Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Is Vasculopathy Associated with Systemic Sclerosis More Severe in Men?

STYLIANOS T. PANOPOULOS, VASILIKI-KALLIOPI BOURNIA and PETROS P. SFIKAKIS
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2013, 40 (1) 46-51; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120667
STYLIANOS T. PANOPOULOS
From the First Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Laikon Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sty.panopoulos@gmail.com
VASILIKI-KALLIOPI BOURNIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETROS P. SFIKAKIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To identify possible differences in morbidity and mortality between men and women with systemic sclerosis (SSc) by examining a homogeneous cohort at a single academic center.

Methods. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data for all 231 patients of Greek origin with SSc who were examined between 1995 and 2011 in our department (200 women) were recorded in consecutive 3-year intervals from disease onset; data were analyzed retrospectively.

Results. Factors comparable between sexes were age (yrs ± SD) at disease onset (46 ± 15 vs 46 ± 15), diffuse skin involvement (61.3% of men vs 46.4% of women), and anti-Scl-70 antibody positivity (66.6% of men vs 59.2% of women). Also comparable were prevalence of interstitial lung disease, upper or lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement, and echocardiographic findings during the first, second, and third 3-year intervals from disease onset (2904 patient-yrs). In contrast, vasculopathy occurred earlier in men. During the first 3 years digital ulcers developed in 54% of men versus 31% of women (p = 0.036) and renal crisis developed in 17% of men versus 3% of women (p = 0.006). No significant differences regarding social history, smoking, medical history, or disease management were identified. After excluding non-SSc-related deaths, survival was worse in men (p = 0.005, Kaplan-Meier analysis) with significantly lower 6- and 12-year cumulative rates (77.2% and 53.8%, respectively, in men vs 97.3% and 89.2% in women).

Conclusion. Results derived from an unselected SSc population indicate that the disease is more severely expressed in men than in women, a finding that could be related to more rapid development of vasculopathy in men. Studies are warranted in other single-center cohorts to confirm these findings.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS
  • SEX
  • VASCULOPATHY
  • DIGITAL ULCERS
  • RENAL CRISIS
  • SURVIVAL

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an uncommon systemic autoimmune disorder, characterized by fibrosis of the skin and visceral organs, as well as by structural damage and dysfunction of the small vessels1. Disease expression is heterogeneous, in terms of both symptom severity and variability of clinical manifestations. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying fibrosis and vasculopathy may differ and are not well understood, although certain genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors are involved2,3. Also identified as contributing factors are deregulation of cytokine expression, i.e., transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); and aberrant proliferation of fibroblasts and the resultant excessive deposition of various extracellular matrix components, especially collagen type I and III, in skin and internal organs4. Depending on the severity of organ involvement, SSc may substantially affect functional capacity of patients5 and reduce life expectancy6.

Several studies have identified risk factors that determine poor prognosis in SSc7,8,9 such as advanced age at disease onset, diffuse skin involvement, or presence of antitopoisomerase antibodies (Scl-70). Similarly to other autoimmune conditions, SSc has a pronounced female predominance, with a male-to-female ratio varying in different studies between 1:4 to 1:810. However, the effect of sex on disease expression and survival remains unclear. Whether SSc is differently expressed in men and women has recently been readdressed, but data from relevant studies are controversial11,12,13,14,15. Clearly, the low prevalence of SSc, its heterogeneity, and the rarity of the disease among men make it difficult to identify differences in clinical expression between sexes. However, this controversy may also occur because those data from multiethnic cohorts include patients referred to tertiary care centers for severe disease. The men-to-women ratios are almost double (1:4–5) in those cohorts16,17,18,19 compared to homogeneous ethnic cohorts20,21,22,23,24, suggesting a bias associated with the underrepresentation of women with milder forms of SSc.

The aim of our study was to detect possible sex-related differences in mortality and morbidity in a relatively large, homogeneous cohort comprising unselected patients with SSc who received standardized care in the setting of a single university hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For our study we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with a diagnosis of SSc who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology SSc classification criteria25 and the LeRoy and Medsger criteria for the classification of limited (lcSSc) or diffuse (dcSSc) cutaneous SSc26 and who had been examined at our department between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2011. Using these criteria we excluded 4 patients with overlap syndromes or SSc sine scleroderma. After excluding 11 patients of non-Greek origin who were referred to us for severe disease, the medical records of 231 patients with SSc were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as having either dcSSc, when skin thickening extended proximal to the elbows or the knees, or lcSSc, when skin thickening affected the face, the neck, and areas distal to the elbows and the knees26. Additional variables recorded included the following: sex; disease subtype; anti-Scl-70 and anticentromere antibody (ACA) positivity; duration of followup in years; and age at disease onset, defined as date of first symptom other than Raynaud phenomenon (RP).

To detect differences in disease progression over time and survival, clinical manifestations and medications for each patient were recorded in consecutive 3-year intervals from disease onset. Organ involvement was defined according to preestablished criteria. Digital ulcers were defined as denuded areas with loss of epithelialization on the digits of the hands or the feet. Musculoskeletal involvement was identified by the presence of myopathy, articular contractures, arthralgia, or arthritis. Involvement of the upper GI tract was recognized by clinical symptoms such as dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux and was always confirmed by esophageal dilatation in chest computed tomography (CT) and/or endoscopy or esophageal manometry. Involvement of the lower GI tract was recognized by relevant clinical symptoms such as chronic or recurrent diarrhea or constipation that required therapy. Renal crisis was considered if rapidly progressive renal failure, with or without arterial hypertension, occurred that could not be attributed to other causes. Interstitial lung disease was defined by the presence of either fibrosis or ground-glass attenuation in a high-resolution CT scan of the lungs, in the absence of infection or left ventricular failure. Data of lung function tests (forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide) were also recorded. Arrhythmia was defined as the presence of rhythm disturbances in electrocardiography (more commonly premature ventricular contractions, flutter or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and transient atrial fibrillation), thereafter confirmed by 24-h Holter monitoring of cardiac rhythm27. Finally, using echocardiography, the value of 60% was considered a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), whereas a value of 40 mm Hg was set as the limit above which pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) was considered elevated28. The presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was confirmed by right heart catheterization whenever feasible.

For patients who died during hospitalization, causes of death were recorded from the medical charts. For those who died in an outpatient setting, the cause of death was recorded as stated on the death certificate and was crosschecked with the families. In either case, we decided whether death could be attributed to SSc, based on clinical data.

Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS statistical package, version 20.0. The Pearson chi-squared test for qualitative variables and the 2-sample t-test for quantitative data were used for comparisons between female and male groups. Differences were considered significant for values of p < 0.05. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Mantel-Cox test were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

Demographic data and clinical features during disease progression

Overall, 231 patients of Greek origin with SSc were included in our study; the male-to-female ratio was 1:6.6. As shown in Table 1, the age at disease onset was comparable between sexes, whether defined as age at presentation of first symptom other than RP or as age at RP presentation (44.2 ± 15.3 yrs in men vs 43.1 ± 14.4 yrs in women). Ninety-three of 200 women (46.5%) compared to 19 of 31 men (61.5%) had the diffuse SSc subtype, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, no significant differences in serologic markers were found between men and women; the prevalence of both antitopoisomerase (anti-Scl70) and ACA were comparable between sexes (66.7% in men vs 59.3% in women and 9.5% in men vs 22.8% in women, respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Organ involvement (percentage of patients completing followup periods) during disease progression and characteristics of 231 consecutive Greek patients with systemic sclerosis, stratified by sex (2904 patient-yrs).

During followup (2904 patient-yrs), the musculoskeletal symptoms did not differ significantly between sexes, with the exception of contractures that were more frequent in men during the early phase of the disease (p = 0.019 for the first 3-yr interval). As shown in Table 1, men tended to have pulmonary fibrosis more often than women (45.5% in men vs 40.7% in women, 56.2% vs 51.6%, and 75.0% vs 60.7%, during the first, second, and third 3-yr intervals from disease onset, respectively), albeit not reaching significance. Moreover, lung function tests in surviving patients during followup did not differ between sexes (Table 2). Women presented a somewhat higher frequency of upper GI tract involvement than men in the second and third intervals (52.4% vs 37.5%, 61.5% vs 33.3%; findings in esophageal manometry performed in 39 women and 9 men always confirmed the reported symptoms), as well as of lower GI tract involvement (17.5% vs 11.8%, 24.1% vs 14.3%) in the second and third intervals; these differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference between the sexes in the presence of arrhythmias, of LVEF ≤ 60%, or of the prevalence of PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg by ultrasound (right heart catheterization performed in 5 women and 2 men confirmed the presence of PAH in 4 patients).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Mean values (% of predicted ± SD) of forced vital capacity (FVC), total lung capacity (TLC), and diffusion capacity for CO (DLCO) at the third, sixth, and ninth year after disease onset in surviving patients, stratified by sex.

On the other hand, significant sex-related differences were found for features of vasculopathy other than PAH. Analysis of data showed that renal crisis and digital ulcers occurred more frequently in men than women during the first 3 years after disease onset. As shown in Table 1, 17.4% of men presented renal crisis in the first 3 years compared to only 2.9% of women in the same period (p = 0.006). In addition, digital vasculopathy in the first 3 years after disease onset developed in 54.2% of men compared to 31.5% of women (p = 0.036). In the following 3-year intervals, no significant differences between sexes were noted.

Finally, no significant differences were noted between sexes regarding social history, smoking (34.1% of women vs 35.7% of men at disease onset), and medical history of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease and thyroidopathy (data not shown). Moreover, there were no significant differences regarding disease management in men versus women in terms of medications and doses during the 3-year intervals, with the exception of intravenous treatment with iloprost, which was more frequent among men (p = 0.04) during the first 3 years after disease onset. Also, during this period more men than women received bosentan, albeit not to the point of statistical significance.

Survival

During the study period, 35 deaths occurred. After excluding non-SSc-related deaths (5 women and 1 man from cancer, 1 woman from sepsis, and 1 woman from anaphylactic shock), 27 patients (21 women) died from SSc-related causes. Deaths were considered related to renal crisis in 2 men, heart involvement in 7 women, pulmonary fibrosis in 12 women, pulmonary hypertension in 3 patients (2 men), and severe GI tract involvement in 3 patients (2 men). In all 3-year intervals, men had worse survival rates than women (Table 3). As shown in Figure 1, Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the statistical difference in survival between sexes (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.005).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the statistical difference in survival between sexes. Mantel-Cox log-rank test, p = 0.005.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Survival rates (by percentage) in 231 patients with systemic sclerosis (2904 patient-yrs) stratified by sex. No. patients who completed each period of followup are shown in parentheses.

DISCUSSION

Older data from SSc referral centers indicated that the male/female ratio was around 1:4–516,17, whereas clear differences in disease expression and/or progression between sexes were not identified. According to more recent data from several studies of ethnic cohorts21,23,24 and from a global analysis published in 200929, the male/female ratio is considerably lower (1:7–8). This difference suggests that a referral bias may be present in the older studies, due to underrepresentation of women with milder forms of SSc in the examined patient populations. On the other hand, few studies11,12,13,14,15 have attempted to directly address the differences in expression of SSc between men and women, and most of the available data represent circumstantial evidence, or at best, secondary outcomes of trials. Until now, data regarding the effect of sex on the clinical severity of SSc are limited and inconclusive. Existing data are also controversial regarding differences in survival: there are studies reporting similar survival rates between sexes15,30 and studies demonstrating significantly higher mortality in men compared to women with SSc17,31.

Our primary endpoint was to detect possible sex-related differences in the clinical manifestations of SSc, at any stage of the disease course. For that purpose we arbitrarily divided disease progression into consecutive 3-year intervals. We tried to eliminate any relevant confounding factors, such as differences in social background, treatment strategies, or medical history between men and women, by including only Greek patients who received the same standardized care in a single center. The clinical characteristics of patients in our cohort are consistent with a previously published Greek cohort32, with Canadian33 and German registries34, and with other ethnic cohorts8,23,24. Moreover, survival rates in our cohort are comparable with those reported elsewhere7,24,32. Therefore, it seems that our cohort is representative of the general SSc population, not only in our country, possibly permitting extrapolation of our findings to other white patient groups.

We found that musculoskeletal symptoms, pulmonary fibrosis, and GI tract and cardiac involvement were comparably prevalent in both sexes. But renal crisis and digital ulcers occurred significantly earlier in men than women. These results indicate that vasculopathy, one of the 2 main underlying pathophysiologic processes in SSc, develops earlier in men than women, suggesting that the pattern of clinical expression in SSc depends on sex. Moreover, our data also imply that SSc progresses faster and more severely in men than in women. In one study, diagnosis of SSc after RP presentation occurred earlier in men than in women, possibly reflecting more severe expression and more rapid evolution of SSc in men35. Consistent with the proposal that SSc is expressed more aggressively in men is our finding that survival rates in men were significantly lower than in women for all consecutive 3-year intervals.

The first study to search for clinical differences between men and women with SSc was published in 1996 by Simeon, et al11. In that cohort of 91 patients with SSc, prospectively followed for a mean of 5.8 years, men displayed a significantly higher prevalence of myositis and a lower prevalence of arthritis compared to women. In addition, men more frequently presented a nucleolar pattern of antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence, a finding that was significantly associated with myositis in the multiple logistic regression analysis. However, this study did not show significant sex-related survival differences.

Two additional studies published in 201113 and 201014 also reported a significant sex-related variance in the clinical manifestations of SSc. In the first of these studies13, a higher frequency of diffuse skin involvement, lung involvement, and estimated PAH, by echocardiographic finding of PASP > 35 mm Hg, were found among men, and a higher frequency of calcinosis was found among women. In the Canadian study14, diffuse disease subtype and renal crisis were more common in men, who also had a younger age at diagnosis compared to women. Finally, in 2 additional studies presented in abstract form15,36, comparison of clinical expression of SSc between men and women revealed several significant differences. Specifically, myopathy, arrhythmias, and renal failure were more prevalent among men in the first study15, and lung fibrosis, arrhythmias, and diffuse skin involvement were more prevalent among men in the second study36. To our knowledge, an earlier development of digital ulcers in men than in women has not been previously reported.

The limitations of our study should be addressed. Its retrospective design makes it hard to apply strict criteria for the recognition of GI tract involvement or PAH. Not all patients had undergone esophageal manometry and very few had the diagnosis of PAH confirmed by right heart catheterization. In addition, the milder course of vasculopathy in women should have been confirmed by longitudinal capillaroscopic studies. Because capillaroscopy was not routinely performed, while available data in 45 patients did not derive from the same timepoints in the course of the disease, a comparison between men and women is not meaningful.

We conclude that vasculopathy develops earlier in male patients with SSc and that survival in men is worse compared to that in women. The results support the notion that SSc is expressed more severely in men and that male sex is a poor prognostic factor in SSc, which is also the case in systemic lupus erythematosus37. To elucidate the possible mechanisms that underlie the excessive vasculopathy in men with SSc, further study is required of genetic, hormonal, vascular, immunologic, and environmental factors affecting the course of SSc.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Panayiotis Vlachoyiannopoulos for helpful discussions.

  • Accepted for publication September 27, 2012.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tamby MC,
    2. Chanseaud Y,
    3. Guillevin L,
    4. Mouthon L
    . New insights into the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2003;2:152–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Allanore Y,
    2. Boileau C
    . [Genetics and pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis.] Bull Acad Natl Med 2011;195:55–65; discussion 6–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tan FK
    . Systemic sclerosis: The susceptible host (genetics and environment). Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003;29:211–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Usategui A,
    2. del Rey MJ,
    3. Pablos JL
    . Fibroblast abnormalities in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Exp Rev Clin Immunol 2011;7:491–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hudson M,
    2. Thombs BD,
    3. Steele R,
    4. Panopalis P,
    5. Newton E,
    6. Baron M
    . Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:1112–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Karassa FB,
    2. Ioannidis JP
    . Mortality in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26:S85–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tyndall AJ,
    2. Bannert B,
    3. Vonk M,
    4. Airo P,
    5. Cozzi F,
    6. Carreira PE,
    7. et al.
    Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: A study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1809–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Joven BE,
    2. Almodovar R,
    3. Carmona L,
    4. Carreira PE
    . Survival, causes of death, and risk factors associated with mortality in Spanish systemic sclerosis patients: Results from a single university hospital. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010;39:285–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Park SK,
    3. Moon KW,
    4. Lee EY,
    5. Lee YJ,
    6. Song YW,
    7. et al.
    The prognostic factors of systemic sclerosis for survival among Koreans. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:297–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chifflot H,
    2. Fautrel B,
    3. Sordet C,
    4. Chatelus E,
    5. Sibilia J
    . Incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2008;37:223–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Simeon CP,
    2. Castro-Guardiola A,
    3. Fonollosa V,
    4. Armadans L,
    5. Clemente C,
    6. Solans R,
    7. et al.
    Systemic sclerosis in men: clinical and immunological differences. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:910–1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nashid M,
    2. Khanna PP,
    3. Furst DE,
    4. Clements PJ,
    5. Maranian P,
    6. Seibold J,
    7. et al.
    Gender and ethnicity differences in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis — analysis from three large randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology 2011;50:335–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nguyen C,
    2. Berezne A,
    3. Baubet T,
    4. Mestre-Stanislas C,
    5. Rannou F,
    6. Papelard A,
    7. et al.
    Association of gender with clinical expression, quality of life, disability, and depression and anxiety in patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS One 2011;6:e17551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Al-Dhaher FF,
    2. Pope JE,
    3. Ouimet JM
    . Determinants of morbidity and mortality of systemic sclerosis in Canada. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010;39:269–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Joven BE,
    2. Almodovar R,
    3. Carreira PE
    . Gender differences in systemic sclerosis clinical expression and survival [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:395.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Englert H,
    2. Small-McMahon J,
    3. Davis K,
    4. O’Connor H,
    5. Chambers P,
    6. Brooks P
    . Systemic sclerosis prevalence and mortality in Sydney 1974–88. Aust NZ J Med 1999;29:42–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mayes MD,
    2. Lacey JV Jr.,
    3. Beebe-Dimmer J,
    4. Gillespie BW,
    5. Cooper B,
    6. Laing TJ,
    7. et al.
    Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2246–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Medsger TA Jr.,
    2. Masi AT
    . Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Ann Intern Med 1971;74:714–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Steen VD,
    2. Oddis CV,
    3. Conte CG,
    4. Janoski J,
    5. Casterline GZ,
    6. Medsger TA Jr.
    . Incidence of systemic sclerosis in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. A twenty-year study of hospital-diagnosed cases, 1963–1982. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:441–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Alamanos Y,
    2. Tsifetaki N,
    3. Voulgari PV,
    4. Siozos C,
    5. Tsamandouraki K,
    6. Alexiou GA,
    7. et al.
    Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis in northwest Greece 1981 to 2002. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005;34:714–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fan X,
    2. Pope J,
    3. Baron M
    . What is the relationship between disease activity, severity and damage in a large Canadian systemic sclerosis cohort? Results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG). Rheumatol Int 2010;30:1205–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Geirsson AJ,
    2. Steinsson K,
    3. Guthmundsson S,
    4. Sigurthsson V
    . Systemic sclerosis in Iceland. A nationwide epidemiological study. Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:502–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Simeon-Aznar CP,
    2. Fonollosa-Plá V,
    3. Tolosa-Vilella C,
    4. Espinosa-Garriga G,
    5. Ramos-Casals M,
    6. Campillo-Grau M,
    7. et al.
    Registry of the Spanish network for systemic sclerosis: Clinical pattern according to cutaneous subsets and immunological status. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2012;41:789–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Vettori S,
    2. Cuomo G,
    3. Abignano G,
    4. Iudici M,
    5. Valentini G
    . [Survival and death causes in 251 systemic sclerosis patients from a single Italian center.] Reumatismo 2010;62:202–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)
    . Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:581–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. LeRoy EC,
    2. Medsger TA Jr.
    . Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1573–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gialafos E,
    2. Konstantopoulou P,
    3. Voulgari C,
    4. Giavri I,
    5. Panopoulos S,
    6. Vaiopoulos G,
    7. et al.
    Abnormal spatial QRS-T angle, a marker of ventricular repolarisation, predicts serious ventricular arrhythmia in systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012;30:327–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Elias GJ,
    2. Ioannis M,
    3. Theodora P,
    4. Dimitrios PP,
    5. Despoina P,
    6. Kostantinos V,
    7. et al.
    Circulating tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-4 (TIMP-4) in systemic sclerosis patients with elevated pulmonary arterial pressure. Mediators Inflamm 2008;2008:164134.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Coral-Alvarado P,
    2. Pardo AL,
    3. Castano-Rodriguez N,
    4. Rojas-Villarraga A,
    5. Anaya JM
    . Systemic sclerosis: A world wide global analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2009;28:757–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gaultier JB,
    2. Hot A,
    3. Cathebras P,
    4. Grange C,
    5. Ninet J,
    6. Rousset H
    . [Systemic sclerosis in men.] Rev Med Interne 2008;29:181–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hissaria P,
    2. Lester S,
    3. Hakendorf P,
    4. Woodman R,
    5. Patterson K,
    6. Hill C,
    7. et al.
    Survival in scleroderma: Results from the population-based South Australian Register. Intern Med J 2011;41:381–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Vlachoyiannopoulos PG,
    2. Dafni UG,
    3. Pakas I,
    4. Spyropoulou-Vlachou M,
    5. Stavropoulos-Giokas C,
    6. Moutsopoulos HM
    . Systemic scleroderma in Greece: Low mortality and strong linkage with HLA-DRB1*1104 allele. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:359–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Khimdas S,
    2. Harding S,
    3. Bonner A,
    4. Zummer B,
    5. Baron M,
    6. Pope J
    . Associations with digital ulcers in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis: Results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:142–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hunzelmann N,
    2. Genth E,
    3. Krieg T,
    4. Lehmacher W,
    5. Melchers I,
    6. Meurer M,
    7. et al.
    The registry of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma: Frequency of disease subsets and patterns of organ involvement. Rheumatology 2008;47:1185–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hudson M,
    2. Thombs B,
    3. Baron M
    . Time to diagnosis in systemic sclerosis: Is sex a factor? Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:274–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Carreira P,
    2. Carmona L,
    3. Joven BE,
    4. Allanore Y,
    5. Walker U,
    6. Matucci-Cerinic M,
    7. et al.
    Gender differences in early systemic sclerosis patients: A report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research Group (EUSTAR) database [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68 Suppl:96.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Tan TC,
    2. Fang H,
    3. Magder LS,
    4. Petri MA
    . Differences between male and female systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic population. J Rheumatol 2012;39:759–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Vasculopathy Associated with Systemic Sclerosis More Severe in Men?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is Vasculopathy Associated with Systemic Sclerosis More Severe in Men?
STYLIANOS T. PANOPOULOS, VASILIKI-KALLIOPI BOURNIA, PETROS P. SFIKAKIS
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2013, 40 (1) 46-51; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120667

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Is Vasculopathy Associated with Systemic Sclerosis More Severe in Men?
STYLIANOS T. PANOPOULOS, VASILIKI-KALLIOPI BOURNIA, PETROS P. SFIKAKIS
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2013, 40 (1) 46-51; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120667
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Keywords

SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS
SEX
VASCULOPATHY
DIGITAL ULCERS
RENAL CRISIS
SURVIVAL

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Update to a Systematic Review on Quality Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Rural-Dwelling Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization: An Observational Study Using the National Inpatient Sample
  • Correlation Between Interferon Response Gene Score and Disease Activity in Juvenile Dermatomyositis
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • systemic sclerosis
  • SEX
  • vasculopathy
  • digital ulcers
  • RENAL CRISIS
  • survival

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire