Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Bone Mineral Density Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 5-year Followup Study

Tracy Y. Zhu, James F. Griffith, Sze-Ki Au, Xiao-Lin Tang, Anthony W. Kwok, Ping-Chung Leung, Edmund K. Li and Lai-Shan Tam
The Journal of Rheumatology October 2014, 41 (10) 1990-1997; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131190
Tracy Y. Zhu
From the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics; Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology; and The Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James F. Griffith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sze-Ki Au
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-Lin Tang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony W. Kwok
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ping-Chung Leung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmund K. Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lai-Shan Tam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lstam@cuhk.edu.hk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Percentage changes of bone mineral density over followup period in subgroups of patients according to use of glucocorticoid (GC) during followup (GC+: user, GC−: non-user) and disease flare during followup (panel A, flare+: patients with flare, flare−: patients with no flare), and use of antiosteoporosis therapies (AOT) for ≥ 24 months (panel B, AOT+: user, AOT−: non-user). Bars represent mean percentage change over followup period and error bars represent the standard error of mean. Grey bars: users of GC with disease flare/use of AOT; white bars: nonusers of GC with disease flare/use of AOT; dotted bars: users of GC without disease flare/use of AOT; striped bars: nonusers of GC without disease flare/use of AOT. All p values were derived from between-group comparisons by ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline demographic and characteristics of participants.

    VariablesParticipants, n = 125
    Age, yrs46.5 ± 10.1
    Body height, m1.56 ± 0.06
    Body weight, kg53.7 ± 9.0
    Body mass index, kg/m222.1 ± 3.5
    Postmenopausal, no. (%)79 (63.2)
      Age of menopause, yrs45 (41, 49)
      Duration of menopause, yrs5.7 (2.2, 9.8)
    Current drinker, no. (%)0
    Current smoker, no. (%)2 (1.6)
    History of fragility fracture, no. (%)6 (4.8)
    Disease duration, yrs10.4 (5.4, 16.0)
    SELENA-SLEDAI score1 (0, 3.5)
    SDI score1 (0, 1)
    Lupus nephritis, no. (%)76 (61.3)
    25[OH]D, μg/l17.9 (14.2, 21.3)
    Baseline BMD, g/cm2
      Femoral neck0.668 ± 0.105
      Total hip0.802 ± 0.128
      Lumbar spine0.866 ± 0.149
    • Results are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated. SELENA-SLEDAI: the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus, National Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index; SDI: the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index; 25[OH]D: 25-hydroxy Vitamin D; BMD: bone mineral density.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Treatment variables during followup.

    VariablesAll Patients, n = 125
    Hydroxychloroquine, ≥ 3 mos
      Current user55 (44.0)
      Ever user14 (11.2)
    Other immunosuppressants*, ≥ 3 mos
      Current user29 (23.2)
      Ever user17 (13.6)
    Oral glucocorticoids ≥ 3 mos
      Current user86 (68.8)
      Ever user7 (5.6)
      User of ≥ 7.5 mg for ≥ 3 mos52 (41.6)
      Cumulative dose#, g9.6 ± 4.3
      Cumulative duration of use#, mos55.2 ± 10.3
    Intravenous methylprednisolone
      Ever user6 (4.8)
    Antiosteoporosis therapies
      Bisphosphonates
        Current user17 (13.6)
        Ever user19 (15.2)
        Use for ≥ 24 mos20 (16)
      Hormone replacement therapy, ≥ 24 mos
        Current user1 (0.8)
        Ever user1 (0.8)
    Calcium supplement
      Current user89 (71.2)
      Ever user10 (8)
    Vitamin D supplement
      Current user78 (62.4)
      Ever user8 (6.4)
    • Results are mean ± SD or number (percentage).

    • ↵* Includes azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, and leflunomide.

    • ↵# Among patients who used oral glucocorticoids and in prednisolone-equivalent dose.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Bone mineral density variables at baseline and followup.

    VariablesBaselineFemoral Neck FollowuppBaselineTotal Hip FollowuppBaselineLumbar Spine Followupp
    BMD, g/cm20.668 ± 0.1050.652 ± 0.109< 0.0001*0.802 ± 0.1280.790 ± 0.131< 0.0005*0.866 ± 0.1490.858 ± 0.1480.128
    T score−1.08 ± 1.16−1.25 ± 1.19< 0.0001*−0.79 ± 1.19−0.91 ± 1.22< 0.0005*−1.15 ± 1.41−1.22 ± 1.400.183
    Low bone mass57 (46.3)66 (54.1)0.07844 (35.2)52 (41.6)0.06448 (38.4)53 (42.4)0.383
    Osteoporosis10 (8.1)14 (11.5)0.21910 (8)9 (7.2)1.00019 (15.2)18 (14.4)1.000
    • Results are mean ± SD or n (%).

    • ↵* Statistically significant. BMD: bone mineral density.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Percentage changes of bone mineral density over followup period by menstrual status, disease flare, new organ damage, use of glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine, immunosuppressants, and antiosteoporosis therapies.

    VariablesFemoral NeckTotal HipLumbar Spine
    Menstrual status at baseline
      Postmenopausal, n = 79−2.31 ± 5.10−1.40 ± 4.58−0.55 ± 6.84
      Premenopausal, n = 46−2.57 ± 6.38−2.00 ± 5.91−0.74 ± 8.15
      p0.8010.5530.893
    Transitional menstrual status during followup
      Yes, n = 16−5.80 ± 6.13−5.26 ± 5.23−5.38 ± 6.06
      No, n = 109−1.89 ± 5.36−1.08 ± 4.880.08 ± 7.24
      p0.009*0.002*0.005*
    Flare during followup
      Yes, n = 44−3.48 ± 5.47−3.44 ± 4.75−3.10 ± 6.35
      No, n = 81−1.80 ± 5.61−0.60 ± 5.040.72 ± 7.49
      p0.1120.003*0.005*
    New organ damage
      Yes, n = 41−4.22 ± 5.35−3.30 ± 4.83−1.84 ± 7.09
      No, n = 84−1.55 ± 5.53−0.84 ± 5.06−0.03 ± 7.39
      p0.013*0.012*0.194
    New renal damage
      New renal damage, n = 10−8.03 ± 4.02−6.10 ± 3.90−5.16 ± 5.00
      New other damage, n = 31−2.91 ± 5.17−2.34 ± 4.80−0.77 ± 7.39
      p **0.031*0.1180.293
    Hydroxychloroquine
      Yes, n = 68−2.29 ± 5.25−1.88 ± 4.91−0.44 ± 7.11
      No, n = 56−2.55 ± 6.05−1.31 ± 5.36−0.85 ± 7.61
      p0.7980.5400.756
    Immunosuppressants
      Yes, n = 46−2.79 ± 6.55−2.59 ± 6.06−1.20 ± 8.32
      No, n = 79−2.18 ± 4.99−1.06 ± 4.40−0.29 ± 6.69
      p0.5680.1120.503
    Oral glucocorticoids
      Yes, n = 93−2.73 ± 5.90−2.13 ± 5.31−1.47 ± 7.55
      No, n = 32−1.50 ± 4.61−0.21 ± 4.241.83 ± 6.03
      p0.2890.0670.027*
    Daily oral glucocorticoids ≥ 7.5 mg for ≥ 3 mos
      Yes, n = 52−3.34 ± 5.51−3.35 ± 4.75−2.82 ± 7.09
      No, n = 41−1.93 ± 6.35−0.54 ± 5.620.25 ± 7.86
      p0.2650.012*0.051
    Antiosteoporosis therapies
      Yes, n = 220.33 ± 5.671.93 ± 5.344.41 ± 7.51
      No, n = 103−2.97 ± 5.43−2.37 ± 4.75−1.70 ± 6.84
      p0.013*< 0.0005*< 0.0005*
    • Results are mean ± SD.

    • ↵* Statistically significant difference.

    • ↵** p value was Bonferroni-adjusted.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Multivariate linear regression analyses with percentage changes of bone mineral density over followup period as dependent variables.

    Characteristicβ (95% CI)p
    Femoral neck
      Transitional menstrual status−0.460 (−1.632, 0.712)0.439
      New organ damage−2.417 (−4.526, −0.308)0.025*
      Antiosteoporosis therapies3.397 (0.797, 5.996)0.011*
    Total hip
      Transitional menstrual status−0.526 (−1.570, 0.517)0.319
      Flare during followup−1.262 (−3.662, 1.138)0.300
      New organ damage−1.667 (−3.607, 0.274)0.092
      Daily oral glucocorticoids ≥ 7.5 mg for ≥ 3 mos−0.614 (−3.406, 2.178)0.664
      Cumulative dose of glucocorticoids−0.073 (−0.286, 0.141)0.502
      Antiosteoporosis therapies3.729 (1.389, 6.070)0.002*
    Lumbar spine
      Transitional menstrual status−1.808 (−3.259, −0.357)0.015*
      25[OH]D level0.116 (−0.021, 0.254)0.097
      Flare during followup−1.342 (−4.390, 1.584)0.385
      Oral glucocorticoids−6.307 (−14.197, 1.584)0.116
      Cumulative dose of glucocorticoids−0.432 (−0.887, 0.022)0.062
      Cumulative duration of glucocorticoids0.150 (−0.010, 0.310)0.065
      Antiosteoporosis therapies6.048 (2.796, 9.301)< 0.0005*
    • ↵* Statistically significant. 25[OH]D: 25-hydroxy Vitamin D.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bone Mineral Density Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 5-year Followup Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bone Mineral Density Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 5-year Followup Study
Tracy Y. Zhu, James F. Griffith, Sze-Ki Au, Xiao-Lin Tang, Anthony W. Kwok, Ping-Chung Leung, Edmund K. Li, Lai-Shan Tam
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2014, 41 (10) 1990-1997; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131190

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Bone Mineral Density Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 5-year Followup Study
Tracy Y. Zhu, James F. Griffith, Sze-Ki Au, Xiao-Lin Tang, Anthony W. Kwok, Ping-Chung Leung, Edmund K. Li, Lai-Shan Tam
The Journal of Rheumatology Oct 2014, 41 (10) 1990-1997; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131190
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
BONE MINERAL DENSITY
ORGAN DAMAGE
GLUCOCORTICOIDS

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Vasculitis: What Have We Learned in the Last 50 Years?
  • Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)–associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies
  • Effectiveness of 6-month Use of Secukinumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • BONE MINERAL DENSITY
  • ORGAN DAMAGE
  • glucocorticoids

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire