Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleOMERACT 9: International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Kananaskis Village, Alberta, Canada, May 27–31, 2008

Proposal for Levels of Evidence Schema for Validation of a Soluble Biomarker Reflecting Damage Endpoints in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Recommendations for Study Design

WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH, OLIVER FITZGERALD, GEORGE A. WELLS, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, ROBERT LANDEWÉ, MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD, WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, ROBIN CHRISTENSEN, PAUL-PETER TAK, MAARTEN BOERS, SILJE W. SYVERSEN, JOAN M. BATHON, CHRISTOPHER J. RITCHLIN, PHILIP J. MEASE, VIVIEN P. BYKERK, PATRICK GARNERO, PIET GEUSENS, HANI EL-GABALAWY, DANIEL ALETAHA, ROBERT D. INMAN, VIRGINIA BYERS KRAUS, TORE K. KVIEN and DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE
The Journal of Rheumatology August 2009, 36 (8) 1792-1799; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum090347
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: walter.maksymowych@ualberta.ca
OLIVER FITZGERALD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGE A. WELLS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAFNA D. GLADMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT LANDEWÉ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WILLIAM J. TAYLOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBIN CHRISTENSEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAUL-PETER TAK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAARTEN BOERS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SILJE W. SYVERSEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOAN M. BATHON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTOPHER J. RITCHLIN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PHILIP J. MEASE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VIVIEN P. BYKERK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PATRICK GARNERO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIET GEUSENS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HANI EL-GABALAWY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIEL ALETAHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT D. INMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VIRGINIA BYERS KRAUS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORE K. KVIEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    OMERACT 9 Levels of Evidence framework for validation of a soluble biomarker reflecting damage endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing arthritis (adapted from the generic biomarker framework at OMERACT 81).

    Domain Components
    1. Target outcome
      0 Disease-centered, reversible
      1 Disease-centered, irreversible
      2 Patient-centered, reversible
      3 Patient-centered, irreversible, minor organ/clinical morbidity (radiography)
    2. Study design
      1 Prospective, non-population, observational
      2 Prospective, population observational or 1 RCT
      3 ≥ 2 RCT and/or ≥ 2 prospective observational studies, same drug class (total of any 2)
      4 ≥ 2 RCT and/or ≥ 2 prospective observational studies, each of different drug class (total of any 2)
      5 ≥ 3 studies, ≥ 1 RCT and ≥ 1 prospective observational study (at least one of each study design), different drug class studies
    3. Penalties*
      –1 No evidence in ≥ 1 powered RCT
      –1 Opposite assertion in epidemiological study
      –1 No evidence in ≥ 1 epidemiological powered study
      –1 ≥ 1 RCT demonstrating clinical heterogeneity
      –2 ≥ 1 RCT supports opposite assertion
      –3 ≥ 1 RCT use of marker confers patient harm
    4. Performance criteria†
      Reproducibility
      Feasibility (readily accessible, availability of international standards, reasonable costs)
      Confounders (assay related, non-assay related)
      Stability
    • ↵* Penalties are not additive. The highest penalty ranking is applied. Studies should meet minimum standards for longitudinal study design.

    • ↵† 1. Performance criterion domain meets criteria 1, 2, 4, and 5 of OMERACT 9 v2 criteria. 2. Performance criteria should be met in their entirety before clinical validation studies. RCT: randomized controlled trial.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary results of 3-stage Delphi consensus exercise addressing minimum standards for longitudinal study design for validation of biomarker reflecting damage endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Items lacking consensus are indicated in bold type (percentage of respondents voting in support of the item is indicated in parentheses).

    RAPsAAS
    Inclusion CriteriaACR (48%)17, EULAR early referral criteria (26%)18, ANTI-CCP arthritis (25%)CASPAR19Modified New York (67%)20
    Pre-radiographic axial (24%)21
    Treatment strategyAll treatments (68%)All treatmentsAll treatments
    Selection of patient cohortConsecutive casesConsecutive cases (67%)Consecutive cases
    Inception cohort (33%)
    Study duration2 yrs4 yrs (69%)4 yrs
    2 yrs (27%)
    Frequency of assessmentEvery 3 moEvery 6 moEvery 6 mo
    Analysis of radiographic endpointBlinded to timepointBlinded to timepointBlinded to timepoint
    Allow steroidYesNot consideredNot considered
    Rules for changes in treatmentBy predetermined DAS every 3 moNot consideredNot considered
    Frequency of biomarker collectionQ6 mo and prior to new DMARD/anti-TNFQ6 mo and prior to new DMARD/anti-TNFQ6 mo and prior to new DMARD/anti-TNF
    SymptomsPain, patient global, fatigue (50%), stiffness (51%)Pain, skin global, patient global, stiffness (61%), fatigue (40%)Pain, stiffness, patient global, fatigue (38%)
    Physical functionPatient self-reported function, objective measures of function (47%)Patient self-reported functionPatient self-reported function, metrology
    Psychosocial functionQuality of lifeQuality of lifeQuality of life
    OtherWork status, work productivity (53%), participation (42%)Work status, work productivity (33%), participation (40%)Work status
    Disease activityJoint inflammation, global disease activity (patient/physician), general labs (ESR, CRP), imaging/MRI (62%), imaging/US (31%)Joint inflammation, global disease activity, (patient/physician), clinical enthesitis, dactylitis, spinal, skin, general labs (ESR, CRP), nail (56%), extraarticular disease (67%)Joint inflammation, global disease activity (patient/physician), clinical enthesitis, metrology, general labs (ESR, CRP), extraarticular disease, imaging/MRI
    Radiographic damage endpointModified SharpModified SharpmSASSS
    • ACR: American College of Rheumatology; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism; CCP: cyclic citrullinated peptide; CASPAR: CASPAR Study Group Criteria; DAS: Disease Activity Score; DMARD: disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; mSASSS: modified Stoke AS Spinal Score; US: ultrasonography.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    OMERACT 9 Soluble Biomarker Working Group minimum standards for the handling and processing of biomarker samples.

    RecommendationComment
    Type of sampleSerum, urineStandardized sample collection (e.g., tubes)
    Fasting sample
    Time of collection2–4 hours after risingDiurnal variation is common with musculoskeletal biomarkers22
    Time of sample processingWithin 2 hours of collectionStandardized centrifugation procedure. Keep sample at 4°C prior to centrifugation23
    Storage of samplesSample storage in 300–400 μl aliquots in −70°C freezerAvoid use of sample after 3 freeze/thaw cycles
    Sample transportExpress delivery on dry iceUse ample dry ice
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 36, Issue 8
1 Aug 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proposal for Levels of Evidence Schema for Validation of a Soluble Biomarker Reflecting Damage Endpoints in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Recommendations for Study Design
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Proposal for Levels of Evidence Schema for Validation of a Soluble Biomarker Reflecting Damage Endpoints in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Recommendations for Study Design
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH, OLIVER FITZGERALD, GEORGE A. WELLS, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, ROBERT LANDEWÉ, MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD, WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, ROBIN CHRISTENSEN, PAUL-PETER TAK, MAARTEN BOERS, SILJE W. SYVERSEN, JOAN M. BATHON, CHRISTOPHER J. RITCHLIN, PHILIP J. MEASE, VIVIEN P. BYKERK, PATRICK GARNERO, PIET GEUSENS, HANI EL-GABALAWY, DANIEL ALETAHA, ROBERT D. INMAN, VIRGINIA BYERS KRAUS, TORE K. KVIEN, DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2009, 36 (8) 1792-1799; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum090347

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Proposal for Levels of Evidence Schema for Validation of a Soluble Biomarker Reflecting Damage Endpoints in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Recommendations for Study Design
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH, OLIVER FITZGERALD, GEORGE A. WELLS, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, ROBERT LANDEWÉ, MIKKEL ØSTERGAARD, WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, ROBIN CHRISTENSEN, PAUL-PETER TAK, MAARTEN BOERS, SILJE W. SYVERSEN, JOAN M. BATHON, CHRISTOPHER J. RITCHLIN, PHILIP J. MEASE, VIVIEN P. BYKERK, PATRICK GARNERO, PIET GEUSENS, HANI EL-GABALAWY, DANIEL ALETAHA, ROBERT D. INMAN, VIRGINIA BYERS KRAUS, TORE K. KVIEN, DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2009, 36 (8) 1792-1799; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum090347
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER DIRECTIONS
    • Appendix 1. Ranking surrogate validity: domains, criteria, and ranks. From Lassere, et al. J Rheumatol 2007;34:607–15
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Developing a Standardized Definition for Disease “Flare” in Rheumatoid Arthritis (OMERACT 9 Special Interest Group)
  • Outcome Domains for Studies of Acute and Chronic Gout
  • Progress in Measurement Instruments for Acute and Chronic Gout Studies
Show more OMERACT 9: International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Kananaskis Village, Alberta, Canada, May 27–31, 2008

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire