Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 11

Methodologies for Semiquantitative Evaluation of Hip Osteoarthritis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Approaches Based on the Whole Organ and Focused on Active Lesions

Jacob L. Jaremko, Robert G.W. Lambert, Veronika Zubler, Ulrich Weber, Damien Loeuille, Frank W. Roemer, Jolanda Cibere, Marcus Pianta, David Gracey, Philip Conaghan, Mikkel Ostergaard and Walter P. Maksymowych
The Journal of Rheumatology February 2014, 41 (2) 359-369; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131082
Jacob L. Jaremko
From the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Radiology and Department of Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, CHU de NANCY-Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France; Department of Radiology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany; Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Research Scientist, Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; St. Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia; Radiology Department, Craigavon Area Hospital, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Portadown, Northern Ireland; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jjaremko{at}ualberta.ca
Robert G.W. Lambert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronika Zubler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Weber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Loeuille
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank W. Roemer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jolanda Cibere
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Pianta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Gracey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Conaghan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikkel Ostergaard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter P. Maksymowych
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Search strategy for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hip osteoarthritis (OA) scoring systems. The 5 scoring systems are reported4,5,6,8,9.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Assessment of cartilage lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A. Method according to Schmid, et al4. Sagittal proton density (PD) fat saturated (FS) MRI. Acetabular zones are labeled anterosuperior (AS), anteroinferior (AI), posterosuperior (PS), posteroinferior (PI). Note that the PI zone is present only medially. B. Method according to Neumann, et al5. C, D. Method according to Roemer, et al6, Hip OsteoArthritis MRI Scoring System. C: sagittal PD FS MRI. The edges of the joint (anterior and posterior 9 mm of femoral head) are scored in 4 zones: AS: anterior-superior, AI: anterior-inferior, PS: posterior-superior, PI: posterior-inferior. D: coronal PD FS MRI showing one of the central slices of joint (between anterior and posterior 9 mm). Scoring is in 5 zones: CL: central-lateral, CS: central-superior, CC: central-central, CI: central-inferior, CM: central-medial. From Roemer, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:946–62; adapted with permission.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Assessment of bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A, B. Method according to Hip OsteoArthritis MRI Scoring System6. A: Sagittal proton density fat saturated (PD FS) MRI showing scoring for edges of joint, at anterior and posterior 9 mm of femoral head. Seven zones, including ASF: anterior-superior femoral, AIF: anterior-inferior femoral, PSF: posterior-superior femoral, PIF: posterior-inferior femoral, ASA: anterior-superior acetabulum, PSA: posterior-superior acetabulum, PIA: posterior-inferior acetabulum. B: Coronal PD FS MRI at one of the central slices of the joint (between anterior and posterior 9 mm). Three acetabular zones (CSA: central-superior acetabulum, CCA: central-central acetabulum, CIA: central-inferior acetabulum) and 5 femoral head zones (CLF: central-lateral femoral, CSF: central-superior femoral, CCF: central-central femoral, CIF: central-inferior femoral, CMF: central-medial femoral). C. Method according to Hip Inflammation MRI Scoring System (HIMRISS)8. Coronal short-tau inversion recovery MRI. The central 5 slices of femoral head (right image) have 8 circle sectors, numbered 1 = superomedial, clockwise to 8 = superolateral; center = 9. The central 5 slices of acetabulum have 3 sectors each, numbered 10 (lateral) to 12 (medial). Anterior slices (D) and posterior slices (E) have 2 regions for femoral head and acetabulum (e.g., anterior superior femoral, anterior superior acetabular). Edema in each region receives a score of 1, no edema = score of 0. AS: anterosuperior; AI: anteroinferior; PS: posterosuperior; PI: posteroinferior. See www.arthritisdoctor.ca for more detailed methodology. From Roemer, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:946–62; adapted with permission.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis scale (for radiographs)3.

    0Normal
    1Doubtful joint space narrowing, possible osteophytes
    2Possible joint space narrowing, definite osteophytes
    3Definite joint space narrowing, multiple osteophytes, some sclerosis, possible deformity of bone ends
    4Marked joint space narrowing, large osteophytes, severe sclerosis, definite deformity of bone ends
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based scoring systems for hip osteoarthritis.

    Neumann, et al5HOAMS6HIMRISS8
    ConceptOverall grading of hip degeneration, as statistical combination of maximum changes in each of 5 zonesScore of 14 features of osteoarthritis in the hip, developed by multidisciplinary consensus committeeSum of signs of inflammation (edema, synovitis, effusion) in portions of femoral head, acetabulum and adjacent tissue, across each slice of MRI
    Base sequenceMR arthrogramProton density fat saturated (PD FS), small field of view (1 hip), axial and sagittalCoronal inversion recovery (STIR), can be large field of view (full pelvis) or 1 hip
    Zones: femoral head15 sectors in central hip: central-central, central-superior, central-inferior, central-medial, central-lateralCentral 5 slices: 8 equal sectors of arc + 1 central zone, per slice
    4 zones in anterior and posterior 9 mm of femoral head: anterosuperior, anteroinferior, posterosuperior, posteroinferior2 zones (superior and inferior) per slice up to 5 anterior slices and up to 5 posterior slices
    Zones: acetabulum43 sectors in central hip (central-central, central-superior, central-inferior); 2 sectors in anterior and posterior 9 mm (superior and inferior)3 sectors per slice for central 5 slices; 2 sectors per slice for up to 5 anterior slices, 5 posterior
    Zones: total5 total9 femoral, 5 acetabular, total 1465 femoral, 35 acetabular, total 100
    Planes to useCoronal for central slices, sagittal for ant/postCoronal only
    Cartilage0 normal0 normalNot scored
    1 = signal change only1 focal partial thickness < 25% of region area
    2 fissuring only, < 1 mm width2 focal full thickness < 25% of region area
    3 defect < 50% of thickness3 several partial or 1 full > 25%
    4 defect > 50% of thickness4 several full thickness defects or one large, > 25%
    5 exposed bone
    Width of lesion
    A = < 1 cm, B = 1–2 cm, C = > 2 cm per zone
    BML0 = none0 = none0 = normal
    1 = < 0.5 cm from bone1 = < 33% of region1 = higher signal than reference signal (uninvolved or contralateral marrow)
    2 = < 1.5 cm from bone2 = < 66% of region
    3 = > 1.5 cm from bone3 = > 66% of region
    Subchondral cystsGrade whole joint: 0 none0 = noneNot scored
    1 = 1–2 cysts1 = < 33% of region
    2 = 3–4 cysts2 = < 66% of region
    3 = 5+ cysts3 = > 66% of region
    Osteophytes
      Locations5 zones (ant/post/med/lat + central)Femoral in each locationNot scored
      ScoringPer zone: 0 = absent; 1 = mild (< 2 mm); 2 = mod (< 5 mm); 3 = severe > 5 mm5 locations: (ant/post on axial slices; superomedial/inferolateral/central intra-articular on coronal slices)
    Whole-joint score, from sum of partial scores: 0 if 0; 1 if 1–2; 2 if 3–4; 3 if > 5+0 absent; 1 = equivocal; 2 = small definite beak-like; 3 = intermediate; 4 = large proliferative
    Labrum
      LocationsAnterior/posterior/medial/lateralAnterior on sagittal; superolateral/posteromedial on coronal; anterior/posterior on axialNot scored
      Scoring0 = normal0 = normal
    1 = signal change or small labrum1 = signal change or small labrum
    2 = simple tear2 = simple tear
    3 = complex tear3 = maceration
    Synovitis
      Locations4 sites: ant/post/med/lat femoral head/neck junctionScored once per slice × 15 slices
      ScoringNASynovium only; thickness 0 if < 2 mm; 1 if 2–4 mm; 2 if > 4 mmCombined synovium + effusion: thickness 0 < 2 mm; 1 if 2–4 mm; 2 if > 4 mm
    EffusionNASingle grade 0, 1, 2 (overall joint assessment)Combined with synovitis
    Other
      Loose bodiesNAPresent or absentNA
      Attrition (flattened articular surface)1 if definite flattening/asphericity of femoral head
      Dysplasia (undercoverage of acetabular roof)Measure centre-edge angle at mid coronal slice, if < 25*, score as dysplastic
      Bursitis/enthesopathyTrochanteric bursitis, greater & lesser trochanteric tendinopathy each either present or absent
      Paralabral cystsPresent or absent
      Superolateral femoral head cystPresent or absent (“herniation pit”)
    Maximum scoreStatistical combination scheme using max. individual score at each site45 (cartilage) + 45 (BML) + 45 (cysts) + 40 (osteophytes) + 15 (labrum) + 8 (synovitis) + 10 (other) = 20857 (femoral head BML) + 27 (acetabular BML) + 30 (synovitis/effusion) = 114
    • HOAMS: Hip OsteoArthritis Scoring System; HIMRISS: Hip Inflammation MRI Scoring System; BML: bone marrow lesion; NA: not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Signal changes in subarticular bone and bone marrow18,19.

    T1T2Post-gadolinium EnhancementOtherInterpretation
    LowHighHomogeneousIll defined marginsEdema-like
    LowHighHeterogeneousWell defined marginsNecrosis-like
    LowLowNoSclerosis
    LowLowMaybeGenerally surrounded by edema-likeSclerosis-like
    Linear low signal lineSurrounding highSubchondral bone deformitySubchondral fracture
    LowVery highRim enhancementWell defined, roundedCyst
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Studies of histologic findings in areas of marrow “edema” on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the hip.

    AuthorsDesignFinding in Specimen at Site of MRI “Edema”Extent of Finding on Specimen vs MRI
    Hofmann, et al 199325Marrow from core decompression in transient osteoporosis of hip“Pale to dark staining homogeneous fluid” Necrotic and reparative changes, ? early osteonecrosisSpecimens “filled” with fluid
    Taljanovic, et al 200823Resected hip components post total arthroplasty. Decalcified specimens, MRI within 48 h pre-surgery“Palely eosinophilic extracellular fluid”Much less than on MRI: 8/20 patients, only 3% of subchondral bone
    Leydet-Quilici, et al, 201024Resected femoral heads post total arthroplasty. Non-decalcified specimens, MRI within 1 mo pre-surgeryEdema (SN 80%, SP 95%)
    Combined with vascular marrow fibrosis (SN 69%, SP 80%)
    Some necrosis
    MRI more specific than sensitive for true edema
    Kappa = 0.77
    • SN: sensitivity; SP: specificity.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 2
1 Feb 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Methodologies for Semiquantitative Evaluation of Hip Osteoarthritis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Approaches Based on the Whole Organ and Focused on Active Lesions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Methodologies for Semiquantitative Evaluation of Hip Osteoarthritis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Approaches Based on the Whole Organ and Focused on Active Lesions
Jacob L. Jaremko, Robert G.W. Lambert, Veronika Zubler, Ulrich Weber, Damien Loeuille, Frank W. Roemer, Jolanda Cibere, Marcus Pianta, David Gracey, Philip Conaghan, Mikkel Ostergaard, Walter P. Maksymowych
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2014, 41 (2) 359-369; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Methodologies for Semiquantitative Evaluation of Hip Osteoarthritis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Approaches Based on the Whole Organ and Focused on Active Lesions
Jacob L. Jaremko, Robert G.W. Lambert, Veronika Zubler, Ulrich Weber, Damien Loeuille, Frank W. Roemer, Jolanda Cibere, Marcus Pianta, David Gracey, Philip Conaghan, Mikkel Ostergaard, Walter P. Maksymowych
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2014, 41 (2) 359-369; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131082
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

OSTEOARTHRITIS
HIP
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
OMERACT
SCORING SYSTEM

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

OMERACT 11

  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Imaging and Soluble Biomarkers
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Patient-reported Outcomes
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discrimination and Feasibility
Show more OMERACT 11

Imaging and Other Biomarkers

  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Imaging and Soluble Biomarkers
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Patient-reported Outcomes
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discrimination and Feasibility
Show more Imaging and Other Biomarkers

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • osteoarthritis
  • HIP
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • OMERACT
  • scoring system

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire