Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Nonarticular Tenderness and Functional Status in Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis

REUVEN MADER, IRINA NOVOFASTOVSKI, EHUD ROSNER, MUHAMMAD ADAWI, PAULA HERER and DAN BUSKILA
The Journal of Rheumatology September 2010, 37 (9) 1911-1916; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.091008
REUVEN MADER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Mader_r@clalit.org.il
IRINA NOVOFASTOVSKI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EHUD ROSNER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MUHAMMAD ADAWI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAULA HERER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAN BUSKILA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the degree of nonarticular tenderness and functional status in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). We assessed these variables’ correlation with their clinical, radiographic, and constitutional measurements and with metabolic syndrome (MS).

Methods. Eighty-seven patients with DISH were compared with 65 controls without DISH. Examination of nonarticular tenderness was performed by thumb palpation. Tenderness was scored for the 18 fibromyalgia tender points (TP), and 4 control points. Nonarticular tenderness was expressed by the number of TP and by the total tenderness score (TTS). The Short Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ II) was administered to all participants. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from all patients. Patients were classified as having MS by both the National Cholesterol Education Program and World Health Organization definitions.

Results. There was a statistically significant difference in TTS between controls and patients with DISH. The mean tenderness of many individual TP was significantly higher in the DISH group compared with the control group. TP counts, TTS, and body mass index (BMI) positively correlated with the HAQ II. There was a linear trend in intensity of T-spine bony bridges (BB) and the total number of TP as well as many individual TP. Patients with DISH were more likely to be affected by MS. No correlation was found between TP count, TTS, and MS.

Conclusion. Patients with DISH have a lower pain threshold than patients who do not have DISH. TP count and TTS correlate with the functional status, BMI, waist circumference, and high-grade BB. No correlation was observed between pain threshold and MS.

  • NONARTICULAR TENDERNESS
  • FUNCTIONAL STATUS
  • DIFFUSE IDIOPATHIC SKELETAL HYPEROSTOSIS
  • METABOLIC SYNDROME

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterized by calcification and ossification of soft tissues, mainly ligaments and enthesis. The main pathologic process is within the enthesis, in particular that of the axial skeleton. However, involvement of peripheral joints led researchers to use the name DISH1,2. Because this condition is more prevalent in older individuals, DISH and osteoarthritis (OA) often coexist. Although they have some common clinical features, several manifestations of DISH may distinguish it from primary OA3. However, nonarticular tenderness and functional status have rarely been reported in this group of patients. A single controlled study showed that patients with DISH had a higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score compared with healthy individuals despite similar fibromyalgia (FM) tender point (TP) counts. However, no differences in HAQ score or TP counts were observed between patients with DISH and patients with spondylosis4.

Because of many constitutional and metabolic abnormalities, patients with DISH have often been reported to have metabolic syndrome (MS)5. Recently, the association between chronic pain and MS in women has been reported6.

Our aim was to assess tenderness threshold and functional status in patients with DISH compared to patients with OA. We also investigated the relationships between soft tissue tenderness, functional status, and the degree of vertebral bony bridges (BB) and MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients who fulfilled the Resnick classification criteria for DISH7, and 65 controls with OA (23 with multiple site OA, 20 with large joint OA, 15 with small joint OA, and 7 with spinal OA) and no evidence for DISH were included in the study. Examination of tenderness was performed by thumb palpation, exerting a pressure of about 4 kg. Tenderness was scored for the 18 FM TP8 and 4 control points: the right distal radius, thumb nailbed, dorsal midtarsal, and the forehead. FM TP were numbered from top (occiput) to bottom (knee medial fat pad) with even numbers for the left side and odd numbers for the right side (Table 1). Tenderness was scored as 0 (no pain); 1 (mild, expressed pain but no withdrawal); 2 (moderate, expressed pain plus withdrawal); 3 (severe, immediate exaggerated withdrawal); and 4 (patient untouchable)8. Soft tissue tenderness was expressed by the number of TP, and by the sum of the TP score, called the total tenderness score (TTS). The thoracic spine BB were scored by a single observer as 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. The intensity of the bridges was judged by the thickness of the ossification on antero-posterior or lateral thoracic spine radiographs. By definition, patients without DISH had no spinal bony bridges. The Short HAQ (HAQ II) was administered to all participants9. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data including fasting glucose levels, serum insulin levels (Immulite 2000 Insulin; EURO/DPC Ltd., Llanberis, UK), and serum lipids profile were collected from all patients. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 3 consecutive measurements at 5-minute intervals were recorded.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Mean tenderness of tender points, number of tender points, and tenderness score in relation to the intensity of T-spine bony bridges.

Based on these data, patients were classified as having MS by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP)10 and the World Health Organization (WHO)11,12. Insulin resistance was defined by either diabetes mellitus (DM), fasting glucose ≥ 110 mg/dl, or a homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA) in the top quartile of a nondiabetic population. This last measurement was calculated from the nondiabetic patients from the entire cohort [fasting glucose (mmol/l) × fasting insulin (μU/ml)/22.5].

The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board.

Data analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The relationships between the 2 study groups and categorical data were examined using chi-squared tests or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. The t-test or Mann-Whitney test (where appropriate) were used to compare continuous data between the 2 independent groups. Spearman’s correlations were performed to assess the associations between the variables studied. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The 2 groups had similar ethnic origin makeup, marital status, and number of children. The comparator group was made up of patients with OA. Patients with DISH were significantly more often affected by DM (40.2% vs 12.3%; p = 0.001). The main demographic, constitutional, and laboratory findings are given in Table 2. The upper quartile of the HOMA index in patients without DM was 2.6.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Patient characteristics, and clinical and laboratory values.

There was a statistically significant difference in TTS between controls and patients with DISH and the difference between TTS and total control point score. TP count ≥ 11 was higher in the DISH group, but did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.06). The data regarding soft tissue tenderness are given in Table 3. The mean tenderness of 9 of the 18 individual TP was significantly higher in the DISH group compared with the control group (TP 5–12 and 17; Figure 1). The groups had similar sex distribution; women had increased tenderness compared with men.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Tenderness scores of the individual fibromyalgia tender points in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) versus controls.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Nonarticular tenderness in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) vs patients without DISH.

TP counts, TTS, and body mass index (BMI) positively correlated with the HAQ II (r = 0.62, r = 0.64, r = 0.32, respectively, p < 0.001; Figure 2). The correlation between HAQ II and soft tissue tenderness was maintained after removing the effect of BMI.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Correlations between quality of life (QOL) and body mass index (BMI), number of tender points (TP), and total tenderness score (TTS; Spearman, p < 0.001). QOL was scored by the Short Health Assessment Questionnaire.

There was a linear trend in intensity of T-spine bony bridges and the total number of TP as well as many individual TP (Table 1). This was particularly true for patients with grade 4 bridges (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The number of tender points and the total tenderness score (TTS) in relation to the intensity of bony bridges (BB): 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. TTS in patients with grade 4 bridges was significantly higher compared to patients with no bridges (p < 0.001).

BMI and waist circumference were related to both BB and tenderness. After adjusting for BMI, there was no relationship between TP count and BB, but there was a relationship between TTS and BB (p < 0.01). Adjusting for waist circumference, no relationship was found between TP count and BB, but there was a relationship between TTS and intensity of BB (p < 0.005). Patients with DISH were more likely to be affected by MS by both the WHO definition (52.9 vs 18.8%; p = 0.001) and the NCEP definition (58.6 vs 40.0%; p = 0.02). No association was found among TP count, TP score, and MS.

DISCUSSION

DISH has been established as a radiologic entity. However, the clinical manifestations have not yet been investigated in depth and it is still considered by some authors as a state and not a disease13. Other authors have suggested that in some cases, radiographic involvement of peripheral joints might be symptomatic, while in others it might be asymptomatic14,15. It has been suggested that patients with DISH have similar characteristics of pain and stiffness to patients with spondylosis. FM TP count did not differ among patients with DISH, spondylosis, and “healthy” controls4. In our study, the sample size was larger than previous studies and the control group was not composed of “healthy” individuals. We believe that in this older group of patients (mean age 64.1 yrs), it would be extremely difficult to find healthy subjects. Therefore, the control group was composed of patients with OA who were discriminated from the DISH group by the absence of the characteristic thoracic spine BB. As opposed to the TP count, TTS was significantly higher in patients with DISH, suggesting a lower tenderness threshold in these patients. The TTS directly correlated with the intensity of BB, and in particular to grade 4 BB. The correlation with milder forms of BB was weak, probably caused by the subjective aspect of the grading, based on the impression of the observer. It could well be that with a more accurate and validated measurement of the intensity of BB, the results might have reached statistical significance also for milder forms of BB.

The HAQ is a widely used and accepted measure of functional status in rheumatic diseases16. The HAQ is also capable of predicting work disability, medical costs, joint replacement, and mortality17,18,19,20,21. Recently, it was shown that a shorter questionnaire, the HAQ II, performs as well as the more extensive HAQ9. It has recently been shown that nonarticular tenderness and poor functional status are directly associated with elevated BMI22. In our study, BMI, TP count, and TTS correlated with poor functional status. The relationships between tenderness scores and poor functional status were maintained after correction for BMI, suggesting that patients with DISH have poor functional status independent of BMI. Further, the correlation between high-grade BB and TTS was preserved after adjusting for BMI, suggesting that the intensity of the spinal entheseal ossification is the main contributor to the soft tissue tenderness and poor functional status. It has been suggested and recently reiterated that mechanical factors arising from the cervical and lumbar spine determine patterns of symptoms and tenderness in many subjects with regional and general pain syndromes23. We did not investigate the upper and lower portions of the spine, although they are often involved in DISH. The role played by involvement of the thoracic spine has not been investigated. However, a significantly increased tenderness, for grade 4 BB, was observed between the upper and lower margins of the thoracic cage (Table 1). It is therefore conceivable that the T-spine could be at least a contributor for the generation of low tenderness threshold in this region.

DISH has long been known to be associated with metabolic and constitutional disorders such as obesity, high blood pressure, glucose intolerance, or overt DM, hyperuricemia, and others. It was recently shown that these patients have a significantly higher likelihood to be affected by MS, and bear a higher risk for cardiovascular morbidity5. A recent study showed that women with chronic pain were more often affected by MS6. Those patients were significantly younger than the prevalent age group of patients with DISH, and patients with DM were excluded from this analysis. It is conceivable, therefore, that chronic pain might further enhance the risk for MS. Of interest is the higher mortality rate associated with widespread pain disorders24,25. The mortality was ascribed mainly to cancer, and to a lesser extent to cardiovascular morbidities. Interestingly, the risk of death increased as the number of reported pain sites increased. Although we do not have, at present, enough data to demonstrate a higher mortality rate among patients with DISH, we did demonstrate a higher TTS in patients with high-grade BB. Whether increased tenderness further amplifies the known cardiovascular risk in patients with DISH remains to be investigated. Elevated BMI is a risk factor per se for FM26, but the role of MS as a risk factor for the development of widespread pain has not yet been investigated.

Our study shows that patients with DISH have increased nonarticular tenderness. A high degree of BB is associated with a lower pain threshold and as a consequence, with a lower functional status. The increased prevalence of MS, and the augmented cardiovascular risk, might be enhanced by the lower tenderness threshold. While we have no known methods to reverse the entheseal calcification and/or ossification, early diagnosis combined with standard care for treatment of nonarticular tenderness might prove useful in improving the quality of life and functional status of these patients. Additional improvement can be obtained by controlling risk factors for MS, in particular BMI and waist circumference. Forestier, et al, in a description of 9 cases, considered DISH to be nearly asymptomatic except for a well tolerated stiffness27. This statement, as well as others in that study, should be challenged by further studies.

  • Accepted for publication April 15, 2010.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Resnick D,
    2. Niwayama G
    . Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology 1976;119:559–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Utsinger PD,
    2. Resnick D,
    3. Shapiro R
    . Diffuse skeletal abnormalities in Forestier disease. Arch Intern Med 1976;136:763–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mader R
    . Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a distinct clinical entity. Isr Med Assoc J 2003;5:506–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mata S,
    2. Fortin PR,
    3. Fitzcharles MA,
    4. Starr MR,
    5. Joseph L,
    6. Watts CS,
    7. et al.
    A controlled study of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Clinical features and functional status. Medicine 1997;76:104–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mader R,
    2. Novofastovski I,
    3. Adawi M,
    4. Lavi I
    . Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2009;38:361–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Loevinger BL,
    2. Muller D,
    3. Alonso C,
    4. Coe CL
    . Metabolic syndrome in women with chronic pain. Metabolism 2007;56:87–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Resnick D,
    2. Niwayama G
    . Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988:1563–615.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Smythe HA,
    3. Yunus MB,
    4. Bennett RM,
    5. Bombardier C,
    6. Goldenberg DL,
    7. et al.
    The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Michaud K,
    3. Pincus T
    . Development and validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire II. A revised version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3296–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Grundy SM,
    2. Becker D,
    3. Clark LT,
    4. Cooper RS,
    5. Denke MA,
    6. Howard J,
    7. et al.
    Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Laaksonen DE,
    2. Lakka HM,
    3. Niskanen LK,
    4. Kaplan GA,
    5. Salonen JT,
    6. Lakka TA
    . Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1070–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Reilly MP,
    2. Wolfe ML,
    3. Rhodes T,
    4. Girman C,
    5. Mehta N,
    6. Rader DJ
    . Measures of insulin resistance add incremental value to the clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in association with coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004;110:803–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hutton C
    . DISH... a state not a disease? Br J Rheumatol 1989;28:277–80.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Beyeler C,
    2. Schlapbach P,
    3. Gerber NJ,
    4. Sturzenegger J,
    5. Fahrer H,
    6. Van der Linden S,
    7. et al.
    Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) of the shoulder. A cause of shoulder pain? Br J Rheumatol 1990;29:349–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Beyeler C,
    2. Schlapbach P,
    3. Gerber NJ,
    4. Sturzenegger J,
    5. Fahrer H,
    6. Hasler F,
    7. et al.
    Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) of the elbow: A cause of elbow pain? A controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 1992;31:319–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fries JF,
    2. Spitz PW,
    3. Kraines RG,
    4. Holman HR
    . Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fries JF,
    2. Spitz PW,
    3. Young DY
    . The dimensions of health outcomes: the Health Assessment Questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982;9:789–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Michaud K,
    3. Gefeller O,
    4. Choi HK
    . Predicting mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1530–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Hawley DJ
    . The long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis: work disability: a prospective 18 year study of 823 patients. J Rheumatol 1998;25:2108–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wolfe F,
    2. Zwillich SH
    . The long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis: a 23-year prospective, longitudinal study of total joint replacement and its predictors in 1,600 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1072–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Michaud K,
    2. Messer J,
    3. Choi HK,
    4. Wolfe F
    . Direct medical costs and their predictors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a three-year study of 7,527 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2750–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Neumann L,
    2. Lerner E,
    3. Glazer Y,
    4. Bolotin A,
    5. Shefer A,
    6. Buskila D
    . A cross-sectional study of the relationship between body mass index and clinical characteristics, tenderness measures, quality of life, and physical functioning in fibromyalgia patients. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:1543–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Holman AJ
    . Positional cervical spinal cord compression and fibromyalgia: a novel comorbidity with important diagnostic and treatment implications. J Pain 2008;9:613–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. McBeth J,
    2. Silman AJ,
    3. Macfarlane GJ
    . Association of widespread body pain with an increased risk of cancer and reduced cancer survival: a prospective, population based study. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1686–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. McBeth J,
    2. Symmons DP,
    3. Silman AJ,
    4. Allison T,
    5. Webb R,
    6. Brammah T,
    7. et al.
    Musculoskeletal pain is associated with a long-term increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular-related mortality. Rheumatology 2009;48:74–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yunus MB,
    2. Arslan S,
    3. Aldag JC
    . Relationship between body mass index and fibromyalgia features. Scand J Rheumatol 2002;31:27–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Forestier J,
    2. Rotes-Querol J
    . Senile ankylosing hyperostosis of the spine. Ann Rheum Dis 1950;9:321–30.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 37, Issue 9
1 Sep 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nonarticular Tenderness and Functional Status in Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nonarticular Tenderness and Functional Status in Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis
REUVEN MADER, IRINA NOVOFASTOVSKI, EHUD ROSNER, MUHAMMAD ADAWI, PAULA HERER, DAN BUSKILA
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2010, 37 (9) 1911-1916; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.091008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Nonarticular Tenderness and Functional Status in Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis
REUVEN MADER, IRINA NOVOFASTOVSKI, EHUD ROSNER, MUHAMMAD ADAWI, PAULA HERER, DAN BUSKILA
The Journal of Rheumatology Sep 2010, 37 (9) 1911-1916; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.091008
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Do Patterns of Early Disease Severity Predict Grade 12 Academic Achievement in Youths With Childhood-Onset Chronic Rheumatic Diseases?
  • High Prevalence of Foot Insufficiency Fractures in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Real-world Retention and Clinical Effectiveness of Secukinumab for Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From the Canadian Spondyloarthritis Research Network
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire