Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
EditorialEditorial

Rheumatoid Cachexia: What Is It and Why Is It Important?

ROSY RAJBHANDARY, AZADEH KHEZRI and RICHARD S. PANUSH
The Journal of Rheumatology March 2011, 38 (3) 406-408; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.101036
ROSY RAJBHANDARY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AZADEH KHEZRI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RICHARD S. PANUSH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: panush@usc.edu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Rheumatoid cachexia (RC) is common, probably underappreciated, and incompletely understood. It is important to recognize this, because these patients can often be helped.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease affecting more women than men, with a prevalence of 0.5%–1% in the United States1,2. Nearly two-thirds of patients with RA have a metabolic abnormality accompanied by wasting of muscle mass, with the presence of stable or even increased fat mass3. This is referred to as RC. This condition is seen without any evidence of malabsorption or impaired renal or liver function.

RC was first described by Sir James Paget over 100 years ago. It is derived from the Greek word meaning “bad condition”4. It is a major cause of weight loss and increased mortality and morbidity in patients with RA.

While cachexia generally reflects advanced malnutrition and wasting, we now know that this term more specifically refers to a loss of body cell mass (BCM). BCM is clinically relevant as loss of more than 40% of baseline BCM is associated with death5. With even as little as 5% loss of BCM, there are demonstrable changes in morbidity, including reduced muscle strength, altered energy metabolism, and increased susceptibility to infections6. The average loss of BCM among patients with RA is 13%–15%, about one-third of the maximum survivable loss of BCM3.

Patients with RA have a 2-fold to 5-fold higher mortality rate than the general population because of increased risk of infections2. Thus, RC should be viewed as an important contributor to increased morbidity and premature mortality in RA. Understanding the metabolic abnormalities and mechanisms involved in the development of RC may help to identify potential new therapeutic targets.

Three weight-losing syndromes, associated with different disease states, have been defined. These are cachexia, starvation, and sarcopenia7. In cachexia, lean body mass (LBM) is lost while fat mass tends to be maintained or even increased so that body weight, at least in the early stages, can remain stable. Cachexia, which occurs in the context of a chronic inflammatory response in diseases such as RA, cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cardiac failure, tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic lung disease, is always associated with a poor prognosis and cannot be treated with protein-energy repletion alone. BCM is the most metabolically active component that determines energy expenditure, protein requirements, and the metabolic response to physiological stress. BCM consists primarily of muscle mass, with visceral mass (serum proteins, erythrocytes, granulocytes, lymphocytes, liver, kidneys, pancreas, and heart) and immune cell mass. Fat mass, extracellular water, connective tissue (cartilage, fibrous tissues, and skeletal tissues), and bone account for the remaining components.

The etiology and consequences of loss of BCM can be variable. Frank wasting involves loss of body weight (fat mass) and BCM. This is typically due to inadequate dietary intake. Cachexia, however, refers to loss of BCM without loss of weight; in fact, loss of BCM is at times accompanied by increased fat mass and stable body weight. In patients with RA, these changes predispose to a condition called rheumatoid cachectic obesity8, which, although seemingly contradictory, appears to be a common metabolic consequence of RA.

The exact pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of RC are not fully understood. But several potential mechanisms have been investigated. The etiology is probably multifactorial. It includes excessive cytokine production, physical inactivity, and reduced peripheral insulin action.

The inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) are thought to be centrally involved in the pathogenesis of RA9. Both cytokines are produced primarily by monocytes and macrophages, but they are also produced by a variety of other cells including B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, and skeletal muscle10. Concentrations of TNF and IL-1ß are high in patients with active RA; these substances act by stimulating the release of tissue-destroying matrix metalloproteinases as well as by inhibiting the production of endogenous inhibitors of these metalloproteinases, the net result being joint damage.

Not only are TNF-α and IL-1ß centrally involved in causing joint damage in RA, but these cytokines also exert a powerful influence on whole-body protein and energy metabolism. The so-called sarcoactive (“muscle-active”) cytokines include IL-6, interferon-γ, and transforming growth factor-ß, in addition to TNF-α and IL-1ß. Although the specific mechanism(s) by which TNF-α and IL-1ß exert their catabolic effect is not known, it has been shown that subjects with RA have higher rates of whole-body protein breakdown compared with young and elderly healthy subjects, and TNF-α is thought to stimulate muscle catabolism11.

It has been demonstrated that patients with RA have low physical activity. Many factors contribute to reduced physical activity among patients with RA, including joint pain and stiffness, metabolic changes leading to loss of muscle mass and strength, and simple disuse, perhaps related to general caution regarding physical activity. Physical inactivity is associated with changes in normal physiological processes leading to muscle atrophy and insulin resistance. Lack of effective muscle stimuli decreases the turnover rates of muscle and whole-body proteins with inhibition of protein synthesis. These factors also lead to the initiation and progression of RC12.

Studies have shown that in normal aging there is an association between loss of lean mass and decrease in activity of the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 axis. Therefore it raises the question of whether GH is reduced in patients with RA and whether it may contribute to loss of BCM. Studies have found no differences in the amount of GH between patients with RA and healthy controls. These findings suggest that persistent GH deficiency does not appear to be the cause of RC. However, lower serum IGF-1 levels have been noted in patients with RA; this may contribute to RC13.

Peripheral insulin action is reduced in patients with RA. Insulin acts to inhibit muscle protein degradation, thus making it a potent anabolic hormone. Therefore, decrease in insulin action causes muscle loss in RA14. The etiology of reduced peripheral insulin action in RA is not known, but TNF-α may interfere with insulin receptor signaling and may be a contributing factor15.

Three approaches have been found to be effective: exercise, and dietary and pharmacological interventions.

Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in strength and pain in patients with RA without exacerbating disease activity or joint pain. High-intensity strength training is feasible and safe in patients with well controlled RA16; studies have shown that regular progressive resistance strength training is the best way to improve muscle strength and physical functioning in patients with RA and is one of the best nonpharmacological treatments. It should be routinely prescribed and maintained17.

Patients with RA appeared to have adequate dietary intake in terms of calories and protein. Because the total energy expenditure was reduced in these patients (despite their elevated resting energy expenditure), they were most likely prone to fat accretion over time. Clinicians should not recommend increased caloric intake to patients with RA. Some studies have shown that increased protein intake would be helpful for overcoming the catabolic process in RA, particularly when combined with an exercise intervention18. Many dietary suggestions have been made for RA, ranging from fasting or vegetarianism to supplementation with various fatty acids or protein supplements, but none of these various diets have proven to be effective.

TNF-α has a central role in the pathogenesis of joint inflammation and destruction in RA. RC is thought to have the same pathogenesis as joint inflammation and it would be anticipated that TNF blockers would result in significant improvements in body composition19.

It is known that RC increases morbidity and mortality in patients with RA. It is therefore important to prevent or at least slow the advance of this complication. Available therapeutic methods include increasing physical activity and maintaining a diet adequate in protein and energy. Anti-TNF-α therapy is an intervention that seems to improve RC, but more investigation is needed to prove its efficacy and safety.

Acknowledgment

This work was derived and modified from Bhangle, et al1.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bhangle SD,
    2. Khezri A,
    3. Rajbhandary R,
    4. Sen D,
    5. Panush RS
    . Rheumatoid arthritis and cachexia. Arthritis Self-Management 2010 (in press).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Symmons DP
    . Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: determinants of onset, persistence and outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002;16:707–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Roubenoff R,
    2. Roubenoff RA,
    3. Cannon JG,
    4. Kehayias JJ,
    5. Zhuang H,
    6. Dawson-Hughes B,
    7. et al.
    Rheumatoid cachexia: cytokine-driven hypermetabolism accompanying reduced body cell mass in chronic inflammation. J Clin Invest 1994;93:2379–86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Paget J
    . Nervous mimicry of organic diseases. Lancet 1873;2:727–9.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dewys WD,
    2. Begg C,
    3. Lavin PT,
    4. Band PR,
    5. Bennett JM,
    6. Bertino JR,
    7. et al.
    Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med 1980;69:491–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Roubenoff R,
    2. Kehayias JJ
    . The meaning and measurement of lean body mass. Nutr Rev 1991;46:163–75.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rall LC,
    2. Roubenoff R
    . Rheumatoid cachexia: metabolic abnormalities, mechanisms and interventions. Rheumatology 2004;43:1219–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Walsmith J,
    2. Roubenoff R
    . Cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis. Intern J Cardio 2002;85:89–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Choy EHS,
    2. Panayi GS
    . Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:907–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Koch AE,
    2. Kunkel SL,
    3. Strieter RM
    . Cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. J Invest Med 1995;43:28–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rall LC,
    2. Rosen C,
    3. Dolnikowski G,
    4. Hartman WJ,
    5. Lundgren N,
    6. Abad LW,
    7. et al.
    Protein metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis and aging. Effects of muscle strength training and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1115–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Biolo G,
    2. Ciocchi B,
    3. Stulle M,
    4. Piccoli A,
    5. Lorenzon S,
    6. Dal Mas V,
    7. et al.
    Metabolic consequences of physical inactivity. J Ren Nutr 2005;15:49–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lemmey A,
    2. Maddison P,
    3. Breslin A,
    4. Cassar P,
    5. Hasso N,
    6. McCann R,
    7. et al.
    Association between insulin-like growth factor status and physical activity levels in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:29–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Svenson KL,
    2. Lundqvist G,
    3. Wide L,
    4. Hallgren R
    . Impaired glucose handling in active rheumatoid arthritis: relationship to the secretion of insulin and counter-regulatory hormones. Metabolism 1987;36:940–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yamaguchi K,
    2. Higashiura K,
    3. Ura N,
    4. Murakami H,
    5. Hyakukoku M,
    6. Furuhashi M,
    7. et al.
    The effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on tissue specificity and selectivity to insulin signaling. Hypertens Res 2003;26:389–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Rall LC,
    2. Meydani SN,
    3. Kehayias JJ,
    4. Dawson-Hughes B,
    5. Roubenoff R
    . The effect of progressive resistance training in rheumatoid arthritis: increased strength without changes in energy balance or body composition. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:415–26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bearne L,
    2. Scott D,
    3. Hurley M
    . Exercise can reverse quadriceps sensorimotor dysfunction that is associated with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbating disease activity. Rheumatology 2002;41:157–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Marcora SM,
    2. Chester KR
    . Dietary treatment of rheumatoid cachexia. Clin Nutr 2005;24:442–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Marcora SM,
    2. Chester KR,
    3. Mittal G,
    4. Lemmey AB,
    5. Maddison PJ
    . Randomized phase 2 trial of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for cachexia in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:1463–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 38, Issue 3
1 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rheumatoid Cachexia: What Is It and Why Is It Important?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rheumatoid Cachexia: What Is It and Why Is It Important?
ROSY RAJBHANDARY, AZADEH KHEZRI, RICHARD S. PANUSH
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2011, 38 (3) 406-408; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.101036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Rheumatoid Cachexia: What Is It and Why Is It Important?
ROSY RAJBHANDARY, AZADEH KHEZRI, RICHARD S. PANUSH
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2011, 38 (3) 406-408; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.101036
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgment
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • From Prediction Tools to Precision Medicine in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
  • Optimizing Care for Pregnancy in Rheumatic Diseases: Barriers and Potential Solutions
  • High Frequency of Foot Insufficiency Fractures in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Referred for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Is the Clinical Relevance?
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire