Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

American College of Rheumatology Criteria at Inception, and Accrual over 5 Years in the SLICC Inception Cohort

Murray B. Urowitz, Dafna D. Gladman, Dominique Ibañez, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Anne E. Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Paul R. Fortin, John G. Hanly, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Daniel J. Wallace, Ellen Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N. Bruce, Joan T. Merrill, Ola Nived, Gunnar Sturfelt, Mary Anne Dooley, Graciela S. Alarcón, Barri Fessler, Kristjan Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad Zoma, Munther Khamashta, Susan Manzi, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Cynthia Aranow and Thomas Stoll
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2014, 41 (5) 875-880; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130704
Murray B. Urowitz
From the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico; Rheumatology Research Group, School of Immunity and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases and Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Divisions of Clinical Immunology/Allergy and Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal General Hospital and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec et Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College, London, UK; Cedars-Sinai/David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden; Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Center for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reyjkavik, Iceland; Northwestern University and Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, UK; Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UK; Allegheny Singer Research Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Unit for Clinical Therapy Research (ClinTRID), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Josep Font Autoimmune Diseases Laboratory, IDIBAPS, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA; Unidad de Enfermedades, Barcelona, Spain; Kantonsspital, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.urowitz{at}utoronto.ca
Dafna D. Gladman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominique Ibañez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juanita Romero-Diaz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Gordon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang-Cheol Bae
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne E. Clarke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sasha Bernatsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul R. Fortin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John G. Hanly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Isenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anisur Rahman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Wallace
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen Ginzler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Petri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian N. Bruce
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joan T. Merrill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ola Nived
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gunnar Sturfelt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Anne Dooley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graciela S. Alarcón
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barri Fessler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristjan Steinsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asad Zoma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Munther Khamashta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Manzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald van Vollenhoven
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Ramos-Casals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cynthia Aranow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Stoll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To determine the frequency of each American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criterion met at time of enrollment, and the increase in each of the criteria over 5 years.

Methods. In 2000 the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) recruited an international inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; ≥ 4 ACR criteria) who were followed at yearly intervals according to a standard protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the total and cumulative number of ACR criteria met at each visit. Regression models were done to compare the increase of individual and cumulative criteria as a function of race/ethnicity group, and sex.

Results In all, 768 patients have been followed for a minimum of 5 years. Overall, 59.1% of the patients had an increase in the number of ACR criteria they met over the 5-year period. The mean number of ACR criteria met at enrollment was 5.04 ± 1.13 and at year 5 was 6.03 ± 1.42. At enrollment, nonwhite patients had a higher number of ACR criteria (5.19 ± 1.23) than white patients. The total number of criteria increased in both white and nonwhite ethnicities, but increased more among whites. Males had a slightly lower number of criteria at enrollment compared to females and males accrued fewer criteria at 5 years.

Conclusion. In this international inception cohort of SLE patients with at least 4 ACR criteria at entry, there was an accumulation of ACR criteria over the following 5 years. The distribution of criteria both at inception and over 5 years is affected by sex and ethnicity.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY
  • CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
  • DISEASE PROGRESSION

In longterm observational studies and in therapeutic trials, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are often recruited if they have 4 or more classification criteria1. Heinlen, et al2 have shown that symptoms associated with the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classifications of SLE are commonly present before the diagnosis of SLE. Alarcon, et al3 examined the accrual of SLE criteria in a multiethnic cohort, prior to the accrual of 4 criteria. They found through a Cox-regression multivariable model that Hispanic ethnicity (from Texas) and HLA-DRB1*0301 were predictors of shorter time to criteria accrual, whereas older age and married/living together were associated with longer time to criteria accrual. However, the rate of accrual of additional revised ACR criteria after the diagnosis of SLE is unknown. To address this question in an optimal manner requires a group of patients with 4 ACR criteria followed at intervals from inception. The aims of our study were to determine the frequency of occurrence of each ACR criterion at enrollment, the mean number of criteria in each of the first 5 years of disease, and the increase in the number of each of the criteria over 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting and patient selection

The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group assembled in 1991 and consists of investigators interested in the study of outcomes in SLE4. In 2000, the SLICC group developed an international inception cohort of patients with SLE recruited within 15 months of diagnosis (presence of at least 4 ACR criteria) and followed at yearly intervals according to a standard protocol. For this study, 24 SLICC centers from 10 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia were included.

Patient assessment

A standard protocol, which includes demographics and clinical and laboratory features of SLE, was used at recruitment and at yearly intervals. Each ACR criterion was ascertained at each visit except for the antinuclear antibody test, which was often not done annually because of its limited usefulness once the diagnosis of SLE was established.

Statistical analysis

Time 0 was considered the time of enrollment into the cohort. For each of the yearly visits, the cumulative percentage of patients who have ever had each of the ACR criteria was evaluated, as well as the total number of ACR criteria ever present. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the cumulative and total number of ACR criteria at each visit. A comparison between patients who had an increased number of ACR criteria to those who did not was performed; comparatives included demographics and disease-related and therapy variables. A multivariate analysis was then performed including all 11 individual ACR criteria at enrollment to determine which criteria were more likely to be associated with a further increase in total number of ACR criteria by the 5-year timepoint. The accumulation of ACR criteria was evaluated and plotted against year since entry into the SLICC Registry for Atherosclerosis cohort. Logistic regression adjusting for repeated measures and using autoregressive correlation matrix (generalized estimating equation) were done to compare the increase, over the 5 years of followup, in the cumulative presence of ACR criteria. This was done separately for each individual criterion. Regression models were done for sex and then for ethnicity with no other variable included in the model. Then, regression models were done to compare the increase as a function of race/ethnicity group and sex correcting for disease activity and treatment as well as marital status and education level. The same approach was used to compare the total number of ACR criteria using linear regression models adjusting for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2012, 1845 patients with SLE were recruited. By definition all patients had 4 or more ACR classification criteria at entry into the cohort. There were 993 patients who had not reached a 5-year followup, and 84 missed their fifth-year appointment. This study population comprised 768 patients who had been followed for a minimum of 5 years. The patient population was 681 females (88.7%); 387 were white (50.4%), 110 African (14.3%), 119 Asian (15.5%), 128 Hispanic (16.7%), and 24 other race/ethnicities (3.1%). The mean (± SD) age at inclusion into the SLICC cohort was 35.0 ± 13.3 years, and the mean disease duration was 5.4 ± 4.1 months. The mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was 5.6 ± 5.6. Three hundred nine patients had disease duration of ≥ 6 months at the time of study enrollment. A comparison to the 768 included in the study to those not included in the study revealed that there was a lower frequency of discoid rash (10.8% vs 14.1%, respectively, p = 0.04), and a higher frequency of hematologic disorder (66.8% vs 60.4%, p = 0.006) at enrollment. Of the 768 patients, 349 were married (45.4%) or in common-law relationships, and 453 had postsecondary education (59.2%; Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison at enrollment of patients who increased their total number of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria to those who did not. Except for p values, data are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

ACR criteria at enrollment

The most frequent clinical criteria at enrollment were arthritis (75.9%), oral ulcers (38.3%), and malar rash and photosensitivity (each at 35.9%; Table 1). At enrollment only 30.7% met the renal disorder criterion (cellular casts or proteinuria > 0.5 g/dl) while only 6.1% met the neurologic disorder criterion (seizures or psychosis). The laboratory criteria were more prevalent, with antinuclear antibodies occurring in 95.6%, immunologic disorder (anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-Smith antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies, or positive lupus anticoagulant) in 79.4%, and hematologic disorder (hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, or thrombocytopenia) in 66.8%. The mean number of ACR criteria at enrollment was 5.04 ± 1.13.

Accrual of ACR criteria over 5-year followup

Overall, 59.1% of the patients had an increase in the number of ACR criteria over the 5-year period, with an average increase of 1 criterion per patient.

A comparison of patients who had an increased number of ACR criteria to those who did not is presented in Table 1. Among the 454 patients who did have an increase, the mean increase was 1.7 ± 0.9 criteria per patient. A multivariate analysis was run comparing patients who accrued ACR criteria to those who did not, modeling for the 11 individual ACR criteria at enrollment. It revealed that patients with arthritis, renal disorder, and hematological disorder were less likely to increase the total number of ACR criteria over the 5 years [OR (95% CI) 0.57 (0.40, 0.82) for arthritis; 0.65 (0.47, 0.89) for renal disorder; 0.41 (0.30, 0.57) for hematologic disorder]. The yearly increase in ACR criteria accumulation is shown in Table 2. At 5 years the percentage of occurrence of each criterion increased, and the 3 most common clinical criteria at enrollment (arthritis, oral ulcers, and malar rash) continued to be the most prevalent. However, renal disorder increased to 43.5% and neurologic disorder to 10.2%. The mean number of criteria per patient increased over the 5 years to 6.03 ± 1.42.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Accumulation of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. In 454 (59.1%) patients, the total number of criteria increased in 5 years.

Effect of sex

Analysis of the relationship between sex and each individual criterion revealed that males had a lower frequency of malar rash, oral ulcers, arthritis, and photosensitivity, and a higher incidence of renal and immunologic disorders. Males had a slightly lower number of criteria compared to females (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Effect of sex, race, and ethnicity on the number of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria accrual.

Effect of race/ethnicity

At enrollment, nonwhite patients had a higher number of ACR criteria (5.19 ± 1.23) than white patients (4.88 ± 1.02, p = 0.0001). The total number of criteria increased in both white and nonwhite ethnicities, but increased more among whites. However, at 5 years there was no statistically significant difference (5.95 ± 1.42, vs 6.11 ± 1.43, Figure 1B). At each annual assessment in nonwhite patients, renal disease, hematologic disorder, and immunologic disorder were more frequent, and photosensitivity was less frequent than in whites (data not shown). When individual ethnicities were considered, both white and black had 4.88 criteria at inception while Asians had 5.07 and Hispanics had 5.71. Hispanics had a significantly higher number of ACR criteria over the entire 5 years of followup compared to whites (p < 0.0001, Figure 1C).

Table 3 summarizes the relationship between race/ethnicity and the accrual of each criterion. Whites were used as the comparator group in the statistical tests. The analysis was adjusted for sex, age, SLEDAI-2K, steroids, antimalarials, and immunosuppressives. Asians had a lower frequency of accrual of arthritis, photosensitivity, and neurologic disorder, and were more likely to accrue hematologic and immunologic disorders. Blacks were found to have decreased accrual of malar rash, oral ulcers, and photosensitivity and increased accrual of discoid rash. Hispanics had increased accrual of arthritis and malar rash and lower frequency of photosensitivity and neurologic disorder.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria accumulation by ethnicity and sex after adjusting for age, SLE Disease Activity Index-2K, steroids, antimalarials, and immunosuppressives.

DISCUSSION

The classification criteria for SLE were derived to ensure confidence that patients included in studies could be considered to have SLE by accepted standards1. Most therapeutic trials and longitudinal observational cohort and registry studies require the presence of 4 or more criteria for inclusion. Recently the SLICC group has developed an alternative set of classification criteria for SLE5. Unfortunately, appropriate information for applying these criteria in this cohort was not collected in a systematic fashion and therefore these criteria could not be tested in the current study.

Previous studies have addressed the accrual of ACR criteria prior to the diagnosis of SLE2,3. In our study we examined the accrual of criteria beyond 4 in a multinational multicenter inception cohort of patients already diagnosed with SLE. In the first 5 years after diagnosis, there is accumulation of each of the criteria in a small number of patients varying from 2.1% for antinuclear antibody to 12.5% for malar rash, 12.8% for renal disorder, and 15.2% for hematologic disorder. In a single-center inception cohort, 28% of the patients who did not have renal disorder at inception developed it over followup, the majority within the first 5 years6. This should alert the clinician to look for further manifestations of SLE beyond 4, particularly over the first 5 years. Patients who accrued additional criteria in the first 5 years were less likely to have arthritis, renal, or hematological criteria at inception, and were more likely to be older and receiving antimalarial therapy. These clinical criteria are among the most commonly present at inception. Older-age SLE has been shown to have a lower frequency of malar rash, arthritis, and nephropathy; and accrued those manifestations at followup less frequently compared to younger patients7. That antimalarials are protective against the accrual of manifestations is in keeping with the current concept that they are protective for mortality and morbidity in SLE8,9.

Sex differences were observed in our study. While males had a lower number of criteria at inception, they did demonstrate more renal disorder, hematologic disorder, and immunologic disorder. Similar observations were recently reported for a Chinese cohort10, the Hopkins’ cohort, and the LUMINA cohort11,12. In a large sample of patients with SLE from the Dallas Fort Worth Metropolitan Area, males were also found to have more severe disease13. Thus, although SLE is more common among females, its expression may be more severe in males.

Different race/ethnicity groups present with different criteria. Although nonwhite ethnicities each had more renal, hematologic, and immunologic disorders than whites, whereas whites had higher frequency of photosensitivity when adjusted for sex, age, disease activity, and therapies, only immunologic disorder remained significantly higher, whereas photosensitivity remained significantly lower in all ethnicities. Although renal disorder was higher among nonwhites, this difference remained significant only for Hispanics. These observations are consistent with a previous report from the SLICC cohort that demonstrated that nonwhites had a higher disease burden in terms of active disease than whites at presentation and over the first 5 years14. A study from the Toronto Cohort found that black Canadians also had more renal disease than whites15. Ethnic differences in SLE manifestations have also been observed in the LUMINA cohort, where Texan Hispanics as well as black American patients fared worse than whites and Puerto Rican Hispanics16,17. Thus ethnicity has an effect on disease expression in SLE, although it is unclear to what extent these less favorable outcomes relate to differences in ancestral genes and socioeconomic status18.

In this international inception cohort of SLE patients with at least 4 ACR criteria at entry, there was an accumulation of ACR criteria over the following 5 years. The distribution of criteria both at inception and over 5 years is affected by sex and ethnicity.

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the generous donation of our patients’ time and the dedication of all the Fellows, research coordinators, and assistants in the SLICC group for the completion of this work.

Footnotes

  • Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Lupus UK, Tolfo Family, Lupus Ontario, and the Conn Smythe Foundation.

  • Accepted for publication January 29, 2014.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tan EM,
    2. Cohen AS,
    3. Fries JF,
    4. Masi AT,
    5. McShane DJ,
    6. Rothfield NF,
    7. et al.
    The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Heinlen LD,
    2. McClain MT,
    3. Merrill J,
    4. Akbarali YW,
    5. Edgerton CC,
    6. Harley JB,
    7. et al.
    Clinical criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus precede diagnosis, and associated autoantibodies are present before clinical symptoms. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2344–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alarcon GS,
    2. McGwin G Jr.,
    3. Roseman JM,
    4. Uribe A,
    5. Fessler BJ,
    6. Bastian HM,
    7. et al.
    Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. XIX. Natural history of the accrual of the American College of Rheumatology criteria prior to the occurrence of criteria diagnosis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:609–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Isenberg DA,
    2. Ramsey-Goldman R,
    3. Gladman D,
    4. Hanly JG
    . The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group — It was 20 years ago today. Lupus 2011;20:1426–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Orbai AM,
    3. Alarcón GS,
    4. Gordon C,
    5. Merrill JT,
    6. Fortin PR,
    7. et al.
    Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dye-Torrington D,
    2. Ibañez D,
    3. Urowitz M,
    4. Gladman D
    . Time to development of nephritis in patients with SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60 Suppl:S348.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cervera R,
    2. Khamashta MA,
    3. Font J,
    4. Sebastiani GD,
    5. Gil A,
    6. Lavilla P,
    7. et al.
    Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and immunologic patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. The European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Medicine 1993;72:113–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Tom BD,
    4. Ibañez D,
    5. Farewell VT
    . Changing patterns in mortality and disease outcome for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2008;35:2152–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fessler BJ,
    2. Alarcón GS,
    3. McGwin G Jr.,
    4. Roseman J,
    5. Bastian HM,
    6. Friedman AW,
    7. et al; and
    8. LUMINA Study Group
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1473–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ding Y,
    2. He J,
    3. Guo JP,
    4. Dai YJ,
    5. Li C,
    6. Feng M,
    7. et al.
    Gender differences are associated with the clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus. Chin Med J 2012;125:2477–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tan TC,
    2. Fang H,
    3. Magder LS,
    4. Petri MA
    . Differences between male and female systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic population. J Rheumatol 2012;39:759–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Andrade RM,
    2. Alarcón GS,
    3. Fernández M,
    4. Apte M,
    5. Vilá LM,
    6. Reveille JD
    . Accelerated damage accrual among men with systemic lupus erythematosus: XLIV. Results from a multiethnic US cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:622–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Crosslin KL,
    2. Kristin L,
    3. Wiginton KL
    . Sex differences in disease severity among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Gender Medicine 2011;8:365–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Urowitz MB,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Ibañez D,
    4. Fortin PR,
    5. Bae SC,
    6. Gordon C,
    7. et al.
    Evolution of disease burden over 5 years in a multicentre inception SLE cohort. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:132–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Johnson SR,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Ibañez D,
    4. Urowitz MB
    . Ethnic variation in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1990–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Burgos PI,
    2. McGwin G Jr.,
    3. Pons-Estel1 GJ,
    4. Reveille JD,
    5. Alarcón GS,
    6. Vilá LM
    . US patients of Hispanic and African ancestry develop lupus nephritis early in the disease course: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA LXXIV). Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:393–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fernández M,
    2. Alarcón GS,
    3. Calvo-Alén J,
    4. Andrade R,
    5. McGwin G Jr.,
    6. Vilá LM,
    7. et al; and
    8. LUMINA Study Group
    . A multiethnic, multicenter cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as a model for the study of ethnic disparities in SLE. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:576–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sánchez E,
    2. Rasmussen A,
    3. Riba L,
    4. Acevedo-Vasquez E,
    5. Kelly JA,
    6. Langefeld CD,
    7. et al.
    Impact of genetic ancestry and sociodemographic status on the clinical expression of systemic lupus erythematosus in American Indian–European populations. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:3687–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 5
1 May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
American College of Rheumatology Criteria at Inception, and Accrual over 5 Years in the SLICC Inception Cohort
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
American College of Rheumatology Criteria at Inception, and Accrual over 5 Years in the SLICC Inception Cohort
Murray B. Urowitz, Dafna D. Gladman, Dominique Ibañez, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Anne E. Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Paul R. Fortin, John G. Hanly, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Daniel J. Wallace, Ellen Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N. Bruce, Joan T. Merrill, Ola Nived, Gunnar Sturfelt, Mary Anne Dooley, Graciela S. Alarcón, Barri Fessler, Kristjan Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad Zoma, Munther Khamashta, Susan Manzi, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Cynthia Aranow, Thomas Stoll
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2014, 41 (5) 875-880; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130704

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
American College of Rheumatology Criteria at Inception, and Accrual over 5 Years in the SLICC Inception Cohort
Murray B. Urowitz, Dafna D. Gladman, Dominique Ibañez, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Anne E. Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Paul R. Fortin, John G. Hanly, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Daniel J. Wallace, Ellen Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N. Bruce, Joan T. Merrill, Ola Nived, Gunnar Sturfelt, Mary Anne Dooley, Graciela S. Alarcón, Barri Fessler, Kristjan Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad Zoma, Munther Khamashta, Susan Manzi, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Cynthia Aranow, Thomas Stoll
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2014, 41 (5) 875-880; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130704
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY
CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
DISEASE PROGRESSION

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Evolution of the Diagnostic Paradigm for Giant Cell Arteritis: From Histopathology to Multimodal Imaging Integration
  • Evaluating Hip Osteoarthritis as a Risk Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Real-World Adherence to Systemic Sclerosis Quality Indicators: A Single-Center Quality of Care Study
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • American College of Rheumatology
  • classification criteria
  • disease progression

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire