Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Are More Likely to Have Pain and Poor Function After Total Hip Replacements than Patients with Osteoarthritis

Susan M. Goodman, Danielle N. Ramsden-Stein, Wei-Ti Huang, Rebecca Zhu, Mark P. Figgie, Michael M. Alexiades and Lisa A. Mandl
The Journal of Rheumatology September 2014, 41 (9) 1774-1780; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140011
Susan M. Goodman
From the Division of Rheumatology, and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: GoodmanS{at}HSS.edu
Danielle N. Ramsden-Stein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei-Ti Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Zhu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark P. Figgie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael M. Alexiades
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. Mandl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient characteristics.

    CharacteristicsOA, n = 5473RA, n = 193p
    Age, mean (SD)62.8 (11.6)63.3 (13.6)0.51
    Female, n (%)2613 (48)147 (77)< 0.001
    BMI, mean (SD)28.2 (5.4)27.7 (6.6)0.33
    Length of stay, days, mean (SD)4.6 (1.3)5.1 (2.1)< 0.001
    Expectation score, mean (SD)83.6 (16.2)80.0 (18.3)< 0.001
    College degree or higher, n (%)3834 (70)71 (37)< 0.001
    Race, n (%)< 0.001
      White5031 (92)147 (76)
      Asian37 (1)3 (2)
      African American194 (4)20 (10)
      Other/Mixed39 (1)8 (4)
    Deyo-Charlson comorbidities, n(%)< 0.001
      04296 (79)60 (31)
      1+1131 (21)131 (68)
    ASA class, n (%)< 0.001
    Class 1 or 24575 (83)124 (64)
    Class 3 or 4895 (17)69 (36)
    Previous hip replacement, n (%)953 (20)31 (27)0.06
    Back pain at baseline, n (%)2294 (45)41 (35)0.04
    DMARD41.5%
    TNFi28.5%
    Non-TNF biologics5.2%
    Corticosteroid8.3%
    None16.6%
    • Values in bold face are statistically significant. OA: osteoarthritis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesia; DMARD: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; TNFi: tumor necrosis-α inhibitors.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    RA responders versus nonresponders.

    Responders, n = 134Nonresponders, n = 59p
    Age, yrs, mean (SD)62.9 (13.5)64.3 (13.8)0.52
    BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)27.5 (6.4)28.4 (7.0)0.42
    Length of stay, days, mean (SD)4.9 (1.7)5.7 (2.7)0.01
    Female, n (%)100 (76)47 (80)0.55
    ASA class 1 and class 2, n (%)91 (67)33 (56)0.20
    White, n (%)106 (79)41 (69)0.44
    Baseline WOMAC pain44.7 (20.4)55.0 (63.6)0.49
    Baseline WOMAC function38.4 (19.4)55.9 (62.4)0.23
    • BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesia; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Baseline and 2-year outcomes. Data are mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated.

    OA, n = 5473RA, n = 193p
    WOMAC baseline pain (SD)53.2 (17.9)44.8 (21.1)< 0.001
    WOMAC 2-yr pain (SD)94.0 (11.2)88.4 (17.1)< 0.001
      WOMAC > 10, pain, n (%)3549 (96)72 (94)0.35
    WOMAC baseline function (SD)49.9 (18.6)38.7 (20.3)< 0.001
    WOMAC 2-yr function (SD)91.8 (12.5)82.9 (19.6)< 0.001
      WOMAC > 10, function, n (%)3071 (94)63 (95)0.69
    Poor pain at 2 yrs, WOMAC pain ≤ 60, n (%)122 (3)10 (12)< 0.001
    Poor function at 2 yrs, WOMAC function ≤ 60, n (%)152 (4)16 (19)< 0.001
    SF-12 PCS baseline (SD)33.9 (8.4)29.3 (7.9)< 0.001
    SF-12 PCS at 2 yrs (SD)50.1 (9.3)40.8 (13.0)< 0.001
    SF-12 MCS baseline (SD)50.1 (12.5)46.4 (13.6)< 0.001
    SF-12 MCS at 2 yrs (SD)54.1 (8.8)52.1 (10.9)0.05
    • OA: osteoarthritis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; SF-12: SF-12 Short Form Health Survey; PCS: physical component scale; MCS: mental component scale.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Predictors of having poor pain or function (WOMAC < 60) 2 years after hip replacement* (logistic regression results).

    Poor WOMAC Pain at 2 Yrs, OR (95% CI)pPoor WOMAC Function at 2 Yrs, OR (95% CI)p
    Age0.99 (0.97, 1.01)0.141.01 (0.99, 1.00)0.34
    Female vs male1.06 (0.61, 1.83)0.361.25 (0.69, 2.26)0.46
    RA vs OA3.22 (1.29, 8.07)0.014.32 (1.57, 11.89)0.005
    Back pain vs no back pain1.25 (0.75, 2.08)0.301.62 (0.93, 2.82)0.08
    25 ≤ BMI < 30 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.91 (0.48, 1.73)0.781.36 (0.65, 2.84)0.42
    30 ≤ BMI < 35 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.94 (0.46, 1.93)0.871.64 (0.75, 3.56)0.22
    35 ≤ BMI < 40 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.42 (0.13, 1.31)0.130.78 (0.23, 2.66)0.70
    BMI > 40 vs 18.5 < BMI < 251.30 (0.44, 3.85)0.632.93 (0.95, 8.99)0.06
    Preoperative WOMAC pain0.99 (0.97, 1.01)0.171.01 (0.98, 1.03)0.71
    Preoperative PCS0.95 (0.91, 0.99)0.01****
    Preoperative WOMAC function****0.96 (0.94, 0.99)0.03
    Preoperative MCS0.96 (0.94, 0.98)0.00020.98 (0.96, 0.999)0.04
    Education: college vs no college0.83 (0.49, 1.41)0.560.74, (0.43, 1.30)0.30
    White vs other0.46 (0.23, 0.92)0.020.66 (0.30, 1.47)0.31
    Expectation score****0.97 (0.96, 0.99)0.0005
    Deyo: 0 comorbidities vs 1–3+****0.80 (0.44, 1.47)0.47
    ASA class 2 vs ASA class 11.01 (0.37, 2.74)0.99****
    ASA class 3+ vs ASA class 12.11 (0.67, 6.59)0.20****
    Previous hip replacement vs no
    previous replacement1.37 (0.75, 2.50)0.301.35 (0.72, 2.53)0.35
    • ↵* Multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, BMI, education, race, back pain, previous hip replacement, preoperative WOMAC pain and function, preoperative MCS and PCS, expectations score, ASA class, and number of Deyo comorbidities.

    • ↵** Variable excluded because of nonconvergence of logistic model. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; OA: osteoarthritis; BMI: body mass index; PCS: physical component scale; MCS: mental component scale; ASA: American Society of Anesthesia.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Satisfaction at 2 years.

    OA, n = 5473RA, n = 193p
    Very/Somewhat satisfied with pain relief, n (%)3710 (97)72 (94)0.43
    Very/Somewhat satisfied with improved ability to do recreational activities, n (%)3470 (92)60 (79)0.002
    Very/Somewhat satisfied overall, n (%)3676 (96)69 (90)< 0.001
    Great/moderate improvement in quality of life, n (%)3436 (89)63 (79)< 0.001
    • OA: osteoarthritis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Predictors of having poor pain (WOMAC < 60) 2 ys after hip replacement* for patients with and without previous hip replacement (logistic regression results).

    Poor WOMAC Pain at 2 Yrs Without Previous Hip Replacement, OR (95% CI)pPoor WOMAC Pain at 2 Yrs With Previous Hip Replacement, OR (95% CI)p
    Age0.99 (0.96, 1.02)0.460.98 (0.93, 1.04)0.54
    Female vs male1.02 (0.54, 1.91)0.961.06 (0.33, 3.37)0.93
    RA vs OA3.17 (1.06, 9.53)0.044.00 (0.72, 22.33)0.11
    Back pain vs no back pain1.17 (0.65, 2.11)0.591.63 (0.54, 4.89)0.38
    25 ≤ BMI < 30 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.87 (0.42, 1.78)0.701.23 (0.27, 5.54)0.79
    30 ≤ BMI < 35 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.93 (0.42, 2.07)0.851.07 (0.19, 6.16)0.94
    35 ≤ BMI < 40 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.35 (0.09, 1.32)0.120.74 (0.07, 8.00)0.81
    BMI > 40 vs 18.5 < BMI < 250.65 (0.16, 2.72)0.555.61 (0.78, 40.27)0.09
    Preoperative WOMAC pain0.98 (0.97, 1.00)0.191.00 (0.96, 1.04)0.86
    Preoperative PCS0.94 (0.89, 0.99)0.010.96 (0.88, 1.05)0.39
    Preoperative MCS0.96 (0.94, 0.98)0.00090.96 (0.92, 1.01)0.10
    Education: college vs no college0.83 (0.46, 1.51)0.550.74 (0.24, 2.30)0.61
    White vs other0.59 (0.26, 1.32)0.200.20 (0.05, 0.85)0.03
    ASA class 2 vs ASA class 10.84 (0.30, 2.36)0.74**0.96
    ASA class 3+ vs ASA class 11.89 (0.56, 6.34)0.30**0.95
    • ↵* Multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, back pain, BMI, preoperative WOMAC pain and function, preoperative MCS and PCS, education, race, expectations score, ASA class, number of Deyo comorbidities, and previous hip replacement.

    • ↵** Variable excluded because of nonconvergence of logistic model. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; OA: osteoarthritis; BMI: body mass index; PCS: physical component scale; MCS: mental component scale; ASA: American Society of Anesthesia.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 9
1 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Are More Likely to Have Pain and Poor Function After Total Hip Replacements than Patients with Osteoarthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Are More Likely to Have Pain and Poor Function After Total Hip Replacements than Patients with Osteoarthritis
Susan M. Goodman, Danielle N. Ramsden-Stein, Wei-Ti Huang, Rebecca Zhu, Mark P. Figgie, Michael M. Alexiades, Lisa A. Mandl
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2014, 41 (9) 1774-1780; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Are More Likely to Have Pain and Poor Function After Total Hip Replacements than Patients with Osteoarthritis
Susan M. Goodman, Danielle N. Ramsden-Stein, Wei-Ti Huang, Rebecca Zhu, Mark P. Figgie, Michael M. Alexiades, Lisa A. Mandl
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2014, 41 (9) 1774-1780; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140011
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

ARTHROPLASTY
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
OSTEOARTHRITIS
OUTCOME MEASURES

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Congruence Between Child Self-Reported and Caregiver-Proxy–Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
  • Comorbidity Development and Mortality During 10 Years of Follow-up in a Danish Nationwide Cohort of 3178 Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ARTHROPLASTY
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • osteoarthritis
  • outcome measures

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire