Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
  • Log Out
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Research ArticleArticle

The Minimally Important Difference for the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Followed in an Academic Clinical Practice

DINESH KHANNA, JANET E. POPE, PUJA P. KHANNA, MICHELLE MALONEY, NOOSHIN SAMEDI, DEBBIE NORRIE, GILLIAN OUIMET and RON D. HAYS
The Journal of Rheumatology December 2008, 35 (12) 2339-2343; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080375
DINESH KHANNA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dkhanna@mednet.ucla.edu
JANET E. POPE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PUJA P. KHANNA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELLE MALONEY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NOOSHIN SAMEDI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DEBBIE NORRIE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GILLIAN OUIMET
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RON D. HAYS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the minimally important difference (MID) for a fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) using patient-reported anchors (fatigue, pain, and overall health).

Methods

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 307) had 2 clinic visits at a median of 5.9 months apart. They completed a fatigue VAS (0–10 scale) and the retrospective anchor items, “How would you describe your overall fatigue/pain/overall health since the last visit?” with response options: Much worsened, Somewhat worsened, Same, Somewhat better, or Much better. The fatigue anchor was used for primary analysis and the pain/overall health anchors for sensitivity analyses. The minimally changed group was defined by those reporting they were somewhat better or somewhat worsened.

Results

The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 59.4 (13.2) years, disease duration was 14.1 (11.5) years, and 83% of patients were women. The baseline mean (SD) Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index score was 0.84 (0.75). The baseline fatigue VAS score was 4.2 (2.9) and at followup was 4.3 (2.8) [mean change of −0.07 (2.5); p = not significant]. The fatigue change score (0–10 scale) for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened for the fatigue anchor averaged −1.12 and 1.26, respectively. Using the pain anchor, the fatigue change score for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened averaged −0.87 and 1.13; and using the global anchor, the fatigue change score for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened averaged −0.82 and 1.17, respectively. Effect size estimates using 3 anchors were small for the Somewhat better (range 0.27–0.39) and Somewhat worsened (0.40–0.44) groups, but larger than for the no-change group (0.03–0.08).

Conclusion

The MID for fatigue VAS is between −0.82 for −1.12 for improvement and is 1.13 to 1.26 for worsening on a 0–10 scale in a large RA clinical practice, and is similar to that seen in RA clinical trials. This information can aid in interpreting fatigue VAS in day-to-day care in clinical practice

Key Indexing Terms:
  • MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES
  • RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
  • FATIGUE
  • VISUALANALOG SCALE
  • RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX
  • CLINICAL PRACTICE

Footnotes

  • D. Khanna, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, UCLA; J.E. Pope, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph’s Health Care and University of Western Ontario; P.P. Khanna, MD, MPH, Fellow in Rheumatology, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA; M. Maloney, BA, MA, Medical Student; N. Samedi, MD, Resident in Rheumatology; D. Norrie, BSc, MD, Resident, Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph’s Health Care and University of Western Ontario; G. Ouimet, BSc, Research Assistant, Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph’s Health Care; R.D. Hays, PhD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, UCLA, and Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

  • Dr. D. Khanna was supported by a National Institutes of Health Award (NIAMS K23 AR053858-01A1). Dr. P.P. Khanna was supported by a National Institutes of Health Award (T32 AR 053463). Dr. Hays was supported by the UCLA Center for Health Improvement in Minority Elderly/Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, NIH/NIA/NCMHD, under Grant 2P30-AG-021684 and a grant from the National Institute on Aging (AG 020679-01). Pfizer Inc. and Bristol- Meyer Squibs Inc. provided unrestricted grants for portions of the study.

    • Accepted for publication July 14, 2008.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 35, Issue 12
1 Dec 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Minimally Important Difference for the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Followed in an Academic Clinical Practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Minimally Important Difference for the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Followed in an Academic Clinical Practice
DINESH KHANNA, JANET E. POPE, PUJA P. KHANNA, MICHELLE MALONEY, NOOSHIN SAMEDI, DEBBIE NORRIE, GILLIAN OUIMET, RON D. HAYS
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2008, 35 (12) 2339-2343; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080375

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
The Minimally Important Difference for the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Followed in an Academic Clinical Practice
DINESH KHANNA, JANET E. POPE, PUJA P. KHANNA, MICHELLE MALONEY, NOOSHIN SAMEDI, DEBBIE NORRIE, GILLIAN OUIMET, RON D. HAYS
The Journal of Rheumatology Dec 2008, 35 (12) 2339-2343; DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080375
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Traditional and Disease-Specific Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Multinational Retrospective Study
  • Canadian Rheumatology Association Meeting, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, February 8-11, 2023
  • Avoiding Blunders When Analyzing Correlated Data, Clustered Data, or Repeated Measures
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire