Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Risk of Coronary Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

MANDANA NIKPOUR, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, DOMINIQUE IBAÑEZ, IAN N. BRUCE, ROBERT J. BURNS and MURRAY B. UROWITZ
The Journal of Rheumatology February 2009, 36 (2) 288-294; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080776
MANDANA NIKPOUR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAFNA D. GLADMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOMINIQUE IBAÑEZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
IAN N. BRUCE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT J. BURNS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MURRAY B. UROWITZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.urowitz@utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Kaplan-Meier survival curves depicting accrual of coronary events over time in patients with normal and abnormal myocardial perfusion scans. Solid line represents the group with normal myocardial perfusion scans; broken line represents the group with abnormal myocardial perfusion scans.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic and disease-related characteristics of patients with normal and abnormal myocardial per-fusion scans.

    CharacteristicNormal Scan, n = 76Abnormal Scan, n = 46p
    Age*, yrs, mean (SD)42.7 (9.9)48.3 (11.9)0.007
    Disease duration*, yrs, mean (SD)13.14 (8.7)16.3 (10.5)0.07
    Caucasian, n (%)55 (72.4)40 (87.0)0.06
    Postmenopausal*, n (%)24 (31.6)24 (52.2)0.02
    HRT use, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan17/24 (70.8)14/24 (58.3)0.37
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)25/76 (32.9)16/46 (34.8)0.83
    SLEDAI-2K activity score*†, mean (SD)3.7 (4.5)3.9 (4.3)0.87
    Elevated anti-DNA antibody* (by radioimmunoassay)23 (30.3)16 (34.8)0.60
    Low complement* (low C3 or C4)21 (27.6)13 (28.3)0.94
    Antiphospholipid antibody*††13 (17.1)8 (17.4)0.97
    SLICC-DI damage score*,§, mean (SD)1.57 (1.71)1.93 (2.04)0.30
    Corticosteroid use, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan64 (84.2)38 (82.6)0.82
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)57 (75.0)37 (80.4)0.49
    Antimalarial use**, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan55 (72.4)38 (82.6)0.20
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)59 (77.6)40 (87.0)0.20
    Immunosuppressive use***, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan38 (50.0)25 (54.4)0.64
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)39 (51.3)23 (50.0)0.89
    • ↵* At time of myocardial scan;

    • ↵† scores range from 0 to 105, higher scores indicating more active disease20;

    • ↵†† lupus anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibody;

    • ↵§ scores range from 0 to 46, higher scores indicating greater disease-related damage19;

    • ↵** chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine;

    • ↵*** methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide. HRT: hormone replacement therapy, CAD: coronary artery disease; SLEDAI-2K: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; SLICC-DI: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-Damage Index.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Coronary events, cardiac risk factors, and cardiovascular medications in patients with normal and abnormal myocardial scans.

    Event/Risk FactorNormal Scan, n = 76Abnormal Scan, n = 46p
    New coronary event, n (%)2 (2.6)13 (28.3)< 0.0001
    Ten-year Framingham risk score*†, mean (SD)2.01 (1.10)2.39 (0.98)0.006
    Hypertension*,§, n (%)19 (25.0)23 (50.0)0.005
      Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean (SD)123.6 (18.4)130.9 (18.2)0.04
      Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean (SD)76.9 (9.9)78.1 (7.6)0.48
    Hypercholesterolemia*††, n (%)22 (29.0)17 (37.0)0.36
      Total cholesterol (mmol/l)a, mean (SD)4.94 (1.16)5.06 (1.09)0.56
    Reduced HDL cholesterol*,b, n (%)2 (2.7)2 (4.4)0.63
      HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)a, mean (SD)1.47 (0.38)1.34 (0.38)0.07
    Elevated LDL cholesterol*,c, n (%)17 (23.0)12 (26.7)0.65
      LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)a, mean (SD)2.92 (0.98)2.94 (1.30)0.93
    Smoking*, n (%)11 (14.7)6 (13.0)0.80
    Diabetes*,d, n (%)3 (4.0)2 (4.4)1.00
    Body mass index*,e24.4 (5.8)25.9 (6.0)0.16
    Antihypertensive usef, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan23 (30.3)27 (58.7)0.002
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)42 (55.3)28 (60.9)0.54
    Lipid-lowering medication useg, n (%)
      From clinic entry to scan1/3 (33.3)5/14 (35.7)1.00
      From scan to CAD event (or last visit)17 (23.3)9 (21.4)0.82
    • ↵* At the time of myocardial scan;

    • ↵† calculated using patient’s age, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and total and high density cholesterol level; on average, low-risk women below 50 years of age have a 10-year risk score ranging from minus 2 to 3 inclusive, while low-risk women above 50 years of age have a 10-year risk score ranging from 6 to 8 inclusive22–24;

    • ↵§ defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg or treatment with antihypertensives25–27;

    • ↵†† ≥5.2 mmol/l or lipid-lowering therapy28.

    • ↵a To convert mmol/l to mg/l multiply by 38.67;

    • ↵b < 0.9 mmol/l29,30;

    • ↵c > 3.4 mmol/l29,30;

    • ↵d defined as fasting plasma glucose > 7.0 mmol/l or diabetes therapy30,31;

    • ↵e weight in kilogram divided by the square of the height in meters32;

    • ↵f diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers;

    • ↵g HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (“statins”).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Cox regression analysis of independent predictors of coronary events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

    VariableHazard Ratio (95% CI)p
    Disease duration at time of myocardial scanNS
    Abnormal myocardial scan13.0 (2.8–60.1)0.001
    Ten-year Framingham risk score† at time of myocardial scan1.8 (1.1, 2.9)0.01
    • ↵† Calculated using patient’s age, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and total and high density cholesterol level22–24. For definitions of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, reduced HDL-C, and elevated LDL-C refer to the legend for Table 2. NS: nonsignificant, p > 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 36, Issue 2
1 Feb 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Risk of Coronary Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Risk of Coronary Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
MANDANA NIKPOUR, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, DOMINIQUE IBAÑEZ, IAN N. BRUCE, ROBERT J. BURNS, MURRAY B. UROWITZ
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2009, 36 (2) 288-294; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080776

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Risk of Coronary Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
MANDANA NIKPOUR, DAFNA D. GLADMAN, DOMINIQUE IBAÑEZ, IAN N. BRUCE, ROBERT J. BURNS, MURRAY B. UROWITZ
The Journal of Rheumatology Feb 2009, 36 (2) 288-294; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080776
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Vasculitis: What Have We Learned in the Last 50 Years?
  • Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)–associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies
  • Baseline Disease Activity Predicts Achievement of cDAPSA Treatment Targets With Apremilast: Phase III Results in DMARD-naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire