Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle
Open Access

Longterm Safety of Rituximab: Final Report of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Clinical Trial Program over 11 Years

Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Roy M. Fleischmann, Daniel E. Furst, Stuart Lacey and Patricia B. Lehane
The Journal of Rheumatology October 2015, 42 (10) 1761-1766; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150051
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
From the Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Rheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ronald.van.vollenhoven@ki.se
Roy M. Fleischmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel E. Furst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Lacey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia B. Lehane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Final evaluation of the longterm safety of rituximab (RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) up to 11 years.

Methods. Pooled observed case analysis of data from patients with moderate to severe, active RA in a global clinical trial program.

Results. As of September 2012, 3595 patients received a mean of 4 courses (range 1–20) of RTX over 11 years [14,816 patient-years (PY)]. Of these, 1246 patients had > 5 years of followup (8970 PY). A pooled placebo population (n = 818) was included in the analysis. The overall serious infection event (SIE) rate was 3.76/100 PY (2.71/100 PY in patients observed for > 5 yrs) and comparable with rates reported previously at 9.5 years (3.94/100 PY and 3.26/100 PY, respectively). SIE rates continued to be similar before and during/after development of low immunoglobulin levels, and serious opportunistic infections remained rare. Rates of cardiac events remained consistent with previous analysis and with rates in the general RA population. No increased risk of malignancy over time was observed.

Conclusion. This final report demonstrates that RTX remains well tolerated over time and multiple courses. No new safety risks were identified and there was no increase in the rate of any types of adverse events with prolonged exposure to RTX during 11 years of observation.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
  • RITUXIMAB
  • SAFETY

Rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to improve signs and symptoms of disease and reduce radiographic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)1,2. A previously published analysis found that exposure to multiple courses of RTX over 9.5 years of observation was associated with a well-tolerated safety profile3. While these data are reassuring, continued monitoring of the longterm safety of RTX is necessary to understand the potential risk associated with prolonged and repeated peripheral B cell depletion. In particular, the potential cumulative risks of serious infection events (SIE) and malignancies require further followup. The objective of our analysis was to provide the final report on the longterm safety of RTX over 11 years of observation in the clinical trial program. It represents 2854 additional patient-years (PY) of followup with the inclusion of an additional 401 patients treated with RTX, pooled from an RTX RA open-label prospective study4. This update not only increases the probability of detecting uncommon and infrequent safety risks, but also affords rheumatologists a higher level of confidence in the data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Safety data were evaluated from patients with moderate to severe, active RA treated with RTX plus methotrexate (MTX) from a global clinical trial program (8 randomized clinical trials, 2 longterm open-label extensions, 1 open-label prospective study)1,4,5,6,7,8. Eligibility criteria and study designs have been previously presented1,5,6,7,8. Each RTX course consisted of either 2 × 1000 mg or 2 × 500 mg intravenous infusions, 2 weeks apart. Repeat treatment was based on the physician’s decision of clinical need and included evidence of active disease (either swollen/tender joint counts ≥ 8 or Disease Activity Score in 28 joints ≥ 2.6). Safety assessments were conducted as previously reported3. The analysis consisted of the following populations: the RTX all-exposure population (all patients exposed to at least 1 or part of 1 RTX infusion, regardless of dose), the RTX longterm population (a subset of the all-exposure population with > 5 yrs followup from first RTX exposure), and the pooled placebo population (all patients receiving placebo during placebo-controlled and study followup periods). Our longterm followup was completed in September 2012; the final results are provided here.

RESULTS

Demographics

As of September 2012, 3595 patients received a mean of 4 courses (range 1–20) of RTX over 11 years, providing 14,816 PY of observation in the RTX all-exposure population. Of these patients, 1246 patients (8970 PY) were followed for > 5 years (RTX longterm population). The placebo population included 818 patients (1107 PY). Patients in the RTX longterm population had a longer mean RA disease duration and a greater number (n = 2.3) of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (excluding MTX) than the all-exposure and placebo populations. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were otherwise similar across groups. The placebo population included patients with a substantially shorter mean duration of followup compared with the RTX populations (> 50% withdrew from placebo followup by 1 yr and 93% withdrew by 3 yrs).

The greatest number of withdrawals occurred following the first 2 courses (1034 patients, 29%), principally for nonsafety reasons and because 2 studies limited patients to receiving 1 or 2 courses per protocol. Across the trials, there was a normal expected dropout rate (1–14%) for subsequent courses. Overall, withdrawals due to adverse events (AE) were infrequent (241 patients, 7%). Most withdrawals were attributed to “other” reasons that included insufficient therapeutic response, failure to return, violation of selection criteria at entry, other protocol violation, refused treatment/did not cooperate, withdrew consent, administrative/other (including patient entry to extension protocols), lost to followup, physician’s decision to withdraw, and pregnancy. Data from the patients who remained in the study were largely complete with any missing data considered to be missing at random.

AE and serious AE (SAE)

Rates of AE and SAE remained similar in the RTX all-exposure, RTX longterm, and placebo populations (Table 1). The rate of all AE over time was highest during the first 6 months after the first RTX exposure, in part because of infusion-related reactions (IRR) that predominantly occurred with the first infusion of the first course. Rates of AE and SAE subsequently decreased and remained stable thereafter, irrespective of the number of RTX courses received (Figure 1A–1B). SAE that occurred in > 1% of patients receiving RTX were RA exacerbations (n = 83, 2%), pneumonia (n = 74, 2%), osteoarthritis (n = 55, 2%), and falls (n = 62, 2%).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A. Rate of AE over time in 1-year increments (all-exposure population). B. Rate of SAE over time in 1-year increments (all-exposure population). C. Rate of SIE over time in 1-year increments (all-exposure population). D. Rate of SIE by treatment course (all-exposure population). Only data up to 10 years has been presented because data > 10 years represented < 100 PY exposures. Error bars represent 95% CI of the rate per 100 PY. AE: adverse events; SAE: serious AE; SIE: serious infection events; PY: patient-years.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of AE rates per 100 PY.

There were 78 deaths in the all-exposure population (0.53 events/100 PY, 95% CI 0.42–0.66) and 7 in the placebo population (0.63 events/100 PY, 95% CI 0.30–1.33). Death rates were consistent with the previous analysis and with the rate expected in the general US population, adjusted for age and sex9. Frequent causes of death included malignancies (n = 19), cardiovascular events (n = 15), infections (n = 15), respiratory disorders (n = 8), and nervous system events (n = 4), which are consistent with those expected in this RA population of biologic-treated patients. The incidence of death did not appear to increase over multiple courses and there have been no fatal IRR. There was no evidence of an increased rate of any type of fatal event with prolonged RTX exposure.

In the all-exposure population, 241 patients (7%) withdrew prematurely from their respective study because of AE (including SAE). The incidence of AE leading to withdrawal was highest in the first course and decreased thereafter with each treatment course. The most common types of AE leading to withdrawal were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (mainly RA exacerbation), IRR, neoplasms (benign, malignant, and unspecified), and infections and infestations.

Infections

The overall rates of all infections and SIE changed very little from the previous analysis of this cohort and remained similar across analysis populations (Table 1). The rate of SIE generally remained stable over time (Figure 1C) and over multiple treatment courses (Figure 1D). A numerically higher SIE rate between Year 5 and Year 6 was not observed in subsequent years. Large CI were observed at > 9 years because of low PY exposure. The most frequent SIE in the all-exposure population were lower respiratory tract infections, predominantly pneumonia (2%).

Infections of interest in RA

Serious opportunistic infections remained rare (all-exposure, 0.05 events/100 PY; placebo, 0.09 events/100 PY). No additional serious opportunistic infections occurred since the 7 events previously reported3. A subanalysis of patients who went on to receive approved biologic agents for RA, namely tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors or abatacept, showed that the use of subsequent biologics after RTX therapy was not associated with an increased SIE rate (Table 2). Although limited by small patient numbers, SIE rates were similar in patients who received their biologic < 6 months (n = 98) and ≥ 6 months (n = 255) after last RTX dose (3.65 events/100 PY, 95% CI 1.64–8.13 vs 4.28, 95% CI 2.53–7.22).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

SIE rates before and after treatment with biologics, including TNF inhibitors. Multiple occurrences of the same event in 1 individual are counted multiple times. DMARD received after the first day of study RTX dose are the DMARD of interest. N is the number of patients receiving treatment with a DMARD post-RTX.

Screening for latent tuberculosis (TB; by means of purified protein derivative testing) in the RTX clinical development program was not mandated by protocol, although it can be assumed that patients who received a prior TNF inhibitor would have undergone such screening. Two cases of pulmonary TB, treated with anti-TB medication, occurred in the all-exposure population and both were reported previously3. No cases were observed of extrapulmonary TB, atypical mycobacterial infection, or multidrug-resistant TB.

One case of de novo hepatitis B was reported previously1. Within the RTX RA clinical development program, there were no reported cases of hepatitis B viral reactivation (patients with active hepatitis B infection, defined by the presence of HBsAg, were excluded from the RA clinical trials; however, patients who tested negative for HBsAg and hepatitis B DNA but positive for hepatitis B core antigen were included). As of the data cutoff, 131 (6.5%) of 2096 evaluable patients in the all-exposure population were enrolled with a positive test for hepatitis B core antigen. This group of patients received up to 16 courses of RTX. The overall proportions of these patients who experienced AE, SAE, or liver function test abnormalities were consistent with those in the all-exposure population, and there were no liver-related SAE.

Infection risk in patients with low immunoglobulin (Ig) levels

Depending on study protocols, Ig serum levels were measured every 8–16 weeks throughout treatment periods. Mean Ig concentrations decreased from baseline over time and over courses. The largest decreases were observed in IgM levels. At pre-RTX Day 1 baseline, few patients (≤ 2.2%) from the RTX all-exposure population had total Ig, IgA, IgG, or IgM concentrations below the lower limit of normal (LLN). After RTX treatment (postbaseline), ≤ 3.9% had IgA or total Ig levels below LLN at any time, while 14.8% had IgG levels < LLN and 37.9% had IgM levels < LLN at any time. The proportion of patients with IgM but not IgG or IgA below the LLN continued to increase over the first 5 RTX courses (data not shown). The clinical relevance of low Ig serum levels and potential to predispose individuals to infections was evaluated. An analysis was performed to assess the rates of serious infections in patients before and after a low (< LLN) IgG or IgM level for at least a 4-month period (or 2 consecutive study visits). Out of 3595 patients (24%), 863 developed IgM < LLN for at least 4 months while 143/3595 (4%) developed IgG < LLN for at least 4 months. For both of these Ig classes, SIE rates per 100 PY were similar before (IgM 2.80, 95% CI 2.09–3.75; IgG 6.75, 95% CI 4.48–10.15) and during/after development of low Ig (IgM 3.84, 95% CI 3.20–4.62; IgG 8.16, 95% CI 5.86–11.36).

SIE rates in patients who developed low IgG levels were higher than corresponding rates in patients who never developed low IgG and higher than those in the all-exposure population, both before and after development of low IgG levels, suggesting that these patients may have a higher inherent risk of developing SIE. Limitations of the Ig analysis included low patient numbers in the IgG subgroup (n = 143), lack of a placebo comparator, and lack of correlation between SIE onset and recording of low Ig levels.

Cardiac events

Myocardial infarction (MI) was the most frequent cardiac AE (58 events in 52 patients). Most affected patients had ≥ 1 risk factor for MI. The rate of MI in patients receiving RTX (0.39 events/100 PY, 95% CI 0.30–0.51) was consistent with rates in the general RA population (0.48, 95% CI 0.34–0.94 to 0.59 events/100 PY, 95% CI 0.37–0.61)10.

Malignancies

There was no evidence of an increased risk of malignancy of any type over time or RTX course (exclusion criteria for study entry included history of prior malignancy). In the all-exposure population, there were 109 confirmed malignancies (0.74 events/100 PY, 95% CI 0.60–0.88), excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) and non-malignant events. These rates were comparable with rates observed in the placebo population (0.81 events/100 PY) and those in the general RA population (1.17/100 PY11 and 1.30/100 PY, 95% CI 1.19–1.4112). A total of 68 NMSC (0.46/100 PY) were reported. For solid tumors, the most frequently reported malignancy was breast cancer (16 events, 0.14/100 PY, 95% CI 0.08–0.22 in female patients only), comparable with or lower than RA observational studies (0.13/100 PY11 and 0.21/100 PY, 95% CI 0.17–0.2612). Age- and sex-matched standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for all confirmed malignancies did not indicate an increased risk of malignancy for patients receiving RTX with RA (1.07, 95% CI 0.88–1.29) compared with the general US population (SEER database13) and compared with published data in adults with RA (1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.0914). The SIR of breast cancer for patients with RA receiving RTX (0.63, 95% CI 0.36–1.03) was also comparable with the published data in adults with RA (0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.9014). The observed incidences of all malignancies (overall and by type) in RTX clinical trials were (based on reported data in the literature) within the expected ranges for the RA population.

DISCUSSION

We report here the final results of the global RTX clinical trial program in RA. These longterm followup data confirm that RTX has a consistent safety profile over time and multiple courses up to 11 years of observation. While the number of patients in this update (n = 3595) did not significantly increase from what was previously reported (n = 3194), the total exposure time increased significantly by 2854 additional PY, representing a total followup time of 14,816 PY. An additional 619 patients more than the previous analysis were observed for > 5 years, with some having received up to 20 RTX courses over 11 years. No new safety signals or increased reporting rates of any types of AE were observed with increasing duration of exposure or courses of treatment. Rates of all AE were highest during the first 6 months, owing in part to IRR. Rates of AE and SAE subsequently decreased and remained stable thereafter, irrespective of the number of RTX courses received. Rates of all infections and serious infections remained similar to the previous analysis despite the increased observation time and additional courses.

Serious opportunistic infections remained rare. No additional cases of confirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in the RA clinical trial program have been reported other than the single case described in 200815. The occurrence of confirmed PML from spontaneous reporting and clinical trial sources remains very rare (8 confirmed cases in 271,615 patients treated with RTX, based on patient market exposure estimates as of November 2013). Thus, the reporting rate of confirmed PML in patients with RA is 2.95 (95% CI 1.27–5.8) per 100,000 patients, which has remained stable over time (Roche data on file). Unreported cases of PML are not included in this calculation, which underscores the importance of physician vigilance and reporting of PML cases to most accurately estimate its prevalence. Although there were no reported cases of hepatitis B viral reactivation within the RA clinical development program, hepatitis B virus screening may be considered for high-risk patients before initiation of treatment with RTX. Use of subsequent biologics, including TNF inhibitors, in patients with RA previously treated with RTX was not associated with an increased SIE rate. Rates of MI and malignancies (overall and by type) continued to be consistent with those observed in the placebo population and in epidemiologic data from other RA cohorts.

These findings indicate that repeated peripheral B cell depletion with RTX did not give rise to any increased safety risk over time or increased reporting rates of any types of AE (including serious infections, cardiovascular events, malignancies, or fatal AE) in the global RA clinical trial program. With the exceptions of IRR and low Ig concentrations, the overall safety profile of RTX remains similar to that of the placebo population and consistent with published data for moderate to severe RA and with previous analyses of this patient cohort.

Footnotes

  • Full Release Article. For details see Reprints/Permissions at jrheum.org

  • Sponsored and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech (a member of the Roche group), and Biogen Idec. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript, furnished by Vivian Chen, PharmD of Health Interactions, was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

  • Accepted for publication June 17, 2015.

Free online via JRheum Full Release option

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cohen SB,
    2. Emery P,
    3. Greenwald MW,
    4. Dougados M,
    5. Furie RA,
    6. Genovese MC,
    7. et al;
    8. REFLEX Trial Group
    . Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2793–806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Keystone E,
    2. Emery P,
    3. Peterfy CG,
    4. Tak PP,
    5. Cohen S,
    6. Genovese MC,
    7. et al.
    Rituximab inhibits structural joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:216–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. van Vollenhoven RF,
    2. Emery P,
    3. Bingham CO 3rd,
    4. Keystone EC,
    5. Fleischmann RM,
    6. Furst DE,
    7. et al.
    Longterm safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: 9.5-year follow-up of the global clinical trial programme with a focus on adverse events of interest in RA patients. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1496–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Loveless J,
    2. Olech E,
    3. Pritchard CH,
    4. Chai A,
    5. Kelman A,
    6. Klearman M
    . An open-label, prospective study (SUNDIAL) of the safety of rituximab in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SUNDIAL). Arthritis Rheum 2009;60 Suppl 10:1660.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Emery P,
    2. Fleischmann R,
    3. Filipowicz-Sosnowska A,
    4. Schechtman J,
    5. Szczepanski L,
    6. Kavanaugh A,
    7. et al;
    8. DANCER Study Group
    . The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1390–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Keystone E,
    2. Fleischmann R,
    3. Emery P,
    4. Furst DE,
    5. van Vollenhoven R,
    6. Bathon J,
    7. et al.
    Safety and efficacy of additional courses of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label extension analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:3896–908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Emery P,
    2. Deodhar A,
    3. Rigby WF,
    4. Isaacs JD,
    5. Combe B,
    6. Racewicz AJ,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naive with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab’s Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE)). Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1629–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tak PP,
    2. Rigby WF,
    3. Rubbert-Roth A,
    4. Peterfy CG,
    5. van Vollenhoven RF,
    6. Stohl W,
    7. et al;
    8. IMAGE Investigators
    . Inhibition of joint damage and improved clinical outcomes with rituximab plus methotrexate in early active rheumatoid arthritis: the IMAGE trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:39–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics Reports. Deaths: final data for 2005. [Internet. Accessed June 30, 2015.] Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_10.pdf
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dixon WG,
    2. Watson KD,
    3. Lunt M,
    4. Hyrich KL;
    5. British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register Control Centre Consortium,
    6. Silman AJ,
    7. et al.
    Reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2905–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mellemkjaer L,
    2. Linet MS,
    3. Gridley G,
    4. Frisch M,
    5. Møller H,
    6. Olsen JH
    . Rheumatoid arthritis and cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1753–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Michaud K
    . Biologic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of malignancy: analyses from a large US observational study. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2886–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. [Internet. Accessed June 30, 2015.] Available from: seer.cancer.gov
  14. 14.↵
    1. Smitten AL,
    2. Simon TA,
    3. Hochberg MC,
    4. Suissa S
    . A meta-analysis of the incidence of malignancy in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fleischmann RM
    . Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy following rituximab treatment in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:3225–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 42, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Longterm Safety of Rituximab: Final Report of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Clinical Trial Program over 11 Years
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Longterm Safety of Rituximab: Final Report of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Clinical Trial Program over 11 Years
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Roy M. Fleischmann, Daniel E. Furst, Stuart Lacey, Patricia B. Lehane
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2015, 42 (10) 1761-1766; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150051

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Longterm Safety of Rituximab: Final Report of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Clinical Trial Program over 11 Years
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Roy M. Fleischmann, Daniel E. Furst, Stuart Lacey, Patricia B. Lehane
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2015, 42 (10) 1761-1766; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150051
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
RITUXIMAB
SAFETY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • One-Third of European Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Reach Pain Remission With Routine Care Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment
  • Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Positive Predictive Value of a Very High Serum IgG4 Concentration for the Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • rituximab
  • safety

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire