Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

The Relationship Between Renal Activity and Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

SIMONE APPENZELLER, ANN E. CLARKE, PANTELIS PANOPALIS, LAWRENCE JOSEPH, YVAN ST. PIERRE and TRACY LI
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2009, 36 (5) 947-952; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080822
SIMONE APPENZELLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANN E. CLARKE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ann.clarke@mcgill.ca
PANTELIS PANOPALIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LAWRENCE JOSEPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YVAN ST. PIERRE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TRACY LI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the relationship between renal activity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods. Three hundred eighty-six patients completed annual Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 questionnaires and physicians completed the SLE Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Concurrent association between renal activity and QOL was evaluated through regression models that adjusted for demographics and nonrenal disease activity and nonrenal damage. To characterize the longitudinal relationship between change in renal activity and change in QOL, all renal activity and QOL data over the entire study were used to estimate a linear trend within each individual patient through hierarchical modeling.

Results. In the regression model that assessed the association between renal activity and QOL, on average, each additional renal activity item fulfilled was associated with a 2.04-unit (95% CI 0.88, 3.24) decrease in the physical function subscale, a 5.28-unit (95% CI 2.76, 7.76) decrease in the role-physical subscale, a 2.24-unit (95% CI 0.72, 3.80) decrease in the social function subscale, and a 1.16-unit (95% CI 0.60, 1.72) decrease in the physical component summary score. In the hierarchical model, no association was observed between changes in renal activity and QOL.

Conclusion. Patients with SLE and active renal disease concurrently experience a slightly poorer QOL than those without renal disease, especially in the physical domains. Because the confidence intervals were wide, we could not accurately estimate whether a longitudinal change in renal activity was associated with a change in QOL.

  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
  • QUALITY OF LIFE
  • RENAL ACTIVITY
  • HIERARCHICAL MODELING

With the significantly improved survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), due, in part, to earlier diagnosis and advances in the treatment of the disease and its comorbidities, quality of life (QOL) is an increasingly important consideration when caring for patients with SLE1.

Although numerous studies have shown that QOL in SLE is significantly poorer than in the general population1 and in some other chronic diseases2,3, studies examining the variables influencing QOL are somewhat contradictory1–21. In cross-sectional studies, psychosocial and behavioral variables, such as patients’ attitudes toward their disease, fatigue, and pain, are reported to compromise QOL5–9,15–17. In contrast, studies assessing the relationship between SLE disease activity and damage and QOL are equivocal, some5,9,11,17–21 showing no relationship, while others report worsening QOL with increasing disease activity4,6–8,12–14,22. Further, in longitudinal studies, QOL seems to be stable over time in most patients and is not influenced by disease-specific and socioeconomic variables1,10.

It is possible that QOL is influenced more by specific aspects of the disease than by overall disease activity. Although renal involvement occurs in up to 30% of SLE patients during the course of their disease23 and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, few studies have evaluated the QOL experienced by SLE patients with renal involvement16,24–26. We have previously shown that irreversible renal damage does not influence QOL27. Our aim was to evaluate the concurrent relationship between level of renal activity and QOL in SLE as well as the relationship between changes in renal activity and changes in specific QOL domains.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Consecutive patients presenting to the McGill University Health Centre Lupus Clinic and fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised criteria for SLE28 are invited to complete annual questionnaires and the physician completes annual measures of disease activity and damage. Participants were enrolled from 1995 to August 1, 2007. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the McGill University Health Centre.

Study instruments

QOL was determined using the standard version (4-week recall) of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 (SF-36)29. The SF-36 is a generic self-administered questionnaire that measures QOL in 8 areas of perceived health: physical function—limitations in physical activities because of health problems; role-physical — limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain — influence of pain on daily activities; vitality — energy level and fatigue; role-emotional — limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; mental health — psychological distress and well-being; social function — limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; and general health — subjective perception of health status. Scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores reflecting a more favorable QOL. The SF-36 subscales can be summarized into the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS) scores, derived using the original US algorithm.

Disease activity was assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)30. This instrument is a “weighted” index of disease activity in 9 organ systems: 8 points for each item characterizing involvement of the central nervous and vascular systems; 4 for items describing renal and musculoskeletal involvement; 2 for items describing serosal, dermal, and immunologic involvement; and 1 for items describing constitutional and hematologic involvement. The maximum theoretical score is 105, but in practice, few patients have scores exceeding 45.

Patients were considered to have renal activity if they fulfilled any of the following SLEDAI items that specifically characterize renal activity: (1) presence of heme-granular or red blood cell casts; (2) > 5 red blood cells per high power field; or (3) urine protein > 500 mg/day. Each item was scored according to the SLEDAI weight attributed to that item (i.e., 4 points per item) and the patient’s level of renal activity was expressed as the sum of these 3 renal SLEDAI items. Pyuria was not included in the definition of renal activity since it is possible that in some cases, urinary tract infections were not definitively excluded as the cause of the pyuria. Nonrenal activity was determined by all the other SLEDAI items (excluding pyuria) and scored accordingly.

Cumulative disease damage was calculated by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI)31. Damage is assessed in 12 organ systems: ocular (range of score for this item 0–2), neuropsychiatric (0–6), renal (0–3), pulmonary (0–5), cardiovascular (0–6), peripheral vascular (0–5), gastrointestinal (0–6), musculoskeletal (0–7), skin (0–3), gonadal (0–1), endocrine (0–1), and malignancy (0–2). Damage over time either remains stable or increases monotonically, theoretically to a maximum total score of 47. Each item is required to be present for at least 6 months (with a few exceptions) to be scored as cumulative damage.

Patients were considered to have renal damage if they fulfilled any of the following SLICC/ACR-DI items that specifically characterize renal damage: (1) estimated or measured glomerular filtration rate < 50%; (2) 24-hour proteinuria ≥ 3.5 g; or (3) endstage renal disease (regardless of dialysis or transplantation). Nonrenal damage was determined by all the other SLICC/ACR-DI items and scored accordingly.

Statistical analyses

Demographics, disease characteristics, and QOL are presented using means, medians, standard deviations, interquartile ranges, and proportions, as appropriate.

To estimate the relationship between level of renal activity and QOL, 2 different analyses were performed. (1) The concurrent association between the renal SLEDAI score (at time t) and each QOL outcome (at time t) was assessed through multivariate regression models, adjusting for the following potential confounders (all measured at time t): age, sex, ethnicity (Caucasian vs non-Caucasian), marital status (married vs unmarried), education (continuous variable), disease duration (defined as the time from the diagnosis of SLE until the study visit), nonrenal SLEDAI, and nonrenal SLICC/ACR-DI. Model selection was based on Bayes factor as approximated by the Bayesian information criteria. We used the Bayesian information criteria algorithm in order to explore the most plausible predictive models, and to select among these a model that included as many predictors as possible that were either significantly associated with the outcome and/or confounding the association between the outcome and our main predictor of interest (i.e., renal SLEDAI). (2) To characterize the longitudinal relationship between change in renal activity and change in QOL, all renal activity and SF-36 subscale and PCS and MCS scores over the entire course of the study were used to estimate the linear trend across time within each individual patient. This was done through 2-level hierarchical modeling, an approach that allows the borrowing of strength across patients while still allowing for individual within-patient variations. A Gibbs sampler algorithm, as implemented in WinBUGS 1.4 software32, was used to estimate the model parameters, with 95% credible intervals (CrI). In contrast to the first analysis, where the concurrent association between renal activity and QOL at each point in time is examined, in this analysis, there is only one observation per patient for each of renal activity and QOL measures, expressed as estimated average yearly change (i.e., a slope over time) in renal activity and QOL over the observation window. Potential covariates included study entry values of age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, education, disease duration, renal and nonrenal SLEDAI, nonrenal SLICC/ACR-DI, and the outcome variable. As in the first analysis, the best predictive model was selected using the Bayesian information criteria.

A sensitivity analysis was conducted to address the possibility that hematuria may represent a urinary tract infection and not renal activity, by considering hematuria as indicative of activity only if occurring in the absence of pyuria or in the presence of heme-granular or red blood cell casts.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-six patients (354 women, 71.5% Caucasian), with a mean age of 40.6 years (SD 14.5) and mean disease duration 8.1 years (SD 8.8, range 0–42.7 yrs), were evaluated (Table 1). Of the 386 participants, 322 had ≥ 2 visits with renal activity and QOL data.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographic, clinical, and quality of life characteristics at study entry and throughout observation interval.

The patients were followed for an average of 5.4 years (SD 4.5, range 0–14.5), with an average of 4.8 annual visits per patient (range 1–17). At baseline, 10.4% of the patients had renal activity. Over the study period, 51% of the patients had at least one non-zero renal activity score. Over the entire study interval, the average total SLEDAI was 5.3 (SD 4.1); the average of the renal and nonrenal SLEDAI items was 1.4 (SD 2.2) and 3.9 (SD 2.9), respectively. The average PCS and MCS score was 41.8 (SD 10.3) and 46.4 (SD 9.7), respectively (Table 1).

In the multiple regression models that examined the concurrent associations between renal activity and QOL, and which were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, education, disease duration, nonrenal disease activity, and nonrenal disease damage, on average, each additional renal activity item fulfilled was associated with a 2.04-unit (95% CI 0.88, 3.24) decrease in the physical function subscale, a 5.28-unit (95% CI 2.76, 7.76) decrease in the role-physical subscale, a 2.24-unit (95% CI 0.72, 3.80) decrease in the social function subscale, and a 1.16-unit (95% CI 0.60, 1.72) decrease in the PCS score. The other SF-36 subscales and the MCS score did not differ between patients with and those without renal activity (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Regression models for the concurrent and longitudinal association between renal activity and quality of life (QOL).

In the hierarchical model that examined the association between changes in renal activity and changes in QOL, each additional renal activity item fulfilled was associated with a 6.68-unit (95% CrI −6.24, 19.56) decrease in the physical function subscale and a 2.56-unit (95% CrI −1.40, 6.52) decrease in the PCS. No other associations between renal activity and the other QOL outcomes were observed, but wide confidence intervals preclude definitive conclusions for many of the QOL subscales (Table 2).

The results for the concurrent association between renal activity and QOL were unchanged when only hematuria occurring in the absence of pyuria or in the presence of heme-granular or red blood cell casts was considered reflective of renal activity.

DISCUSSION

Several studies have shown little association between overall disease activity and QOL in SLE1,4,5,9,11,17–20. It has been suggested that the perception of QOL may be modulated more by sociodemographic (age, education) and behavioral (coping with illness) characteristics than by overall disease activity5–9,15–17. However, the influence of specific SLE manifestations on QOL was not assessed in most of these studies. Renal involvement is still associated with increased morbidity in SLE, and responses to induction treatment vary. Renal relapses are frequent, and patients now routinely receive longstanding maintenance therapy with immunosuppressive drugs23. We therefore analyzed specifically the influence of active renal disease on QOL. We have shown previously that irreversible renal damage is not associated with change in QOL27. In the multiple regression model that examined the concurrent association between renal activity and QOL, we observed that patients with active renal disease experience a poorer QOL than those without renal disease, especially in the physical domains. Each additional renal activity item fulfilled was associated with a 2.04-unit (95% CI 0.88, 3.24) decrease in the physical function subscale, a 5.28-unit (95% CI 2.76, 7.76) decrease in the role-physical subscale, a 2.24-unit (95% CI 0.72, 3.80) decrease in the social function subscale, and a 1.16-unit (95% CI 0.60, 1.72) decrease in the PCS score. It has been suggested that minimum clinically important differences, which should reflect a degree of change perceptible to patients, require changes of 5 to 10 points in the individual domains of the SF-36 and 2.5 to 5 points for the PCS and MCS scores10,33. Hence, most of the changes we observed did not quite attain clinically meaningful differences.

Our study has some limitations. Disease activity and QOL are assessed only at the time of the patient’s annual research visit. Given the potential fluctuations in the disease course, our data may not reflect the patient’s full experience with SLE throughout the entire year. Further, patients who are unwell may be unwilling to attend a long research visit. Therefore, our results could have underestimated the effect of renal activity on QOL. Further, the SF-36, a generic instrument for characterizing QOL, may not identify SLE-specific manifestations that may compromise QOL10. However, the SF-36 allows comparison of QOL between different diseases and it alone has been used in almost all studies analyzing QOL in SLE1,4–7,9–11,13–17,20–22. In most studies, as in our own, the SF-36 was completed annually1,10,11. In one previous short-term study where the SF-36 was administered monthly, an association between disease activity and QOL was observed14.

Similar to our findings, others have also shown that the physical domains were more frequently affected than the mental domains in patients with SLE1,24,34,35. In one study, SLE patients with impaired renal function reported better mental well-being, but poorer physical functioning and general health, than SLE patients with preserved renal function24. One possible explanation is that patients with worse medical conditions may experience better mental than physical well-being due to various forms of social support (emotional, instrumental, self-esteem, and companionship)7,17,35. Existing studies examining QOL in patients with renal involvement16,24–26 are small, short-term, and do not include a comparator group without renal dysfunction.

In contrast to these few other studies that examined the concurrent association between renal activity and QOL16,24–26, we also evaluated the association between change in renal activity and change in QOL. However, wide confidence intervals precluded definitive conclusions. A larger sample size or a more comprehensive indicator of renal activity may have allowed more precise estimates. Although sequential renal biopsies may better characterize renal activity than the renal components of the SLEDAI, a renal biopsy is usually only performed when there is a reasonable clinical suspicion of renal activity because it carries substantial risk. Further, we acknowledge it is possible that a persistent low level of proteinuria, which is scored as renal activity on the SLEDAI, does not necessarily reflect renal activity. This limitation in the SLEDAI was recognized by the SELENA (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment) trial investigators36,37. In an attempt to better identify renal activity, the SLEDAI proteinuria item was modified to require “new onset or recent increase in proteinuria of > 500 mg per 24 hours” instead of presence of this level of proteinuria. Unfortunately, this SLEDAI modification was introduced only relatively recently and therefore, disease activity in our cohort was evaluated using the older instrument.

Kuriya, et al1 have conducted the only other research that examined the relationship between disease activity and QOL over time in SLE. It differs from our study in that it did not specifically assess renal activity. Further, Kuriya, et al1 included only those patients with at least 6 evaluations and used linear regression to estimate a slope for the change in QOL for each patient. However, by using hierarchical modeling, an approach that allows borrowing of strength across patients while still allowing for individual within-patient variations, we were able to include patients with only 2 observations. Further, the hierarchical modeling accounts for the variance in the estimation of the slopes.

In this longitudinal study, we observed that the majority of patients had relatively low disease activity and a stable QOL. As indicated in Table 1, the average slope of change in renal activity over the observation interval was −0.06 (95% CI −0.07, −0.05) and the average slope of change in the physical and mental component summary scores was 0.36 (95% CI 0.32, 0.40). Our findings are consistent with previous longitudinal assessments, which, although sparse, have shown that QOL is relatively stable over time in SLE patients with longstanding disease1,10. In our study, the average disease duration of 8.1 years combined with relatively low disease activity over the study period could have contributed to the stable QOL.

We observed that SLE patients with active renal disease concurrently experience a poorer QOL than those without renal disease, especially in the physical domains. Because the confidence intervals were wide, we could not determine whether a longitudinal change in renal activity was associated with a change in QOL. Disease-specific QOL instruments that better characterize the unique manifestations of SLE than the generic measures may be more likely to fluctuate in accord with specific features of SLE activity.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participating physicians (Sasha Bernatsky, MD, PhD; Christian Pineau, MD), research staff (Kim Allan, Denise Clayton, RN, Christina Neville, Popi Panaritis, Tania Santipietro, and Michele Tobaly), and patients whose contribution made this study possible.

Footnotes

  • Supported by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. The McGill University Health Centre Lupus Cohort is partially supported by the Singer Family Fund for Lupus Research. Dr. Appenzeller is the recipient of the Preston Robb Fellowship from the Montreal Neurological Institute and fellowships from the McGill University Health Centre Research Institute and the Canadian Arthritis Network. Dr. Clarke and Dr. Joseph are National Research Scholars of the Fonds de la recherché en santé du Québec. Dr. Panopalis is a Research Fellow of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Dr. Li is an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Dr. Clarke is a consultant for Human Genome Sciences and Bristol-Myers Squibb and has been or is a site investigator for Human Genome Sciences and Med Immune.

    • Accepted for publication December 23, 2008.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kuriya B,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Ibanez D,
    4. Urowitz MB
    . Quality of life over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:181–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gilboe IM,
    2. Kvien TK,
    3. Husby G
    . Health status in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls. J Rheumatol 1999;26:1694–700.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jolly M
    . How does quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compare with that of other common chronic illnesses? J Rheumatol 2005;32:1706–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Perez-Cuevas JB,
    2. Formiga F,
    3. Garcia-Carrasco M,
    4. Ramos M,
    5. Lara C,
    6. Rojas-Rodriguez J
    . A quality of life study in women with systemic lupus erythematosus and its relation to disease activity [Spanish]. An Med Interna 1999;16:457–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Friedman AW,
    2. Alarcon GS,
    3. McGwin G, Jr,
    4. et al
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. IV. Factors associated with self-reported functional outcome in a large cohort study. LUMINA Study Group. Lupus in Minority Populations, Nature versus Nurture. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:256–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Thumboo J,
    2. Fong KY,
    3. Chan SP,
    4. et al
    . A prospective study of factors affecting quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1414–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sutcliffe N,
    2. Clarke AE,
    3. Levinton C,
    4. Frost C,
    5. Gordon C,
    6. Isenberg DA
    . Associates of health status in patients with SLE. J Rheumatol 1999;26:2352–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Devins GM,
    2. Edworthy SM
    . Illness intrusiveness explains race-related quality-of-life differences among women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2000;9:534–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Doria A,
    2. Rinaldi S,
    3. Ermani M,
    4. et al
    . Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. II. Role of clinical, immunological and psychological determinants. Rheumatology 2004;43:1580–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Panopalis P,
    2. Petri M,
    3. Manzi S,
    4. et al
    . The systemic lupus erythematosus tri-nation study: Longitudinal changes in physical and mental well-being. Rheumatology 2005;44:751–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Alarcon GS,
    2. McGwin G, Jr,
    3. Uribe A,
    4. et al
    . Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic lupus cohort (LUMINA). XVII. Predictors of self-reported health-related quality of life early in the disease course. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:465–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stoll T,
    2. Gordon C,
    3. Seifert B,
    4. et al
    . Consistency and validity of patient administered assessment of quality of life by the MOS SF-36; its association with disease activity and damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1608–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Saba J,
    2. Quinet RJ,
    3. Davis WE,
    4. et al
    . Inverse correlation of each functional status scale of the SF-36 with degree of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (m-SLAM). Joint Bone Spine 2003;70:348–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fortin PR,
    2. Abrahamowicz M,
    3. Neville C,
    4. et al
    . Impact of disease activity and cumulative damage on the health of lupus patients. Lupus 1998;7:101–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dobkin PL,
    2. DaCosta D,
    3. Dritsa M,
    4. et al
    . Quality of life in SLE during more and less active disease states: Differential contributors to mental and physical health. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:401–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Medeiros MM,
    2. Menezes AP,
    3. Silveira VA,
    4. Ferreira FN,
    5. Lima GR,
    6. Ciconelli RM
    . Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and its relationship with cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. Eur J Intern Med 2008;19:122–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bae SC,
    2. Hashimoto H,
    3. Karlson EW,
    4. Liang MH,
    5. Daltroy LH
    . Variable effects of social support by race, economic status, and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1245–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.
    1. Hanly JG
    . Disease activity, cumulative damage and quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a cross-sectional study. Lupus 1997;6:243–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.
    1. Khanna S,
    2. Pal H,
    3. Pandey RM,
    4. Handa R
    . The relationship between disease activity and quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2004;43:1536–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Freire EA,
    2. Maia IO,
    3. Nepomuceno JC,
    4. Ciconelli RM
    . Damage index assessment and quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus patients (with long-term disease) in Northeastern Brazil. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26:423–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Urowitz MB,
    3. Gough J,
    4. MacKinnon A
    . Fibromyalgia is a major contributor to quality of life in lupus. J Rheumatol 1997;24:2145–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Mayo NE,
    3. Fortin PR
    . The relationship between health related quality of life and disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2001;28:525–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kulkarni O,
    2. Anders HJ
    . Chemokines in lupus nephritis. Front Biosci 2008;13:3312–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Vu TV,
    2. Escalante A
    . A comparison of the quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without endstage renal disease. J Rheumatol 1999;26:2595–601.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Tse KC,
    2. Tang CS,
    3. Lio WI,
    4. Lam MF,
    5. Chan TM
    . Quality of life comparison between corticosteroid and mycofenolate mofetil and corticosteroid and oral cyclophosphamide in the treatment of severe lupus nephritis. Lupus 2006;15:371–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Grootscholten C,
    2. Snoek FJ,
    3. Bijl M,
    4. van Houwelingen HC,
    5. Derksen RH,
    6. Berden JH
    . Health-related quality of life and treatment burden in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis treated with cyclophosphamide or azathioprine/methylprednisolone in a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1699–707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Clarke AE,
    2. Panopalis P,
    3. Petri M,
    4. et al
    . SLE patients with renal damage incur higher health care costs. Rheumatology 2008;47:329–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hochberg MC
    . Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ware JE, Jr,
    2. Sherbourne CD
    . The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bombardier C,
    2. Gladman DD,
    3. Urowitz MB,
    4. Caron D,
    5. Chang CH
    . Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:630–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Urowitz MB,
    3. Goldsmith CH,
    4. et al
    . The reliability of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:809–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lunn DJ,
    2. Thomas A,
    3. Best N,
    4. Spiegelhalter D
    . WinBUGS — a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics Computing 2000;10:325–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Strand V,
    2. Aranow C,
    3. Cardiel MH,
    4. et al
    . Improvement in health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing LJP 394 treatment with placebo. Lupus 2003;12:677–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Rinaldi S,
    2. Doria A,
    3. Salaffi F,
    4. et al
    . Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Relationship between physical and mental dimension and impact of age. Rheumatology 2004;43:1574–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Campbell R, Jr,
    2. Cooper GS,
    3. Gilkeson GS
    . Two aspects of the clinical and humanistic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus: mortality risk and quality of life early in the course of disease. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:458–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Buyon JP,
    2. Petri MA,
    3. Kim MY,
    4. et al
    . The effect of combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:953–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Kalunian KC,
    4. et al
    . Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2550–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 36, Issue 5
1 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Relationship Between Renal Activity and Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Relationship Between Renal Activity and Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SIMONE APPENZELLER, ANN E. CLARKE, PANTELIS PANOPALIS, LAWRENCE JOSEPH, YVAN ST. PIERRE, TRACY LI
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2009, 36 (5) 947-952; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080822

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
The Relationship Between Renal Activity and Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SIMONE APPENZELLER, ANN E. CLARKE, PANTELIS PANOPALIS, LAWRENCE JOSEPH, YVAN ST. PIERRE, TRACY LI
The Journal of Rheumatology May 2009, 36 (5) 947-952; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080822
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Traditional and Disease-Specific Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Multinational Retrospective Study
  • Consensus-Driven Definition for Unequivocal Sacroiliitis on Radiographs in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis
  • Canadian Rheumatology Association Meeting, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, February 8-11, 2023
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire