Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 10: 10th International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Kota Kinabalu, Borneo - May 4–8, 2010

Synovitis and Osteitis Are Very Frequent in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Remission: Results from an MRI Study of 294 Patients in Clinical Remission or Low Disease Activity State

FRÉDÉRIQUE GANDJBAKHCH, PHILIP G. CONAGHAN, BO EJBJERG, ESPEN A. HAAVARDSHOLM, VIOLAINE FOLTZ, ANDREW K. BROWN, UFFE MØLLER DØHN, MARISSA LASSERE, JANE FREESTON, PERNILLE BØYESEN, PAUL BIRD, BRUNO FAUTREL, MERETE LUND HETLAND, PAUL EMERY, PIERRE BOURGEOIS, KIM HØRSLEV-PETERSEN, TORE K. KVIEN, FIONA McQUEEN and MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD
The Journal of Rheumatology September 2011, 38 (9) 2039-2044; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110421
FRÉDÉRIQUE GANDJBAKHCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: frederique.gandjbakhch@psl.aphp.fr
PHILIP G. CONAGHAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BO EJBJERG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ESPEN A. HAAVARDSHOLM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VIOLAINE FOLTZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREW K. BROWN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
UFFE MØLLER DØHN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARISSA LASSERE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JANE FREESTON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PERNILLE BØYESEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAUL BIRD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRUNO FAUTREL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MERETE LUND HETLAND
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAUL EMERY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIERRE BOURGEOIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIM HØRSLEV-PETERSEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORE K. KVIEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FIONA McQUEEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), radiographic progression may occur despite clinical remission. This may be explained by subclinical inflammation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a greater sensitivity than clinical examination and radiography for assessing disease activity. Our objective was to determine the MRI characteristics of RA patients in clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) state.

Methods. Databases from 6 cohorts were collected from 5 international centers. RA patients in clinical remission according to Disease Activity Score28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP < 2.6; n = 213) or LDA-state (2.6 ≤ DAS28-CRP < 3.2; n = 81) with available MRI data were included. MRI were assessed according to the OMERACT RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS).

Results. Patient characteristics: 70% women, median age 55 (interquartile range, IQR 43–63) years, disease duration 2.3 (IQR 0.7–5.1) years, DAS28-CRP 2.2 (IQR 1.8–2.6), Simplified Disease Activity Index, SDAI, 3.9 (IQR 1.9–6.5), Clinical Disease Activity Index, CDAI, 3.1 (IQR 1.5– 5.8), rheumatoid factor/anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity 57%/54%, presence of radiographic erosions: 66%. Wrist and metacarpophalangeal MRI (MCP-MRI) data were available for 287 and 241 patients, respectively. MRI inflammatory activity in wrist and/or MCP joints was observed in the majority [synovitis: 95%, bone edema (osteitis): 35%] of patients. The median (IQR) RAMRIS score was 6 (3–9) for synovitis and 0 (0–2) for osteitis. Synovitis and osteitis were not less frequent in DAS28 clinical remission (synovitis/osteitis 96%/35%) than LDA (91/36). A trend towards lower frequencies of osteitis in patients in SDAI and CDAI remission was observed.

Conclusion. Subclinical inflammation was identified by MRI in the majority of RA patients in clinical remission or LDA state. This may explain structural progression in such patients. Further work is required to understand the place of modern imaging in future remission criteria.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • REMISSION
  • LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE

In the last few years, remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become an achievable therapeutic goal1. It is generally defined as the absence of inflammatory activity based upon clinical criteria. Recent studies have shown that radiographic structural progression may occur despite clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) state2,3,4. Modern imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide the potential to improve the evaluation of disease activity beyond clinical examination5. A recent study has demonstrated that MRI-detected “subclinical inflammation” may be present in LDA patients and is related to subsequent radiographic progression2,6.

The objective of this study was to determine the MRI characteristics of patients with RA in clinical remission or LDA state.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Anonymized databases from 6 different cohorts were collected from 5 centers (Table 1). For the purposes of this combined cohort [Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid arthritis Acceptable Disease Activity State (ORAS) cohort], RA patients (American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria) in clinical remission [defined as Disease Activity Score28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 2.6] or LDA state (defined as 2.6 ≤ DAS28-CRP < 3.2) with available MRI data were included. Patients could be treated by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or biologics. Clinical data [age, sex, disease duration in years, treatment, tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient visual analog scale (VAS) global assessment, physician VAS global assessment] and laboratory tests (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody status) at baseline were collected. DAS28-CRP, the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), proportions of patients in clinical remission (DAS28 < 2.6, CDAI ≤ 2.8, SDAI ≤ 3.3), and LDA state (2.6 ≤ DAS28 < 3.2, 2.8 < CDAI 10, 3.3 < SDAI ≤ 11) for the different composite indices were calculated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of the individual studies.

MRI acquisition and scoring

An overview of MRI acquisition data in the different cohorts is provided in Table 1. MRI of unilateral wrist and/or metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2–5 was acquired. Synovitis, erosion, and osteitis were defined and scored semiquantitatively according to the OMERACT RAMRIS7,8,9,10,11. By adding scores from the individual joint regions, MRI sum scores for synovitis (wrist: 0–9/MCP: 0–12/wrist+MCP: 0–21), osteitis (0–45/0–24/0–69), and bone erosion (0–150/0–80/0–230) were calculated.

Statistical analyses

A single database was compiled from the individual cohort data. Data were then analyzed using SAS software, version 9.1. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Included in the study were 294 RA patients, of which 213 were in clinical remission and 81 in LDA state. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Thirty-nine percent of patients had a disease duration less than 1 year. Clinical disease activity was low, with median (IQR) DAS28-CRP 2.2 (1.8–2.6) (n = 294), SDAI 3.9 (1.9–6.5) (n = 188), and CDAI 3.1 (1.5–5.8) (n = 188). According to DAS28-CRP, 72% and 28% of these patients were in remission and LDA state, respectively. SDAI and CDAI definitions of remission appeared more stringent: Of the 188 patients with data available for calculating both DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI indices, 75%, 47%, and 45% of the patients were in remission and 25%, 49%, and 52% were in LDA but not remission according to DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI, respectively. Four percent and 3% of the patients were in neither LDA nor remission according to CDAI and SDAI, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Characteristics of the patients.

MRI findings

Wrist and MCP-joint MRI data were available for 287 patients and 241 patients, respectively. MRI inflammatory activity was observed in the majority of patients, as synovitis and osteitis were observed in wrist and/or MCP joints in 95% and 35% of the patients, respectively (Table 3). Figure 1 illustrates the frequency of synovitis and osteitis in wrist and MCP joints in patients in clinical remission. The median (IQR) RAMRIS score (total wrist and MCP) for synovitis was 6 (3–9) and for osteitis was 0 (0–2). Synovitis and osteitis were more commonly observed in the wrist (90% and 31%) than MCP (81% and 16%) joints. The second MCP joint was the most frequently involved MCP joint for both synovitis and osteitis (Table 3). Bone erosion was present in 90% of the patients and more frequently observed in wrist (89%) than in MCP (60%) (Table 3).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Frequencies of synovitis, osteitis, and bone erosion in patients with clinical remission (Disease Activity Score 28 < 2.6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

MRI characteristics of patients in clinical remission or low disease activity state according to Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). No statistically significant differences were observed for presence (Fisher’s exact test) or score (Mann-Whitney U test) of any MRI feature.

No difference was observed between MRI characteristics of patients in clinical remission or LDA, regardless of DAS28-CRP (Table 3), CDAI, or SDAI definitions. While no difference was observed for MRI synovitis with regard to the different remission criteria, a tendency for lower frequencies of osteitis was observed when SDAI/CDAI criteria, as compared to DAS28 criteria, were used (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

MRI synovitis and osteitis in RA patients fulfilling different clinical remission criteria (n = 188).

Patients with early RA had significantly lower RAMRIS osteitis and erosion scores than those with established RA: the median (IQR) RAMRIS osteitis score was 0 (0–0) for early RA versus 0 (0–2) for established RA (p < 0.001; Figure 2) and the RAMRIS erosion score 2 (0–5) for early RA versus 11 (7–19) for established RA (p < 0.0001). No differences in synovitis scores were observed.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteitis in patients with early RA and late RA in clinical remission or low disease activity state. MCP: metacarpophalangeal joint; RAMRIS: Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI scoring system.

DISCUSSION

Clinical remission and LDA are considered realistic therapeutic targets in RA, and treatment should be adjusted if these targets are not achieved in individual patients1. Assessments from imaging modalities are currently not part of the criteria for remission and LDA, which are currently defined solely according to clinical criteria. The present data from multiple cohorts demonstrate clearly that MRI inflammation is frequent both in patients in clinical remission and in patients in LDA state. Inflammatory activity was observed in the majority of patients, with synovitis and osteitis in wrist and/or MCP joints in 95% and 35% of the patients, respectively. These results confirm, in a much larger cohort, the results previously reported from one of the included studies6.

MRI showed no significant difference in signs of inflammation when patients in clinical remission were compared with patients with LDA without remission, whatever the criteria used (DAS28, CDAI, SDAI). A tendency towards lower frequencies of MRI osteitis in patients in remission according to SDAI or CDAI compared to DAS28 was observed in both wrist and MCP joints, whereas no difference in frequencies of synovitis was observed whatever the remission criteria employed. SDAI and CDAI remission criteria are often considered more stringent than DAS28 remission criteria, and the observed tendency towards less osteitis in patients in SDAI/CDAI remission supports this notion. The available data also suggest that MRI could be a useful external reference method for different clinical remission criteria.

Osteitis and bone erosion, but not synovitis, were observed less frequently in patients with early RA compared to those with established RA. As osteitis is known to be an independent predictor of subsequent bone erosion12,13,14, one could speculate that clinical remission in established RA is associated with a higher risk of subsequent erosive progression than clinical remission in early RA. However, longitudinal studies of clinical, MRI, and radiographic data are needed to clarify the relative importance of the observed findings.

Recent studies have demonstrated that progression of joint damage may occur in patients in clinical remission2,3,4. Subclinical MRI inflammation may contribute to structural progression, and further multivariate analyses of longitudinal data are required to determine the strongest predictive factors in these patients fulfilling criteria for remission. The aim would be to determine an MRI-acceptable inflammatory disease activity state, where structural progression will not occur.

Our study presents some limitations. Patients from different cohorts having different study designs and using different MRI units were included. To homogenize the data analyzed in the study, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI were recalculated based on the raw clinical data from the original cohorts. The original MRI assessments from the individual cohorts were used in the analyses, as re-reading of all MRI data was not feasible due to the high number of examinations. Nevertheless, most of the readers had previously participated in RAMRIS multireader exercises, which showed satisfactory interreader reliability.

In summary, MRI identified inflammatory activity in the majority of patients in clinical remission or LDA state. MRI showed no differences between patients in clinical remission and LDA, despite a tendency to lower osteitis scores in patients in CDAI and SDAI remission. Further work is required to understand the place of modern imaging in future remission criteria.

Acknowledgment

Physicians, study nurses, and patients who have contributed to the described RA cohorts are acknowledged for their contributions.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smolen JS,
    2. Landewe R,
    3. Breedveld FC,
    4. Dougados M,
    5. Emery P,
    6. Gaujoux-Viala C,
    7. et al.
    EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis;69:964–75.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Brown AK,
    2. Conaghan PG,
    3. Karim Z,
    4. Quinn MA,
    5. Ikeda K,
    6. Peterfy CG,
    7. et al.
    An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:2958–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Molenaar ET,
    2. Voskuyl AE,
    3. Dinant HJ,
    4. Bezemer PD,
    5. Boers M,
    6. Dijkmans BA
    . Progression of radiologic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:36–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rau R
    . Is remission in rheumatoid arthritis associated with radiographic healing? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2006;24 Suppl 43:S-41–4.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Backhaus M,
    2. Burmester GR,
    3. Sandrock D,
    4. Loreck D,
    5. Hess D,
    6. Scholz A,
    7. et al.
    Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:895–904.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brown AK,
    2. Quinn MA,
    3. Karim Z,
    4. Conaghan PG,
    5. Peterfy CG,
    6. Hensor E,
    7. et al.
    Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3761–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Østergaard M,
    2. Peterfy C,
    3. Conaghan P,
    4. McQueen F,
    5. Bird P,
    6. Ejbjerg B,
    7. et al.
    OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1385–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ejbjerg B,
    2. McQueen F,
    3. Lassere M,
    4. Haavardsholm E,
    5. Conaghan P,
    6. O’Connor P,
    7. et al.
    The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the wrist joint. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 1:i23–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Conaghan P,
    2. Bird P,
    3. Ejbjerg B,
    4. O’Connor P,
    5. Peterfy C,
    6. McQueen F,
    7. et al.
    The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 1:i11–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bird P,
    2. Conaghan P,
    3. Ejbjerg B,
    4. McQueen F,
    5. Lassere M,
    6. Peterfy C,
    7. et al.
    The development of the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 1:i8–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Østergaard M,
    2. Edmonds J,
    3. McQueen F,
    4. Peterfy C,
    5. Lassere M,
    6. Ejbjerg B,
    7. et al.
    An introduction to the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 1:i3–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hetland ML,
    2. Ejbjerg BJ,
    3. Hørslev-Petersen K,
    4. Jacobsen S,
    5. Vestergaard A,
    6. Jurik AG,
    7. et al.
    MRI bone oedema is the strongest predictor of subsequent radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a 2 year randomized controlled trial (CIMESTRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:384–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. McQueen FM,
    2. Stewart N,
    3. Crabbe J,
    4. Robinson E,
    5. Yeoman S,
    6. Tan PL,
    7. et al.
    Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:156–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Haavardsholm EA,
    2. Bøyesen P,
    3. Østergaard M,
    4. Schildvold A,
    5. Kvien TK
    . Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 84 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: bone marrow oedema predicts erosive progression. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:794–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 38, Issue 9
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Synovitis and Osteitis Are Very Frequent in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Remission: Results from an MRI Study of 294 Patients in Clinical Remission or Low Disease Activity State
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Synovitis and Osteitis Are Very Frequent in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Remission: Results from an MRI Study of 294 Patients in Clinical Remission or Low Disease Activity State
FRÉDÉRIQUE GANDJBAKHCH, PHILIP G. CONAGHAN, BO EJBJERG, ESPEN A. HAAVARDSHOLM, VIOLAINE FOLTZ, ANDREW K. BROWN, UFFE MØLLER DØHN, MARISSA LASSERE, JANE FREESTON, PERNILLE BØYESEN, PAUL BIRD, BRUNO FAUTREL, MERETE LUND HETLAND, PAUL EMERY, PIERRE BOURGEOIS, KIM HØRSLEV-PETERSEN, TORE K. KVIEN, FIONA McQUEEN, MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2011, 38 (9) 2039-2044; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110421

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Synovitis and Osteitis Are Very Frequent in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Remission: Results from an MRI Study of 294 Patients in Clinical Remission or Low Disease Activity State
FRÉDÉRIQUE GANDJBAKHCH, PHILIP G. CONAGHAN, BO EJBJERG, ESPEN A. HAAVARDSHOLM, VIOLAINE FOLTZ, ANDREW K. BROWN, UFFE MØLLER DØHN, MARISSA LASSERE, JANE FREESTON, PERNILLE BØYESEN, PAUL BIRD, BRUNO FAUTREL, MERETE LUND HETLAND, PAUL EMERY, PIERRE BOURGEOIS, KIM HØRSLEV-PETERSEN, TORE K. KVIEN, FIONA McQUEEN, MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2011, 38 (9) 2039-2044; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110421
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

OMERACT 10: 10th International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Kota Kinabalu, Borneo - May 4–8, 2010

  • OMERACT 10 Sharp Symposium: Important Findings in Examination of Imaging Methods for Measurement of Joint Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials: Emerging Patterns Based on Recent Experience
  • Damage and Progression on Radiographs in Individual Joints: Data from Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials
Show more OMERACT 10: 10th International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Kota Kinabalu, Borneo - May 4–8, 2010

Biomarker and Imaging Outcomes

  • The OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force — Status and Perspectives
  • Update on Research and Future Directions of the OMERACT MRI Inflammatory Arthritis Group
  • Patterns of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis — Which Bones Are Most Frequently Involved and Show the Most Change?
Show more Biomarker and Imaging Outcomes

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire