Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 11

Outcome Measures in Acute Gout: A Systematic Literature Review

Nicola Dalbeth, Cathy S. Zhong, Rebecca Grainger, Dinesh Khanna, Puja P. Khanna, Jasvinder A. Singh, Fiona M. McQueen and William J. Taylor
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2014, 41 (3) 558-568; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131244
Nicola Dalbeth
From the Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland; Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand; Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: n.dalbeth@auckland.ac.nz
Cathy S. Zhong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Grainger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dinesh Khanna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Puja P. Khanna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jasvinder A. Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fiona M. McQueen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. Taylor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Five core domains have been endorsed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) for acute gout: pain, joint swelling, joint tenderness, patient global assessment, and activity limitation. We evaluated instruments for these domains according to the OMERACT filter: truth, feasibility, and discrimination.

Methods. A systematic search strategy for instruments used to measure the acute gout core domains was formulated. For each method, articles were assessed by 2 reviewers to summarize information according to the specific components of the OMERACT filter.

Results. Seventy-seven articles and abstracts met the inclusion criteria. Pain was most frequently reported (76 studies, 20 instruments). The pain instruments used most often were 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and 5-point Likert scale. Both methods have high feasibility, face and content validity, and within- and between-group discrimination. Four-point Likert scales assessing index joint swelling and tenderness have been used in numerous acute gout studies; these instruments are feasible, with high face and content validity, and show within- and between-group discrimination. Five-point Patient Global Assessment of Response to Treatment (PGART) scales are feasible and valid, and show within- and between-group discrimination. Measures of activity limitations were infrequently reported, and insufficient data were available to make definite assessments of the instruments for this domain.

Conclusion. Many different instruments have been used to assess the acute gout core domains. Pain VAS and 5-point Likert scales, 4-point Likert scales of index joint swelling and tenderness and 5-point PGART instruments meet the criteria for the OMERACT filter.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • GOUT
  • PAIN
  • MEASUREMENT
  • OUTCOME

Footnotes

  • Supported by a University of Auckland summer studentship (CSZ). Dr. Dalbeth has received consultant fees from Ardea Biosciences, Metabolex, Novartis, and Takeda; her institution has received funding from Fonterra; and she is inventor on a patent related to milk products and gout. Dr. D. Khanna has received consultant fees from Ardea, Takeda, Novartis, and Savient, and has served on a speakers bureau for Savient. Dr. P. Khanna serves on the speakers bureau for Takeda. J.A. Singh has received research grants from Takeda and Savient and consultant fees from Savient, Takeda, Ardea, Regeneron, Allergan, URL pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. J.A. Singh is a member of the executive of OMERACT, an organization that develops outcome measures in rheumatology and receives arms-length funding from 36 companies; a member of the American College of Rheumatology’s Guidelines Subcommittee of the Quality of Care Committee; and a member of the Veterans Affairs Rheumatology Field Advisory Committee.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 3
1 Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outcome Measures in Acute Gout: A Systematic Literature Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Outcome Measures in Acute Gout: A Systematic Literature Review
Nicola Dalbeth, Cathy S. Zhong, Rebecca Grainger, Dinesh Khanna, Puja P. Khanna, Jasvinder A. Singh, Fiona M. McQueen, William J. Taylor
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2014, 41 (3) 558-568; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131244

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Outcome Measures in Acute Gout: A Systematic Literature Review
Nicola Dalbeth, Cathy S. Zhong, Rebecca Grainger, Dinesh Khanna, Puja P. Khanna, Jasvinder A. Singh, Fiona M. McQueen, William J. Taylor
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2014, 41 (3) 558-568; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131244
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

GOUT
PAIN
MEASUREMENT
OUTCOME

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

OMERACT 11

  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of “Truth”: Content, Face, and Construct Validity
  • Toward a Generalized Framework of Core Measurement Areas in Clinical Trials: A Position Paper for OMERACT 11
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Imaging and Soluble Biomarkers
Show more OMERACT 11

Disease-specific Outcomes I

  • Application of the OMERACT Filter to Measures of Core Outcome Domains in Recent Clinical Studies of Acute Gout
  • Patient-reported Outcomes and Adult Patients’ Disease Experience in the Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies. Report from the OMERACT 11 Myositis Special Interest Group
  • Current Status of Outcome Measure Development in Vasculitis
Show more Disease-specific Outcomes I

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gout
  • pain
  • MEASUREMENT
  • outcome

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire