Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Immunosuppressive Therapies for the Induction Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis

Simon Yu Tian, Brian M. Feldman, Joseph Beyene, Patrick E. Brown, Elizabeth M. Uleryk and Earl D. Silverman
The Journal of Rheumatology October 2014, 41 (10) 1998-2007; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140050
Simon Yu Tian
From the Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto; Division of Rheumatology and Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto; Program in Population Genomics, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto; Hospital Library, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Feldman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Beyene
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick E. Brown
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth M. Uleryk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Earl D. Silverman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: earl.silverman@sickkids.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Network of evidence. A solid line denotes a direct comparison between 2 basic nodes; a dashed line denotes an indirect comparison between 2 functional nodes. The relative effect of 2 therapies as shown by an indirect contrast denoted by a dashed line, for example, Cyclo versus Aza, can be determined using this network through head-on comparisons that have already been done. The number of all possible pairwise comparisons in this case is 6. Numbers on the outer edges denote the study number in Table 2. Aza: azathioprine; Cyclo: cyclophosphamide; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; Pred: prednisone alone.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Caterpillar plots of conventional (frequentist) metaanalysis of the 12 studies included. A. Two comparisons of 5 studies, using serum creatinine < 132 µmol/l as the outcome measure for renal remission.

    B. Six comparisons of the 12 studies, using proteinuria < 0.5 g/day as the outcome measure for renal remission. For the M-H method used to combine OR see the Cochrane Handbook16. Aza: azathioprine; Cyclo: cyclophosphamide; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; Tac: tacrolimus; Pred: prednisone alone; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Outcomes of the 12 studies used.

    No.StudyCitationArmSerum CreatinineProteinuria
    ResponseArm SizeResponseArm Size
    1Appel, 200918CYC12518550185
    MMF13018544185
    2Chan, 200519CYC2331
    MMF2433
    3Chen, 201120CYC33391539
    Tac38422242
    4Donadio, 197221AZA27
    Prednisone alone29
    5Donadio, 197617CYC419
    Prednisone alone220
    6El-Shafey, 201022CYC523523
    MMF624624
    7Ginzler, 200523CYC469469
    MMF16711671
    8Hahn, 197524AZA811
    Prednisone alone810
    9Li, 20129CYC620
    MMF920
    Tac920
    10Miyasaka, 200925Tac427
    Prednisone alone133
    11Ong, 200526CYC325
    MMF519
    12Ren, 200727CYC312312
    Tac613613
    • The outcome used is the number of renal remissions, as defined by serum creatinine < 132 µmol/l; proteinuria < 0.5 g/day. Response: no. responses in each arm; arm size: sample size of each arm; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; CYC: cyclophosphamide; Tac: tacrolimus; AZA: azathioprine.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Features of the 12 studies used.

    No.StudyCitationRegionSample SizeInduction (weeks)Biopsy Class (%)Baseline Features (mean ± SD)Complete Renal Remission Definition
    1Appel GB, 200918International (ALMS)37024III, III/V (15.7), IV, IV/V (68.1), V (16.2)sCr (µmol/l, same below): 100.6 ± 1.1; urine protein/creatinine ratio: 4.1 ± 3.7Return to normal sCr, proteinuria ≤ 0.5 g/day, and inactive urinary sediment (≤ 5 white and ≤ 5 erythrocytes per HPF, and a reading of < ++ on dipstick and absence of RBC casts)
    2Chan TM, 200519China (Hong Kong)6424IV, IV/V (100)sCr: 112.9 ± 57.0; proteinuria (g/24 h, same below): 5.32 ± 3.94Proteinuria < 0.3 g/day, normal urinary sediment, normal serum albumin, and improved or stable renal function
    3Chen W, 201120China (southern)8124III (3.7), IV (71.6), V (11.1), III/V, IV/V (13.6)sCr: 82.88 ± 102.54; proteinuria: 1.50 ± 1.40Proteinuria < 0.3 g/day with normal urinary sediment, normal serum albumin (≥ 35 g/l), and stable kidney function (normal sCr or ≤ 15% above baseline values)
    4Donadio Jr JV, 197221North America (Mayo)1624III, IV (100)Proteinuria: 3.39 ± 3.36Proteinuria < 0.5 g/day, inactive urine sediments (≤ 8 erythrocytes per HPF and absent of RBC casts)
    5Donadio Jr JV, 197617North America3924IV (100)Proteinuria: 5.11 ± 3.50Proteinuria < 0.5 g/day
    6El-Shafey EM, 201022North Africa4724III (31.9), IV (68.1)sCr: 137.15 ± 50.24; proteinuria: 2.03 ± 1.05Normal sCr, reduction in proteinuria < 0.5 g/day and urinary sediment < 5 erythrocytes per HPF, without RBC casts
    7Ginzler EM, 200523North America (NYC)14024III (15.7), IV (54.3), V (19.3), III/V, IV/V (10.7)sCr: 94.58 ± 44.64; proteinuria: 4.25 ± 3.30The return to within 10% of normal values of sCr, proteinuria (< 0.33–0.4 g/day), and urine sediment
    8Hahn BH, 197524North America (Missouri)2424III (15), II (25), V (15), IV/V (45)Proteinuria ≤ 0.2 g/day; OR inactive urine sediments (≤ 6 erythrocyte per HPF), OR normal renal function (sCr clearance > 80 ml/min)
    9Li X, 20129China (eastern)6024III, IV(66.7), III/V, IV/V (20), V(13.3)sCr: 77; proteinuria: 3.57Proteinuria < 0.3 g/day, normal urine sediment, serum albumin> 35 g/l and stabilization (± 15%) or improvement in sCr at 24 weeks
    10Miyasaka N, 200925Japan (Tokyo)6328III (17.5), IV (30.2), V (27.0), II (4.8)sCr: 61.19 proteinuria: 1.55Proteinuria < 0.3 g/day
    11Ong LM, 200526Southeastern Asia (Malaysia)4424III (6.8), III/V (2.3), IV (61.4), IV/V (29.5)sCr: 95.08 ± 38.95; proteinuria: 2.48 ± 1.54Stabilization or improvement in renal function, urinary sediment < 10 erythrocytes per HPF and proteinuria < 0.3 g/day
    12Ren H, 200727China (eastern)2524IV (100)sCr < 265.2; proteinuria > 2.0Proteinuria < 0.4 g/day, no active urinary sediment (< 10 erythrocytes per HPF), serum albumin > 35 g/l, and normal sCr
    • RBC: red blood cell; sCr: serum creatinine; HPF: high power field.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Expected odds ratio (95% credible interval).

    PriorOutcomeAgents, no., nameAZAMMFPrednisone AloneTacrolimus
    FlatSerum creatinine3 CYC1.70 (0.51, 6.87)2.16 (0.38, 13.36)
    MMF1.25 (0.13, 10.51)
    FlatProteinuria4 CYC0.33 (0.01, 8.06)1.50 (0.73, 3.64)0.37 (0.02, 4.36)
    AZA4.59 (0.18, 145.22)1.09 (0.15, 7.90)
    MMF0.24 (0.01, 3.04)
    FlatProteinuria5 CYC0.31 (0.02, 3.60)1.46 (0.81, 3.04)0.34 (0.05, 1.90)1.96 (0.80, 5.11)
    AZA4.76 (0.38, 75.76)1.09 (0.18, 6.91)6.34 (0.53, 92.51)
    MMF0.23 (0.03, 1.38)1.34 (0.43, 3.90)
    Pred5.69 (1.03, 41.32)
    ScepticalSerum creatinine3 CYC1.01 (0.60, 1.63)1.30 (0.68, 2.34)
    MMF1.30 (0.57, 2.73)
    ScepticalProteinuria5 CYC0.97 (0.52, 1.78)0.91 (0.62, 1.38)0.92 (0.55, 1.56)0.98 (0.61, 1.58)
    AZA0.94 (0.46, 1.97)0.95 (0.46, 1.94)1.01 (0.47, 2.17)
    MMF1.01 (0.52, 1.94)1.08 (0.57, 1.96)
    Pred1.07 (0.55, 2.04)
    • Agent in columns is the numerator; agent in rows is the denominator. Outcome: serum creatinine < 132 µmol/l; or proteinuria < 0.5 g/day. Model convergence: empirical measures for chain convergence were excellent; Gelman-Rubin statistic R = 1.00 for each node consistently. The model converged. MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; Pred: prednisone alone; CYC: cyclophosphamide; Tac: tacrolimus; AZA: azathioprine

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Expected probability of ranks for each therapy (95% credible interval).

    PriorOutcomeAgentsCYCAZAMMFPredTacrolimus
    FlatSerum creatinine3Rank3 (1, 3)2 (1, 3)1 (1, 3)
    10.030.390.59
    20.250.500.26
    30.73 (0.00, 1.00)0.12 (0.00, 1.00)0.16 (0.00, 1.00)
    FlatProteinuria4Rank2 (1, 4)3 (1, 4)1 (1, 3)3 (1, 4)
    10.080.140.720.07
    20.640.080.180.10
    30.160.290.090.47
    40.12 (0.00, 1.00)0.49 (0.00, 1.00)0.02 (0.00, 0.00)0.36 (0.00, 1.00)
    FlatProteinuria5Rank3 (2, 5)4 (1, 5)2 (1, 4)5 (2, 5)1 (1, 3)
    10.010.060.260.010.67
    20.120.050.560.030.24
    30.680.060.140.050.08
    40.130.310.040.510.01
    50.06 (0.00, 1.00)0.52 (0.00, 1.00)0.01 (0.00, 0.00)0.41 (0.00, 1.00)0.00 (0.00, 0.00)
    ScepticalSerum Creatinine3Rank2 (1, 3)2 (1, 3)1 (1, 3)
    10.100.210.69
    20.480.360.16
    30.42 (0.00, 1.00)0.43 (0.00, 1.00)0.15 (0.00, 1.00)
    ScepticalProteinuria5Rank3 (1, 5)3 (1, 5)4 (1, 5)4 (1, 5)3 (1, 5)
    10.150.290.130.170.26
    20.320.160.160.170.19
    30.330.140.200.160.18
    40.170.170.250.220.19
    50.03 (0.00, 1.00)0.25 (0.00, 1.00)0.27 (0.00, 1.00)0.27 (0.00, 1.00)0.18 (0.00, 1.00)
    • Agent in columns is ranked; rank in rows indicates the probability for a rank; rank is a comprehensive measure. Outcome: serum creatinine < 132 µmol/l; or proteinuria < 0.5 g/day. Model convergence: empirical measures for chain convergence were excellent; Gelman-Rubin statistic R = 1.00 for each node consistently. The model converged. sCr: serum creatinine; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; Pred: prednisone alone; CYC: cyclophosphamide; Tac: tacrolimus; AZA: azathioprine.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    Data Supplement

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Data Supplement
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunosuppressive Therapies for the Induction Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Immunosuppressive Therapies for the Induction Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis
Simon Yu Tian, Brian M. Feldman, Joseph Beyene, Patrick E. Brown, Elizabeth M. Uleryk, Earl D. Silverman
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2014, 41 (10) 1998-2007; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Immunosuppressive Therapies for the Induction Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis
Simon Yu Tian, Brian M. Feldman, Joseph Beyene, Patrick E. Brown, Elizabeth M. Uleryk, Earl D. Silverman
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2014, 41 (10) 1998-2007; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140050
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ONLINE SUPPLEMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
LUPUS NEPHRITIS
METAANALYSIS
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS
DRUG THERAPY
CLINICAL TRIALS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Vasculitis: What Have We Learned in the Last 50 Years?
  • Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)–associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies
  • Baseline Disease Activity Predicts Achievement of cDAPSA Treatment Targets With Apremilast: Phase III Results in DMARD-naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • lupus nephritis
  • metaanalysis
  • immunosuppressive agents
  • DRUG THERAPY
  • clinical trials

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire