Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
LetterCorrespondence

Caveat on the Interpretation of Metacarpal Head Erosions Seen by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

FRANCESCA BARBIERI, MASSIMILIANO PARODI, GIUSEPPE ZAMPOGNA, FRANCESCO PAPARO and MARCO A. CIMMINO
The Journal of Rheumatology September 2010, 37 (9) 1965-1966; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100212
FRANCESCA BARBIERI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASSIMILIANO PARODI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIUSEPPE ZAMPOGNA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCO PAPARO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCO A. CIMMINO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cimmino@unige.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

To the Editor:

Olech, et al1 recently used extremity-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to highlight hand lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with controls. They noted that the second and third metacarpal heads were more often eroded in RA. Bone lesions, morphologically identical with erosions, were also common in controls at the same locations. A similar observation was made by Tan, et al, who linked it to anatomical causes2. The term “lesion” in MRI studies of the joints encompasses bone edema, erosions, and cysts3. According to the OMERACT definition4, an erosion is a sharply marginated bone lesion, of typical juxtaarticular localization and specific signal characteristics, which is visible on 2 planes with a cortical break in at least 1 plane. There is no definition for MRI cyst, but this could possibly correspond to lesions without cortical break, even if their location is central.

Our experience is in agreement that metacarpal heads are a common location of both erosions and cysts. Much attention should be paid to this differential diagnosis by MRI in consideration of their different prognoses. We have recently seen 3 patients with early, undifferentiated arthritis. Two men and a woman complained of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) pain for 2 to 6 months. MRI disclosed large lesions of the third MCP heads. This finding suggested a diagnosis of rapidly progressive, erosive arthritis. IgM rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies were negative. Turbo 3D T1-weighed MRI showed lesions with cortical break on 3 planes and hyperintense signal on short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences (Figure 1). Because of the large size of these defects, unusual for patients with early disease, computed tomography (CT) was performed to confirm.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Imaging findings in 2 patients with early arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joints examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; a, b) and computed tomography (CT; c). A large erosion with cortical break is seen on the MRI Turbo 3D sequence (a). On short-tau inversion recovery images (b), the cortical bone seems to be present, although faint. CT (c) clearly shows the cystic nature of the lesions, although in Patient A a thin interruption of the cortical bone is seen (arrow). The first row shows the coronal images, the second row, the axial images.

CT revealed that these lesions were cysts (Figure 1). In patient A, a thin communication (1.5 mm) through the bone cortex was observed. Because of its small size, it was interpreted as an enlargement of a cortical bone channel5. In the other 2 patients, no cortical disruption was seen. CT is superior to MRI in detecting bone lesions because MRI is unable to image bone per se, but can show only the bone marrow inside. Compact bone, such as that of the cyst wall of our patients, is invisible on MRI. STIR sequences, which suppress fat bone marrow, may be superior to other morphological MRI sequences for correctly interpreting cysts. In fact, compact bone, which is deprived of water and fat, appears black (Figure 1). The followup reflected our interpretation: the patients experienced disease remission after a short period of methotrexate treatment, without the onset of new bone lesions.

In general, MRI is a powerful technique to diagnose erosions because of its multiplanar imaging capability. However, in doubtful cases, careful examination of the STIR image and CT, which represents the gold standard, should be considered. Caution should be used in the diagnosis of erosions, especially in the metacarpal heads. Further prospective studies could evaluate whether cysts are a pre-erosive condition.

    REFERENCES

    1. 1.↵
      1. Olech E,
      2. Crues JV 3rd.,
      3. Yocum DE,
      4. Merrill JT
      . Bone marrow edema is the most specific finding for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging of the hands and wrists: a comparison of patients with RA and healthy controls. J Rheumatol 2010;37:265–74.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. 2.↵
      1. Tan AL,
      2. Tanner SF,
      3. Conaghan PG,
      4. Radjenovic A,
      5. O’Connor P,
      6. Brown AK,
      7. et al.
      Role of metacarpophalangeal joint anatomic factors in the distribution of synovitis and bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1214–22.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. 3.↵
      1. Ostergaard M,
      2. Peterfy C,
      3. Conaghan P,
      4. McQueen F,
      5. Bird P,
      6. Ejbjerg B,
      7. et al.
      OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1385–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. 4.↵
      1. Conaghan P,
      2. Bird P,
      3. Ejbjerg B,
      4. O’Connor P,
      5. Peterfy C,
      6. McQueen F,
      7. et al.
      The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 1:i11–21.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. 5.↵
      1. Stach CM,
      2. Bäuerle M,
      3. Englbrecht M,
      4. Kronke G,
      5. Engelke K,
      6. Manger B,
      7. et al.
      Periarticular bone structure in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy individuals assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:330–9.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    The Journal of Rheumatology
    Vol. 37, Issue 9
    1 Sep 2010
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • Index by Author
    • Editorial Board (PDF)
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Caveat on the Interpretation of Metacarpal Head Erosions Seen by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Caveat on the Interpretation of Metacarpal Head Erosions Seen by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    FRANCESCA BARBIERI, MASSIMILIANO PARODI, GIUSEPPE ZAMPOGNA, FRANCESCO PAPARO, MARCO A. CIMMINO
    The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2010, 37 (9) 1965-1966; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100212

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

     Request Permissions

    Share
    Caveat on the Interpretation of Metacarpal Head Erosions Seen by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    FRANCESCA BARBIERI, MASSIMILIANO PARODI, GIUSEPPE ZAMPOGNA, FRANCESCO PAPARO, MARCO A. CIMMINO
    The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2010, 37 (9) 1965-1966; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100212
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One
    Bookmark this article

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • REFERENCES
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • References
    • PDF
    • eLetters

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Dr. Kitajima et al reply
    • Dr. Putman et al reply
    • Drs. Chung and McMahan reply
    Show more Correspondence

    Similar Articles

    Content

    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

    Resources

    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies

    Subscribers

    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions

    More

    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • My Alerts
    • My Folders
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • RSS Feeds
    The Journal of Rheumatology
    The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
    Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
    Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
    Powered by HighWire