Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Review ArticleArticle

Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A for Refractory Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

JASVINDER A. SINGH, MAREN L. MAHOWALD and SIAMAK NOORBALOOCHI
The Journal of Rheumatology November 2010, 37 (11) 2377-2386; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100336
JASVINDER A. SINGH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Jasvinder.md@gmail.com
MAREN L. MAHOWALD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SIAMAK NOORBALOOCHI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The structure of the study. Five patients had simultaneous bilateral TKA injected, 1 patient had sequential TKA injection (i.e., enrolled his left and right TKA in the study at 2 different times). Baseline, 2, 3, 4, and 6-month followup visits were in-clinic or required hospitalization.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Study inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Inclusion criteria
    1. Adults who underwent TKA > 6 months before study entry

    2. Chronic painful TKA for > 3 months with pain ≥ 6 on a 10-point numerical pain rating scale

    3. Failed treatments including oral pain medications and were not surgical candidates

    4. Negative investigation for an infectious etiology by the referring orthopedic surgeon with one or more of the following — normal inflammatory markers, including normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein; normal clinical examination; and/or culture-negative joint fluid aspirate

    Exclusion criteria
    1. History of myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or other known diseases of the neuromuscular junction or motor neuron disease

    2. Concomitant use of aminoglycoside or agents that interfere with neuromuscular junction transmission

    3. Women who were pregnant or breast-feeding

    4. Known allergy or sensitivity to the study medication

    5. Recent or ongoing alcohol or drug abuse

    6. Known, uncontrolled systemic disease

    7. Concurrent participation in other drug study

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants.

    CharacteristicIA-BoNT/A, n = 23*, mean (SD) or %IA-placebo, n = 26*, mean (SD) or %
    Mean age, (SD), yrs67.1 (10.1)66.8 (11.5)
    Men, n (%)18/23 (78)23/26 (88)
    Caucasian, n (%)22/23 (96)25/26 (96)
    Mean comorbidity index**13.0 (5.5)12.5 (28.7)
    Mean pain duration of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yrs4.8 (5.1)4.1 (4.6)
    Primary/revision TKA16/721/5
    Current treatment, n (%)†
      Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs15/23 (65)21/26 (81)
      Narcotics10/23 (43)10/26 (38)
      Acetaminophen11/23 (48)8/26 (31)
      Other††8/23 (35)8/26 (31)
    Primary outcome
      VAS pain severity, 0–107.2 (1.1)7.5 (1.3)
    Secondary outcomes
      WOMAC physical function, 0–10056.5 (8.9)63.3 (17.5)
      WOMAC pain, 0–10058.0 (13.6)67.1 (15.3)
      WOMAC stiffness, 0–10064.1 (20.4)64.4 (18.9)
      WOMAC total, 0–10063.2 (9.3)70.6 (16.8)
      Timed Stands Test, seconds49.9 (31.5)50.8 (29.3)
      Timed Up and Go Test, seconds18.3 (13.8)18.5 (12.7)
      Active flexion83.3 (22.5)86.2 (16.7)
      Active extension170.7 (10.9)167.8 (10.0)
      McGill affective dimension6.1 (2.9)5.3 (3.1)
      McGill sensory dimension16.7 (6.5)17.3 (6.8)
      McGill total score22.8 (8.2)22.7 (8.8)
    • ↵* Data from 49 patients with 49 TKA, i.e., only one TKA per patient.

    • ↵** Comorbidity assessed using self-reported validated comorbidity index51.

    • ↵† Many patients were taking multiple medications.

    • ↵†† Included capsaicin and medications used for treatment of neuropathic pain, including gabapentin, sertraline, amitryptiline, trazodone, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, topiramate. IA: intraarticular; BoNT/A: botulinum toxin A; VAS: visual analog scale; WOMAC: Western Ontario McMaster University Arthritis Index.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Percentage of responders, i.e., patients with 2-point decrease in visual analog scale pain severity at each efficacy timepoint.

    Group2-month Proportion (95% CI)3-month Proportion (95% CI)4-month Proportion (95% CI)
    IA-BoNT/A71 (49, 92)62 (41, 83)50 (27, 73)
    IA-placebo35 (15, 54)43 (22, 64)55 (33, 77)
    Difference (IA-BoNT/A–IA-placebo)*36 (7, 65)19 (−11, 49)−5 (−37, 27)
    • ↵* The difference between botulinum toxin and placebo groups was statistically significant at 2 months (p = 0.025). The difference between botulinum toxin and placebo groups was also statistically significant when all 3 timepoints (2, 3 and 4 months) were included (p = 0.019), using generalized estimating equations analyses.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Additional outcomes comparing the IA-BoNT/A and IA-placebo groups using generalized estimating equations (GEE) analyses. Data are mean (SD).

    Baseline Preinjection2 Weeks1 Month2 Months3 Months4 Monthsp (repeated measures analyses*†)
    Mean VAS pain (0–10)0.09
        IA-BoNT/A7.2 (1.1)NANA4.4 (2.5)4.2 (2.6)4.8 (2.4)
        IA-placebo7.5 (1.3)NANA5.7 (2.9)5.2 (3.2)5.0 (2.6)
    Secondary outcomes
      WOMAC physical function (0–100)
        IA-BoNT/A56.5 (8.9)48.3 (13.1)47.8 (14.7)48.5 (14.4)46.8 (16.6)45.9 (17.9)0.03
        IA-placebo63.3 (17.5)60.9 (16.0)57.7 (18.8)59.7 (17.4)52.9 (21.1)57.1 (17.4)
      WOMAC stiffness (0–100)
        IA-BoNT/A64.1 (20.4)44.3 (24.9)49.4 (20.9)51.8 (19.1)50.0 (19.7)47.4 (25.5)< 0.01
        IA-placebo64.4 (18.9)63.7 (18.1)48.9 (26.1)60.4 (16.3)57.7 (23.5)59.9 (22.7)
      WOMAC pain (0–100)
        IA-BoNT/A58.0 (13.6)40.0 (16.9)49.5 (18.1)45.2 (22.3)43.6 (20.1)42.6 (20.1)0.12
        IA-placebo67.1 (15.3)54.7 (19.7)57.0 (17.6)58.3 (14.7)51.2 (22.7)51.6 (20.9)
      WOMAC total (0–100)
        IA-BoNT/A63.2 (9.3)50.9 (15.2)53.1 (16.2)52.9 (15.5)51.0 (17.8)49.9 (18.3)0.02
        IA-placebo70.6 (16.8)65.9 (17.7)62.5 (19.1)65.5 (17.0)58.3 (22.3)61.8 (18.9)
      Timed Stands Test
        IA-BoNT/A49.9 (31.4)NANA37.4 (15.8)35.5 (13.9)37.6 (15.7)0.98
        IA-placebo50.8 (29.3)NANA42.1 (22.5)39.3 (22.1)38.9 (13.0)
      Timed Up and Go Test
        IA-BoNT/A18.3 (13.8)NANA17.2 (9.6)17.6 (13.2)14.8 (5.9)0.14
        IA-placebo18.5 (12.7)NANA18.2 (13.8)15.5 (10.5)18.2 (16.3)
      Active flexion
        IA-BoNT/A83.3 (22.5)NANA75.0 (20.8)74.7 (23.0)79.3 (23.0)0.23
        IA-placebo86.2 (16.7)NANA87.5 (15.3)85.6 (12.5)83.1 (15.4)
      Active extension
        IA-BoNT/A170.7 (10.9)NANA170.0 (18.0)169.7 (13.1)157.8 (44.4)0.86
        IA-placebo167.8 (10.0)NANA170.5 (7.4)163.2 (40.2)163.7 (38.0)
      McGill affective dimension
        IA-BoNT/A6.1 (2.8)NA4.5 (3.1)3.8 (3.1)3.6 (3.1)3.9 (3.1)0.08
        IA-placebo5.3 (3.1)NA4.1 (3.5)4.8 (3.4)4.8 (3.5)4.8 (3.3)
      McGill sensory dimension
        IA-BoNT/A16.7 (6.5)NA14.5 (8.3)14.5 (8.0)11.6 (6.3)12.9 (8.1)0.73
        IA-placebo17.3 (6.8)NA13.4 (5.8)14.6 (7.5)11.7 (7.3)13.5 (8.4)
      McGill total
        IA-BoNT/A23.8 (8.3)NA19.0 (10.8)18.3 (10.1)15.4 (8.1)16.8 (10.8)0.42
        IA-placebo22.7 (8.8)NA17.5 (8.4)19.4 (10.3)16.7 (9.8)18.3 (11.2)
    SF-36 subscales
      Bodily pain††
        IA-BoNT/A28.5 (17.0)NANA46.5 (19.0)42.9 (20.1)43.9 (22.7)0.049
        IA-placebo29.0 (13.7)NANA36.4 (17.4)37.0 (23.3)39.1 (24.5)
      Physical functioning
        IA-BoNT/A29.4 (21.3)NANA30.7 (21.8)29.3 (15.1)30.5 (19.6)0.68
        IA-placebo20.6 (16.0)NANA23.6 (17.5)25.2 (20.0)22.6 (18.8)
      Role physical
        IA-BoNT/A12.0 (21.1)NANA22.7 (29.8)26.1 (34.0)26.3 (30.9)0.74
        IA-placebo13.5 (23.7)NANA18.0 (26.5)28.1 (32.4)29.8 (35.0)
      Role emotional
        IA-BoNT/A49.3 (47.0)NANA45.4 (40.6)56.1 (47.6)46.7 (43.8)0.08
        IA-placebo48.7 (49.2)NANA61.3 (45.8)68.1 (42.3)63.5 (43.3)
      Mental health
        IA-BoNT/A69.6 (17.1)NANA67.8 (21.4)68.6 (17.8)68.6 (20.9)0.31
        IA-placebo64.0 (20.3)NANA67.5 (21.7)70.7 (26.1)69.5 (20.1)
      Social functioning
        IA-BoNT/A55.4 (26.1)NANA64.8 (26.3)60.2 (26.9)60.6 (25.1)0.99
        IA-placebo50.5 (29.3)NANA61.5 (27.7)62.0 (31.8)58.9 (37.3)
      General health
        IA-BoNT/A52.9 (20.7)NANA55.0 (20.4)49.3 (20.4)49.5 (24.4)0.98
        IA-placebo55.1 (24.4)NANA51.8 (21.7)52.1 (21.6)53.2 (21.7)
      Vitality
        IA-BoNT/A42.6 (17.8)NANA41.6 (19.5)46.4 (15.6)45.0 (23.5)0.98
        IA-placebo40.0 (24.6)NANA41.2 (24.3)44.4 (28.9)43.6 (27.9)
    • ↵* Comparison of IA-BoNT/A and placebo for all efficacy timepoints up to 4 months using GEE, adjusting for respective baseline scores.

    • ↵† Sensitivity analyses that included bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) did not change the significance for any variable listed above (data not shown), except SF-36 pain, for which p value was 0.14 when all 60 TKA were included.

    • ↵†† Only the SF-36 bodily pain subscale score was significantly different between groups; no other SF-36 subscale scores were significantly different between groups at 2 months. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; SF-36: Short-form 36; NA: not applicable since these variables were not assessed at these telephone followup visits.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Adverse events and serious adverse events.

    Adverse EventsIA-BoNT/A GroupIA-placebo Groupp, BoNT/A vs Placebo
    Total adverse events66730.76
    Serious adverse effects*5110.47
    No. patients with ≥ 1 serious adverse events390.16
    Most common side effects
      Dry mouth43
      Accidental injury117
      Back pain34
      Upper respiratory symptoms/infection1010
      Difficulty swallowing04
      Headache32
      Nausea21
      Scheduled procedure35
      Local side effects
        Pain in the study joint62
        Muscle weakness around the study joint or knee “giving out”42
    Serious adverse effects
      Cardiac
        Chest pain/new diagnosis of coronary artery disease03
        Supraventricular tachycardia01
      Pulmonary
        Decreased saturation01
        Pneumonia01
      Other
        Subarachnoid hemorrhage10
        Atypical chest pain10
        Seafood allergy10
        Depression20
        Gouty arthritis01
        Influenza01
        Cellulitis and septic arthritis01
        Deep vein thrombosis01
        Lethargy and decreased appetite01
    • ↵* Defined as an event that was fatal, life-threatening, permanently disabling, or required hospitalization.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 37, Issue 11
1 Nov 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A for Refractory Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A for Refractory Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JASVINDER A. SINGH, MAREN L. MAHOWALD, SIAMAK NOORBALOOCHI
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2010, 37 (11) 2377-2386; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100336

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A for Refractory Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JASVINDER A. SINGH, MAREN L. MAHOWALD, SIAMAK NOORBALOOCHI
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2010, 37 (11) 2377-2386; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100336
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • National Sjögren’s Foundation Survey: Burden of Oral and Systemic Involvement on Quality of Life
  • Comparing the Visual Analog Scale and the Numerical Rating Scale in Patient-reported Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis
  • STRATUS: A Phase II Study of Abituzumab in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis–associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire