Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • COVID-19 and Rheumatology
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies in the elderly.

Thomas Quéméneur, Marc Lambert, Eric Hachulla, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Claudine Caron, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Bernard Devulder and Pierre-Yves Hatron
The Journal of Rheumatology August 2006, 33 (8) 1559-1562;
Thomas Quéméneur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Lambert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Hachulla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvain Dubucquoi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudine Caron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Laure Fauchais
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Devulder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Yves Hatron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and of vascular diseases increases with age, and aCL may be associated with various diseases in the elderly. So the significance of aCL in the elderly remains difficult to determine. We sought to determine the significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the elderly. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the files of 327 patients [149 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); 64 patients age >or= 65 yrs] with 2 positive aPL [lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or aCL]. RESULTS: The frequency of APS was 40.8% (n = 134) in our 263 young patients (< 65 yrs) and 23.4% (n = 15) in our 64 elderly patients (>or= 65 yrs). The clinical characteristics of patients with persistent aPL were the same in those under and over 65 years. LAC was positive in all but one elderly patient with APS, and occurred in this group more frequently than in the young patients (93.3% vs 44.6%; p < 0.006). The presence of LAC allowed to discriminate APS patients in our elderly population (93.3% in APS vs 48.9% in non-APS patients; p < 0.009). CONCLUSION: Interpretation of a positive determination of APL is difficult in the elderly; persistent LAC may be the most valuable biological marker of APS in the elderly.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 33, Issue 8
1 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies in the elderly.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies in the elderly.
Thomas Quéméneur, Marc Lambert, Eric Hachulla, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Claudine Caron, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Bernard Devulder, Pierre-Yves Hatron
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2006, 33 (8) 1559-1562;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies in the elderly.
Thomas Quéméneur, Marc Lambert, Eric Hachulla, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Claudine Caron, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Bernard Devulder, Pierre-Yves Hatron
The Journal of Rheumatology Aug 2006, 33 (8) 1559-1562;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
  • eLetters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire