Mandl, Andrea Delle Sedie, Hilde Berner Hammer, Robin Christensen, Ingrid Möller, Carlos Pineda, Eugene Kissin, George A. Bruyn, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2015, 42 (11) 2177-2181; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141294
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgment
    • APPENDIX 1
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

ULTRASOUND
GOUT
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

OMERACT 12 — International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary, May 7–11, 2014

  • Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Working Toward Incorporation of the Patient Perspective at OMERACT 12
  • Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP
  • OMERACT Filter Evidence Supporting the Measurement of At-work Productivity Loss as an Outcome Measure in Rheumatology Research
Show more OMERACT 12 — International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary, May 7–11, 2014

Part 2: Working Groups

  • Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Working Toward Incorporation of the Patient Perspective at OMERACT 12
  • Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP
  • OMERACT Filter Evidence Supporting the Measurement of At-work Productivity Loss as an Outcome Measure in Rheumatology Research
Show more Part 2: Working Groups

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ultrasound
  • gout
  • REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire