Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Review ArticleReview

Systemic Sclerosis: Environmental Factors

GABRIELA FERNANDA MORA
The Journal of Rheumatology November 2009, 36 (11) 2383-2396; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090207
GABRIELA FERNANDA MORA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence for the association between environmental and occupational risk factors and systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been extensively analyzed. Such exposures are frequently of long duration, and the inadequate classification of the type of exposure and other confounding variables may bias their estimated association with SSc. Environmental factors could be classified as occupational (silica, organic solvents), infectious (bacterial, viral), and non-occupational/non-infectious (drugs, pesticides, silicones). Understanding the link between environmental risk factors and the development of SSc is limited, due to the phenotypic and pathogenic heterogeneity of patients and disease, respectively, and also due to poor ability to assess environmental exposures quantitatively and the role of the gene-environment interactions in this disease. Global collaboration could increase the chance for a better use of the data obtained from a limited number of cases and also limited resources. Normalization and validation of biomarkers and questionnaires could also be very useful to reliably quantify environmental exposures.

  • SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS
  • RISK FACTORS
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

Understanding the role of environment in autoimmune disease pathogenesis is limited even in the genomic era. Environmental risk factors are identified when autoimmunity emerges after certain exposure, resolves when that exposure has stopped and relapses at rechallenge.

Environmental disease risk factors can be identified by means of several standardized methods when there are uniform systematic criteria to be applied by the investigators. However, there is a limited number of validated exposure biomarkers and other tools for environmental assessment; physicians lack accurate knowledge in environmental medicine; systemic autoimmune diseases are rare; and there are no national databases on autoimmune diseases to enhance epidemiologic research, making it difficult to define environmental risk factors for autoimmunity. That is the reason why epidemiologic research with the accurate power to identify environmental risk factors in autoimmune diseases may require an important sample size, resulting in unpractical and expensive studies.

Environmental etiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been extensively investigated. Clusters of disease have been identified among certain occupational groups1–7, and small descriptive research has identified a variety of environmental agents such as vinyl chloride8–10, silica1–5,7,11–13, certain hydrocarbons14,15, epoxy resins16, rapeseed oil17, drugs18–22, and vaccines23 (Table 1). There is a growing body of evidence related to the “spacio-temporal” cluster in systemic sclerosis etiology24–27.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Environmental factors associated with SSc.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Mechanisms responsible of the development of environmentally induced systemic autoimmunity are poorly understood. There are several hypotheses, but none of them are accurately sustained by direct evidence. Those mechanisms supposed to be involved in the beginning of the disease may be different to those worsening an established disease.

Environmental pathogenesis of SSc may be divided into 3 major mechanisms28, as follows.

Immune Tolerance Interference

Loss of self-tolerance is crucial for the development of autoimmunity as a general concept. Many studies suggest that environmental exposure to certain agents affects tolerance at several points.

The haptene hypothesis proposes that a drug or its metabolites bind to certain proteins, changing their immunogenicity and triggering an immune response. The T cell recognition of such a complex is altered and results in immune tolerance interference. Human lymphocytes stimulated with silica express high levels of Fas receptor (CD95) and undergo apoptosis, with autoantigen alteration, concentration, and release, provoking an autoimmune attack29 and post-translational protein changes28.

Epigenetics comprise all inherited changes in gene expression that are not coded in the DNA sequence itself. Two major mechanisms mediate epigenetic changes: DNA methylation and histone modification30–33. There is a direct causal relationship between methylation-dependent transcriptional repression and histone modifications. Some drugs may alter genomic activity by means of changes on DNA structure. Methylation of DNA suppresses genetic activity and regulates genes potentially harmful for cell functions. Hydralazyne and procainamyde are examples of DNA methylation inhibitors that enhance the expression of normally silenced genes and may lead to autoimmunity33–37.

Scleroderma-associated cellular abnormalities persist in multiple generations of SSc fibroblasts in vitro and this profibrotic phenotype persists outside the disease microenvironment, suggesting the inheritance and transmission of in vivo imprinting of this disease phenotype among generations of fibroblasts. Increased levels of epigenetic mediators in SSc fibroblasts were noted in a study by Wang and colleagues30. The augmented collagen synthesis by SSc fibroblasts was linked to epigenetic repression of the collagen suppressor gene FLI1. Heavy methylation of the CpG islands in the FLI1 promoter region was demonstrated in SSc fibroblasts and skin biopsy specimens.

Immune System Activation

It has been postulated that many cases of autoimmunity that occur after the therapeutic administration of cytokines and resolve after withdrawal may be the result of the direct immune activation by these cytokines. Other studies show that respirable silica particles are phagocytized by alveolar macrophages, driving cell activation and release of soluble mediators such as cytokines: tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin 1-ß, and transforming growth factor-ß38. T cell incubation with silica and silicates may cause lymphoid polyclonal activation in vitro29.

The role of solvents in the initiation of SSc is not clear. Autoimmune disease-prone MRL +/+ mice exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE) and its metabolites induced autoantibody production39. In a population exposed to domestic contamination of water with TCE, there were found high levels of CD4+ CD8+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood, suggesting that this agent may alter normal immunity by modification of autoantigens40. Solvents penetrate through the skin and the airways, initiating cellular and humoral autoimmunity and stimulating the production of fibrogenic proteins and growth factors41.

Vinyl chloride can enhance the immunogenicity of certain intracellular molecules, CD8+ activation42, and skin thickening related to collagen deposition43.

Molecular Mimicry

This mechanism is characterized by an immune response to an environmental agent cross-reacting with the host antigens. The best epidemiologic evidence for this mechanism in human disease is beta-hemolytic streptococci infection and rheumatic fever44. It is challenging to elucidate if this cross-reactivity is an epiphenomenon of such infection, or if autoimmunity appears after a loss of T cell ability to discriminate self- from non-self antigens through the shared epitope mechanism45.

Maul, et al identified an 11-amino acid epitope on the C-terminal extreme of topoisomerase (topo)-1 sharing 6 of 11 sequential amino acids of the group-specific antigen p30gag from certain mammal retroviruses46. Muryoi and colleagues described an epitope the recognizes the N-terminal extreme of topo-1 in patients with SSc and TSK mice. This epitope seems to have a cross-reactivity with other fragments of topo-1 and shares some degree of homology with UL70 protein of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)47.

There may be no single mechanism to explain environmental exposure triggering such an heterogeneous disease as SSc. It is more likely to exist a combination of all these mechanisms. Most of the alterations of the immune system may involve antigen recognition and processing, cell signaling, and cytokine production.

New approaches in biology have led to the implementation and combination of genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic studies, bringing us closer to identifying the molecular signature of some environmental exposures.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Epidemiologic evidence for the association between environmental and occupational risk factors and SSc has been extensively analyzed. Because those exposures are frequently of long duration, there is growing interest in study of damage to health in the workplace, to establish a safe occupational environment for human health.

The majority of individuals are not aware of the specific agent they have been exposed to during their work, and without validated biomarkers, many of these studies are based on indirect evidence of exposure.

Environmental exposure may vary widely and it may be considered to include all non-genetic factors. Commonly, chemicals or drugs are considered environmental factors; stress events of daily life, other factors from lifestyle and incidental exposures like ultraviolet radiation could also be environmental risk factors for autoinmune diseases. With this in mind, environmental factors can be classificated into 3 categories: occupational, infectious, and non-occupational/non-infectious.

The association between environmental exposure and the beginning of SSc may be difficult to demonstrate. In this situation, the association is rare due to the fact that most of the patients with SSc did not have any exposure, just as the majority of the exposed subjects do not develop the disease, unless we work with a small group of subjects in which both situations occur simultaneously.

Case-control studies are of limited value because of the rarity of the exposure, as are cohort studies because of the rarity of the disease that could develop in an exposed group. Thus, many of these studies do not have enough statistical power to exclude the real effects or to detect moderate associations. The inadequate classification of the type of environmental exposure and other confounding variables may bias the estimated association between exposure and SSc.

Occupational Factors

Silica. The frequency of occupational exposure to crystaline silica dust, as a generator of work damage, has been underestimated, even though it is recognized as a risk factor for many systemic autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, and small-vessel vasculitis with renal involvement (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody related vasculitis)38,48–50.

Silicon is an ubiquitous mineral in the environment. It constitutes the second most abundant element in the earth’s crust and is part of air pollution particles; it may represent a significant proportion of environmental dust levels in some geographic areas51,52. It primarily exists in the crystalline state as quartz, which is structurally and chemically different from amorphous silica (diatomaceous earth), silicates (starch and asbestos), and silicones (a polymer containing silicon: polydimethyl siloxane [(Si[CH3]2O)n]). Crystalline silica may be harmful when it is inhalated as respirable dust (particles of less than 5 μm). The allowed limits of exposure for respirable silica stablished by the US Occupational Health and Safety Administration are close to 0.1 mg/m3 (estimated for an 8 h exposure for quartz), constituting double the recommended limit of exposure: 0.05 mg/m3, suggested by the US National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, to minimize the risk of silicosis53,54.

Professions classically related to occupational exposure to this agent are mining, sandblasting, and pottery. There are many other occupational sources not frequently associated with the induction of autoimmunity. Some examples are mechanical dentistry, agricultural tasks, asphalt work, cosmetology, use of abrasives, jewelry, etc.50,54 (Table 2)55.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Industries, occupations and tasks with crystalline silica exposure. Data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer55.

Technological advances provided powerful tools to the mining industry, increasing the workers’ exposure to silica dust. Pneumoconiosis became more frequent and developed faster when steam machinery was installed in factories by the end of the 19th century. The intensive use of pneumatic hammers made this occupation more dangerous for human health56.

In 1914, a physician from Chalmers Hospital and consultant to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary named Bramwell described the incidence of scleroderma in 9 Scottish patients. Surprisingly, in his study, there was just 1 female patient57.

Four decades later, Erasmus expressed his interest in the high prevalence of SSc in 40,013 gold miners from the Witwatersrand1. Rodnan, et al reported a prevalence study about silica exposure in 60 men with SSc between 1955 and 1965. They showed evidence that SSc in patients with occupational exposure to silica is higher than in the general population, suggesting that silicosis could be a predisposing factor in the pathogenesis of the disease7.

Other reports documented SSc cases among patients working in mechanical dentistry58; a case of conjugal SSc related to silica exposure was also described59.

In the 1990s case reports, case-control studies, exposure prevalence and incidence studies in patients with Ssc (institutionally or population based) were published. Even though the number of exposed subjects may vary from different samples and the spacio-temporal cluster, the data obtained did not sustain an important role for silica in women, but in some cases evidenced the occupational background of silica exposure for SSc in men (published findings in Tables 3–6)60–73.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Studies of SSc in occupational cohorts with silica dust exposure.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Registry-based studies on occupational exposure to silica dust or silicosis and autoimmune disease-SSc.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Case-series studies describing silica exposure in SSc.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6.

Case-control studies on silica exposure and SSc.

In Argentina, a clinic-based case-control study assessed silica dust exposure in 20 patients with SSc between 1998 and 2002. A questionnaire designed by environmental hygienists was applied to cases and controls discriminating the type of task carried by the subjects: construction, janitorial, agricultural, and dental72. Although this study did not achieve adequate statistical power, the group with SSc showed 60% previous exposure to free silica sources [odds ratio (OR) 21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-101; p < 10−7]. Sixty-seven percent of patients with SSc and silica exposure were women (OR 24.6; 95% CI 3.6-216; p < 10−5). Time of latency between the beginning of the exposure and disease diagnosis was 21 years, on average. In an emerging country, the role of women in tasks classically assigned to men may be similar in middle and low income classes.

Vinyl chloride

This is an uncolored combustible gas (CH2 = CHCl), used in plastic manufacturing. In the mid-1960s a new syndrome affecting workers of vinyl chloride polymerization was described by Wilson and colleagues74. These patients developed finger paresthesias, Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP), pseudo-acropachy, skin thickening, edema of hands and forearms, and chest radiographic changes75. Risk for suffering these alterations is related to cumulative exposure over time and not necessarily with manipulation of the final product, polyvinyl chloride (PVC)74. There seems to be an apparent increase of the prevalence of MHC DR3 and DR3/B8 haplotypes in patients with this disease76. Skin changes in vinyl chloride disease may be similar to morphea, and the most striking hallmark of the syndrome is phalanx acroosteolysis75. Several immune alterations have been described, such as polyclonal IgG increase, cryoglobulins, complement activation, and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in low titers10. Clinical and symptomatic improvement after withdrawal of the exposure is characteristic74.

Organic solvents

The determination of the type of solvent that a subject has been exposed to is crucial to the accuracy of epidemiological studies. It is frequently difficult to infer which agent is involved, not only because of limitations in the individual’s knowledge but also because frequent users of solvents do not look for a specific chemical but for the chemical properties of solvents or their blends. Examples of them are trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), toluene, paint thinners, varnish, gasoline, and aromatic hydrocarbons77.

Estimations of industrial exposure to solvents may widely vary depending on the type of use or industry. Domestic exposure and use of solvents in hobbies such as cleaning, and furniture and ship restoration are even more variable due to differences in ventilation, lack of training in solvent use, absence of legal regulations, and the idiosyncratic nature of working habits of people in their homes77.

Exposure levels in Table 7 represent the upper limit of typical exposures for these agents in several situations, more than their whole rank. These levels could vary from high to trace (Table 7). Some high level exposures are from historical records and they should not happen within the present regulatory framework.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7.

Typical uses, upper range of reported exposure levels and recommended exposure limits for solvents associated with connective tissue diseases.

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommended a maximum level of exposure for an 8 h exposure for each type of solvent. These recommendations (threshold limit value) for average exposure of 8 h are concentrations in the environment’s aerosol not believed to have serious consequences on adult health77. Exceeding these limits is not prohibited by any regulatory authority, but they are recognized as reasonable limits in many countries.

The first description of TCE induced SSc reported a group of German workers in 195778. Years later, Walder referred to the association of exposure to solvents and the development of SSc14.

In 2007, Kettaneh, et al’s metaanalysis of case-control studies about occupational exposure to solvents and the sex-related risk of SSc (Figure 1)79–86. They stated that occupational exposure to solvents confers an increased risk of SSc to men [OR 3.0 (1.9–4.6), p < 0.0001] compared to women [OR 1.8 (1.5–2.1), p < 0.0001].

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Metanalysis of Kettaneh and colleagues79 on exposure to any organic solvent and risk of systemic sclerosis in the whole sample. Points and diamond represent the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The size of each box is approximately proportional to the weight of the study in the metaanalysis.

Other agents

In 1977 Fessel published 2 cases of SSc in the context of an intense professional exposure to welding fumes87. In 2002, Diot, et al stated that an existing exposure to these fumes could carry an OR of 3.74 (1.06–13.18) for SSc84.

Exposure to vibrations is considered a risk factor for SSc due to case reports of patients using vibrating tools in their professional work88,89. In 2001 Bovenzi, et al carried 2 case-control studies to verify this occupational hypothesis. The OR obtained in each study were not significant90. The study of Maitre, et al in 2004 depicted an OR of 3.9 (0.8–19), statistically nonsignificant due to the limited number of exposed cases86.

The process of industrial polymerization of epoxy resins has been associated in several reports with skin sclerosis, arthralgias, and myalgias, but not with visceral involvement nor with RP or autoantibodies16. Silman and Jones studied a population of 56 men with SSc and found an OR of 1.7 (0.4–7.3) on exposure to epoxy resins69. The limited number of studies and the heterogeneity of the results do not permit assigning a role as a risk factor for these substances.

Infectious Factors

Bacterial and viral infections have long been considered as contributing factors to the development and progression of SSc. This hypothesis could be sustained by the fact that many sclerodermiform symptoms are transiently provoked by infectious agents in healthy subjects91.

Bacterial agents

There are 2 lines of evidence involving bacterial infection in the pathogenesis of SSc. One of them is anecdotal evidence that antibiotic therapy ameliorates SSc symptoms in some people. The other is evidence that graft versus host disease (GVHD), which shares many features with SSc, cannot be induced in “aseptic” animals92,93 and its incidence is significantly reduced in childrent pretreated with antibiotic to eradicate their normal bacterial flora94.

Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a gastric bacterium that has been involved in some vascular disease95 and has been studied as a potential risk factor for SSc. In a study of patients with primary RP, eradication of HP infection with a triple antibiotic schedule was associated with disappearance of RP in 17% of treated patients and a decrease of symptoms in another 72% of subjects96. Although this was not a double blind trial, it is interesting to observe the lack of improvement in those patients in which HP infection was not completely eradicated. Another study of comparable design reported similar results97.

Attempts to associate HP infection and SSc have yielded conflicting results. One study identified high incidence rates of infection in patients with autoimmune disease, such as SSc98. In contrast, 2 studies found no differences in HP infection rates between patients with RP and SSc and healthy controls99,100. Although is true that the rates of HP infection do not correlate with SSc, this does not rule out its role in the disease101. There is evidence that HP infection is not different between patients with SSc and healthy controls, but it has been shown that 90% of patients with SSc were infected with the HP strain CagA, in comparison with 37% of infected controls101. For this reason, confounders like co-infections, differences between HP strains, and host factors should be observed and controlled to understand HP’s role in RP and SSc.

Viral agents

SSc is also associated with viral infection. The pathogenic role of 2 viruses, HCMV and parvovirus B19 (B19), has been recently proposed. Herpes viruses, in particular HCMV, have been involved in several vascular diseases including atherosclerosis, allograft rejection vasculopathy, vascular restenosis, and GVHD.

Neointimal formation is a common feature shared by SSc and all the above vascular diseases. When human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infects vascular endothelium and this process is characterized by latency, reactivation, and spreading of viruses to distant tissues. In murine models it was shown that CMV infection leads to the development of intimal lesions102,103. There is indirect evidence of a HCMV role in SSc, linking high levels of HCMV antibodies and the prevalence of specific SSc autoantibodies in patients with scleroderma104–106. Recently, molecular mimicry mechanisms have shown a relationship between antibodies against the HCMV derived protein UL94 and SSc pathogenesis106. UL94 epitope shares homology with NAG-2, a surface molecule highly expressed in endothelial cells. Antibodies against UL94 purified from sera of patients with SSc induce endothelial cell apoptosis by enhancing a NAG-2/integrin complex. NAG-2 is expressed in dermal fibroblasts and anti-UL94 bind to fibroblasts activating them, with subsequent fibrosis.

HCMV infection and its downstream effects on immune, vascular, and repairing effects serve as a trigger for SSc. The identification of genes controlling susceptibility to CMV in mice by genetic analysis may be a path to understanding human genetic susceptibility to HCMV infection.

Strain C57BL/6 mice, genetically resistant to CMV, do not develop vascular pathology in response to the infection, while susceptible mice (129 interferon R−/−) develop neointimal lesions that reproduce CMV infection in a dose dependent manner107.

Microchimerism is another possible mechanism to explain sporadic development of SSc regarding its 8:1 rate of women/men affected by the disease. Microchimerism refers to prolonged allotypic lymphocyte survival (fetal T cells acquired during pregnancy or cells received by transfusion or organ transplant), usually in circulating blood. Fetal microchimeric T cells were isolated 27 years after delivery in a patient with SSc, and it has been shown that they are more common in patients with SSc than in age matched healthy controls108. Pathogenic effects of these cells are unknown, but microchimeric cells were also found in cell infiltrates of scleroderma lesions109. Engraftment and survival of these cells depends on the complex relationship between tissue antigens from the mother and the fetus (or host and donor), and so, they are highly variable110.

In vitro studies showing T cells exposed to allotypic endothelial cells activate and proliferate more if they are infected by HCMV, sustaining the idea that HCMV can induce proliferation of microchimeric cells111.

Vascular endothelium is an allotypic stimulus for circulating microchimeric cells. If endothelium is infected with HCMV, cytokine production may be amplified, possibly triggering endothelial cell activation, vascular inflammation, and neointimal formation such as it happens with T cells transplanted in GVHD.

Genomic sequences of B19 have been found in 57% (12/21) of bone marrow specimens from patients with SSc and in none of the control group. It has been speculated that bone marrow could be a reservoir of the virus from which viruses disseminate to target tissues in SSc112. There was also an increase in the frequency of anti NS1-B19 antibodies in sera of patients with SSc (33%) compared to controls (13%).

In a case series, ANA with a nucleolar pattern were detected in a patient with B19 arthritis113.

Altschuler114 highlighted that SSc is a relatively new disease, with the first case reported in 1753115, coincidental with the B19 virus reintroduction in Europe (in the XVI century).

Non-occupational/Non-infectious Factors

There are few epidemiologic studies regarding such factors and SSc, even though there is a wide list of them (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Epidemiologic studies regarding non-occupational/non-infectious factors and systemic sclerosis.

Drugs — estrogens

Beebe, et al116 studied the association between reproductive history, oral contraceptives, and estrogen replacement therapy in 472 women with SSc and 2227 controls. They did not find a relationship between risk of Ssc and contraceptive intake, early menarche, or multiple delivery. Hormone replacement therapy with estrogens showed an association with a mild but significant increase of SSc, with an adjusted OR of 1.40 (1.10–1.77). Mean age at start of therapy was not different between cases and controls, suggesting that early menopause did not cause the results.

Fraenkel and colleagues117 assessed the association between estrogen replacement therapy and RP in 497 postmenopausal women in the US Framingham Offspring Study. RP prevalence was 8.4% in women not receiving treatment, 19.1% of those receiving estrogens and 9.8% of women taking estrogens plus progesterone. Adjusted OR was 2.5 (1.2–5.3) for estrogens and 0.9 (0.3–2.6) for estrogens plus progesterone. This risk was associated with development of the disease after initiation of treatment, and does not necessarily imply a worse prognosis by their intake itself118.

Appetite suppressants

There are a few case reports documenting SSc after prolonged use of these drugs. Examples of them are dexamphetamine, diethylpropion, fenfluramine, fenproporex, mazindol, methaqualone, and phenmetrazine119. Duration of therapy, variety of drugs used, and lack of prescription criteria in the general population make it difficult to analyze if there is a chance of co-occurrence or if it is a real phenomenon.

Carbidopa and L-5 hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)

Carbidopa inhibits conversion of 5-HTP to 5-hydroxytryptomen and the alternative pathway to tryptophan metabolism leads to an increased synthesis of quineurin. High levels of this molecule are associated with SSc, and this is not observed in patients continuously treated with carbidopa/L-5HTP.

A patient receiving carbidopa as treatment for myoclonus developed SSc after therapy120.

Bleomycin

Bleomycin is an antitumoral antibiotic drug used for several types of cancer, primarily isolated from Streptomyces verticillus121. Lung fibrosis is a known side effect of this drug. Skin changes like hyperpigmentation, alopecia, gangrene, edema, RP, fibrosis, scleroderma, and others were described in relation with bleomycin122.

Bleomycin induced lung fibrosis is an established murine model, pathologically and biochemically similar to human lung fibrosis. Mice develop acute alveolitis followed by an intense interstitial inflammation when bleomycin is administered intratracheally. Late in its evolution, there is an increase of the extracellular matrix (collagen, fibronectin, hyaluronates, and small proteoglycans)123,124.

In vitro, this drug upregulates collagen messenger RNA in the lungs and dermal fibroblasts125,126. Mountz, et al reported that mice repeatedly injected with sublethal doses of bleomycin develop severe dermal fibrosis — similar to human SSc — in a 58-week period, with structural anomalies in collagen fibers127.

Five cases of scleroderma-like disease following bleomycin use were described in 2 case reports18,128. Bleomycin use enhanced an in vivo lymphoproliferative response in one of these patients18.

Gadolinium

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)129 was described in 2000130. This entity is characterized by extensive cutaneous fibrosis similar to SSc, sparing the face and neck in the absence of autoantibodies, also involving lungs, heart, liver and muscle131.

A link with contrast agents containing gadolinium was first established in 2006132, leading regulatory bureaus to set recommendations for its use. In 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration warned health professionals to avoid gadolinium use in patients at risk of developing NSF, to evaluate renal function, not to exceed the dose recommended on the product label of this substance, and eventually, to consider immediate hemodialysis after infusion of a gadolinium-containing agent133.

Other drugs

Cases of cutaneous sclerosis proven histologically — even without clinical features of Ssc — have been described in relation to pentazocine abuse21.

A few articles have linked cocaine abuse with SSc development in young men134,135. Cocaine causes vasoconstriction, and may constitute a first step in the pathogenesis of SSc in a susceptible host.

Mercury chloride is an immunomodulating agent that may cause immunocomplex mediated glomerulonephritis and autoantibody production in susceptible mice strains136,137. These autoantibodies recognize the fibrillar protein fibrillarin138. Arnett, et al suggested that mercury modifies fibrillarin, causing autoantigenicity139. Anti-fibrillarin antibodies are found in 8% of patients with SSc and are associated with severe forms of the disease.

Pesticides

There are potential endocrine modulators under the form of pesticides that could also increase the risk of SSc. Some pesticides are known as endocrine disruptors, like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), DDT metabolites, and 2.3.7.8-tetrachlorinedibenzo p-dioxin (TCDD).

PCB exert an anti-estrogen effect by inhibition of estrogen-mediated transduction signals140,141. Similarly, a DDT metabolite (p,p-DDE) may bind the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor, which plays a role in hormone signaling142. Acute and chronic exposure of mice to TCDD affects their bacterial pathogen innate immunity by supressing total hemolytic complement and C3143.

A case of SSc was documented after exposure to a combination of herbicides: bromobuthyl-methyluracil, dichlorophenyl-dimethylurea, and aminotriazole144. Aminotriazol may cause contact dermatitis145, but none of these compounds was previously associated with autoimmune diseases. In a case-control study in women, exposure to pesticides and herbicides by self-reference showed an adjusted OR of 2.19 for SSc, without distinction between both exposures146.

Silicones

These are synthetic polymers with organic groups bound to silicone atoms by carbon-silicon bonds; polydimethyl siloxane is the most commonly used silicone in medicine147.

Silicone gel has been used since 1962 to fill breast implants118. Silicone elastomer containing chemically treated amorphous silica is added to the capsule of certain breast augmentation implants to increase its tensile strength, reducing the potential of implant rupture148.

The first report of a connective tissue disease related to silicone was in a young woman who received silicone injections for breast augmentation149. Other reports referred to this circumstance as “adjuvant induced disease”150.

Association between silicone breast implants and the occurrence of SSc was not observed in several epidemiological studies71,151–154. The risk for SSc in implanted medical devices was also evaluated71 but this study did not find an association.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the link between environmental risk factors and the development of SSc is limited due to the phenotypic and pathogenic heterogeneity of the patients and the disease, respectively, and also because there is a poor ability to assess environmental exposures quantitatively and the role of gene-environment interactions in this disease.

Global collaboration could allow better use of the data obtained from a limited number of cases and limited resources. Collaboration may exploit the natural genetic and environmental variability on the planet, together with a careful phenotyping of larger populations of patients with SSc and the development of larger and more detailed databases. Normalization and validation of biomarkers and questionnaires could also be very useful to reliably quantify environmental exposures.

The use of genomic techniques to assess exposure biomarkers through their RNA expression signatures, proteomic, metabolomic, and microarray studies could change our ability to define environmental risk factors in the future. Even though those approaches require additional research and the use of resources for a long period, the investment should be made in terms of cost-effectiveness to provide an accurate understanding of disease mechanisms and to evolve to a predictive, personalized, and preventive medicine.

Footnotes

    • Accepted for publication May 12, 2009.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Erasmus LD
    . Scleroderma in gold miners on the Witwatersrand with particular reference to pulmonary manifestations. S Afr J Lab Clin Med 1957;3:209–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gunther G,
    2. Shuchardt E
    . Silicosis and progressive scleroderma. Is there an etiologic connection? [in German] Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1970;95:467–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sluis-Cremer GK,
    2. Hessel PA,
    3. Nizdo EH,
    4. Churchill AR,
    5. Zeiss EA
    . Silica-silicosis, and progressive systemic sclerosis. Br J Ind Med 1985;41:838–43.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Haustein UF,
    2. Ziegler MD
    . Environmentally induced systemic sclerosis-like disorders. Int J Dermatol 1985;24:147–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sanchez-Roman J,
    2. Wichmann I,
    3. Salaberri J,
    4. Varela JM,
    5. Nunez-Roldan A
    . Multiple clinical and biological autoimmune manifestations in 50 workers after occupational exposure to silica. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:534–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Owens GR,
    2. Medsger TA
    . Systemic sclerosis secondary to occupational exposure. Am J Med 1988;85:114–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rodnan GP,
    2. Benedek TG,
    3. Medsger TA,
    4. Cammarata RJ
    . The association of progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) with coal miners’ pneumoconiosis and other forms of silicosis. Ann Intern Med 1967;66:323–34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Harris DK,
    2. Adams WGF
    . Acroosteolysis occurring in men engaged in the polymerisation of vinyl chloride. BMJ 1967;3:712–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lange CE,
    2. Juhe S,
    3. Veltman G
    . The occurrence of liver angiosarcoma in 2 patients in the PVC manufacturing industry. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974;99:1598–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ward AM,
    2. Udnoon S,
    3. Watkins J,
    4. Walker AE,
    5. Darke CS
    . Immunological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of vinyl chloride disease. BMJ 1976;1:936–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kissel P,
    2. Schmitt J,
    3. Barrucand D,
    4. Sapelier J
    . Reports of scleroderma and silicosis: an observation. Ann Med Nancy 1965;4:26–34.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cauvet M,
    2. Matrin E
    . Silicose and sclerodermis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl 1969;4:1261–3.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Englert H,
    2. Small-McMahon J,
    3. Davis K,
    4. O’Connor H,
    5. Chambers P,
    6. Brooks P
    . Male systemic sclerosis and occupational silica exposure – a population-based study. Aust NZ J Med 2000;30:215–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Walder B
    . Solvents and scleroderma. Lancet 1965;ii:436–7.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Brasington RD,
    2. Thorpe-Swenson AJ
    . Systemic sclerosis associated with cutaneous exposure to solvent: case report and review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:631–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yamakage A,
    2. Ishikawa H,
    3. Saito Y,
    4. Hattori A
    . Occupational scleroderma-like disorder occurring in men engaged in the polymerisation of epoxy resins. Dermatologica 1980;161:44.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Diaz de R,
    2. Castro Garcia M,
    3. Borda A,
    4. Alonso Gordo JM,
    5. Posada de la Paz M,
    6. Kilbourne EM,
    7. et al.
    The association of oil ingestion with toxic oil syndrome in two convents. Am J Epidemiol 1987;125:907–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Finch WR,
    2. Rodnan GP,
    3. Buckingham RB,
    4. Prince RK,
    5. Winkelstein W
    . Bleiomycin-induced scleroderma. J Rheumatol 1980;7:651–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Silver RM,
    2. Heyes MP,
    3. Maize C,
    4. Quearry B,
    5. Vionnet-Fuasset MD,
    6. Sternberg EM
    . Scleroderma, fasciitis, and eosinophilia associated with the ingestion of tryptophan. N Engl J Med 1990;322:874–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Aeschlimann A,
    2. de Truchis P,
    3. Kahn MF
    . Scleroderma after therapy with appetite suppressants. Report on four cases. Scand J Rheumatol 1990;19:87–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Palestine RF,
    2. Millns JL,
    3. Spigel GT,
    4. Schroeter AL
    . Skin manifestations of pentazocine abuse. Am Acad Dermatol 1980;2:47–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Rose T,
    2. Nothjunge J,
    3. Schlote W
    . Familial occurrence of dermatomyositis and progressive scleroderma after injection of a local anaesthetic for dental treatment. Eur J Pediatr 1985;143:225–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Skouby AP
    . Sclerodermia-like picture following a single serum injection. Acta Med Scand 1949;136:51–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Silman AJ,
    2. Hicklin AJ,
    3. Black C
    . Geographical clustering of scleroderma in south and west London. Br J Rheumatol 1990;29:92–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Valesini G,
    2. Litta A,
    3. Bonavita MS,
    4. Luan FL,
    5. Purpura M,
    6. Mariani M,
    7. et al.
    Geographical clustering of scleroderma in a rural area in the province of Rome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1993;11:41–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Thompson AE,
    2. Pope JE
    . Increased prevalence of scleroderma in southwestern Ontario: a cluster analysis. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1867–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Englert H,
    2. Joyner J,
    3. Bade R,
    4. Thompson M,
    5. Morris D,
    6. Chambers P,
    7. et al.
    Systemic scleroderma: a spaciotemporal clustering. Intern Med J 2005;35:228–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gourley M,
    2. Miller F
    . Mechanisms of disease: environmental factors in the pathogenesis of rheumatic disease. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2007;3:171–80.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ueki A,
    2. Yamaguchi M,
    3. Ueki H,
    4. Watanabe Y,
    5. Ohsawa G,
    6. Kinugawa K,
    7. et al.
    Polyclonal human T-cell activation by silicate in vitro. Immunology 1994;82:332–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Fan P,
    3. Kahaleh B
    . Association between enhanced type I collagen expressionand epigenetic repression of the FLI1 gene in scleroderma fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2271–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Razin A,
    2. Cedar H
    . DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Rev 1991;55:451–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. James G,
    2. Herman JG,
    3. Baylin SB
    . Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2042–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. He H,
    2. Lehming N
    . Global effects of histone modifications. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2003;2:234–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hewagama A,
    2. Richardson B
    . The genetics and epigenetics of autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun 2009;33:3–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Yung RL,
    2. Richardson BC
    . Drug-induced lupus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994;20:61–86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cornacchia E,
    2. Golbus J,
    3. Maybaum J,
    4. Strahler J,
    5. Hanash S,
    6. Richardson B
    . Hydralazine and procainamide inhibit T cell DNA methylation and induce autoreactivity. J Immunol 1988;140:2197–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lee BH,
    2. Yegnasubramanian S,
    3. Lin X,
    4. Nelson WG
    . Procainamide is a specific inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase 1. J Biol Chem 2005;280:40749–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Koeger AC,
    2. Lang T,
    3. Alcaix D,
    4. Milleron B,
    5. Rozenberg S,
    6. Chaibi P,
    7. et al.
    Silica-associated connective tissue disease. A study of 24 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995;74:221–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Khan MF,
    2. Kaphalia BS,
    3. Prabhakar BS,
    4. Kanz MF,
    5. Ansari GA
    . Trichloroethene-induced autoimmune response in female MRL +/+ mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1995;134:155–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Byers V,
    2. Levin A,
    3. Ozonoff D,
    4. Baldwin R
    . Association between clinical symptoms and lymphocyte abnormalities in a population with chronic domestic exposure to industrial solvent-contaminated domestic water supply and a high incidence of leukaemia. Cancer Immunol 1988;27:77–81.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Bottomley W,
    2. Sheehan-Dare R,
    3. Hughes P,
    4. Cunliffe W
    . A sclerodermatous syndrome with unusual features following prolonged occupational exposure to organic solvents. Br J Dermatol 1993;128:203–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Yoshida S,
    2. Gershwin M
    . Autoimmunity and selected environmental factors of disease induction. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1993;22:399–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Knight K,
    2. Gibbons R
    . Increased collagen synthesis and cross-link formation in the skin of rats exposed to vinyl chloride monomer. Clin Sci (Lond) 1987;72:673–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Guilherme L,
    2. Faé K,
    3. Oshiro SE,
    4. Kalil J
    . Molecular pathogenesis of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Expert Rev Mol Med 2005;7:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pleister A,
    2. Eckels DD
    . Cryptic infection and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 2003;2:126–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Maul G,
    2. Jimenez S,
    3. Riggs E,
    4. Ziemnicka-Kotula D
    . Determination of an epitope of the diffuse systemic sclerosis marker antigen DNA topoisomerase I: sequence similarity with retroviral p30gag protein suggests a possible cause for autoimmunity in systemic sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:8492–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Muryoi T,
    2. Kasturi K,
    3. Kafina M,
    4. Cram DS,
    5. Harrison LC,
    6. Sasaki T,
    7. et al.
    Antitopoisomerase I monoclonal autoantibodies from scleroderma patients and tight skin mouse interact with similar epitopes. J Exp Med 1992;175:1103–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Rosenman KD,
    2. Zhu Z
    . Pneumnoconiosis and asscociated medical conditions. Am J Ind Med 1995;27:107–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Rosenman KD,
    2. Moore-Fuller M,
    3. Reilly MJ
    . Connective tissue disease and silicosis. Am J Ind Med 1999;25:375–81.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Van Loveren H,
    2. Vos JG,
    3. Germolec D,
    4. Simeonova PP,
    5. Eijkemanns G,
    6. McMichael AJ
    . Exploratory Meeting: Epidemiology of occupational and environmental factors associated with autoimmunity. Bilthoven, The Netherlands; 2000.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Davis BL,
    2. Johnson LR,
    3. Stevens RK,
    4. Courtney WJ,
    5. Safriet DW
    . The quartz content and elemental composition of aerosols from selected sites of the EPA Inhalable Particulate Network. Atmos Environ 1984;18:771–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Norboo T,
    2. Angchuk PT,
    3. Yahya M,
    4. Kamat SR,
    5. Pooley FD,
    6. Corrin B,
    7. et al.
    Silicosis in a Himalayan village population: role of environmental dust. Thorax 1991;46:341–343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910) — General Industry. OSHA Publ no 2206. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 1983.
  54. 54.↵
    1. Parks C,
    2. Conrad K,
    3. Cooper G
    . Occupational exposure to crystalline silica and autoimmune disease. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107 Suppl:793–802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. IARC
    . Silica. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemical to humans. Vol 68: Silica and some silicates. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1997.
  56. 56.↵
    1. Ziskind M,
    2. Jones R,
    3. Weill H
    . Silicosis. Am Rev Resp Dis 1976;713:643–65.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    1. Bramwell B
    . Diffuse scleroderma: Its frequency, its occurrence in stone masons, its treatment by fibrinolysin injections, elevations of temperature due to fibrinolysin. Edinb J Med 1914;12:387–401.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    1. Caux F,
    2. Chosidow O,
    3. De Cremoux H,
    4. Roujeau JC,
    5. Revuz J
    . Dental prosthesis technician, a subject with risk of Erasmus syndrome. Apropos of a case [French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1991;118:301–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Christy W,
    2. Rodnan G
    . Conjugal progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Report of the disease in husband and wife. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:251–4.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    1. Cowie R
    . Silica dust-exposed mine workers with scleroderma (systemic sclerosis). Chest 1987;92:260–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Melhorn J,
    2. Enderlein G,
    3. Conrad K,
    4. Ziegler V
    . Analysis for the association between progressive systemic scleroderma, exposure to quartz dust and silicosis in East German uranium miners. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed 1999;49:134–47.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    1. Steenland K,
    2. Brown D
    . Mortality study of gold miners exposed to silica and nonasbestiform amphibole minerals: an update with 14 more years of follow-up. Am J Ind Med 1995;27:217–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Brown LM,
    2. Gridley G,
    3. Olsen JH,
    4. Mellemkjaer L,
    5. Linet MS,
    6. Fraumeni JF, Jr
    . Cancer risk and mortality patterns among silicotic men in Sweden and Denmark. J Occup Eviron Med 1997;39:633–8.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    1. Walsh S
    . Divergent effects of occupational silica exposure on proportional mortality from systemic sclerosis and silicosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40 Suppl:S262.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    1. Calvert GM,
    2. Rice FL,
    3. Boiano JM,
    4. Sheehy JW,
    5. Sanderson WT
    . Occupational silica exposure and risk of various deseases: an analysis susing death certificates from 27 states of the United States. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:122–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Ziegler V,
    2. Enderlein G,
    3. Melhorn J,
    4. Conrad K
    . Retrospective epidemiological analysis of the relation between progressive systemic scleroderma and the exposure to quartz dust out of uranium ore mining in East Germany. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed 1997;47:7–13.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    1. Haustein U,
    2. Anderegg U
    . Silica induced scleroderma — clinical and experimental aspects. J Rheumatol 1998;25:1917–26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Magnant J,
    2. de Monte M,
    3. Guilmot JL,
    4. Lasfargues G,
    5. Diot P,
    6. Asquier E,
    7. et al.
    Relationship between occupational risk factors and severity markers of systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1713–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Silman A,
    2. Jones S
    . What is the contribution of environmental factors to the occurrence of scleroderma in men? Arthritis Rheum 1992;51:1322–4.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    1. Bovenzi M,
    2. Barbone F,
    3. Betta A,
    4. Tommasini M,
    5. Versini W
    . Scleroderma and occupational exposure. Scan J Work Environ Health 1995;21:289–92.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    1. Burns CJ,
    2. Laing TJ,
    3. Gillespie BW,
    4. Heeringa SG,
    5. Alcser KH,
    6. Mayes MD,
    7. et al.
    The epidemiology of scleroderma among women: assessment of risk from exposure to silicone and silica. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1904–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Mora G
    . Esclerodermia inducida por sílice. Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2003.
  73. 73.↵
    1. Bovenzi M,
    2. Barbone F,
    3. Pisa FE,
    4. Betta A,
    5. Romeo L,
    6. Tonello A,
    7. et al.
    A case-control study of occupational exposures and systemic sclerosis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77:10–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Wilson RH,
    2. McCormick WE,
    3. Tatum CF,
    4. Creech JL
    . Occupational acroosteolysis. Report of 31 cases. JAMA 1967;201:577–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Veltman G,
    2. Lange CE,
    3. Jühe S,
    4. Stein G,
    5. Bachner U
    . Clinical manifestations and course of vinyl chloride disease. NY Acad Sci 1975;246:6–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.↵
    1. Black CM,
    2. Welsh KI,
    3. Walker AE,
    4. Bernstein RM,
    5. Catoggio LJ,
    6. McGregor AR,
    7. et al.
    Genetic susceptibility to a scleroderma-like syndrome induced by vinyl chloride. Lancet 1983;1:53–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Garabrant D,
    2. Dumas C
    . Epidemiology of organic solvents and connective tissue disease. Arthritis Res 2000;2:5–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Reinl W
    . Scleroderma caused by trichloroethylene in workers. Bull Hyg 1957;32:678.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    1. Kettaneh A,
    2. Al Moufti O,
    3. Tiev KP,
    4. Chayet C,
    5. Tolédano C,
    6. Fabre B,
    7. et al.
    Occupational exposure to solvents and gender-related risk of systemic sclerosis: a metaanalysis of case-control studies. J Rheumatol 2007;34:97–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    1. Czirjak L,
    2. Kumanovics G
    . Exposure to solvents in female patients with scleroderma. Clin Rheumatol 2002;21:114–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Goldman JA
    . Connective tissue disease in people exposed to organic chemical solvents. Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) in dry cleaning plants and aircraft industry workers. J Clin Rheumatol 1996;2:185–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    1. Zachariae H,
    2. Bjerring P,
    3. Sondergaard KH,
    4. Halkier-Sorensen L
    . Arbejdsbetinget systemisk sklerodermi hos maend. Ugeskr Laeger 1997;159:2687–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Nietert PJ,
    2. Sutherland SE,
    3. Silver RM,
    4. Pandey JP,
    5. Knapp RG,
    6. Hoel DG,
    7. et al.
    Is occupational organic solvent exposure a risk factor for scleroderma? Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1111–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. Diot E,
    2. Lesire V,
    3. Guilmot J,
    4. Metzger M,
    5. Pilore R,
    6. Rogier S,
    7. et al.
    Systemic sclerosis and occupational risk factors: A case-control study. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:545–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    1. Garabrant DH,
    2. Lacey JV, Jr,
    3. Laing TJ,
    4. Gillespie BW,
    5. Mayes MD,
    6. Cooper BC,
    7. et al.
    Scleroderma and solvent exposure among women. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:493–500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. 86.↵
    1. Maitre A,
    2. Hours M,
    3. Bonneterre V,
    4. Arslan MT,
    5. Carpentier P,
    6. Bergeret A,
    7. et al.
    Systemic sclerosis and occupational risk factors: Role of solvents and cleaning products. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2395–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    1. Fessel W
    . Scleroderma and welding. N Eng J Med 1977;296:1537.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    1. Pelmear PL,
    2. Roos J,
    3. Maehle W
    . Occupationally-induced scleroderma. J Occup Med 1992;34:20–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. 89.↵
    1. Blair H,
    2. Headington J,
    3. Lynch P
    . Occupational trauma, Raynaud phenomenon, and sclerodactylia. Arch Environ Health 1974;28:80–1.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    1. Bovenzi M,
    2. Barbone F,
    3. Pisa F,
    4. Betta A,
    5. Romeo L
    . Scleroderma and occupational exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001;74:579–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. 91.↵
    1. Hamamdzic D,
    2. Kasman L,
    3. LeRoy C
    . Role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:694–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.↵
    1. Heidt PJ,
    2. Vossen JM
    : Experimental and clinical gnotobiotics: influence of the microflora on graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Med 1992;23:161–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. 93.↵
    1. Waer M,
    2. Ang KK,
    3. Van der Schueren E,
    4. Vandeputte M
    . Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in mice after total lymphoid irradiation: influence of breeding conditions and strain of recipient mice. J Immunol 1984;132:991–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. 94.↵
    1. Vossen JM,
    2. Heidt PJ,
    3. van den Berg H,
    4. Gerritsen EJ,
    5. Hermans J,
    6. Dooren LJ
    . Prevention of infection and graft-versus-host disease by suppression of intestinal microflora in children treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1990;9:14–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    1. Mendall MA,
    2. Goggin PM,
    3. Molineaux N,
    4. Levy J,
    5. Toosy T,
    6. Strachan D,
    7. et al.
    Relation of Helicobacter pylori infection and coronary heart disease. Br Heart J 1994;71:437–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    1. Gasbarrini A,
    2. Massari I,
    3. Serricchio M,
    4. et al.
    Helicobacter pylori eradication ameliorates primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:1641–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. 97.↵
    1. Csiki Z,
    2. Gal I,
    3. Sebesi J,
    4. Szegedi G
    . Raynaud syndrome and eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Orv Hetil 2000;141:2827–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    1. Aragona P,
    2. Magazzu G,
    3. Macchia G,
    4. Bartolone S,
    5. Di Pasquale G,
    6. Vitali C,
    7. et al.
    Presence of antibodies against Helicobacter pylori and its heat-shock protein 60 in the serum of patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. J Rheumatol 1999;26:1306–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. 99.↵
    1. Savarino V,
    2. Sulli A,
    3. Zentilin P,
    4. Raffaella Mele M,
    5. Cutolo M
    . No evidence of an association between Helicobacter pylori infection and Raynaud phenomenon. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:1251–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    1. Sulli A,
    2. Seriolo B,
    3. Savarino V,
    4. Cutolo M
    . Lack of correlation between gastric Helicobacter pylori infection and primary or secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1820–1.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    1. Danese S,
    2. Zoli A,
    3. Cremonini F,
    4. Gasbarrini A
    . High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori type I virulent strains in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1568–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  102. 102.↵
    1. Zhou YF,
    2. Shou M,
    3. Harrell RF,
    4. Yu ZX,
    5. Unger EF,
    6. Epstein SE
    . Chronic non-vascular cytomegalovirus infection: effects on the neointimal response to experimental vascular injury. Cardiovasc Res 2000;45:1019–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. 103.↵
    1. Presti RM,
    2. Pollock AJ,
    3. Dal Canto AK,
    4. O’Guin AK,
    5. Virgin HW, 4th
    . Interferon gamma regulates acute and latent murine cytomegalovirus infection and chronic disease of the great vessels. J Exp Med 1998;188:577–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. 104.↵
    1. Vaughan JH,
    2. Shaw PX,
    3. Nguyen MD,
    4. Medsger TA, Jr,
    5. Wright TM,
    6. Metcalf JS,
    7. et al.
    Evidence of activation of 2 herpes viruses, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, in systemic sclerosis and normal skin. J Rheumatol 2000;27:821–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    1. Neidhart M,
    2. Kuchen S,
    3. Distler O,
    4. Brühlmann P,
    5. Michel BA,
    6. Gay RE,
    7. et al.
    Increased serum levels of antibodies against human cytomegalovirus and prevalence of autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:389–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. 106.↵
    1. Lunardi C,
    2. Dolcino M,
    3. Peterlana D,
    4. Bason C,
    5. Navone R,
    6. Tamassia N,
    7. et al.
    Antibodies against human cytomegalovirus in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. A gene array approach. PLoS Med 2006;3:94–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. 107.↵
    1. Hamamdzic D,
    2. Harley RA,
    3. Hazen-Martin D,
    4. LeRoy EC
    . MCMV induces neointima in IFN-gamma R−/− mice: intimal cell apoptosis and persistent proliferation of myofibroblasts. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2001;2:3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. 108.↵
    1. Artlett CM,
    2. Cox LA,
    3. Jimenez SA
    . Detection of cellular microchimerism of male or female origin in systemic sclerosis patients by polymerase chain reaction analysis of HLA-Cw antigens. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1062–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. 109.↵
    1. Artlett CM,
    2. Smith JB,
    3. Jimenez SA
    . Identification of fetal DNA and cells in skin lesions from women with systemic sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1186–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.↵
    1. Nelson JL,
    2. Furst DE,
    3. Maloney S,
    4. Gooley T,
    5. Evans PC,
    6. Smith A,
    7. et al.
    Microchimerism and HLA-compatible relationships of pregnancy in scleroderma. Lancet 1998;351:559–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    1. Scholz M,
    2. Rabenau HF,
    3. Doerr HW
    1. Waldman WJ
    . Cytomegalovirus as a perturbing factor in graft/host equilibrium: havoc at the endothelial interface. In: Scholz M, Rabenau HF, Doerr HW, eds. CMV-Related Immunopathology Monographs in Virology, Vol 21. Basel: Karger; 1998: 54–66.
    OpenUrl
  112. 112.↵
    1. Ferri C,
    2. Zakrzewska K,
    3. Longombardo G,
    4. Giuggioli D,
    5. Storino FA,
    6. Pasero G,
    7. et al.
    Parvovirus B19 infection of bone marrow in systemic sclerosis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1999;17:718–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  113. 113.↵
    1. Cobeta-Garcia JC,
    2. Rodilla F
    . Antinucleolar antibodies and Parvovirus B19 arthritis [letter]. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:537.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  114. 114.↵
    1. Altschuler EL
    . The historical record is consistent with the recent finding of Parvovirus B19 infection of bone marrow in systemic sclerosis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;19:228.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  115. 115.↵
    1. de Silva U,
    2. Parish LC
    . Historical approach to scleroderma. Clin Dermatol 1994;12:201–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. 116.↵
    1. Beebe J,
    2. Lacey J, Jr,
    3. Mayes M,
    4. Gillespie BW,
    5. Cooper BC,
    6. Laing TJ,
    7. et al.
    Reproductive history, oral contraceptive use, estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of developing scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:S100.
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.↵
    1. Fraenkel L,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Chaisson C,
    4. Evans SR,
    5. Wilson PW,
    6. Felson DT
    . The association of estrogen replacement therapy and the Raynaud phenomenon in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:208–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  118. 118.↵
    1. Mayes M
    . Epidemiologic studies of environmental agents and systemic autoinmune diseases. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107 Suppl:743–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. 119.↵
    1. Silman A,
    2. Hochberg M
    . Occupational and environmental influences in scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin NA 1996;22:737–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  120. 120.↵
    1. Sternberg EM,
    2. van Woert MH,
    3. Young S,
    4. Magnussen I,
    5. Baker H,
    6. Gauthier S,
    7. et al.
    Development of a scleroderma-like illness during therapy with L15-Hydroxytryptophan and carbidopa. N Engl J Med 1980;303:782–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  121. 121.↵
    1. Umezawa H,
    2. Maeda K,
    3. Takeuchi T,
    4. Okami I
    . New antibiotics, bleomycin A and B. J Antibiot 1966;19:200–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  122. 122.↵
    1. Remlinger KA
    . Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapy drugs. The art of consultation. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:77–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. 123.↵
    1. Westergren-Thorsson G,
    2. Hernnas J,
    3. Sarnstrand B,
    4. Oldberg A,
    5. Heinegård D,
    6. Malmström A,
    7. et al.
    Altered expression of small proteoglycans, collagen, and transforming growth factor-b1 in developing bleomycin induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. J Clin Invest 1993;92:632–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. 124.↵
    1. Raghow R,
    2. Lurie S,
    3. Seyer J,
    4. Kang AH
    . Profiles steady state levels of messenger RNAs coding for type I procollagen, elastin, and fibronectin in hamster lungs undergoing bleomycin-induced interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 1985;76:1733–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. 125.↵
    1. Clark J C,
    2. Starcher B,
    3. Uitto J
    . Bleomycin-induced synthesis of type I procollagen by human lung skin fibroblasts in culture. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980;631:359–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  126. 126.↵
    1. Yamamoto T,
    2. Eckes B,
    3. Krieg T
    . Bleomycin increases steady-state levels of type I collagen, fibronectin and decorin gene expression in human skin fibroblasts. Arch Dermatol Res 2000;292:556–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. 127.↵
    1. Mountz J,
    2. Downs Minor M,
    3. Turner R,
    4. Thomas MB,
    5. Richards F,
    6. Pisko E
    . Bleomycin-induced cutaneous toxicity in the rat: analysis of histopathology and ultrastructure compared with progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Br J Dermatol 1983;108:679–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.↵
    1. Kerr L,
    2. Spiera H
    . Scleroderma in association with the use of bleomycin: A report of three cases. J Rheumatol 1992;19:294–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  129. 129.↵
    1. Prchal D,
    2. Holmes D,
    3. Levin A
    . Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: the story unfolds. Kidney Int 2008;73:1135–7.
    OpenUrl
  130. 130.↵
    1. Cowper SE,
    2. Robin HS,
    3. Steinberg SM,
    4. Su LD,
    5. Gupta S,
    6. LeBoit PE
    . Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 2000;356:1000–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. 131.↵
    1. Leboit PE
    . What nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy might be. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:928–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. 132.↵
    1. Grobner T
    . Gadolinium: a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:1104–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  133. 133.↵
    1. Information on gadolinium-containing contrast agents
    . Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/gcca/default.htm> (2006).
  134. 134.↵
    1. Kilaru P,
    2. Kim W,
    3. Sequeira W
    . Cocaine and scleroderma: Is there an association? J Rheumatol 1991;8:1753–5.
    OpenUrl
  135. 135.↵
    1. Trozak D,
    2. Gould W
    . Cocaine abuse and connective tissue disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10:525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. 136.↵
    1. Robinson CJ,
    2. White H,
    3. Rose N
    . Murine strain differences in response to mercuric chloride: antinucleolar antibody production does not correlate with renal immune complex deposition. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1997;83:127–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. 137.↵
    1. Hanley G,
    2. Schiffenbauer J,
    3. Sobel E
    . Resistance to HgC12-induced autoimmunity in haplotype-heterozygous mice is an intrinsic property of B cells. J Immunol 1998;161:1778–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  138. 138.↵
    1. Pollard K,
    2. Lee D,
    3. Casiano C,
    4. Bluthner M,
    5. Johnston MM,
    6. Tan EM
    . The autoimmunity-inducing xenobiotic mercury interacts with the autoantigen fibrillarin and modifies its molecular and antigenic properties. J Immunol 1997;158:3521–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  139. 139.↵
    1. Arnett F,
    2. Reveille J,
    3. Goldstein R,
    4. Pollard KM,
    5. Leaird K,
    6. Smith EA
    . Autoantibodies to fibrillarin in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). An immunogenetic, serologic, and clinical analysis. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1151–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. 140.↵
    1. Shekhar P,
    2. Werdell J,
    3. Basrur V
    . Environmental estrogen stimulation of growth and estrogen receptor function in preneoplastic and cancerous human breast cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1774–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  141. 141.↵
    1. Bergeron J,
    2. Crews D,
    3. McLachlan J
    . PCBs as environmental estrogens: turtle sex determination as a biomarker of environmental contamination. Environ Health Perspect 1994;102:780–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. 142.↵
    1. Tian Y,
    2. Ke S,
    3. Thomas T,
    4. Meeker RJ,
    5. Gallo MA
    . Transcriptional suppression of estrogen receptor gene expression by 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998;67:17–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. 143.↵
    1. White K, Jr,
    2. Lysy H,
    3. McCay J,
    4. Anderson AC
    . Modulation of serum complement levels following exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986;84:209–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  144. 144.↵
    1. Dunnill M,
    2. Black M
    . Sclerodermatous syndrome after occupational exposure to herbicides-response to systemic steroids. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994;19:518–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. 145.↵
    1. English J,
    2. Rycroft R,
    3. Calnan CD
    . Allergic contact dermatitis from aminotriazole. Contact Derm 1986;14:255–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  146. 146.↵
    1. Laing T,
    2. Gillespie B,
    3. Burns C,
    4. Garabrant D,
    5. Heeringa S,
    6. Alcser K,
    7. et al.
    Risk factors for scleroderma among Michigan women [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:S341.
    OpenUrl
  147. 147.↵
    1. Levier R,
    2. Harrison M,
    3. Cook R,
    4. Lane TH
    . What is silicone? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:513–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  148. 148.↵
    1. Cook R,
    2. Harrison M,
    3. Levier R
    . The breast implant controversy. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37:153–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  149. 149.↵
    1. Miyoshi K,
    2. Miyaoka T,
    3. Kobayashi Y,
    4. Itahura T,
    5. Nishijo K,
    6. Hagashitara M,
    7. et al.
    Hypergammaglobulinemia by prolonged adjuvanticity in man: Disorders developed after augmentation mammoplasty. Ijishimpo 1964;2122:9–14.
    OpenUrl
  150. 150.↵
    1. Kumagai Y,
    2. Shiokawa Y,
    3. Medsger T,
    4. Rodnan G
    . Clinical spectrum of connective tissue disease after cosmetic surgery: Observations of eighteen patients and a review of the Japanese literature. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  151. 151.↵
    1. Gabriel S,
    2. O’Fallon W,
    3. Kurland L,
    4. Beard CM,
    5. Woods JE,
    6. Melton LJ
    . Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1697–702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. 152.↵
    1. Sanchez-Guerrero J,
    2. Colditz G,
    3. Karlson E,
    4. Hunter D,
    5. Speizer F,
    6. Liang M
    . Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective tissue diseases and symptoms. N EngI J Med 1995;332:1666–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  153. 153.↵
    1. Hochberg M,
    2. Perlmutter D,
    3. Medsger T, Jr,
    4. Nguyen K,
    5. Steen V,
    6. Weisman M,
    7. et al.
    Lack of association between of augmentation mammoplasty and systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1125–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  154. 154.↵
    1. Hennekens C,
    2. Lee M,
    3. Cook N,
    4. Hebert PR,
    5. Karlson EW,
    6. LaMotte F,
    7. et al.
    Self-reported breast implants and connective tissue diseases in female health Professionals. A retrospective cohort study. JAMA 1996;275:616–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 36, Issue 11
1 Nov 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systemic Sclerosis: Environmental Factors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Systemic Sclerosis: Environmental Factors
GABRIELA FERNANDA MORA
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2009, 36 (11) 2383-2396; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090207

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Systemic Sclerosis: Environmental Factors
GABRIELA FERNANDA MORA
The Journal of Rheumatology Nov 2009, 36 (11) 2383-2396; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090207
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
    • EPIDEMIOLOGY
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Overview of Imaging in Adult- and Childhood-onset Takayasu Arteritis
  • The ASAS Health Index: A New Era for Health Impact Assessment in Spondyloarthritis
  • Nail Psoriasis: Diagnosis, Assessment, Treatment Options, and Unmet Clinical Needs
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire