Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 11

Item Response Theory, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of Physical Function

James F. Fries, James Witter, Matthias Rose, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna and Esi Morgan-DeWitt
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2014, 41 (1) 153-158; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130813
James F. Fries
From the Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA; Medical School Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Witter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Rose
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Cella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: d-cella{at}northwestern.edu
Dinesh Khanna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esi Morgan-DeWitt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires record health information directly from research participants because observers may not accurately represent the patient perspective. Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a US National Institutes of Health cooperative group charged with bringing PRO to a new level of precision and standardization across diseases by item development and use of item response theory (IRT).

Methods. With IRT methods, improved items are calibrated on an underlying concept to form an item bank for a “domain” such as physical function (PF). The most informative items can be combined to construct efficient “instruments” such as 10-item or 20-item PF static forms. Each item is calibrated on the basis of the probability that a given person will respond at a given level, and the ability of the item to discriminate people from one another. Tailored forms may cover any desired level of the domain being measured. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) selects the best items to sharpen the estimate of a person’s functional ability, based on prior responses to earlier questions. PROMIS item banks have been improved with experience from several thousand items, and are calibrated on over 21,000 respondents.

Results. In areas tested to date, PROMIS PF instruments are superior or equal to Health Assessment Questionnaire and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Survey legacy instruments in clarity, translatability, patient importance, reliability, and sensitivity to change.

Conclusion. Precise measures, such as PROMIS, efficiently incorporate patient self-report of health into research, potentially reducing research cost by lowering sample size requirements. The advent of routine IRT applications has the potential to transform PRO measurement.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
  • COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING
  • PROMIS
  • PHYSICAL FUNCTION
  • DISABILITY

Footnotes

  • Supported under the PROMIS-Initiative funded by NIAMS, with multiple grants to the listed institutions and others to support development of improved patient-reported outcomes items, instruments, and applications.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 41, Issue 1
1 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Item Response Theory, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of Physical Function
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Item Response Theory, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of Physical Function
James F. Fries, James Witter, Matthias Rose, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna, Esi Morgan-DeWitt
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2014, 41 (1) 153-158; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130813

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Item Response Theory, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of Physical Function
James F. Fries, James Witter, Matthias Rose, David Cella, Dinesh Khanna, Esi Morgan-DeWitt
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2014, 41 (1) 153-158; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130813
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING
PROMIS
PHYSICAL FUNCTION
DISABILITY

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

OMERACT 11

  • Updating the OMERACT Filter at OMERACT 11
  • Updating the OMERACT Filter: Core Areas as a Basis for Defining Core Outcome Sets
  • How to Choose Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT 11 Approves Filter 2.0
Show more OMERACT 11

Methods

  • Worker Productivity Outcome Measures: OMERACT Filter Evidence and Agenda for Future Research
  • What Has Been the Effect on Trial Outcome Assessments of a Decade of Patient Participation in OMERACT?
Show more Methods

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
  • COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING
  • PROMIS
  • PHYSICAL FUNCTION
  • DISABILITY

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire