Abstract
A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.
Paul Bird, Bo Ejbjerg, Marissa Lassere, Mikkel Østergaard, Fiona McQueen, Charles Peterfy, Espen Haavardsholm, Philip O'Connor, Harry Genant, John Edmonds, Paul Emery and Philip G Conaghan
The Journal of Rheumatology April 2007, 34 (4) 854-856;
Paul Bird
Bo Ejbjerg
Marissa Lassere
Mikkel Østergaard
Fiona McQueen
Charles Peterfy
Espen Haavardsholm
Philip O'Connor
Harry Genant
John Edmonds
Paul Emery
In this issue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 34, Issue 4
1 Apr 2007
A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.
Paul Bird, Bo Ejbjerg, Marissa Lassere, Mikkel Østergaard, Fiona McQueen, Charles Peterfy, Espen Haavardsholm, Philip O'Connor, Harry Genant, John Edmonds, Paul Emery, Philip G Conaghan
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2007, 34 (4) 854-856;
A multireader reliability study comparing conventional high-field magnetic resonance imaging with extremity low-field MRI in rheumatoid arthritis.
Paul Bird, Bo Ejbjerg, Marissa Lassere, Mikkel Østergaard, Fiona McQueen, Charles Peterfy, Espen Haavardsholm, Philip O'Connor, Harry Genant, John Edmonds, Paul Emery, Philip G Conaghan
The Journal of Rheumatology Apr 2007, 34 (4) 854-856;