Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Preliminary Validation of a Self-reported Screening Questionnaire for Inflammatory Back Pain

STEPHANIE O. KEELING, SUMIT R. MAJUMDAR, BARBARA CONNER-SPADY, MICHELE C. BATTIÉ, LINDA J. CARROLL and WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
The Journal of Rheumatology April 2012, 39 (4) 822-829; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110537
STEPHANIE O. KEELING
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stephanie.keeling{at}ualberta.ca
SUMIT R. MAJUMDAR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARBARA CONNER-SPADY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE C. BATTIÉ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LINDA J. CARROLL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The Calin questionnaire and the 6-item questionnaire with [associated domains].

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Background characteristics of the patients with mechanical and inflammatory back pain. Data are mean ± SD (95% CI).

    CharacteristicIBP, n = 220MBP, n = 66
    Age, yrs39.7 ± 12.6 (38.0–41.4)48.7 ± 15.6 (44.9–52.6)
    Symptom duration, yrs15.3 ± 11.2 (13.8–16.8)12.7 ± 14.4 (9.2–16.3)
    Pain numerical rating scale (0–10)5.8 ± 2.5 (5.3–6.2)6.2 ± 2.3 (5.4–7.0)
    Sex, male:female170:5025:41
    • IBP: inflammatory back pain; MBP: mechanical back pain.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Classification utility of response to IBP domain questions in patients with inflammatory back pain (IBP) (n = 220) or mechanical back pain (MBP) (n = 66).

    DomainCriteriaNo. IBP (%)No. MBP (%)OR (95% CI)pSensitivty, %Specificity, %LR + (95% CI)LR − (95% CI)
    Morning stiffnessCalin199 (90)45 (68)4.42 (2.23–8.78)0.000190321.33 (1.12–1.57)0.30 (0.18–0.51)
    6-item95 (48)*16 (25)*2.80 (1.49–5.25)0.00148751.94 (1.24–3.04)0.69 (0.57–0.84)
    Response to exerciseCalin136 (67)21 (38)3.43 (1.86–6.36)0.000167631.80 (1.26–2.55)0.52 (0.39–0.69)
    6-item116 (53)*20 (30)*2.62 (1.45–4.71)0.00153701.76 (1.19–2.58)0.67 (0.54–0.83)
    Diurnal variation6-item99 (49)*5 (8)10.66 (4.10–27.71)0.000149925.95 (2.54–13.94)0.56 (0.48–0.65)
    Response to rest6-item131 (60)28 (42)2.07 (1.18–3.61)0.01060581.42 (0.69–1.05)0.69 (0.53–0.9)
    Nocturnal pain6-item97 (51)*22 (38)*1.71 (0.93–3.12)0.08051621.35 (0.94–1.92)0.79 (0.62–1.01)
    Age of onset (< 40 yrs)Calin203 (93)45 (70)*5.71 (2.70–27.71)0.000193301.32 (1.12–1.56)0.23 (0.13–0.43)
    Insidious onsetCalin170 (80)48 (76)1.24 (0.63–2.41)0.53480241.05 (0.90–1.22)0.85 (0.51–1.42)
    • ↵* Denominator is not 220 for IBP or 66 for MBP due to missing responses. LR: likelihood ratio positive/negative.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Multivariate logistic regression analysis of inflammatory back pain (IBP) items significant by univariate analysis to determine independent association with IBP.

    CriteriaDomainOR (95% CI)p
    CalinMorning stiffness3.59 (1.57–8.22)0.002
    Age of onset < 40 yrs3.07 (1.17–8.10)0.023
    Response to exercise3.26 (1.70–6.26)0.0001
    6-item questionnaireMorning stiffness0.61 (0.26–1.40)0.243
    Diurnal variation11.18 (3.66–34.16)0.0001
    Response to exercise2.38 (1.21–4.70)0.012
    Response to rest1.99 (1.02–3.87)0.043
    6-item questionnaireMorning stiffness0.80 (0.35–1.82)0.589
    Diurnal variation9.37 (3.11–28.29)0.0001
    Combination “response to rest” + “response to exercise”4.71 (1.57–14.17)0.006
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Classification utility of candidate tools for inflammatory back pain (IBP): (1) additive score, (2) weighted score, (3) “diurnal variation” single item, (4) Calin criteria, and (5) ASAS IBP according to expert criteria.

    ScoreSensitivity, %Specificity, %LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)AUC
    Additive score* ≥ 254905.52 (2.55–11.92)0.51 (0.43–0.60)0.75
    Weighted** ≥ 0.460895.51 (2.57–10.56)0.45 (0.37–0.55)0.77
    Diurnal variation single item49925.95 (2.54–13.94)0.56 (0.48–0.65)0.70
    Calin criteria83421.42 (1.14–1.78)0.41 (0.27–0.62)0.62
    ASAS IBP criteria59661.72 (1.19–2.47)0.62 (0.48–0.79)0.62
    • ↵* Additive tool domains are “diurnal variation,” “response to rest,” “response to exercise” from the 6-item questionnaire.

    • ↵** Weighted score = (0.6 × diurnal variation + 0.24 × response to exercise + 0.16 × response to rest) from the 6-item questionnaire. ASAS: Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society; LR: likelihood ratio positive/negative; AUC: area under the curve analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Classification utility of candidate tools for inflammatory back pain stratified by sex and symptom duration.

    FactorScoring ToolSensitivity, %Specificity, %LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)
    Sex
      MaleAdditive ≥ 255792.64 (1.19–5.82)0.57 (0.49–0.75)
      FemaleAdditive ≥ 2529719.30 (2.74–136.00)0.49 (0.36–0.67)
      MaleWeighted ≥ 0.459752.38 (1.18–4.82)0.54 (0.40–0.73)
      FemaleWeighted ≥ 0.4619722.52 (3.21–157.85)0.40 (0.28–0.58)
      MaleDiurnal variation47792.26 (1.02–5.02)0.67 (0.52–0.86)
      FemaleDiurnal variation54100—*0.46 (0.34–0.62)
    Symptom duration, yrs
      ≥ 6Additive ≥ 254863.89 (1.70–8.89)0.53 (0.43–0.66)
      < 6Additive ≥ 2559613.78 (1.99–95.57)0.47 (0.34–0.64)
      ≥ 6Weighted ≥ 0.459833.52 (1.67–7.40)0.50 (0.39–0.63)
      < 6Weighted ≥ 0.4639615.82 (2.29–109.21)0.38 (0.26–0.56)
      ≥ 6Diurnal variation58895.48 (1.46–20.61)0.47 (0.35–0.64)
      < 6Diurnal variation489612 (1.72–83.67)0.54 (0.41–0.72)
    • ↵* Incalculable (100% specificity). LR: likelihood ratio positive/negative.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 39, Issue 4
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preliminary Validation of a Self-reported Screening Questionnaire for Inflammatory Back Pain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preliminary Validation of a Self-reported Screening Questionnaire for Inflammatory Back Pain
STEPHANIE O. KEELING, SUMIT R. MAJUMDAR, BARBARA CONNER-SPADY, MICHELE C. BATTIÉ, LINDA J. CARROLL, WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2012, 39 (4) 822-829; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Preliminary Validation of a Self-reported Screening Questionnaire for Inflammatory Back Pain
STEPHANIE O. KEELING, SUMIT R. MAJUMDAR, BARBARA CONNER-SPADY, MICHELE C. BATTIÉ, LINDA J. CARROLL, WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2012, 39 (4) 822-829; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110537
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Congruence Between Child Self-Reported and Caregiver-Proxy–Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
  • Comorbidity Development and Mortality During 10 Years of Follow-up in a Danish Nationwide Cohort of 3178 Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire