Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Limited Diagnostic Value of Unilateral Sacroiliitis in Scintigraphy in Assessing Axial Spondyloarthritis

IN-HO SONG, HENNING BRANDT, MARTIN RUDWALEIT and JOACHIM SIEPER
The Journal of Rheumatology June 2010, 37 (6) 1200-1202; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.091216
IN-HO SONG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HENNING BRANDT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARTIN RUDWALEIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOACHIM SIEPER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: joachim.sieper@charite.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To assess the diagnostic value for axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) of unilateral sacroiliitis in scintigraphy in daily clinical practice.

Methods. In 207 patients with chronic back pain, the diagnostic value of scintigraphy was assessed retrospectively. The diagnosis made by the rheumatologist (axial SpA vs no axial SpA) was the standard.

Results. Sensitivities of scintigraphy for any (unilateral or bilateral), bilateral, and isolated unilateral sacroiliitis were 64.9%, 40.2%, and 24.7%, respectively. Respective specificities were 50.5%, 57.7%, and 92.8%, resulting in likelihood ratios of 1.3, 1.0, and 3.4.

Conclusion. Scintigraphy of the sacroiliac joints is of limited value for the diagnosis of axial SpA. Unilateral compared to bilateral sacroiliitis is slightly superior, but is associated with a low sensitivity.

  • SCINTIGRAPHY
  • ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
  • SACROILIITIS
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • LIKELIHOOD RATIO
  • SENSITIVITY

A recent systematic literature search showed that scintigraphy of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) is of limited value for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA)1. In daily clinical practice, an isolated unilateral sacroiliitis in bone scintigraphy is often regarded to be of better diagnostic value because the negative side acts as an internal control, while in the case of bilateral sacroiliitis the definition of positive/negative is more difficult. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who were referred because of suspected SpA to a specialized tertiary rheumatology center with special interest in SpA, and considered whether unilateral sacroiliitis would have a higher diagnostic value compared to bilateral sacroiliitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We retrospectively analyzed patients with chronic low back pain who were seen in our back pain clinic2 and who had undergone a bone scintigraphy examination for the evaluation of sacroiliitis. A diagnosis of axial SpA was made by experienced rheumatologists according to the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS)3 or for nonradiographic axial SpA2,4–6. Importantly, for the diagnosis of axial SpA, scintigraphy findings were not taken into account. Controls were defined as those patients in whom the expert excluded the diagnosis of axial SpA.

Scintigraphy

Bone scintigraphy findings were classified into unilateral or bilateral sacroiliitis, and suspicion for or exclusion of sacroiliitis. Where available, we collected information about the exact value of the SIJ-sacrum-index (SIJ-S-index), which quantifies the uptake of the radio-tracer in the SIJ compared to the sacrum as a reference point. The decision about whether a scintigraphy result showed active sacroiliitis was based on the judgment of the radiologist who had performed the scintigraphy examination.

Statistics

Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) of scintigraphy for the diagnosis of axial SpA were calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 1202 patients who have been referred to our clinic for the evaluation of back pain, in 207 cases (17.2%) a scintigraphy examination of the SIJ had been performed before referral for the evaluation of sacroiliitis. Out of these 207 patients, we classified 97 as having axial SpA (56 as AS and 41 as nonradiographic axial SpA), 13 as suspicious for axial SpA, and 97 as controls2,4,5. Demographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data for the different patient groups who underwent a scintigraphy examination for the evaluation of sacroiliitis. In the patient group with axial SpA, patients with AS and patients with nonradiographic axial SpA are pooled.

Discriminative property of scintigraphy of the SIJ between patients and controls

All 207 scintigraphy examinations had been performed using 99m technetium-labeled radio-tracers. The mean radiation dose was 568.9 mBq (SD 94.8). In 50.2% (104/207) of scintigraphy examinations, absolute values for the SIJ-S-index were provided.

First, we analyzed whether there was a difference between patients with axial SpA and controls regarding tracer uptake, independent of bilateral or unilateral sacroiliitis. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with axial SpA (mean uptake left SIJ/right SIJ 1.48/1.46; mean cutoff 1.33) and controls (mean uptake left SIJ/right SIJ 1.48/1.41; mean cutoff 1.30).

Diagnostic properties of scintigraphy for sacroiliitis

We next split scintigraphy findings into bilateral and unilateral sacroiliitis independently of quantification. Thus, for the following analysis, qualitative and quantitative scintigraphy findings were analyzed for 97 patients with axial SpA and 97 controls. Only positive or negative findings were counted, according to the radiologist who had performed the scintigraphy examination.

Among 97 patients with axial SpA, scintigraphy showed any sacroiliitis (bilateral or unilateral) in 64.9%, bilateral sacroiliitis in 40.2%, and unilateral sacroiliitis in 24.7%. Based on the analysis of the 97 controls, specificities of 50.5%, 57.7%, and 92.8% and LR of 1.3, 1.0, and 3.4, respectively, were found (Figure 1 and group A in Table 2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) of bone scintigraphy showing any sacroiliitis, bilateral sacroiliitis, or isolated unilateral sacroiliitis. Data are shown for the whole group of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA, n = 97) and non-SpA controls (n = 97). Specificities are calculated from 97 controls.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) of scintigraphy imaging for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Scintigraphy examinations of the sacroiliac joints were performed in 207 patients. Of them, 97 patients were classified with axial SpA, 13 patients with suspicion for axial SpA, and 97 as controls.

In the 2 subgroups with established AS (n = 56, Group A1 in Table 2) compared to nonradiographic axial SpA (n = 41, Group A2 in Table 2), as well as in the AS subgroups with sacroiliitis grade 2/3 (Group A1a in Table 2) and sacroiliitis grade 4 (Group A1b in Table 2), the value of scintigraphy for the diagnosis of axial SpA was very similar compared to the pooled group of axial SpA. In the subgroup of patients with axial SpA in whom absolute values of the SIJ-S-index were given (26 patients with AS, 21 patients with nonradiographic axial SpA, and 48 controls, Group B in Table 2), it could be shown that quantitative scintigraphy was not superior to qualitative scintigraphy.

DISCUSSION

Our retrospective analysis shows that scintigraphy is still used in a proportion of patients for the evaluation of sacroiliitis. About 17% of referred patients with back pain had undergone a scintigraphic examination of the SIJ. Further, our study confirms data of a recent systematic literature search that showed that scintigraphy of the SIJ is at best of limited value for the diagnosis of axial SpA1. This is especially true for bilateral sacroiliitis, which showed only a +LR 1.0 in our study, meaning that it is of no use at all. Unilateral sacroiliitis as shown by scintigraphy showed a slightly higher LR of 3.4. At the same time, unilateral sacroiliitis on scintigraphy was associated with a very low sensitivity of about 25%. Further, an LR of 3.4 of scinti-graphic unilateral sacroiliitis is much lower than an assumed LR of around 10 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)5.

Our findings are in concordance with the few scintigraphy studies that have so far reported on unilateral sacroiliitis (6, including 104 patients with axial SpA and 36 controls)7–12. Sensitivities of unilateral sacroiliitis in these studies were low, ranging from 6.3%10 to 33.3%12, while specificities were high, ranging between 89.5%8 and 94.1%7, resulting in a pooled LR of 2.1.

In the diagnostic approach in our center, scintigraphy results are not included because there has been no proven value for this method for the diagnosis of axial SpA. The optimal study design would be a prospective study with patients with SpA and patients without SpA who are undergoing scintigraphy of the SIJ. Looking at all available data on the limitation of scintigraphy and the superiority of MRI, it is questionable whether such a study is still feasible.

The diagnostic value of scintigraphy of the SIJ might be better in clear cases of unilateral sacroiliitis shown by scintigraphy that correlates with the patient’s symptoms of unilateral buttock pain. This information was not available for our study, and such an analysis has not been performed in the literature.

Our analysis shows that scintigraphy of the SIJ is of quite limited value for the diagnosis of axial SpA. Unilateral sacroiliitis is slightly superior compared to scintigraphy showing a bilateral sacroiliitis, but is associated with a low sensitivity.

Footnotes

  • Accepted for publication February 4, 2010.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Song IH,
    2. Carrasco-Fernández J,
    3. Rudwaleit M,
    4. Sieper J
    . The diagnostic value of scintigraphy in assessing sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature research. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1535–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Brandt HC,
    2. Spiller I,
    3. Song IH,
    4. Vahldiek JL,
    5. Rudwaleit M,
    6. Sieper J
    . Performance of referral recommendations in patients with chronic back pain and suspected axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1479–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. van der Linden S,
    2. Valkenburg HA,
    3. Cats A
    . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. Khan MA,
    3. Sieper J
    . The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1000–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Khan MA,
    4. Braun J,
    5. Sieper J
    . How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:535–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sieper J,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewe R,
    4. Brandt J,
    5. Burgos-Vagas R,
    6. Collantes-Estevez E,
    7. et al.
    New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:784–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Berghs H,
    2. Remans J,
    3. Drieskens L,
    4. Kiebooms L,
    5. Polderman J
    . Diagnostic value of sacroiliac joint scintigraphy with 99m technetium pyrophosphate in sacroiliitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:190–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Van Laere M,
    2. Veys EM,
    3. Mielants H
    . Strontium 87m scanning of the sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1972;31:201–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Szanto E,
    2. Axelsson B,
    3. Lindvall N
    . Detection of sacro-ilitis. A comparison between profile scanning with the use of 99m Tc pertechnetate and scintigraphy with 99m Tc diphosphonate. Scand J Rheumatol 1977;6:129–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jee WH,
    2. McCauley TR,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. Kim SH,
    5. Im SA,
    6. Ha KY
    . Sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: association of MR findings with disease activity. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:245–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Yildiz A,
    2. Gungor F,
    3. Tuncer T,
    4. Karayalcin B
    . The evaluation of sacroiliitis using 99mTc-nanocolloid and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:785–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Peh WC,
    2. Ho WY,
    3. Luk KD
    . Applications of bone scintigraphy in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Imaging 1997;21:54–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 37, Issue 6
1 Jun 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Limited Diagnostic Value of Unilateral Sacroiliitis in Scintigraphy in Assessing Axial Spondyloarthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Limited Diagnostic Value of Unilateral Sacroiliitis in Scintigraphy in Assessing Axial Spondyloarthritis
IN-HO SONG, HENNING BRANDT, MARTIN RUDWALEIT, JOACHIM SIEPER
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2010, 37 (6) 1200-1202; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.091216

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Limited Diagnostic Value of Unilateral Sacroiliitis in Scintigraphy in Assessing Axial Spondyloarthritis
IN-HO SONG, HENNING BRANDT, MARTIN RUDWALEIT, JOACHIM SIEPER
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2010, 37 (6) 1200-1202; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.091216
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Melorheostosis or "Dripping Candle Wax" Bone Disease
  • IgG4-related Disease Mimicking a Paratesticular Tumor and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis
  • Microstructural Evidence of Neuroinflammation for Psychological Symptoms and Pain in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire