Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Muscle Quality, Architecture, and Activation in Cachectic Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

VERENA MATSCHKE, PETER MURPHY, ANDREW B. LEMMEY, PETER J. MADDISON and JEANETTE M. THOM
The Journal of Rheumatology February 2010, 37 (2) 282-284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090584
VERENA MATSCHKE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETER MURPHY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREW B. LEMMEY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETER J. MADDISON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JEANETTE M. THOM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To explore muscle-specific force (force per physiological cross-sectional area, or PCSA) and muscle activation in cachectic patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. In 14 muscle-wasted patients with RA and age and sex matched healthy controls, vastus lateralis (VL) force and voluntary activation capacity were assessed during maximal isometric contractions with electromyography and superimposed electrical stimulations. VL PCSA was determined from ultrasound measures of fiber fascicle length (Lf), pennation angle, and volume, together with assessments of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and objective physical function.

Results. Although patients with RA had reduced physical function, lower muscle mass, and VL volume relative to controls, there were no differences in muscle-specific force and activation. PCSA, force, and pennation angle tended to be lower in RA, with no differences in Lf.

Conclusion. Muscle-specific force and activation are not compromised and thus are unlikely to contribute to reduced function in cachectic patients with RA.

Key Indexing Terms:
  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
  • MUSCLE-SPECIFIC FORCE
  • BODY COMPOSITION
  • ULTRASOUND
  • PHYSICAL FUNCTION

Impaired physical function is characteristic of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is strongly correlated with muscle mass, the main predictor of muscle strength1. Muscle wasting, termed rheumatoid cachexia, is more prevalent and severe in patients with RA than in the general population, perhaps because of increased muscle protein catabolism induced by inflammatory cytokines2.

Compared to published research on muscle quantity, little is known about qualitative changes of rheumatoid muscle. Muscle-specific force, a measure of the force produced per cross-sectional area of a muscle, is reduced in sarcopenia of old age and disuse atrophy, due in part to impaired muscle activation capacity and changes in muscle architecture3.

We aimed to determine whether muscle-specific force, voluntary muscle activation capacity, and muscle architecture are compromised in cachectic patients with RA compared to healthy age and sex matched controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen cachectic patients with RA (disease duration ≥ 3 yrs) were recruited from Gwynedd Hospital Rheumatology clinics. Patients with pain/swelling in the right knee, disease flare, change in medication in the previous 3 months, other catabolic diseases, or joint replacement were excluded. Significant muscle wasting (“cachexia”) was determined following assessment of appendicular lean mass (ALM) by whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry using the definition by Baumgartner, et al4. Age and sex matched healthy controls were recruited from the local community.

Maximal voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion torques of the right leg (knee joint angle 70°, hip angle 90°, arms crossed) were determined on an isokinetic dynamometer (CSMi Medical Solutions, Stoughton, MA, USA). Vastus lateralis (VL) force was calculated taking into account maximal voluntary torque, patellar tendon moment arm length as detailed by Onambele-Pearson, et al5, and antagonist co-contraction estimated from electromyographic activity6. Superimposed and postcontraction supramaximal percutaneous double twitches from a DSV Digitimer Stimulator (Digitimer Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK) were applied over the quadriceps to determine voluntary activation capacity6.

Ultrasonography was used to assess VL volume (VOL; from VL length and VL anatomical cross-sectional area) and muscle architecture, i.e., pennation angle and fiber fascicle length (Lf; Figure 1), which in turn determined physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA = VOL/Lf)6. The primary measure, muscle-specific force, was calculated as VL force/PCSA6.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Sagittal-plane sonographs of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (A) and a healthy control (B). Note the greater pennation angle in the muscle of the healthy control. 1: superficial aponeurosis, 2: deep aponeurosis, 3: fiber fascicles; the pennation angle α is the angle of insertion of the fiber fascicle into the deep aponeurosis of the VL. Fiber fascicle length (Lf) was calculated from the pennation angle and the muscle thickness (d) by the equation Lf = d/(sin)(pennation angle).

Further measures were disease activity using the modified RA Disease Activity Index7 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, objective physical function8,9, the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire10, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. A questionnaire used previously in RA and aging populations11 assessed habitual physical activity and was used to exclude very active participants (> 6 on a scale from 2 to 8).

Depending on normality of the data, the Student’s paired t test or Wilcoxon test was used to detect differences between patient and control groups (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

All patients were taking disease-modifying antirheumatic medication and had low disease activity (Table 1). The groups were well matched for age and habitual physical activity (Table 2). Relative to controls, patients had reduced objective and self-assessed physical function, less ALM and smaller VL volume, and trends toward lower PCSA, lower force, and a smaller pennation angle (Table 2). However, there were no differences in either muscle-specific force or voluntary muscle activation capacity (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with RA (n = 14: 11 women).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Demographics, body composition, physical function, and muscle-specific force data of sarcopenic patients with RA (n = 14; 11 women) compared to sex matched healthy controls.

DISCUSSION

We observed that muscle-specific force and muscle activation capacity are preserved in patients with RA with significantly impaired physical function and reduced muscle mass.

This finding leads to 2 important conclusions. First, it confirms that muscle loss in RA is a process that differs from that seen in aging and disuse, where muscle-specific force and activation capacity are reduced2. Second, it suggests that the ability of rheumatoid muscle to adapt to physical training is not different from healthy muscle. This emphasizes the potential of high intensity exercise to increase muscle quantity and function in RA, as demonstrated in training studies12–14.

Muscle wasting was a selection criterion in our study. This is a phenomenon seen more frequently in patients with RA2 than in the healthy population, and is thought to reflect systemic effects of inflammatory cytokines on muscle tissue. The relative reduction of muscle mass of 13% was in accord with other studies2.

In determining muscle-specific force, we used definitions of force and size that are standard in muscle physiology research, which take into account architectural features (Lf and pennation angle), influencing the mechanical output of the muscle, and factors affecting force production (co-contraction of antagonist muscles)6. Since the trend toward lower force levels in our patients with RA corresponded with loss of PCSA, the force normalized for PCSA was not compromised. Although the pennation angle tended to be smaller in the patient group, this architectural change was not sufficient to influence the force output.

Similarly, muscle activation capacity was not different between our groups, contrasting with Bearne, et al15, who found 8% lower muscle activation in patients with RA with confirmed involvement of the knee joint compared to healthy controls. However, those results may have been compromised by confounding factors such as fatigue, pain, and joint effusions on muscle force and activation, while we excluded patients with active disease in general and with local knee inflammation. Although our data cannot be extrapolated to patients with persistently active disease, which may affect muscle properties, our stable patients with RA were a relevant population to study, because in rheumatological practice most patients only start exercising once disease control has been achieved with medication.

Limitations of the study

First, the wide age range of the participants and the inclusion of both sexes contributed to the variability of force levels. Second, the work-intensive nature of muscle-specific force assessments necessarily limited the subject numbers.

This is the first study to report on muscle-specific force of the rheumatoid muscle. Further research is required to determine other factors influencing muscle function and the causes of muscle loss.

Even in patients with significant muscle loss, muscle-specific force and the ability to recruit muscle fibers are not compromised. Therefore, these factors are unlikely to contribute to the disability seen in patients with RA.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jeremy Jones for reviewing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by a grant from the North West Wales NHS Trust.

    • Accepted for publication September 30, 2009.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Giles JT,
    2. Bartlett SJ,
    3. Andersen RE,
    4. Fontaine KR,
    5. Bathon JM
    . Association of body composition with disability in rheumatoid arthritis: impact of appendicular fat and lean tissue mass. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1407–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Roubenoff R,
    2. Roubenoff RA,
    3. Ward LM,
    4. Holland SM,
    5. Hellmann DB
    . Rheumatoid cachexia: depletion of lean body mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Possible association with tumor necrosis factor. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1505–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Narici MV,
    2. Maganaris CN,
    3. Reeves ND,
    4. Capodaglio P
    . Effect of aging on human muscle architecture. J Appl Physiol 2003;95:2229–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Baumgartner RN,
    2. Koehler KM,
    3. Gallagher D,
    4. Romero L,
    5. Heymsfield SB,
    6. Ross RR,
    7. et al.
    Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:755–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Onambele-Pearson NL,
    2. Pearson SJ
    . Time-of-day effect on patella tendon stiffness alters vastus lateralis fascicle length but not the quadriceps force-angle relationship. J Biomech 2007;40:1031–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Reeves ND,
    2. Narici MV,
    3. Maganaris CN
    . Effect of resistance training on skeletal muscle-specific force in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:885–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Leeb BF,
    2. Haindl PM,
    3. Maktari A,
    4. Nothnagl T,
    5. Rintelen B
    . Patient-centered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity assessment by a modified RADAI. J Rheumatol 2008;5:1294–9.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Mian OS,
    2. Thom JM,
    3. Ardigò LP,
    4. Morse CI,
    5. Narici MV,
    6. Minetti AE
    . Effect of a 12-month physical conditioning programme on the metabolic cost of walking in healthy older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007;100:499–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rikli RE,
    2. Jones J
    . editors Senior fitness test manual. London: Human Kinetics; 2001.
  10. ↵
    1. Pincus T,
    2. Swearingen C,
    3. Wolfe F
    . Toward a multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly Health Assessment Questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2220–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Saltin B,
    2. Grimby G
    . Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation 1968;38:1104–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hakkinen A,
    2. Pakarinen A,
    3. Hannonen P,
    4. Kautiainen H,
    5. Nyman K,
    6. Kraemer WJ,
    7. et al.
    Effects of prolonged combined strength and endurance training on physical fitness, body composition and serum hormones in women with rheumatoid arthritis and in healthy controls. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:505–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lemmey AB,
    2. Marcora SM,
    3. Chester K,
    4. Wilson S,
    5. Casanova F,
    6. Maddison PJ
    . Effects of resistance training in rheumatoid arthritis patients — a randomised controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:1726–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Marcora SM,
    2. Lemmey AB,
    3. Maddison PJ
    . Can progressive resistance training reverse cachexia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Results of a pilot study. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1031–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Bearne LM,
    2. Scott DL,
    3. Hurley MV
    . Exercise can reverse quadriceps sensorimotor dysfunction that is associated with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbating disease activity. Rheumatology 2002;41:157–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 37, Issue 2
1 Feb 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Muscle Quality, Architecture, and Activation in Cachectic Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Muscle Quality, Architecture, and Activation in Cachectic Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
VERENA MATSCHKE, PETER MURPHY, ANDREW B. LEMMEY, PETER J. MADDISON, JEANETTE M. THOM
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2010, 37 (2) 282-284; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090584

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Muscle Quality, Architecture, and Activation in Cachectic Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
VERENA MATSCHKE, PETER MURPHY, ANDREW B. LEMMEY, PETER J. MADDISON, JEANETTE M. THOM
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2010, 37 (2) 282-284; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090584
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Melorheostosis or "Dripping Candle Wax" Bone Disease
  • IgG4-related Disease Mimicking a Paratesticular Tumor and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis
  • Microstructural Evidence of Neuroinflammation for Psychological Symptoms and Pain in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire