Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

Prevalence of Flare and Influence of Demographic and Serologic Factors on Flare Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective Study

MICHELLE PETRI, SUKHMINDER SINGH, HANNA TESFASYONE and ASHIMA MALIK
The Journal of Rheumatology November 2009, 36 (11) 2476-2480; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090019
MICHELLE PETRI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mpetri@jhmi.edu
SUKHMINDER SINGH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HANNA TESFASYONE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ASHIMA MALIK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective. We determined the prevalence of and risk factors for British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods. We followed 299 patients for 1 year with the BILAG scores calculated using British Lupus Integrated Prospective System software and confirmed with manual calculation.

Results. “A” flares occurred at a rate of 0.254/year, “B” flares 1.637/year, and A or B flares 1.765/year. The most common A flares were renal and mucocutaneous. The most common B flares were hematologic, renal, mucocutaneous, and musculoskeletal. Risk factors for a later A or B flare in the hematological system included: low C3 (p < 0.0001), low C4 (p = 0.0004), and positive anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA (p = 0.003); in the mucocutaneous system: low C3 (p = 0.02) and low C4 (p = 0.0004); and in the renal system: low C3 (p = 0.02) and low C4 (p = 0.02). In a stepwise regression model, only ethnicity (p = 0.02) and low C4 (p = 0.0002) remained as independent predictors of later A or 2B flares.

Conclusion. The organ system distribution of A and B flares is very different, with A flares more common in renal and mucocutaneous, and B flares more common in hematologic and renal systems. A or 2B flares are significantly more common in African Americans and in patients with abnormal serologies (low C3, low C4, or high anti-dsDNA). If flare is an outcome in an SLE clinical trial, these factors must be balanced by taking them into account at baseline in terms of randomization, or by statistical adjustment in final analyses.

  • LUPUS
  • BRITISH ISLES LUPUS ASSESSMENT GROUP
  • FLARE

There is no “gold standard” for measuring disease activity and/or flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many lupus activity indices have been developed and validated, including global scoring systems, such as the Systemic Lupus Activity Measurement (SLAM)1–4, SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)3,5–7, Lupus Activity Index (LAI)8,9, European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM)3,10–12, and one that is organ-based, the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)13. All these indices have been shown to be valid, reliable, and sensitive to change14–17.

BILAG, based on the physician’s intent to treat, includes a total of 86 items in 8 organ systems: general, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular/respiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematological. Scores of A, B, C, D, and E are calculated for each organ system, based upon whether clinical features are present and if they are new, worse, same, or improving in the last 4 weeks, compared with the previous visit. Scores can be calculated manually or by a computer program called the British Lupus Integrated Prospective System (BLIPS)18.

A score of “A” in any organ system indicates very active lupus that is expected to be treated with new or an increased dose of corticosteroids (prednisolone > 20 mg per day or equivalent)2. A score of “B” indicates moderate activity that requires lower doses of corticosteroids, antimalarials, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). A score of “C” implies a mild or stable activity that requires only symptomatic treatment, such as analgesics and NSAID. A score of “D” is recorded if there are no current symptoms, but the organ system has been active previously. If the system has never been involved and there is no current disease activity, a score of “E” is recorded2. An active lupus flare is defined as a new A (severe flare) or B (moderate flare) score in at least one system that previously scored a C, D, or E19.

The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of A and B organ flare, using BILAG, over 1 year, in a large cohort of well described patients with SLE in the United States. In addition, we determined the influence of demographic and serologic factors on risk of flare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed 299 patients with SLE prospectively for 1 year (303.1 total followup person-years). The study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board and all patients provided signed informed consent. At each quarterly visit, or more frequently if there were “interval” visits, clinical features that were part of the BILAG assessment of disease activity were recorded in the clinic on standardized BILAG encounter forms. Medications were not required to be stable during the study. The data gathered were subsequently entered into the BLIPS computer software (version 3) by research coordinators18. Using BLIPS software, the BILAG index was recorded for 8 organ systems (general, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular/respiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematological)15. This index generates scores of A for severe activity and B for moderate activity. Patients whose scores moved to an A or to a B in any of the 8 organs/systems, preceded by a C/D/E activity score, were considered to have experienced flare. Each BLIPS result was checked by hand scoring. This was especially important in the renal system. If proteinuria increased from 1 to 2+ on the urine dipstick, the correct score using the BILAG manual was B. However, the BLIPS software gave an incorrect C score in this setting. The BILAG 2004, a revision of the classic BILAG, was not available at the time of this study20.

C3 and C4 concentrations were measured using the Immage kit (Beckman). Anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA by Crithidia was tested first at 1:10 dilution and then titered out, up to 640. Baseline antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were not tested as part of the study.

Statistical analysis

The relevant demographic and laboratory variables were extracted from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort Access database using the Cohort ID as the unique identifier.

Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. A p value of 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The 299 patients with SLE had a mean age of 47 years and 88% were female. Caucasians represented 57% of the study population, followed by African Americans (37%), Asians (3%), Hispanics (2%), and other ethnicities (1%). The patients had 14.0 (± 2.8) mean years of education, 12.5 years (± 8.5) disease duration of SLE, 43.5% smoking (ever), 23.3% low C3, 22.3% low C4, and 25.5% were anti-dsDNA-positive. Cumulative American College of Rheumatology criteria included 54% malar rash, 20% discoid rash, 53% photosensitivity, 52% oral ulcers, 79% arthritis, 46% pleuritis, 25% pericarditis, 44% proteinuria, 7% seizures, 3% psychosis, 9% hemolytic anemia, 52% leukopenia, 53% lymphopenia, 27% thrombocytopenia, 63% anti-dsDNA, 14% anti-Sm, 68% antiphospholipid antibodies, and 97% positive ANA.

The prevalence of A, B, or A/B flares per year is shown in Table 1. Total years of followup were 303.07 for the 299 patients. The frequency of A flare was 0.254/year, B flare 1.637/year, and A or B flare 1.765/year. Seventeen percent of patients had an A flare and 69% had a B flare during the year of followup. Seventy percent had either an A or B flare. Considering the 8 organ systems separately, the most frequent A flare was seen in the renal system (0.102/yr) and the most frequent B flare in the hematologic system (0.868/yr), closely followed by the renal system (0.469/yr). The most frequent A or B flares per year, by organ system, were seen in the hematologic system (0.901/yr), followed by the renal system (0.571/yr).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Frequency of BILAG A, B, or A/B flares by organ system, per person-year.

The frequency of 2B flares (flares in which 2 organs have scored a B at the same visit) was 0.5/year. The most frequent combinations leading to 2B flares were renal and hematologic (0.165/yr), followed by musculoskeletal and hematologic (0.076/yr) and mucocutaneous and hematologic (0.053/yr).

Table 2 shows the distribution summary of how a subject progressed to the A (severe) category from a previous score of B, C, D, or E, or to a B category from a previous score of C, D, or E. For mucocutaneous flares, most A flares were preceded by a B score at the previous visit. For renal A flares, the previous score was equally an E or a C. A hematologic flares were always preceded by a score of B.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Distribution summary of progression to A or B flares from previous BILAG score of E, D, C, or B. Each cell shows the number of patients.

Flares occurred equally throughout the year: 27% at 3 months, 24% between 3 and 6 months, 25% between 6 and 9 months, and 24% between 9 and 12 months. Not all flares resulted in a treatment change.

Table 3 represents various risk factors leading to later A or B flares, based upon the individual organ systems. Women and African Americans were more likely to have a flare than men or non-African Americans, respectively. Abnormal serologies were predictors of having a flare over the next year. Abnormal serologies were predictive of flares in the mucocutaneous, renal, and hematologic organ systems, but not the other organ systems.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Risk factors for later A or B flares based on organ system involvement.

Factors predictive of an A or 2B flare are shown in Table 4. African American ethnicity, low C3, low C4, or anti-dsDNA were all predictive.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Influence of demographic and serologic factors in BILAG A or 2B flare.

Table 5 shows the multiple variable model for an A or 2B flare. The best regression model contained African American ethnicity, low C3, low C4, and anti-dsDNA. Age ≥45 years (vs younger) did not affect the frequency of A or B flares. Duration of SLE ≥ 10 years (vs less) also did not affect the frequency of BILAG flares. Prednisone use at baseline was associated with the frequency of A flare (p = 0.0057), B flare (p = 0.0004), and A or B flare (p = 0.004). Hydroxychloroquine use at baseline did not affect the frequency of A, B, or A or B flares. Immunosuppressive drug use at baseline was associated with A flares (p = 0.0011), B flares (p = 0.0006), or A or B flares (p = 0.0021).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Multiple regression model of later A or 2B flare.

DISCUSSION

Ours is the first study of the prevalence of BILAG A or B flares in a US population. The previous study conducted in the United Kingdom found that over 1 year, 10.4% had an A flare and 51% had a B flare, compared with 17% with an A and 69% with a B flare in our study. The higher frequency of flare in our study may reflect differences in ethnicity, including renal flares in our African American patients.

This is the first study of the pattern of progression, by organ system, to an A or B flare. We found that the progression pattern differs by organ system and by A or B flare. For example, most A flares were preceded by a B score, with the exception of the neurologic and renal systems. In contrast, B flares could be preceded by E, D, or C scores, with the exception of the neurologic system, in which B flares were preceded by E scores.

Several recent clinical trials have based enrollment on one A or two B flares. We were very interested in the combination of organ systems that most frequently constituted a 2B flare. Each of the 3 most common combinations included the hematologic system, with the hematologic B score usually not requiring treatment. Thus, our data show that two B flares may not always have the same severity, or need for aggressive treatment, as one A flare.

The BILAG was designed to reflect the physician’s intention to treat. However, physicians differ in the treatment of SLE. We try to minimize exposure to corticosteroids. Some flares may resolve spontaneously, or in response to a brief burst of intramuscular corticosteroid, as proven in the FLOAT trial21. Some B flares, especially hematologic and cutaneous, may not require treatment. Treatment of disease activity may have been started at a previous visit for the renal, skin, and hematologic organ systems, but the treatment may require time to be efficacious. Thus, it is not surprising that not all A and B flares require treatment. Indeed, the original analysis of flares by the BILAG group showed that there was a significant difference in the frequency and management of A flares (new, very active flare) compared with B flares (new, moderate flare) and in treatment by organ19. In the British series, only 20% of neurologic A flares and 17% of vasculitis A flares were treated. Only 41% of B flares required an increase in therapy.

This is the first study of demographic and serologic predictors of flares, ascertained using the BILAG, in a US population. Women were more likely to have a flare than men. Although we found that men had fewer flares, some studies have shown that men have a more severe course of lupus22. African Americans were more likely to experience flare overall and in the hematologic system than non-African Americans. The increased risk of renal lupus in African Americans is well known23, but this is the first proof of an overall increase in flares.

The role of serologies in predicting flares has been controversial. In a previous study, using multiple different definitions of flare, we showed that no serology predicted which patient would have a flare the next month24,25. However, on the actual day of the flare, anti-dsDNA was lower in the serum (likely representing deposition of anti-dsDNA immune complexes in tissues) and complement was lower with renal or hematologic flares.

Our current study extends those results in BILAG-defined organ system flares. Both low C3 and low C4 doubled the risk of mucocutaneous, renal, or hematologic flares over the next year. Surprisingly, anti-dsDNA was only predictive of hematologic or “any” organ flare over the next year. Because our study examined anti-dsDNA only by the Crithidia assay, the Farr or ELISA might have given different results. Several clinical trials have suggested that treatment of serologic abnormalities can reduce flares. For example, treatment of a change in serologies may reduce later disease activity26. Treatment of anti-dsDNA changes may reduce flares27,28. In addition, a reduction of anti-dsDNA led to a reduction of later flares29.

In conclusion, the BILAG system of flare scores offers the advantage of analysis both by severity, by A or B score, and by organ system. The natural history of BILAG flares elucidated in our study indicates that the progression to an A or B flare differs, and that progression also differs by organ system. The hematologic B flare often does not require treatment and should not be allowed as an entry criterion for clinical trials of major immunosuppressive regimens. In the multiple regression models, the 2 factors that remained independent predictors of later flares were ethnicity and low C4 concentration. These factors must now be taken into account in the design and analysis of clinical trials that include flare as an outcome measure.

Footnotes

  • The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by National Institutes of Health AR 43727 and by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Outpatient General Clinical Research Center M01-RR00052.

    • Accepted for publication June 4, 2009.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Liang MH,
    2. Socher SA,
    3. Larson MG,
    4. Schur PH
    . Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:1107–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Goldsmith CH,
    3. Urowitz MB,
    4. Bacon P,
    5. Bombardier C,
    6. Isenberg D,
    7. et al.
    Crosscultural validation and reliability of 3 disease activity indices in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1992;19:608–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ward MM,
    2. Marx AS,
    3. Barry NN
    . Comparison of the validity and sensitivity to change of 5 activity indices in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2000;27:664–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bae SC,
    2. Koh HK,
    3. Chang DK,
    4. Kim MH,
    5. Park JK,
    6. Kim SY
    . Reliability and validity of Systemic Lupus Activity Measure-revised (SLAM-R) for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2001;10:405–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Hellmann D,
    3. Hochberg M
    . Validity and reliability of lupus activity measures in the routine clinic setting. J Rheumatol 1992;19:53–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gladman DD,
    2. Goldsmith CH,
    3. Urowitz MB,
    4. Bacon P,
    5. Bombardier C,
    6. Isenberg D,
    7. et al.
    Sensitivity to change of 3 systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity indices: international validation. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1468–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hawker G,
    2. Gabriel S,
    3. Bombardier C,
    4. Goldsmith C,
    5. Caron D,
    6. Gladman D
    . A reliability study of SLEDAI: a disease activity index for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1993;20:657–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ruiz-Irastorza G,
    2. Khamashta MA,
    3. Gordon C,
    4. Lockshin MD,
    5. Johns KR,
    6. Sammaritano L,
    7. et al.
    Measuring systemic lupus erythematosus activity during pregnancy: validation of the lupus activity index in pregnancy scale. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:78–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bencivelli W,
    2. Vitali C,
    3. Isenberg DA,
    4. Smolen JS,
    5. Snaith ML,
    6. Sciuto M,
    7. et al.
    Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of the Consensus Study Group of the European Workshop for Rheumatology Research III. Development of a computerised clinical chart and its application to the comparison of different indices of disease activity. The European Consensus Study Group for Disease Activity in SLE. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1992;10:549–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mosca M,
    2. Bencivelli W,
    3. Vitali C,
    4. Carrai P,
    5. Neri R,
    6. Bombardieri S
    . The validity of the ECLAM index for the retrospective evaluation of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 200;9:445–50.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bombardieri S,
    2. Vitali C,
    3. Caponi L,
    4. Manca L,
    5. Bencivelli W
    . Activity criteria in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994;12:S45–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Isenberg DA,
    2. Rahman A,
    3. Allen E,
    4. Farewell V,
    5. Akil M,
    6. Bruce IN,
    7. et al.
    BILAG 2004 — Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group’s disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2009;48:691–5. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Symmons DP,
    2. Coppock JS,
    3. Bacon PA,
    4. Bresnihan B,
    5. Isenberg DA,
    6. Maddison P,
    7. et al.
    Development and assessment of a computerised index of clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Members of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG). Q J Med 1988;69:927–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hay EM,
    2. Bacon PA,
    3. Gordon C,
    4. Isenberg DA,
    5. Maddison P,
    6. Snaith ML,
    7. et al.
    The BILAG index: a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Q J Med 1993;86:447–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Stoll T,
    2. Stucki G,
    3. Malik J,
    4. Pyke S,
    5. Isenberg DA
    . Further validation of the BILAG disease activity index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55:756–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ward MM,
    2. Marx AS,
    3. Barry NN
    . Comparison of the validity and sensitivity to change of 5 activity indices in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2000;27:664–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Isenberg DA,
    2. Gordon C
    . From BILAG to BLIPS — disease activity assessment in lupus past, present and future. Lupus 2000;9:651–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ehrenstein MR,
    2. Conroy SE,
    3. Heath J,
    4. Latchman DS,
    5. Isenberg DA
    . The occurrence, nature and distribution of flares in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a rheumatological view. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:257–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gordon C,
    2. Sutcliffe N,
    3. Skan J,
    4. Isenberg DA
    . Definition and treatment of lupus flares measured by the BILAG index. Rheumatology 2003;42:1372–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yee CS,
    2. Farewell V,
    3. Isenberg DA,
    4. Prabu A,
    5. Sokoll K,
    6. Teh LS,
    7. et al.
    Revised British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index: a reliable tool for assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus activity. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3300–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Danowski A,
    2. Magder L,
    3. Petri M
    . Flares in lupus: Outcome Assessment Trial (FLOAT), a comparison between oral methylprednisolone and intramuscular triamcinolone. J Rheumatol 2006;33:57–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kaufman LD,
    2. Gomez-Reino JJ,
    3. Heinicke MH,
    4. Gorevic PD
    . Male lupus: retrospective analysis of the clinical and laboratory features of 52 patients, with a review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989;18:189–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Petri M,
    2. Perez-Gutthann S,
    3. Longenecker JC,
    4. Hochberg MC
    . Morbidity of systemic lupus erythematosus: role of race and socioeconomic status. Am J Med 1991;91:345–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ho A,
    2. Magder L,
    3. Barr S,
    4. Petri M
    . Decreases in anti-double stranded DNA levels are associated with concurrent flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2342–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ho A,
    2. Magder LS,
    3. Barr SG,
    4. Petri MA
    . A decrease in complement is associated with increased renal and hematologic flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2350–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tseng CE,
    2. Buyon JP,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Belmont HM,
    5. Mackay M,
    6. Diamond B,
    7. et al.
    The effect of moderate-dose corticosteroids in preventing severe flares in patients with serologically active, but clinically stable, systemic lupus erythematosus: Findings of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3623–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Swaak AJG,
    2. Gorenwold J,
    3. Bronsveld W
    . Predictive value of complement profiles and anti-dsDNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 1986;45:359–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ter Borg EJ,
    2. Horst G,
    3. Hummel EJ,
    4. Limburg PC,
    5. Kallenberg CGM
    . Measurement of increases in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels as a predictor of disease exacerbation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a long-term, prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:634–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Alarcon-Segovia D,
    2. Tumlin JA,
    3. Furie RA,
    4. McKay JD,
    5. Cardiel MH,
    6. Strand V,
    7. et al.
    LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:442–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 36, Issue 11
1 Nov 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence of Flare and Influence of Demographic and Serologic Factors on Flare Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Prevalence of Flare and Influence of Demographic and Serologic Factors on Flare Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective Study
MICHELLE PETRI, SUKHMINDER SINGH, HANNA TESFASYONE, ASHIMA MALIK
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2009, 36 (11) 2476-2480; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Prevalence of Flare and Influence of Demographic and Serologic Factors on Flare Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Prospective Study
MICHELLE PETRI, SUKHMINDER SINGH, HANNA TESFASYONE, ASHIMA MALIK
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2009, 36 (11) 2476-2480; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • One-Third of European Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Reach Pain Remission With Routine Care Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment
  • Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Positive Predictive Value of a Very High Serum IgG4 Concentration for the Diagnosis of IgG4-Related Disease
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire