Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Evaluation of an Inter-Professional Educational Intervention to Improve the Use of Arthritis Best Practices in Primary Care

SYDNEY C. LINEKER, MARY J. BELL and ELIZABETH M. BADLEY
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2011, 38 (5) 931-937; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.101007
SYDNEY C. LINEKER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: slineker@arthritis.ca
MARY J. BELL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELIZABETH M. BADLEY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Recruitment of primary healthcare (PHC) organizations and providers.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Scoring of arthritis best practices for 3 case scenarios [moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA), early and late rheumatoid arthritis (RA)].

    Best PracticesModerate Knee OAEarly RALate RA
    EducationProvided education or educational materials or contacts for further information (e.g., support groups, The Arthritis Society, Arthritis Society help line (1 800 line) or website, Arthritis Self Management Program)111
    Exercise/PTProvided or recommended exercise or physical activity or referred to an exercise program or to a physiotherapist111
    Joint protection/OT/assistive devicesProvided instruction in joint protection or energy conservation techniques or recommended or referred to an occupational therapist. Provided a device or recommended or referred to rehabilitation specialist for assistive devices (e.g., canes, crutches, or walkers to improve ambulation)111
    SW/social supportInquired about or discussed social support and coping strategies, provided or recommended or referred to a social worker/psychologist, psychiatrist, or mental health worker/counselor11
    Weight managementProvided information on maintaining a healthy weight, healthy eating, nutrition, or assessed body mass index/waist circumference/weight1
    AnalgesicsPrescribed or recommended or referred for analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen, glucosamine, capsaicin cream, acupuncture)1
    NSAIDConsidered, prescribed, or referred for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), advancing to higher doses as necessary111
    Intraarticular injectionsConsidered, prescribed, or referred for intraarticular corticosteroids or hyaluronans1
    Rheumatology referralDiscussed or considered or made a referral to an arthritis specialist (rheumatologist, internist)11
    DMARDDiscussed or recommended or prescribed or referred for a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)11
    OrthopedicsDiscussed or considered or made a referral to an orthopedic surgeon11
    Total points878
    • PT: physical therapy; OT: occupational therapy; SW: social worker; NSAID: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; DMARD: disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Total best practices scores at baseline and 6 months post-workshop for early and late RA and moderate knee OA based on discipline (n = 275). Best possible score is 7 for early RA and 8 for late RA and moderate knee OA.

    Discipline (n)Early RA, mean (SD)Late RA, mean (SD)Moderate Knee OA, mean (SD)
    Baseline*6 MonthsBaseline*6 MonthsBaseline*6 Months
    Physicians (60)2.90 (1.62)3.13 (1.85)3.32 (1.42)3.60 (2.02)3.71 (1.98)3.93 (2.16)
    Nurse practitioners (30)3.27 (1.74)4.17 (1.70)**3.43 (1.65)4.69 (1.67)**3.50 (1.70)4.76 (1.64)**
    Rehabilitation therapists (61)2.74 (1.30)3.31 (1.38)**2.10 (1.13)2.48 (1.10)**3.11 (1.49)3.58 (1.60)**
    Nursing (84)1.75 (1.65)2.12 (1.80)1.33 (1.43)1.61 (1.54)2.02 (1.74)2.24 (1.96)
    Other (36)0.86 (1.25)0.97 (1.32)0.78 (1.05)0.78 (1.12)1.22 (1.40)1.28 (1.50)
      Total scores2.28 (1.71)2.69 (1.89)**2.11 (1.65)2.47 (1.95)**2.71 (1.90)3.06 (2.13)**
    • ↵* p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test, comparing scores by discipline at baseline.

    • ↵** p < 0.05, ANOVA, comparing baseline and 6 month scores, controlling for baseline scores.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Percentage (number) of providers recommending specific interventions at baseline and 6 months for 3 case scenarios (n = 275).

    InterventionEarly RALate RAModerate Knee OA
    Baseline6 MonthsBaseline6 MonthsBaseline6 Months
    Education31.0 (84)48.7 (132)*32.1 (86)50.4 (135)*22.2 (60)41.9 (113)*
    PT/exercise58.3 (158)57.6 (156)57.1 (153)53.4 (143)66.3 (179)66.3 (179)
    OT/joint protection/energy conservation38.0 (103)45.0 (122)*45.5 (122)54.1 (145)*30.4 (82)35.6 (96)
    Weight management/healthy eating————4.4 (12)17.4 (47)*
    SW/social support23.3 (63)34.0 (92)*47.4 (127)56.0 (150)*——
    Analgesics————24.8 (67)27.4 (74)
    NSAID27.3 (74)19.2 (52)*18.3 (49)13.1 (35)*25.2 (68)20.4 (55)
    Intraarticular injections————12.2 (33)15.9 (43)
    DMARD7.4 (20)9.6 (26)11.9 (32)15.7 (42)*——
    Referral to rheumatology43.2 (117)54.6 (148)*53.7 (144)59.7 (160)——
    Referral to orthopedics——2.2 (6)3.4 (9)22.6 (61)21.9 (59)
    • ↵* p < 0.05, McNemar’s test. PT: physical therapy, OT: occupational therapy; SW: social worker; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; OA: osteoarthritis; NSAID: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; DMARD: disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Comparison of providers at baseline and at 6 months followup: satisfaction, confidence, and perceived barriers.

    CharacteristicsNo.Baseline, mean (SD)6 Months, mean (SD)p
    Satisfaction with ability to deliver arthritis care†2214.9 (2.2)6.3 (1.8)< 0.01*
    Confidence†
      Musculoskeletal examination (GP, PT, OT, NP, nurses only)1895.4 (2.5)6.3 (2.4)< 0.01*
      Intraarticular injection (GP only)515.4 (3.3)5.9 (3.2)0.05*
      Initiating DMARD (GP only)513.1 (2.3)3.8 (2.3)0.03*
      NSAID (GP, NP only)718.2 (1.5)8.5 (1.4)0.02*
      Arthritis management (all)2636.2 (2.5)7.1 (2.2)< 0.01*
    Perception of barriers (1 or more) to
      PT, % (n)77.6 (204)25.1 (66)< 0.01**
      OT, % (n)71.5 (188)29.7 (78)< 0.01**
      SW, % (n)76.4 (201)35.4 (93)< 0.01**
      Rheumatologist91.6 (241)10.3 (27)< 0.01**
    • ↵* Paired t test;

    • ↵** McNemar’s test. GP: general practitioners; PT: physical therapy; OT: occupational therapy; SW: social worker; NP: nurse practitioner.

    • ↵† 10 point numerical rating scale: 1 = not at all confident/satisfied, and 10 = extremely confident/satisfied.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 38, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of an Inter-Professional Educational Intervention to Improve the Use of Arthritis Best Practices in Primary Care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of an Inter-Professional Educational Intervention to Improve the Use of Arthritis Best Practices in Primary Care
SYDNEY C. LINEKER, MARY J. BELL, ELIZABETH M. BADLEY
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2011, 38 (5) 931-937; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.101007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Evaluation of an Inter-Professional Educational Intervention to Improve the Use of Arthritis Best Practices in Primary Care
SYDNEY C. LINEKER, MARY J. BELL, ELIZABETH M. BADLEY
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2011, 38 (5) 931-937; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.101007
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Analysis
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Follow-up Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography of the Carotid Artery in Patients With Takayasu Arteritis: A Retrospective Study
  • Disease Flare of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Patients With Endstage Renal Disease on Dialysis
  • A Practical Guide for Assessment of Skin Burden in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire