Abstract
Objective. Previous studies suggested a role for the death decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) in the pathogenesis of adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated the role of DcR3 in juvenile-onset SLE, to identify polymorphisms that might alter the function of this protein.
Methods. DcR3 was measured in the serum of 61 patients with juvenile SLE. The coding region of the DcR3 gene was sequenced in 100 juvenile and 103 adult patients with SLE, together with 500 healthy controls.
Results. DcR3 was elevated in the serum of juvenile patients with active SLE disease (440.8 ± 169.1 pg/ml), compared to patients with inactive disease (122.6 ± 28.05 pg/ml; p = 0.0014) and controls (69.27 ± 20.23 pg/ml; p = 0.0009). DNA sequencing identified 2 novel missense mutations: c.C167T (p.T56I) in an adult SLE patient and c.C364T (p.H122Y) in a juvenile patient. Recombinant proteins containing these mutations exhibited altered binding kinetics to FasL and they significantly increased lymphocyte proliferation, compared to the wild-type protein (p < 0.05). The adult patient with SLE carrying the p.T56I mutation had significantly increased lymphocyte proliferation compared to 3 SLE controls matched for age, sex, and disease severity.
Conclusion. DcR3 may play an etiologic role in SLE through either elevated serum levels of wild-type DcR3 or normal levels of gain-of-function DcR3 proteins that increase lymphocyte proliferation.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disorder with aberrant autoantibody production leading to abnormalities in multiple organs. Many genes have been found to play roles in pathogenesis1, but these do not fully account for the pathogenesis, indicating that other, unidentified genes or other factors are likely to be involved.
Death decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) is member 6B of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF6B). It is a secreted molecule, lacking a transmembrane domain2, and it functions as a decoy, by neutralizing the biological effects of at least 3 members of the TNF superfamily, including FasL2, TL1A3, and LIGHT4. These ligands can, among other effects, induce apoptosis in various cell types3,5,6; thus one important role of DcR3 is to prevent cell death under certain circumstances. DcR3 is expressed by various tumors2,7, providing one possible mechanism for such tumors to escape immune surveillance. In addition, DcR3 is secreted by activated T cells8 to suppress activation-induced cell death (AICD) in T cells2,9. DcR3 also stimulates lymphocyte proliferation9,10,11, thereby fine-tuning homeostasis of T cell expansion.
Several lines of evidence suggest a pathogenic role of DcR3 in SLE. For example, transgenic mice expressing human DcR3 exhibited an SLE-like syndrome12, and adult patients with SLE had increased serum DcR3 levels, compared to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls9,13. DcR3 can enhance proliferation and inhibit AICD in T cells2,9,11, and T cells from patients with SLE had enhanced reactivity to DcR3 stimulation compared to those from healthy controls9.
While there are some similarities in the symptoms of adult SLE and juvenile-onset SLE, the patterns of disease and organ involvement are quite different14,15,16. Juvenile patients usually have more severe and frequent renal, hematologic, and central nervous system involvement, while adult patients more commonly present with arthritis, photosensitivity, and discoid rash17. Thus, it is possible that the genes and associated pathways involved in the pathogenesis of both SLE types might be different.
The aim of our study was to investigate the role of DcR3 in juvenile-onset SLE and to identify polymorphisms that may alter the function of this protein. While we identified significantly elevated levels of this molecule in the sera of patients with active (but not inactive) disease, we also found 2 missense mutations in the DcR3 gene of 2 patients. Moreover, recombinant proteins containing these mutations altered binding affinity for FasL and significantly enhanced lymphocyte proliferation. These novel data point to gain-of-function mutations in DcR3 that have significant roles in disease pathogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and controls
We collected blood samples of 100 juvenile and 103 adult patients with SLE. Juvenile-onset SLE is defined by age at diagnosis < 16 years. Sera samples were collected from 61 of these 100 patients and 28 healthy controls matched for age and ethnicity. The mean age of these 61 patients was 11.1 years when they were first diagnosed and 14.8 years when their sera samples were taken. The SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) of each patient was measured at the time of serum collection. Patients with SLEDAI scores ≥ 10 and < 10 were classified as active (n = 12, all females) and inactive SLE (n = 49, 44 females and 5 males), respectively. Clinical manifestations of these 61 patients are summarized in the Appendix. Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes of 203 SLE patients and 500 healthy controls using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen).
These patients had been treated in accord with standard guidelines18,19,20. Informed consent was obtained from each patient and control, and this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University.
ELISA for serum DcR3 levels
Sera from 61 juvenile patients with SLE (56 females, 5 males) and 28 unaffected controls matched for age and ethnicity (17 females, 11 males) were analyzed for levels of DcR3 using an ELISA kit with lower limit of detection of 7 pg/ml (BMS2031, Bender MedSystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance values were measured at 450 nm using a Biotrak II Plate Reader (Biosciences).
Mutation analysis of DcR3 gene
All coding regions of the DcR3 (TNFRSF6B) gene were amplified by PCR in 203 patients with SLE. Briefly, PCR reactions were carried out in a 20 μl volume containing 50 ng genomic DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxyribo-nucleoside triphosphate, 0.2 mM of each primer, 5% dimethylsulfoxide, and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific). Primers and PCR conditions are shown in Table 1. PCR products were treated with ExoSAPIT according to the manufacturer’s instructions (USP Corp.) and sent for direct sequencing (Macrogen Inc.). Sequence data were analyzed using Sequencher (version 4.2; Gene Codes Corp.).
PCR-restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) to identify DNA mutations
PCR amplification covering nucleotides 167 and 364 (relative to the transcriptional start site of DcR3) was performed in 500 unaffected ethnicity-matched controls. RFLP was performed in a 20 μl volume of PCR products using BanI (New England Biolabs) for c.C167T and RsaI (New England Biolabs) for c.C364T. The resulting products were further analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Protein sequence analysis
For protein sequence comparison, DcR3 orthologs were obtained by searching for the TNFRSF6B gene in all species available from the Ensembl Website (European Bioinformatics Institute-Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute; Website: www.ensembl.org/index.html). The DcR3 protein sequences from 14 vertebrate species were aligned by ClustalX2 software, version 2.0.11. PolyPhen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/) and SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_enst_submit.html) online software was used to predict the possible influence of both missense mutations on protein function.
Cloning, mutagenesis, expression, and purification of DcR3
The pRK5 vector engineered to express DcR3-Fc was kindly provided by Genentech. Two variants of this vector, expressing either the c.C167T or c.C364T mutation, were introduced into the pRK5-wild type DcR3-Fc using the QuikChange Lighting Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Stratagene). Recombinant proteins were obtained in 2 ways. First, plasmids encoding either the wild-type or mutant proteins were transfected into the COS7 cell line with Lipofectamine™2000 reagent, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Second, in experiments designed to obtain stably-transfected cell lines, pRK5-wild-type, -c.C167T, and -c.C364T DcR3-Fc were subcloned to the pIRES2-EGFP expression vector (BD Biosciences, Clonetech) and transfected into COS-1 or COS-7 cells with Lipofectamine™2000 reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Transfection efficiency was determined by measurement of GFP-expressing cells using flow cytometry (Guava EasyCyte Plus; Millipore) and the expression of all transgenes was examined in cell culture supernatants by immunoblotting. For protein purification, cell culture supernatants were dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and applied to HiTrap Protein G HP columns (GE Healthcare). The column was then washed with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and bound proteins were subsequently eluted with 100 mM glycine-HCl buffer, pH 2.7. Each fraction was neutralized with 1.0 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, to preserve protein stability. The purified fractions were dialyzed against phosphate buffered saline (PBS), protein concentrations measured using the Micro BCA Protein Assay according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific), and the proteins were used in further functional analysis experiments.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding assay
Protein binding assays were performed by SPR (Autolab Esprit; Eco Chemie). Experiments were performed at 25°C, using gold-coated SPR sensor chip bearing poly (acrylic acid) brushes at 50% graft density for FasL-FLAG (F4428; Sigma) immobilization, which was performed by an amine coupling reaction. The wild-type, p.T56I, and p.H122Y DcR3-Fc proteins were injected over the sensor chip at concentrations ranging from 10.8 to 346 nM.
Apoptosis assay
Jurkat cells (1 × 106 cells/ml) were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin). They were treated with 7.27 ng/ml FasL-FLAG (F4428; Sigma) and then crosslinked with 0.25 μg/ml anti-FLAG in the absence or presence of the wild-type DcR3-Fc, the DcR3-Fc mutants p.T56I and p.H122Y, and human Fc (10 μg/ml) as a control at 37°C for 16 h. Apoptosis was then determined by AnnexinV/PI staining; lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood using Lymphoprep (Axis-Shield) and apoptosis was performed as described9. Purified lymphocytes (2 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate) were stimulated with 1 μg/ml phytohemagglutinin (PHA) for 24 h and cultured in the presence of 1 ng/ml interleukin 2 (IL-2) for 5 days at 37°C in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. Activated lymphocytes were then restimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3, prepared by coating wells with 1 μg/ml anti-CD3 (MAB100; R&D Systems) in PBS. Cells were then incubated in the absence or presence of wild-type, p.T56I, and p.H122Y DcR3-Fc or human Fc (10 μg/ml) as a control for 16 h. Apoptosis was then determined by AnnexinV/PI staining. Statistical analyses were evaluated by Student t test and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Lymphocyte proliferation assay
Lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood from healthy controls and patients with SLE using Lymphoprep. For the proliferation assay, lymphocytes isolated from 4 healthy controls (2 × 105 cells/well) were cultured for 72 h in 96-well plates precoated with suboptimal anti-CD3 concentrations (50 ng/ml anti-CD3 in PBS; MAB100, R&D Systems) in the presence or absence of the wild-type, p.T56I, and p.H122Y DcR3-Fc. Human Fc (10 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. After 72 h incubation, the cultures were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine (1.0 μCi/well) for 16 h before cell harvesting. [3H]-thymidine incorporation was then measured using a multipurpose scintillation counter (LS6500; Beckman). The value most distant from the mean was considered an outlier and was excluded from the statistical analysis.
A proliferation assay was performed on lymphocytes isolated from an adult patient with SLE who was carrying the c.C167T DcR3 mutation and compared with lymphocytes from 3 SLE controls with wild-type DcR3. Cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were cultured 72 h in 96-well plates with soluble anti-CD3 (MAB100; R&D Systems) at concentrations of 50, 500, and 1000 ng/ml. After 72 h incubation, cultures were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine (1.0 μCi/well) for 16 h before cell harvesting. [3H]-thymidine incorporation was then measured using a multipurpose scintillation counter (LS6500; Beckman). The experiments from each preparation of cells were performed in triplicate.
Statistical analyses
ELISA data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and median. Differences in mean DcR3 levels between SLE groups and unaffected controls were evaluated with a nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank-sum test using Prism 5 (GraphPad software). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In SPR experiments, the protein binding constant values (Kd) indicate best-fit values ± SE, as determined by Kinetic Evaluation V.5.3 (Autolab Esprit software) assuming the monophasic association model. The results of cell apoptosis and lymphocyte proliferation assays were analyzed by a Student t test using Prism 5 (GraphPad software). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Increased levels of DcR3 in juvenile patients with SLE
Previous work has implicated DcR3 in the pathogenesis of adult SLE, and so our first experiments measured levels of this molecule in the sera of patients with juvenile-onset SLE, compared to healthy controls. Levels of DcR3 were increased in serum of 61 juvenile patients with SLE (185.2 ± 42.47 pg/ml) compared to 28 controls (69.27 ± 20.23 pg/ml), but this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1930; Figure 1A). However, when the patient data were analyzed according to disease severity status at the time of serum collection (Figure 1B), it was found that those with active disease had significantly higher serum DcR3 levels (mean 440.8 ± 169.1 pg/ml; median 323.6 pg/ml) than patients with inactive disease (122.6 ± 28.05 pg/ml, median ≤ 7 pg/ml; p = 0.0014) or healthy controls (69.27 ± 20.23 pg/ml, median ≤ 7 pg/ml; p = 0.0009). Of note, 30 of the 61 patient samples analyzed had undetectable serum DcR3 levels (≤ 7 pg/ml), and of these, 29 (96.7%) were from patients with inactive disease. These data show that DcR3 levels are elevated in serum of juvenile patients with SLE, but only in those patients with active disease (Appendix).
DcR3 gene mutations in patients with SLE
We then sequenced the entire coding regions of the DcR3 gene in 203 patients with SLE (100 with juvenile-onset SLE and 103 adult patients). We identified 2 heterozygous missense mutations in 2 unrelated patients with SLE. A c.C364T (p.H122Y) mutation was found in a juvenile patient (Figure 2A), while a c.C167T (p.T56I) mutation was identified in an adult patient (Figure 2C). We then designed an RFLP assay based on these mutations: the c.C364T mutation resulted in the generation of an RsaI restriction site (Figure 2E), whereas the c.C167T mutation destroys a BanI restriction site (Figure 2F). These assays were therefore used to screen 500 healthy control samples for the presence of either of these mutations. While the c.C167T mutation was absent, the c.C364T mutation was detected in 1 of these 500 control DNA samples. These 2 missense mutations have never been reported previously.
The juvenile patient with SLE (Patient 46; in Appendix) presented with generalized petechiae and purpura at 8 years of age. She was followed regularly, with initial diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. At age 16 years, she developed oral ulcers, malar rash, discoid rash, and lupus nephritis. She was also positive for antinuclear antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies. She was in a quiescent disease phase (SLEDAI = 0) when her serum sample was taken and measured for DcR3 levels. Her serum DcR3 level was 172.55 pg/ml, slightly lower than the mean of serum DcR3 levels (185.2 ± 42.47 pg/ml) in juvenile patients with SLE (Figure 1A; Appendix).
The adult patient with SLE was diagnosed with discoid rash lupus erythematosus (DLE) when she was 25 years old. A year later, she had oral ulcers, malar rash, photosensitive skin, and lupus nephritis. Her serum DcR3 was undetectable.
None of the family members of these 2 patients have been diagnosed with SLE. Familial studies indicated that the mutations in both patients were inherited from their mothers, neither of whom had symptoms of SLE.
Effect of mutations on protein structure
The human DcR3 comprises 3 exons (Figure 3A), with the c.C167T and c.C364T mutations located in exon 1. The c.C167T mutation is predicted to result in a change in amino acid 56 from threonine (polar) to isoleucine (nonpolar), whereas the c.C364T mutation is predicted to change amino acid 122 from histidine (polar) to tyrosine (polar). Both these amino acids are located within cysteine-rich regions of DcR3 that are associated with the binding domains for FasL, LIGHT, and TLA1. Database analysis revealed that threonine 56 is conserved across 14 diverse species (Figure 3B), while histidine 122 is conserved in 5 mammalian species (Figure 3C). Modeling software was used to predict the likely consequences of these mutations on the 3D structure and ligand-binding activity of DcR3. PolyPhen predicted that the p.T56I and p.H122Y mutants were “probably” and “possibly” damaging, respectively, while SIFT predicted that the p.T56I and p.H122Y mutants were “deleterious” and “tolerated,” respectively.
Effects of mutations on DcR3 functions
1. Binding affinity to FasL. Recombinant proteins for the wild-type DcR3 and the p.T56I and p.H122Y mutants were generated as Fc chimeras to allow purification. Surface plasmon resonance was then performed to determine the binding affinities for these proteins to FasL (Figure 4). Wild-type DcR3-Fc had a binding constant (Kd) of 128 ± 1.1 nM under these conditions (best-fit value ± SE, number of concentrations = 5, Bmax = 708.6 ± 53.82, R2 = 0.9895). However, the T56I mutant had a 2.4-fold higher binding constant of 52.8 ± 0.3 (best-fit value ± SE, number of concentrations = 5, Bmax = 676.6 ± 26.94, R2 = 0.9911), whereas the H122Y mutant had a 0.7-fold lower binding constant of 176.0 ± 2.5 nM (best-fit value ± SE, number of concentrations = 5, Bmax = 488.0 ± 21.25, R2 = 0.9977).
2. Apoptosis. In view of the altered binding affinity of the mutant DcR3 proteins to FasL, we then investigated their effects on apoptosis of either cultured Jurkat cells or human lymphocytes. Jurkat cells were incubated with FasL-FLAG and then crosslinked with anti-FLAG antibodies to induce apoptosis. Experiments were performed in the absence (control) and presence of increasing concentrations of the wild-type or mutant DcR3-Fc proteins. Wild-type DcR3-Fc proteins blocked FasL-induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner, with 50% inhibition of apoptosis observed at about 125 μg/ml of DcR3 (Figure 5A). However, the mutant proteins had effects on FasL-induced apoptosis very similar to those of the wild-type protein, under these experimental conditions. Similar experiments were then performed measuring activation-induced apoptosis (PHA, IL-2, followed by anti-CD3 ligation) of purified human lymphocytes. Wild-type DcR3-Fc blocked activation-induced apoptosis (Figure 5B), but the mutant proteins were equally effective as the wild-type protein.
3. Lymphocyte proliferation. Reports have shown that DcR3 can induce T cell activation through costimulation9,11. Consequently, purified human T cells were suboptimally stimulated by CD3 ligation and then incubated with the wild-type or mutant DcR3-Fc. Lymphocyte activation was determined by [3H]-thymidine incorporation, and human Fc and anti-CD28 antibodies were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DcR3 proteins were added to these cultures at concentrations of 20 μg/ml (Figure 6A) and 40 μg/ml (Figure 6B). All DcR3 proteins (wild-type and mutant) at both concentrations used were able to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation, in a dose-dependent manner. However, when used at 40 μg/ml, both mutants stimulated significantly greater levels of lymphocyte proliferation compared to the wild-type control, with p = 0.045 and 0.035 for the p.T56I and p.H122Y, respectively (Figure 6B).
Proliferation assays were then performed on lymphocytes isolated from the adult SLE patient carrying the c.C167T DcR3 mutation and compared to lymphocytes from 3 age- and sex-matched SLE controls with similar disease activity. Rates of lymphocyte proliferation (expressed as mean Δcpm ± SD, n = 3) were as follows: adult SLE with mutation, 56,560 ± 8,863, 52,120 ± 4,163, and 54,220 ± 2,087; SLE controls, 24,290 ± 7,232, 25,030 ± 5,942, and 22,270 ± 6,250 after stimulation with 50, 500, and 1000 ng/ml anti-CD3, respectively (Figure 7). The adult SLE patient with the mutation had significantly increased lymphocyte proliferation compared to the other patients, after stimulation with 50 (p = 0.0238), 500 (p = 0.0491), and 1000 (p = 0.0284) ng/ml anti-CD3.
DISCUSSION
We report 3 novel findings. First, we show that serum levels of DcR3 are elevated in juvenile patients with active SLE disease. Second, we have identified 2 novel missense mutations in the DcR3 gene. Third, these mutant forms of DcR3 encode proteins that have altered function with respect to FasL binding and ability to enhance lymphocyte proliferation. These new data add further support for the role of DcR3 in the pathogenesis of SLE.
While previous work has shown elevated DcR3 protein levels in the serum of adult patients with SLE, we investigated whether patients with the juvenile form of this disease also displayed elevated serum levels. Although serum levels of DcR3 were increased in the juvenile patients with SLE (185.2 ± 42.27 pg/ml) compared to controls (69.27 ± 20.23 pg/ml), this difference did not reach statistical significance. This may be due to large variations in serum levels between individuals, particularly in the patient group (Figure 1). However, when we subgrouped the patients into those with active disease (SLEDAI ≥ 10) and those with inactive disease (SLEDAI ≤ 10), a significant difference was observed: in those with active disease, levels were 440.8 ± 169.1 pg/ml, while in those with inactive disease, the value was 185.2 ± 42.27 pg/ml (p = 0.0014). Interestingly, of the 30 patient samples with undetectable DcR3 serum levels, 29 were from patients with inactive disease. These data point to a role for elevated DcR3 levels as a disease activity marker.
In addition to changes in the absolute levels of a particular protein in disease etiology, loss- or gain-of-function, as a result of gene mutation, can also have a profound effect on protein activity and hence a role in pathogenesis. We sequenced the entire coding region of the DcR3 gene in 203 unrelated patients with SLE (100 with juvenile onset disease and 103 with adult SLE). We identified 2 new heterozygous missense mutations in this gene: p.H122Y in a juvenile patient and p.T56I in an adult patient. Both mutations resulted in changes in the polarity of the amino acids in the protein. In the p.T56I mutation, the uncharged (at neutral pH) polar amino acid threonine is substituted for the nonpolar amino acid isoleucine. In the p.H122Y mutant, the polar histidine (slightly positively charged at neutral pH) is substituted by tyrosine (uncharged at neutral pH), which may be modified by phosphorylation. Both these mutations lie in the FasL-binding domain, implying that these substituted amino acids could alter the binding properties of DcR3 toward its ligands, and hence its functional properties. The importance of residues 56 and 122 in DcR3 function is demonstrated by the fact that the former is conserved in all 14 vertebrate species available in the Ensembl database, while the latter residue is conserved in all 5 mammalian species (Figure 3, Table 2). Prediction software predicted that both mutations might result in some functional changes of the protein. Moreover, the c.C167T was absent in all 500 controls. These observations suggest that the mutations might be pathogenic.
We then investigated whether these mutations had any consequences for the function of DcR3. Using SPR, we found that the mutant proteins had altered binding affinity for FasL, one of the 3 known ligands for this decoy receptor. We found that both mutations affected the binding affinity of DcR3, but with opposing effects. The p.T56I mutant displayed increased binding affinity, whereas the p.H122Y mutant had lower binding affinity. Changes in binding affinity may result in dysregulated apoptosis, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of SLE, and is one mechanism that could result in the generation/exposure of self-antigens and autoantibody production21,22,23. Alternatively, lower rates of apoptosis could provide a mechanism for nonresolving inflammation and persistence of activated cells, such as activated T lymphocytes9,24,25. We therefore measured the ability of the wild-type and mutant DcR3 to protect Jurkat cells from FasL-induced apoptosis, or human lymphocytes from activation-induced apoptosis (Figure 5). While we could demonstrate effective, dose-dependent inhibition of apoptosis by recombinant DcR3, we could not identify any significant difference in efficiency of apoptosis protection with either of the mutant proteins, compared to control DcR3.
DcR3 has also been shown to induce T cell activation through costimulation, although the mechanism for this is incompletely defined9,10,11. Thus, our next experiments were designed to determine whether the mutant proteins acted identically to the wild-type DcR3 in this activity. Human lymphocytes were suboptimally stimulated by CD3 ligation and then incubated with the wild-type or mutant DcR3 at 2 different concentrations. These proteins were effective in enhancing T cell proliferation in partially activated T cells, and this effect was dose-dependent (Figure 6). However, at the higher concentration (40 μg/ml), the mutant proteins induced a small but significantly increased rate of lymphocyte proliferation, compared to the wild-type DcR3. Both mutant proteins displayed enhanced proliferative activity, even though binding experiments revealed that the p.T56I mutant had increased affinity for FasL, whereas the p.H122Y mutant had decreased affinity for this ligand (Figure 4). The reasons for this are unknown, but it should be borne in mind that FasL is only 1 of 3 known ligands that bind DcR3, the others being LIGHT and TL1A. While DcR3 has been shown to be effective in blocking FasL-induced apoptosis2,12,26, LIGHT, but not FasL, was found to block DcR3-mediated T cell costimulation9. These observations indicate that DcR3-LIGHT interactions may be responsible for T cell costimulation, perhaps by LIGHT acting as a receptor, transducing intracellular signals, as well as a ligand for DcR3 and other receptors11. In our experiments measuring T cell costimulation (Figure 6), it is therefore likely that DcR3 was interacting with LIGHT to enhance proliferation. In these experiments, both mutant proteins stimulated higher levels of lymphocyte activation than the wild-type protein. Further studies are required to determine the binding affinities of the mutant proteins to LIGHT. Moreover, lymphocyte proliferation in the adult SLE patient with c.C167T (p.T56I) DcR3 was also increased compared to SLE controls with wild-type DcR3, supporting the role of DcR3 in SLE pathogenesis.
There was no detectable link between mutations and the serum levels of DcR3. Our findings suggest that DcR3 could be involved in SLE pathogenesis either quantitatively or qualitatively. Some patients may develop SLE by increased serum levels of wild-type DcR3, or alternatively by a normal serum level of gain-of-function DcR3, which increases lymphocyte proliferation. Therefore, the absence of a correlation between mutations and the serum levels of DcR3 is not unexpected.
There are some SLE patients without DcR3 mutations who are clinically similar to the patient with the C364T mutation in DcR3 (Patients 4, 39, and 45, Appendix). They had some similar clinical observations, including oral ulcers, blood disorder, immunologic disorder, and positive antinuclear antibodies. SLE is a heterogeneous disorder and the molecular processes responsible for pathogenesis in patients with similar clinical manifestations may not be identical. The fact that out of 203 patients we found only 2 with mutations in DcR3 suggests mutant DcR3 is involved in only a small proportion of patients with SLE.
In addition to the detection of these mutations in SLE patients, we also found the p.H122Y allele in 1 out of 500 healthy controls (1/1000 alleles). Further, family studies indicated that the 2 mutant alleles were maternally inherited, but the mothers were not diagnosed with SLE. Therefore, these mutations per se are unlikely to be sufficient to result in the development of SLE. It is likely that other genetic or environmental factors are required for the manifestation of SLE.
Our study represents the first identification of 2 novel mutations in DcR3 that affect lymphocyte proliferation and an association with juvenile-onset and adult SLE.
Acknowledgment
We thank the patients and their families for participating in our study. The pRK5-DcR3-Fc expression vector was kindly provided by Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Appendix
Footnotes
-
Supported by Chulalongkorn University Dutsadi Phiphat Scholarship, Chulalongkorn University Graduate Scholarship to commemorate the 72nd Anniversary of His Majesty the King Bhumibol Adulyadej, the Thailand Research Fund (RTA5380006, RMU5080072), Integrated Innovation Academic Center, Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project (CU56-HR05), the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission (HR1163A); and by Arthritis Research UK.
- Accepted for publication March 26, 2013.