Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services

User menu

  • My Cart
  • Log In

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Rheumatology
  • JRheum Supplements
  • Services
  • My Cart
  • Log In
The Journal of Rheumatology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • First Release
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Collections
    • Audiovisual Rheum
    • 50th Volume Reprints
  • Resources
    • Guide for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Payment
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Classified Ads
    • Reprints and Translations
    • Permissions
    • Meetings
    • FAQ
    • Policies
  • Subscribers
    • Subscription Information
    • Purchase Subscription
    • Your Account
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Duncan A. Gordon Award
    • Privacy/GDPR Policy
    • Accessibility
  • Contact Us
  • Follow Jrheum on BlueSky
  • Follow jrheum on Twitter
  • Visit jrheum on Facebook
  • Follow jrheum on LinkedIn
  • Follow jrheum on YouTube
  • Follow jrheum on Instagram
  • Follow jrheum on RSS
Abstract

Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire.

Hermine I Brunner, Marisa S Klein-Gitelman, Michael J Miller, Andrea Barron, Nicole Baldwin, Michael Trombley, Anne L Johnson, Angie Kress, Daniel J Lovell and Edward H Giannini
The Journal of Rheumatology January 2005, 32 (1) 150-161;
Hermine I Brunner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marisa S Klein-Gitelman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Barron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Baldwin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Trombley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne L Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angie Kress
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J Lovell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward H Giannini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is a commonly used measure of disability and physical function for children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), whose scores range between 0 (no disability) and 3 (very severe disability), with a smallest potential difference in the CHAQ score of individuals at 0.125. We estimated minimal clinically important differences (MCID) of the CHAQ for worsening and improvement that were actually experienced by children with JRA using patient, parent, and clinical perspectives. METHODS: Changes in CHAQ scores were calculated for parent (n = 92) and patient ratings (children age > or = 8 yrs only; n = 67) between subsequent clinic visits. Changes in patient well being and disease activity and the occurrence of flare or important improvement between visits served as external standards for the MCID. MCID were defined as the median changes of the CHAQ scores of individual patients who had a minimal important improvement or worsening between visits. RESULTS: The median change in CHAQ scores of patients who rated themselves or were rated by others as unchanged was often 0. Depending on the external standard used, the MCID for improvement of the CHAQ was -0.188 at most, while the MCID for worsening was at most +0.125. CONCLUSION: The MCID of the CHAQ for both improvement and worsening are often at or close to the level of the smallest potential difference, suggesting that the CHAQ is relatively insensitive to important short term changes in children with JRA. This may warrant a change in the calculation of the global CHAQ score, or the development of more sensitive functional measures.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Rheumatology
Vol. 32, Issue 1
1 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Rheumatology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Rheumatology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Rheumatology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire.
Hermine I Brunner, Marisa S Klein-Gitelman, Michael J Miller, Andrea Barron, Nicole Baldwin, Michael Trombley, Anne L Johnson, Angie Kress, Daniel J Lovell, Edward H Giannini
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2005, 32 (1) 150-161;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

 Request Permissions

Share
Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire.
Hermine I Brunner, Marisa S Klein-Gitelman, Michael J Miller, Andrea Barron, Nicole Baldwin, Michael Trombley, Anne L Johnson, Angie Kress, Daniel J Lovell, Edward H Giannini
The Journal of Rheumatology Jan 2005, 32 (1) 150-161;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo  logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  •  logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Content

  • First Release
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Collections
  • Audiovisual Rheum
  • COVID-19 and Rheumatology

Resources

  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Author Payment
  • Reviewers
  • Advertisers
  • Classified Ads
  • Reprints and Translations
  • Permissions
  • Meetings
  • FAQ
  • Policies

Subscribers

  • Subscription Information
  • Purchase Subscription
  • Your Account
  • Terms and Conditions

More

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • My Alerts
  • My Folders
  • Privacy/GDPR Policy
  • RSS Feeds
The Journal of Rheumatology
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd.
Print ISSN: 0315-162X; Online ISSN: 1499-2752
Powered by HighWire